scholarly journals Reflective –Formative Measurement Model of Social Factors and Willlingness To Share Knowledge

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norfadzilah Abdul Razak ◽  
Faizuniah Pangil ◽  
Md Lazim Mohd Zin
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Social Factors ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Influence Factor ◽  
Knowledge Worker ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ict Industry ◽  
Formative Measurement Model

This paper aims to investigate the convergent and construct validity between reflective and formative measurement model. The difference assessment presents a different result of the validity. This paper analysed the reflective construct followed by formative measurement of second-order constructs (i.e., social factors and willingness to share knowledge) using SmartPLS. The data were collected from 150 of the knowledge worker in the ICT industry which registered in a MSC Company. The finding confirmed the indicator and construct examined in the model were valid and reliable. Furthermore, details of discriminant validity, collinearity, tolerance, and variance influence factor were also further discussed. The implication of this finding are brought to fore.

Percezione del management e percezione del cliente: un confronto sui punti di forza dell'impresa

2009 ◽  
pp. 125-146
Author(s):  
Stefano Cabras ◽  
Cinzia Dessě ◽  
Michela Floris
Keyword(s):  
Customer Value ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Measurement Scale ◽  
Marketing Theory ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Analysis Measurement ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Additive Contribution ◽  
Formative Measurement Model ◽  
Value Measurement

Customer value is unanimously considered to be one of the most fundamental concepts in marketing theory. Nonetheless, customer value measurement has been at best sparse or minimal. The authors specify and test a formative measurement model of customer value which describes the additive contribution of four categories of benefits and three categories of sacrifices to customer value formation. The authors present results of measurement scale development process in three consumption contexts, and show that the proposed model, which they call perceived consumption experience value (PCEV), is reliable and valid, and is able to predict customer satisfaction and loyalty better than the Gale method.Keywords: customer value, benefits and sacrifices analysis, measurement Parole chiave: valore per il cliente, analisi benefici/sacrifici, misurazione

Gauging the Auditory Dimensions of Dysarthric Impairment: Reliability and Construct Validity of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (BoDyS)

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1516-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfram Ziegler ◽  
Anja Staiger ◽  
Theresa Schölderle ◽  
Mathias Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Speech Impairment ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Purpose Standardized clinical assessment of dysarthria is essential for management and research. We present a new, fully standardized dysarthria assessment, the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (BoDyS). The measurement model of the BoDyS is based on auditory evaluations of connected speech using 9 scales (traits) assessed by 4 elicitation methods. Analyses of the BoDyS' reliability and construct validity were performed to test this model, with the aim of gauging the auditory dimensions of speech impairment in dysarthria. Method Interrater agreement was examined in 70 persons with dysarthria. Construct validity was examined in 190 persons with dysarthria using a multitrait-multimethod design with confirmatory factor analysis. Results Interrater agreement of < 1 on a 5-point scale was found in 91% of cases across listener pairs and scales. Average reliability was .85. Inspection of the multitrait-multimethod matrix pointed at a high convergent and discriminant validity. Modeling of the BoDyS trait and method factors using confirmatory factor analysis yielded high goodness of fit. Model coefficients confirmed high discriminant and convergent validity and revealed meaningful relationships between scales and methods. Conclusions The 9 auditory scales of the BoDyS provide a reliable and valid profile of dysarthric impairment. They permit standardized measurement of clinically relevant dimensions of dysarthric speech.

The construct validity of Schein's career anchors orientation inventory

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nira Danziger ◽  
Dalia Rachman‐Moore ◽  
Rony Valency
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Career Anchors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Working Adults ◽  
Career Anchor ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Reliable Instrument

