Calculation of Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Equilibrium Thermal Wakes

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Sucec
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Energy Equation ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Stanton Number ◽  
Law Of The Wall ◽  
Number Distribution

The combined thermal law of the wall and wake is used as the approximating sequence for the boundary layer temperature profile to solve an integral thermal energy equation for the local Stanton number distribution. The velocity profile in the turbulent boundary layer was taken to be the combined law of the wall and wake of Coles. This allows the solution of an integral form of the x-momentum equation to give the skin friction coefficient distribution. This, along with the velocity profile, is used to solve the thermal energy equation using inner coordinates. The strength of the thermal wake was found by analysis of earlier research results, in the literature, for equilibrium, constant property, turbulent boundary layers. Solutions for the Stanton number distribution with position are found for some adverse pressure gradient boundary layers as well as for those having zero pressure gradient. The zero pressure gradient results cover both fully heated plates and those with unheated starting lengths, including both isothermal surfaces and constant flux surfaces. Comparison of predictions of the present work is made with experimental data in the literature.

Calculation of Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Equilibrium Thermal Wakes

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Sucec
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Energy Equation ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Stanton Number ◽  
Law Of The Wall ◽  
Number Distribution

The combined thermal law of the wall and wake is used as the approximating sequence for the boundary layer temperature profile to solve an integral thermal energy equation for the local Stanton number distribution. The velocity profile in the turbulent boundary layer was taken to be the combined law of the wall and wake of Coles. This allows the solution of an integral form of the x-momentum equation, to give the skin friction coefficient distribution. This, along with the velocity profile is used to solve the thermal energy equation using inner coordinates. The strength of the thermal wake was found by analysis of earlier research results, in the literature, for equilibrium, constant property, turbulent boundary layers. Solutions for the Stanton number distribution with position are found for some adverse pressure gradient boundary layers as well as for zero pressure gradient ones. The zero pressure gradient results cover both fully heated plates and those with unheated starting lengths, including both isothermal surfaces and constant flux surfaces. Comparison of predictions of the present work is made with experimental data in the literature.

An Integral Solution for Heat Transfer in Accelerating Turbulent Boundary Layers

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Sucec
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Energy Equation ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Stanton Number ◽  
Strength Parameter ◽  
Turbulent Dissipation ◽  
Law Of The Wall ◽  
Thermal Wake

An equilibrium thermal wake strength parameter is developed for a two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer flow and is then used in the combined thermal law of the wall and the wake to give an approximate temperature profile to insert into the integral form of the thermal energy equation. After the solution of the integral x momentum equation, the integral thermal energy equation is solved for the local Stanton number as a function of position x for accelerating turbulent boundary layers. A simple temperature distribution in the thermal “superlayer” is part of the present modeling. The analysis includes a dependence of the hydrodynamic and thermal wake strengths on the momentum thickness and enthalpy thickness Reynolds numbers, respectively. An approximate dependence of the turbulent Prandtl number, in the “log” region, on the strength of the favorable pressure gradient is proposed and incorporated into the solution. The resultant solution for the Stanton number distribution in accelerated turbulent flows is compared with experimental data in the literature. A comparison of the present predictions is also made to a finite difference solution, which uses the turbulent kinetic energy—turbulent dissipation model of turbulence, for a few cases of accelerating flows.

Measurements in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers with a step change in surface roughness

1975 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Schofield
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Step Change ◽  
Internal Layer ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Law Of The Wall

The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden changes in surface roughness under adverse-pressure-gradient conditions has been studied experimentally. The roughness used was in the ‘d’ type array of Perry, Schofield & Joubert (1969). Two cases of a rough-to-smooth change in surface roughness were considered in the same arbitrary adverse pressure gradient. The two cases differed in the distance of the surface discontinuity from the leading edge and gave two sets of flow conditions for the establishment and growth of the internal layer which develops downstream from a change in surface roughness. These conditions were in turn different from those in the zero-pressure-gradient experiments of Antonia & Luxton. The results suggest that the growth of the new internal layer depends solely on the new conditions at the wall and scales with the local roughness length of that wall. Mean velocity profiles in the region after the step change in roughness were accurately described by Coles’ law of the wall-law of the wake combination, which contrasts with the zero-pressure-gradient results of Antonia & Luxton. The skin-friction coefficient after the step change in roughness did not overshoot the equilibrium distribution but made a slow adjustment downstream of the step. Comparisons of mean profiles indicate that similar defect profile shapes are produced in layers with arbitrary adverse pressure gradients at positions where the values of Clauser's equilibrium parameter β (= δ*τ−10dp/dx) are similar, provided that the pressure-gradient history and local values of the pressure gradient are also similar.

Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Jason P. Monty ◽  
Romain Mathis ◽  
Ivan Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale

AbstractResearch into high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in recent years has brought about a renewed interest in the larger-scale structures. It is now known that these structures emerge more prominently in the outer region not only due to increased Reynolds number (Metzger & Klewicki, Phys. Fluids, vol. 13(3), 2001, pp. 692–701; Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28), but also when a boundary layer is exposed to an adverse pressure gradient (Bradshaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, 1967, pp. 625–645; Lee & Sung, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 101–131). The latter case has not received as much attention in the literature. As such, this work investigates the modification of the large-scale features of boundary layers subjected to zero, adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is first shown that the mean velocities, turbulence intensities and turbulence production are significantly different in the outer region across the three cases. Spectral and scale decomposition analyses confirm that the large scales are more energized throughout the entire adverse pressure gradient boundary layer, especially in the outer region. Although more energetic, there is a similar spectral distribution of energy in the wake region, implying the geometrical structure of the outer layer remains universal in all cases. Comparisons are also made of the amplitude modulation of small scales by the large-scale motions for the three pressure gradient cases. The wall-normal location of the zero-crossing of small-scale amplitude modulation is found to increase with increasing pressure gradient, yet this location continues to coincide with the large-scale energetic peak wall-normal location (as has been observed in zero pressure gradient boundary layers). The amplitude modulation effect is found to increase as pressure gradient is increased from favourable to adverse.

Recent Developments in Calculation Methods for Turbulent Boundary Layers With Pressure Gradients and Heat Transfer

1966 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Rotta
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Temperature Distribution ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Calculation Methods ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Incompressible Boundary

A review is given of the recent development in turbulent boundary layers. At first, for the case of incompressible flow, the variation of the shape of velocity profile with the pressure gradient is discussed; also the temperature distribution and heat transfer in incompressible boundary layers are treated. Finally, problems of the turbulent boundary layer in compressible flow are considered.

Velocity Profiles of Turbulent Boundary Layers

1969 ◽  
Vol 73 (698) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. Bull
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Experimental Work ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Velocity Profiles ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations

Although a numerical solution of the turbulent boundary-layer equations has been achieved by Mellor and Gibson for equilibrium layers, there are many occasions on which it is desirable to have closed-form expressions representing the velocity profile. Probably the best known and most widely used representation of both equilibrium and non-equilibrium layers is that of Coles. However, when velocity profiles are examined in detail it becomes apparent that considerable care is necessary in applying Coles's formulation, and it seems to be worthwhile to draw attention to some of the errors and inconsistencies which may arise if care is not exercised. This will be done mainly by the consideration of experimental data. In the work on constant pressure layers, emphasis tends to fall heavily on the author's own data previously reported in ref. 1, because the details of the measurements are readily available; other experimental work is introduced where the required values can be obtained easily from the published papers.

Governing Parameters of Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan Maciel ◽  
Tie Wei ◽  
Ayse G. Gungor ◽  
Mark P. Simens
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Inertial Parameter ◽  
Velocity Scale ◽  
Gradient Parameter

We perform a careful nondimensional analysis of the turbulent boundary layer equations in order to bring out, without assuming any self-similar behaviour, a consistent set of nondimensional parameters characterizing the outer region of turbulent boundary layers with arbitrary pressure gradients. These nondimensional parameters are a pressure gradient parameter, a Reynolds number (different from commonly used ones) and an inertial parameter. They are obtained without assuming a priori the outer length and velocity scales. They represent the ratio of the magnitudes of two types of forces in the outer region, using the Reynolds shear stress gradient (apparent turbulent force) as the reference force: inertia to apparent turbulent forces for the inertial parameter, pressure to apparent turbulent forces for the pressure gradient parameter and apparent turbulent to viscous forces for the Reynolds number. We determine under what conditions they retain their meaning, depending on the outer velocity scale that is considered, with the help of seven boundary layer databases. We find the impressive result that if the Zagarola-Smits velocity is used as the outer velocity scale, the streamwise evolution of the three ratios of forces in the outer region can be accurately followed with these non-dimensional parameters in all these flows — not just the order of magnitude of these ratios. This cannot be achieved with three other outer velocity scales commonly used for pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Consequently, the three new nondimensional parameters, when expressed with the Zagarola-Smits velocity, can be used to follow — in a global sense — the streamwise evolution of the stream-wise mean momentum balance in the outer region. This study provides a clear and consistent framework for the analysis of the outer region of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers.

