Is vitamin D deficiency a risk factor for recurrent aphthous stomatitis? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Oral Diseases ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1116-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadeq Ali Al‐Maweri ◽  
Esam Halboub ◽  
Ghadah Al‐Sufyani ◽  
Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi ◽  
Anas Shamala ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Lian Zhu ◽  
Wen-Wen Luo ◽  
Xuan Cheng ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Qi-Zhi Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder in which there is interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Study have found that vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for schizophrenia. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between schizophrenia and blood vitamin D level.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted. All published observational articles have been searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase until September 2019. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to examine the quality of the included studies.Results: A total of 38 articles have been included in this study. The lower level of vitamin D was found in people with schizophrenia compared with controls (WMD =-4.50, 95%CI [-6.69, -2.32]). Subgroup analyses based on study design, the patient’s hospitalization status, quality of the study, outcomes, and the country explained part of between-study heterogeneity. No significant differences in publication bias were observed. The overall prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in schizophrenic patients were 66%, 95%CI [57%–76%] and 76%, 95%CI [69%, 83%], respectively. Subjects with schizophrenia were more likely to have vitamin D deficiency or vitamin D insufficiency compared to controls (2.03, 95%CI [1.49, 2.77]; 2.43, 95%CI [1.40, 4.23]).Conclusion: The results of this systematic review show that low vitamin D levels might contribute to the development of schizophrenia. The prevalence of vitamin D deficient or insufficient in schizophrenia was higher than that in healthy controls or another psychotic disease .


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isolde Sommer ◽  
Ursula Griebler ◽  
Christina Kien ◽  
Stefanie Auer ◽  
Irma Klerings ◽  
...  

Critical Care ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim de Haan ◽  
AB Johan Groeneveld ◽  
Hilde RH de Geus ◽  
Mohamud Egal ◽  
Ard Struijs

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Jeyakumar ◽  
Vidhya Shinde ◽  
Reshma Ravindran

Abstract Background Vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women is a public health concern globally. In India, individual studies report high prevalence. However, lack of national data masks the true burden. This work determined the pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Methods Three different search engines yielded 15 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed by 10 different criteria and summary of study quality was categorized as per Cochrane standards. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy pregnant women and heterogeneity among selected studies. A sample of n = 4088 was used to study the pooled prevalence among pregnant women. Results The random effects combined estimate was 32.35% (95% CI, (12.58–117.48). High heterogeneity (tau2 = 0.39, I2 = 100%) and high risk of bias was observed among the selected studies. The test for overall effect was observed to be z = 2.54(P = 0.01). Conclusion Pooled estimate > 30% emphasizes the need for screening through antenatal care services and initiate preventive measures to address the deficiency.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 508-518
Author(s):  
Shanzhen Shi ◽  
◽  
Jiaxing Feng ◽  
Lixiang Zhou ◽  
Yu Li ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. S. Anglin ◽  
Zainab Samaan ◽  
Stephen D. Walter ◽  
Sarah D. McDonald

BackgroundThere is conflicting evidence about the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and depression, and a systematic assessment of the literature has not been available.AimsTo determine the relationship, if any, between vitamin D deficiency and depression.MethodA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials was conducted.ResultsOne case-control study, ten cross-sectional studies and three cohort studies with a total of 31 424 participants were analysed. Lower vitamin D levels were found in people with depression compared with controls (SMD = 0.60,95% Cl 0.23–0.97) and there was an increased odds ratio of depression for the lowest v. highest vitamin D categories in the cross-sectional studies (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.0–1.71). The cohort studies showed a significantly increased hazard ratio of depression for the lowest v. highest vitamin D categories (HR=2.21, 95% CI 1.40–3.49).ConclusionsOur analyses are consistent with the hypothesis that low vitamin D concentration is associated with depression, and highlight the need for randomised controlled trials of vitamin D for the prevention and treatment of depression to determine whether this association is causal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document