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the construct validity of the measurement model of Schein's Career Orientation Inventory, where entrepreneurship and creativity constitute two separate constructs.Design/methodology/approachA fairly representative sample of 1,847 Israeli working adults completed Schein's Career Anchor Inventory (COI) questionnaire, which probes career anchor constructs through associated indicator items. The data were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis to compare the fit of the proposed nine‐construct model with that of Schein's eight‐construct model.FindingsThe findings demonstrate that: the proposed nine‐construct model of the COI, which distinguishes between Entrepreneurship and Creativity and designates each as a separate construct, yields a better fit than Schein's eight‐construct model; and the nine‐construct model has convergent and discriminant validity and unidimensionality.Originality/valueThe study's contributions are threefold: first, it generally supports Schein's Career Anchor Theory, yet with nine anchors rather than with the original eight; second, it confirms the distinction between entrepreneurship and creativity; and third, it highlights the need to rephrase several existing items, and add new ones. The suggested changes and the conceptual framework of the nine‐anchor model will make the COI a more valid and reliable instrument, both for theory‐building and for practical and diagnostic use by career counselors.

scholarly journals Reflective or formative measurement model of sustainability factor? A three industry comparison

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eijaz Ahmed Khan ◽  
Mohammed Naim A. Dewan ◽  
Md. Maruf Hossan Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Sustainability Concept ◽  
Pls Analysis ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Formative Measurement Model ◽  
Industry Comparison

The sustainability concept is commonly used in many domains. However, the assessment of reflective and formative measurement has been ignored largely. As a result, sustainability factor scales are specified wrongly and this might lead to reduced scale validity. The aim of the study is find out the nature of sustainability factors either reflective or formative by investigating three distinct industrial settings in Bangladesh. A quantitative research design is used and the data is analysed through Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis. PLS analysis validates the indicators and factors. Sustainability factors in context of microbusiness and supply chain found reflective in nature whereas in e-business it was formative. The study suggests that sustainability factor is a context specific phenomena and it can be treated either reflective or formative.

scholarly journals Construct Validity for Measuring Entrepreneurial Readiness Among Malaysian Higher Education Students: A Stochastic Measurement Model Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 06044
Author(s):  
M.S. Jusoh ◽  
M.S. Hj Din ◽  
Hazliza ◽  
T. Suriani
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Item Fit ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Entrepreneurial Readiness ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The One

Instrument construct is one of the most important issues in conducting research. Without proper consideration in tackling the issue, it is difficult for the instrument to be considered as valid and reliable. If construct validity is accurate, then it will provide a clearer and more precise descriptive analysis on the concepts being investigated. The most important criteria that need to be considered in answering the construct validity are reliability and validity. In traditional measurement model, the understanding of reliability and validity is totally different from the one offered by Rasch model. Regardless of the difference, an internal consistency is still widely being used as the primary method to measure the item sampling. Using this model, local dependence and item fit are most considered in getting valid, reliable, and consistent, hence its significance. Finally the study applies goodness of measure purposely to answer issues related to validity and reliability tests. Principal components analysis was carried out to test the construct of questionnaires used in the study.

Construct Validity in Survey-Based Management Accounting and Control Research

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Bedford ◽  
Roland F. Speklé
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Management Accounting ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Theoretical Knowledge ◽  
Organizational Research ◽  
Single Item ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Control Research ◽  
And Control

ABSTRACT The capacity for survey-based research to advance theoretical knowledge is heavily dependent on the degree to which the measures used capture the constructs that they are intended to represent. Despite the importance of construct validity, the management accounting and control (MAC) literature tends to devote less attention to construct validity than other areas of organizational research. In this article, we discuss contemporary thinking about construct validity and examine how this compares to established practice in MAC research through a systematic review of survey studies from 1996 to 2015. Based on this review, we identify four areas where greater attention is warranted: specifying construct dimensionality, justifying the choice of the measurement model, distinguishing between causal indicators and composite indicators in formative measurement models, and being judicious in the use of single item measures. We discuss the implications of each issue and provide suggestions on how they can be addressed.

scholarly journals Engagement in Games: Developing an Instrument to Measure Consumer Videogame Engagement and Its Validation

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Zaib Abbasi ◽  
Ding Hooi Ting ◽  
Helmut Hlavacs
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Model ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Multidimensional Construct ◽  
First Order ◽  
New Instrument ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Formative Measurement Model ◽  
Reflective Measurement

