Comparison of Japan nurse practitioner‐led care and physician trainee‐led care on patients' length of stay in a secondary emergency department: A retrospective study

AbstractObjectivesWe compared nurse practitioner-led care and physician trainees-led care on patients’ length of stay in a secondary emergency department in Japan.MethodsThis observational research utilized a secondary data analysis of medical records. Participants (N = 1,419; mean age = 63.9 ± 23.4 years; 52.3% men) were patients who were transferred to the emergency department by an ambulance between April 2016 and March 2018 in western Tokyo. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed with the length of stay as the dependent variable and the factors related to the length of stay, including medical care leaders, as the independent variable to compare Japanese nurse practitioner-led care and physician trainees-led care on patients’ length of stay.ResultsApproximately half of the patients (n = 763; 53.8%) received Japanese nurse practitioner-led care. Patients’ length of stay was significantly shorter by six minutes in the Japanese nurse practitioner-led care group than the physician trainees-led care group.ConclusionPatients’ length of stay was significantly shorter by six minutes in the Japanese nurse practitioner group than the physician trainees’ group. This time difference suggests that the medical care led by Japanese nurse practitioners is more efficient. In the future, the cost-effectiveness of Japanese nurse practitioner medical care, safety, and patient satisfaction should be examined in a multi-institutional joint study.

Download Full-text

National Trends in Emergency Department Care Processes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2005 to 2015

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.120.017208 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (20) ◽

Author(s):

Akshay Pendyal ◽

Craig Rothenberg ◽

Jean E. Scofi ◽

Harlan M. Krumholz ◽

Basmah Safdar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Real World ◽

The United States ◽

Emergency Department Care ◽

Care Processes ◽

Ed Visits

Background Despite investments to improve quality of emergency care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), few studies have described national, real‐world trends in AMI care in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology and quality of AMI care in US EDs over a recent 11‐year period, from 2005 to 2015. Methods and Results We conducted an observational study of ED visits for AMI using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US EDs. AMI visits were classified as ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non‐STEMI. Outcomes included annual incidence of AMI, median ED length of stay, ED disposition type, and ED administration of evidence‐based medications. Annual ED visits for AMI decreased from 1 493 145 in 2005 to 581 924 in 2015. Estimated yearly incidence of ED visits for STEMI decreased from 1 402 768 to 315 813. The proportion of STEMI sent for immediate, same‐hospital catheterization increased from 12% to 37%. Among patients with STEMI sent directly for catheterization, median ED length of stay decreased from 62 to 37 minutes. ED administration of antithrombotic and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents rose for STEMI (23%–31% and 10%–27%, respectively). Conclusions National, real‐world trends in the epidemiology of AMI in the ED parallel those of clinical registries, with decreases in AMI incidence and STEMI proportion. ED care processes for STEMI mirror evolving guidelines that favor high‐intensity antiplatelet therapy, early invasive strategies, and regionalization of care.

Download Full-text

38 Transforming post triage assessment of chest pain in a busy emergency department (ED), from ED doctor to advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) direct; the impact on patient experience times (PET)

10.1136/heartjnl-2020-ics.38 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

S Ingram

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Chest Pain ◽

Patient Experience ◽

Nurse Practitioner ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Effect of Undertriage on the Outcomes of Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia, Sepsis, and Septic Shock

Clinical Nursing Research ◽

10.1177/1054773821999688 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 105477382199968

Author(s):

Anas Alsharawneh

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Septic Shock ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Emergency Setting ◽

Extended Length ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Sepsis And Septic Shock ◽

Timely Treatment

Sepsis and neutropenia are considered the primary life-threatening complications of cancer treatment and are the leading cause of hospitalization and death. The objective was to study whether patients with neutropenia, sepsis, and septic shock were identified appropriately at triage and receive timely treatment within the emergency setting. Also, we investigated the effect of undertriage on key treatment outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all accessible records of admitted adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and septic shock. Our results identified that the majority of patients were inappropriately triaged to less urgent triage categories. Patients’ undertriage significantly prolonged multiple emergency timeliness indicators and extended length of stay within the emergency department and hospital. These effects suggest that triage implementation must be objective, consistent, and accurate because of the several influences of the assigned triage scoring on treatment and health outcomes.

Download Full-text

Emergency Department Point‐of‐Care Ultrasonography Can Reduce Length of Stay in Pediatric Appendicitis

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine ◽

10.1002/jum.15675 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kathryn Kasmire ◽

Joshua Davis

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Point Of Care Ultrasonography

Download Full-text

Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients

Journal of Patient Experience ◽

10.1177/23743735211011404 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 237437352110114

Author(s):

Andrew Nyce ◽

Snehal Gandhi ◽

Brian Freeze ◽

Joshua Bosire ◽

Terry Ricca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Patient Experience ◽

Waiting Times ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Short Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Patient’S Experience ◽

Discharged Patients ◽

The Impact

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.

Download Full-text