scholarly journals Using Information Technology to Improve the Quality and Safety of Emergency Care

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e45-e51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Handel ◽  
Robert L. Wears ◽  
Larry A. Nathanson ◽  
Jesse M. Pines
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonatas Wendland ◽  
Guilherme Lerch Lunardi ◽  
Décio Bittencourt Dolci

Purpose Health is at the center of society concerns, being characterized by the dilemma of contributing to the population well-being, while demanding high financial investments at the same time. In this sense, information technology (IT) becomes essential for the progress of the sector, directly impacting on how care practices are performed. This study aims to analyze the adoption of mobile devices in the mobile emergency care service (MECS) of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Design/methodology/approach The authors carried out a multi-method study with an initial qualitative exploration through a focal group, followed by a survey. Potential determinants and impacts of mobile device use on the work context of the MECS teams were identified. Following, we tested the proposed conceptual model applying a questionnaire to 350 professionals from a total of 160 bases throughout the State. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses herein. Findings The authors found that Satisfaction with the Use of Mobile PHC (PHC – Primary Health Care) is determined by the application compatibility with MECS work, followed by the performance expectancy with the use of the technology and the technical support provided to the users – acting as important facilitators of this process; while the technological complexity inherent in the use of the technology appears as the main barrier to the success of this technology. Besides, the authors found that both intensity of Use and Satisfaction with the Use of the technology provide different benefits to those involved (teams, patients and the organization). Research limitations/implications As limitations of the study, the authors point out to the fact that the data are from a single Brazilian State, and therefore, its results cannot be generalized. Another limitation is that the study considered only the use of a specific mobile technology, which requires caution when using this information in contexts where the health information technology is different, besides the fact that the findings may not be compatible in environments where IT adoption is voluntary. Practical implications The study can help managers of public and private organizations in the planning and implementation of different technologies, whether mobile or applied to the health context, as well as in the expansion of their use in their respective institutions. Social implications The research contributes to other studies that realize that the adoption of IT can cause relevant changes to health being associated to productivity gains and improvement of the quality of service provided to society through different forms and solutions. Originality/value The adoption and use of IT – such as mobile devices – impacts on how care practices are performed in the MECS, providing different benefits to those involved (teams, patients and the organization).


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 897-910
Author(s):  
Guy Martin ◽  
Sonal Arora ◽  
Nisha Shah ◽  
Dominic King ◽  
Ara Darzi

Health information technology can transform and enhance the quality and safety of care, but it may also introduce new risks. This study analysed 130 healthcare regulator inspection reports and organisational digital maturity scores in order to characterise the impact of health information technology on quality and safety from a regulatory perspective. Although digital maturity and the positive use of health information technology are significantly associated with overall organisational quality, the negative effects of health information technology are frequently and more commonly identified by regulators. The poor usability of technology, lack of easy access to systems and data and the incorrect use of health information technology are the most commonly identified areas adversely affecting quality and safety. There is a need to understand the full risks and benefits of health information technology from the perspective of all stakeholders, including patients, end-users, providers and regulators in order to best inform future practice and regulation.


2015 ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Paul Anthony Cahill

With the abundance of smart technology that has been developed in recent times, society is ever progressing to improve the comfort, quality and safety of our lives and the world around us. Such technological developments have resulted in great improvements in a variety of fields and have greatly enhanced our communications, leisure and health. However, much of the most fundamental infrastructure that we rely on most for our everyday needs has yet to benefit from the information technology revolution, namely civil infrastructure. From the water we use first thing in the morning to shower and brush our teeth, to the roads and bridges we use to travel, civil infrastructure is vital to our everyday lives. Not only that, but improved efficiency in all these areas is required to help protect the environment for future generations and reverse the excess that has damaged our planet in the past two centuries. There ...


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Hansen ◽  
Adrian Boyle ◽  
Brian Holroyd ◽  
Georgina Phillips ◽  
Jonathan Benger ◽  
...  

ObjectivesQuality and safety of emergency care is critical. Patients rely on emergency medicine (EM) for accessible, timely and high-quality care in addition to providing a ‘safety-net’ function. Demand is increasing, creating resource challenges in all settings. Where EM is well established, this is recognised through the implementation of quality standards and staff training for patient safety. In settings where EM is developing, immense system and patient pressures exist, thereby necessitating the availability of tiered standards appropriate to the local context.MethodsThe original quality framework arose from expert consensus at the International Federation of Emergency Medicine (IFEM) Symposium for Quality and Safety in Emergency Care (UK, 2011). The IFEM Quality and Safety Special Interest Group members have subsequently refined it to achieve a consensus in 2018.ResultsPatients should expect EDs to provide effective acute care. To do this, trained emergency personnel should make patient-centred, timely and expert decisions to provide care, supported by systems, processes, diagnostics, appropriate equipment and facilities. Enablers to high-quality care include appropriate staff, access to care (including financial), coordinated emergency care through the whole patient journey and monitoring of outcomes. Crowding directly impacts on patient quality of care, morbidity and mortality. Quality indicators should be pragmatic, measurable and prioritised as components of an improvement strategy which should be developed, tailored and implemented in each setting.ConclusionEDs globally have a remit to deliver the best care possible. IFEM has defined and updated an international consensus framework for quality and safety.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 7-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Coleman ◽  
R O'Hara ◽  
S Mason ◽  
C O'Keeffe

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Dexheimer ◽  
C. Hullin Lucay Cossio ◽  
Y. Gong ◽  
S. Jensen ◽  
J. Kaipio ◽  
...  

SummaryObjectives: The objectives of this paper are to review and discuss the methods that are being used internationally to report on, mitigate, and eliminate technology-induced errors.Methods: The IMIA Working Group for Health Informatics for Patient Safety worked together to review and synthesize some of the main methods and approaches associated with technology-induced error reporting, reduction, and mitigation. The work involved a review of the evidence-based literature as well as guideline publications specific to health informatics.Results: The paper presents a rich overview of current approaches, issues, and methods associated with: (1) safe HIT design, (2) safe HIT implementation, (3) reporting on technology-induced errors, (4) technology-induced error analysis, and (5) health information technology (HIT) risk management. The work is based on research from around the world. Conclusions: Internationally, researchers have been developing methods that can be used to identify, report on, mitigate, and eliminate technology-induced errors. Although there remain issues and challenges associated with the methodologies, they have been shown to improve the quality and safety of HIT. Since the first publications documenting technology-induced errors in healthcare in 2005, we have seen in a short 10 years researchers develop ways of identifying and addressing these types of errors. We have also seen organizations begin to use these approaches. Knowledge has been translated into practice in a short ten years whereas the norm for other research areas is of 20 years.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel O'Hara ◽  
Colin O'Keeffe ◽  
Suzanne Mason ◽  
Joanne E Coster ◽  
Allen Hutchinson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document