The aim of the study is to develop a new instrument to measure engagement in videogame play termed as consumer videogame engagement. The study followed the scale development procedure to develop an instrument to measure the construct of consumer videogame engagement. In this study, we collected the data in two different phases comprising study 1 (n=136) and study 2 (n=270). We employed SPSS 22.0 for exploratory factor analysis using study 1 respondents to explore the factors for consumer videogame engagement and reliability analysis. Results of EFA resulted with six-factor solution. We further used SmartPLS 3.0 software on study 2 respondents to further confirm the six-factor solution as reflective measurement model on the first-order level, and three second-order formative constructs on the second-order or higher-order level as formative measurement model. Results of the reflective measurement model and formative measurement model evidenced that consumer videogame engagement has strong psychometric properties and is a valid instrument to measure engagement in videogame play. Results also confirmed that consumer videogame engagement is a multidimensional construct as well as a reflective-formative construct. The study is unique in its investigation as it develops an instrument to measure engagement in videogame play which comprises the cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions.

scholarly journals Crossing the seven Cs of internal consistency: Assessing the reliability of formative instruments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan L.K. Gruijters ◽  
Bram P.I. Fleuren ◽  
Gjalt - Jorn Ygram Peters
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Composite Score ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Psychological Construct ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Multiple Indicators ◽  
Item Scores ◽  
Formative Measurement Model ◽  
Reflective Measurement

Evaluating the reliability of measurement instruments is common practice in organizational psychology. When measurement proceeds using composites of multiple indicators, reliability is often examined with internal consistency estimates. This is common practice for both measurement instruments with a reflective measurement model, where a latent psychological construct is assumed to cause the item scores, and with a formative measurement model, where the composite score defines the construct. In the latter case, however, internal consistency indices such as Coefficient Alpha or Omega are not informative about reliability. In this paper, we review the assumption of reflective measurement and discuss why internal consistency estimates assume this model. We then provide an illustration of a checklist (originally proposed by Jarvis et al., 2003) intended to aid researchers, reviewers and editors in recognizing reflective measurement. Finally, the paper describes how researchers can estimate the reliability of instruments that use formative items. With these contributions, the paper aims to promote awareness of measurement assumptions when estimating reliability, and to provide tailored alternatives for assessing the reliability of formative instruments.

Development and validation of employee wellbeing scale – a formative measurement model

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 352-368
Author(s):  
Puja Khatri ◽  
Pragya Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Model Specification ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Formative Measurement ◽  
Employee Wellbeing ◽  
Formative Measurement Model

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize a suitable measure for the employee wellbeing construct and validate this tool in Indian workplace settings, especially with reference to IT/ITes and BFSI sectors. Design/methodology/approach This study is descriptive and cross-sectional in nature. The literature was first reviewed to identify the underlying probable dimensions of employee wellbeing and its corresponding items. These items were then subjected to elaborate discussions with experts from industry as well as academia. The index, thus, developed was administered to collect primary data from employees working in IT/ITeS and BFSI sectors based in Delhi-NCR. PLS SEM 3 was applied as employee wellbeing was construed as a first-order reflective second-order formative construct. Thereafter, it was subjected to suitable assessments of reliability and convergent validity. Findings The findings reveal that employee wellbeing can be conceptualized as a construct having four dimensions namely, purpose in life (PIL), work–life balance (WLB), job wellness (JW) and physical wellness (PW). It was also revealed that all the dimensions identified in the study capture different facets of the employee wellbeing and collectively define the construct; omission of any items may lead to change in the nature of the construct. This investigation is unique as it frames the index of employee wellbeing with specifications of a formative measurement model. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no published study so far has measured EWB as a formative construct. Originality/value Many earlier studies have incorporated a unidimensional approach to individual wellbeing and lacked a crucial outlook of having multi-dimensional understanding of the employee wellbeing construct in the social and work context. Furthermore, this paper contributes not only to the existing body of knowledge in employee wellbeing, but also brings forth an important aspect of measurement model specification, i.e. formative measurement model by bringing the specific reasons for taking employee wellbeing as a formative concept.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document