Achieving Rational Management: Bed Managers and the Crisis in Emergency Admissions

1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 743-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Green ◽  
David Armstrong

This paper uses data from a qualitative study to examine the extent to which the perceived problems of dealing with the acute emergency hospital admission can be used to illuminate the interface between professional and managerial authority in hospitals. Clinicians, nurses and managers all described emergency admissions as constituting a ‘constant crisis’ in their hospital. There were practical senses in which this was a realistic depiction of the situation but, as rhetoric, this description had two major implications for the management-professional interface. First, it served to legitimate the authority of managers by creating a problem which needed constant management. Second, in providing the ultimate challenge to general management it provided a scenario in which the superiority of rational management techniques over more localised and apparently self-interested clinical decisions could be demonstrated.

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Alison Porter ◽  
Helen Snooks ◽  
Mark Kingston ◽  
Jan Davies ◽  
Hayley Hutchings ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION:A predictive risk stratification tool (PRISM) to estimate a patient's risk of an emergency hospital admission in the following year was trialled in general practice in an area of the United Kingdom. PRISM's introduction coincided with a new incentive payment (‘QOF’) in the regional contract for family doctors to identify and manage the care of people at high risk of emergency hospital admission.METHODS:Alongside the trial, we carried out a complementary qualitative study of processes of change associated with PRISM's implementation. We aimed to describe how PRISM was understood, communicated, adopted, and used by practitioners, managers, local commissioners and policy makers. We gathered data through focus groups, interviews and questionnaires at three time points (baseline, mid-trial and end-trial). We analyzed data thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory (1).RESULTS:All groups showed high awareness of PRISM, but raised concerns about whether it could identify patients not yet known, and about whether there were sufficient community-based services to respond to care needs identified. All practices reported using PRISM to fulfil their QOF targets, but after the QOF reporting period ended, only two practices continued to use it. Family doctors said PRISM changed their awareness of patients and focused them on targeting the highest-risk patients, though they were uncertain about the potential for positive impact on this group.CONCLUSIONS:Though external factors supported its uptake in the short term, with a focus on the highest risk patients, PRISM did not become a sustained part of normal practice for primary care practitioners.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vii136
Author(s):  
Hayato Kamata ◽  
Shinya Suzuki ◽  
Kiwako Ikegawa ◽  
Hisanaga Nomura ◽  
Tomohiro Enokida ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e009030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Karasouli ◽  
Daniel Munday ◽  
Cara Bailey ◽  
Sophie Staniszewska ◽  
Alistair Hewison ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
GARY ROBINSON ◽  
JOHN B. FORTUNE ◽  
THOMAS L. WACHTEL ◽  
HUGH A. FRANK ◽  
WILLIAM B. LONG

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (695) ◽  
pp. e399-e405
Author(s):  
Rachel Denholm ◽  
Richard Morris ◽  
Sarah Purdy ◽  
Rupert Payne

BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of hospitalisation on prescribing in UK clinical practice.AimTo investigate whether an emergency hospital admission drives increases in polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs).Design and settingA retrospective cohort analysis set in primary and secondary care in England.MethodChanges in number of prescriptions and PIPs following an emergency hospital admission in 2014 (at admission and 4 weeks post-discharge), and 6 months post-discharge were calculated among 37 761 adult patients. Regression models were used to investigate changes in prescribing following an admission.ResultsEmergency attendees surviving 6 months (N = 32 657) had a mean of 4.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.6) prescriptions before admission, and a mean of 4.7 (SD = 4.7; P<0.001) 4 weeks after discharge. Small increases (<0.5) in the number of prescriptions at 4 weeks were observed across most hospital specialties, except for surgery (−0.02; SD = 0.65) and cardiology (2.1; SD = 2.6). The amount of PIPs increased after hospitalisation; 4.0% of patients had ≥1 PIP immediately before pre-admission, increasing to 8.0% 4 weeks post-discharge. Across hospital specialties, increases in the proportion of patients with a PIP ranged from 2.1% in obstetrics and gynaecology to 8.0% in cardiology. Patients were, on average, prescribed fewer medicines at 6 months compared with 4 weeks post-discharge (mean = 4.1; SD = 4.6; P<0.001). PIPs decreased to 5.4% (n = 1751) of patients.ConclusionPerceptions that hospitalisation is a consistent factor driving rises in polypharmacy are unfounded. Increases in prescribing post-hospitalisation reflect appropriate clinical response to acute illness, whereas decreases are more likely in patients who are multimorbid, reflecting a focus on deprescribing and medicines optimisation in these individuals. Increases in PIPs remain a concern.


1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 651-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Turner ◽  
T.J. Turner

Using a sample of 500 emergency psychiatric patients at Victoria Hospital in London, Ontario, this study replicated part of the research on the Crisis Triage Rating Scale (CTRS) conducted by Bengelsdorf, Levy, Emerson and Barile in 1984. The relationship between the suggested CTRS cut-off score and the decision whether or not to hospitalize the patient was studied, independently of these scores. The relative contribution of each of the subscales (Dangerousness, Support System and Ability to Cooperate) to this decision was also determined. The results of this study suggest that using a cut-off score of 9, the easily administered Crisis Triage Rating Scale could be an additional assessment aid in determining whether patients require emergency hospital admission to a psychiatric unit.


1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Coast ◽  
A Inglis ◽  
K Morgan ◽  
S Gray ◽  
M Kammerling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document