scholarly journals PROBABILISTIC GLYCEMIC CONTROL DECISION SUPPORT IN ICU: PROOF OF CONCEPT USING BAYESIAN NETWORK

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma Abu-Samah ◽  
Normy Norfiza Abdul Razak ◽  
Fatanah Mohamad Suhaimi ◽  
Ummu Kulthum Jamaludin ◽  
Azrina Md. Ralib

Glycemic control in intensive care patients is complex in terms of patients’ response to care and treatment. The variability and the search for improved insulin therapy outcomes have led to the use of human physiology model based on per-patient metabolic condition to provide personalized automated recommendations. One of the most promising solutions for this is the STAR protocol, which is based on a clinically validated insulin-nutrition-glucose physiological model. However, this approach does not consider demographical background such as age, weight, height, and ethnicity. This article presents the extension to intensive care personalized solution by integrating per-patient demographical, and upon admission information to intensive care conditions to automate decision support for clinical staff. In this context, a virtual study was conducted on 210 retrospectives intensive care patients’ data. To provide a ground, the integration concept is presented roughly, but the details are given in terms of a proof of concept using Bayesian Network, linking the admission background and performance of the STAR control. The proof of concept shows 71.43% and 73.90% overall inference precision, and reliability, respectively, on the test dataset. With more data, improved Bayesian Network is believed to be reproduced. These results, nevertheless, points at the feasibility of the network to act as an effective classifier using intensive care units data, and glycemic control performance to be the basis of a probabilistic, personalized, and automated decision support in the intensive care units.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-209
Author(s):  
Asma Abu-Samah ◽  
Normy Norfiza Abdul Razak ◽  
Fatanah Mohamad Suhaimi ◽  
Ummu Kulthum Jamaludin ◽  
James Geoffrey Chase

Author(s):  
Asma Abu-Samah ◽  
Normy Norfiza Abdul Razak ◽  
Fatanah Mohamad Suhaimi ◽  
Ummu Kulthum Jamaludin ◽  
Geoffrey Chase

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Malesker ◽  
Pamela A. Foral ◽  
Ann C. McPhillips ◽  
Keith J. Christensen ◽  
Julie A. Chang ◽  
...  

Background The efficiency of protocols for tight glycemic control is uncertain despite their adoption in hospitals. Objectives To evaluate the efficiency of protocols for tight glycemic control used in intensive care units. Methods Three separate studies were performed: (1) a third-party observer used a stopwatch to do a time-motion analysis of patients being treated with a protocol for tight glycemic control in 3 intensive care units, (2) charts were retrospectively reviewed to determine the frequency of deviations from the protocol, and (3) a survey assessing satisfaction with and knowledge of the protocol was administered to full-time nurses. Results Time-motion data were collected for 454 blood glucose determinations from 38 patients cared for by 47 nurses. Mean elapsed times from blood glucose result to therapeutic action were 2.24 (SD, 1.67) minutes for hypoglycemia and 10.65 (SD, 3.24) minutes for hyperglycemia. Mean elapsed time to initiate an insulin infusion was 32.56 (SD, 12.83) minutes. Chart review revealed 734 deviations from the protocol in 75 patients; 57% (n = 418) were deviations from scheduled times for blood glucose measurements. The mean number of deviations was approximately 9 per patient. Of 60 nurses who responded to the workload survey, 42 (70%) indicated that the protocol increased their workload; frequency of blood glucose determinations was the most common reason. Conclusions Nurses spend substantial time administering protocols for tight glycemic control, and considerable numbers of deviations occur during that process. Further educational efforts and ongoing assessment of the impact of such protocols are needed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. e9-e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Faust ◽  
R. L. Attridge ◽  
L. Ryan

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Hevener ◽  
Barbara Rickabaugh ◽  
Toby Marsh

Background Little information is available on the use of tools in intensive care units to help nurses determine when to restrain a patient. Patients in medical-surgical intensive care units are often restrained for their safety to prevent them from removing therapeutic devices. Research indicates that restraints do not necessarily prevent injuries or removal of devices by patients. Objectives To decrease use of restraints in a medical-surgical intensive care unit and to determine if a decision support tool is useful in helping bedside nurses determine whether or not to restrain a patient. Methods A quasi-experimental study design was used for this pilot study. Data were collected for each patient each shift indicating if therapeutic devices were removed and if restraints were used. An online educational activity supplemented by 1-on-1 discussion about proper use of restraints, alternatives, and use of a restraint decision tool was provided. Frequency of restraint use was determined. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to examine nurses’ perceptions of the decision support tool. Results Use of restraints was reduced 32%. No unplanned extubations or disruption of life-threatening therapeutic devices by unrestrained patients occurred. Conclusions With implementation of the decision support tool, nurses decreased their use of restraints yet maintained patients’ safety. A decision support tool may help nurses who are undecided or who need reassurance on their decision to restrain or not restrain a patient.


2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 2483-2491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. MEHTA ◽  
N. JAGGI ◽  
V. D. ROSENTHAL ◽  
C. RODRIGUES ◽  
S. K. TODI ◽  
...  

SUMMARYWe report on the effect of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium's (INICC) multidimensional approach for the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in adult patients hospitalized in 21 intensive-care units (ICUs), from 14 hospitals in 10 Indian cities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted, which was divided into baseline and intervention periods. During baseline, prospective surveillance of VAP was performed applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network definitions and INICC methods. During intervention, our approach in each ICU included a bundle of interventions, education, outcome and process surveillance, and feedback of VAP rates and performance. Crude stratified rates were calculated, and by using random-effects Poisson regression to allow for clustering by ICU, the incidence rate ratio for each time period compared with the 3-month baseline was determined. The VAP rate was 17·43/1000 mechanical ventilator days during baseline, and 10·81 for intervention, showing a 38% VAP rate reduction (relative risk 0·62, 95% confidence interval 0·5–0·78, P = 0·0001).


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Vaishali S Badge ◽  
FM Ashiqe

ABSTRACT Perioperative Hyperglycaemia can lead to sepsis, mediastinitis, prolonged mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrhythmias, increased ICU and hospital stay. The different centres follow different protocols to treat hyperglycaemia and still there is a controversy regarding the tight sugar control protocol. This survey was carried out to find the appropriate protocol regarding glycaemic control in various centres in UK. How to cite this article Badge VS, Ashiqe FM. Survey of Glycemic Control Protocols in Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Units. Res Inno in Anesth 2017;2(1):24-25.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document