Use of k−ε−γ Model to Predict Intermittency in Turbulent Boundary-Layers

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupam Dewan ◽  
Jaywant H. Arakeri
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Rate Of Dissipation ◽  
Dissipation Equation ◽  
Averaged Model

The intermittency profile in the turbulent flat-plate zero pressure-gradient boundary-layer and a thick axisymmetric boundary-layer has been computed using the Reynolds-averaged k−ε−γ model, where k denotes turbulent kinetic energy, ε its rate of dissipation, and γ intermittency. The Reynolds-averaged model is simpler compared to the conditional model used in the literature. The dissipation equation of the Reynolds-averaged model is modified to account for the effect of entrainment. It has been shown that the model correctly predicts the observed intermittency of the flows. [S0098-2202(00)02403-2]

Scaling of Favorable Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers With Eventual Relaminarization

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rau´l Bayoa´n Cal ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Luciano Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Velocity Profiles ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient ◽  
The Mean

Applying similarity analysis to the RANS equations of motion for a pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer, Castillo and George [1] obtained the scalings for the mean deficit velocity and the Reynolds stresses. Following this analysis, Castillo and George studied favorable pressure gradient (FPG) turbulent boundary layers. They were able to obtain a single curve for FPG flows when scaling the mean deficit velocity profiles. In this study, FPG turbulent boundary layers are analyzed as well as relaminarized boundary layers subjected to an even stronger FPG. It is found that the mean deficit velocity profiles diminish when scaled using the Castillo and George [1] scaling, U∞, and the Zagarola and Smits [2] scaling, U∞δ*/δ. In addition, Reynolds stress data has been analyzed and it is found that the relaminarized boundary layer data decreases drastically in all components of the Reynolds stresses. Furthermore, it will be shown that the shape of the profile for the wall-normal and Reynolds shear stress components change drastically given the relaminarized state. Therefore, the mean velocity deficit profiles as well as Reynolds stresses are found to be necessary in order to understand not only FPG flows, but also relaminarized boundary layers.

On the scaling in sink-flow turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 737 ◽  
pp. 329-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivsai Ajit Dixit ◽  
O. N. Ramesh
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Physical Space ◽  
Streamwise Velocity ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Velocity Spectrum ◽  
Scaling Exponent ◽  
Order Of Magnitude

AbstractScaling of the streamwise velocity spectrum ${\phi }_{11} ({k}_{1} )$ in the so-called sink-flow turbulent boundary layer is investigated in this work. The present experiments show strong evidence for the ${ k}_{1}^{- 1} $ scaling i.e. ${\phi }_{11} ({k}_{1} )= {A}_{1} { U}_{\tau }^{2} { k}_{1}^{- 1} $, where ${k}_{1} $ is the streamwise wavenumber and ${U}_{\tau } $ is the friction velocity. Interestingly, this ${ k}_{1}^{- 1} $ scaling is observed much farther from the wall and at much lower flow Reynolds number (both differing by almost an order of magnitude) than what the expectations from experiments on a zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow would suggest. Furthermore, the coefficient ${A}_{1} $ in the present sink-flow data is seen to be non-universal, i.e. ${A}_{1} $ varies with height from the wall; the scaling exponent −1 remains universal. Logarithmic variation of the so-called longitudinal structure function, which is the physical-space counterpart of spectral ${ k}_{1}^{- 1} $ scaling, is also seen to be non-universal, consistent with the non-universality of ${A}_{1} $. These observations are to be contrasted with the universal value of ${A}_{1} $ (along with the universal scaling exponent of −1) reported in the literature on zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Theoretical arguments based on dimensional analysis indicate that the presence of a streamwise pressure gradient in sink-flow turbulent boundary layers makes the coefficient ${A}_{1} $ non-universal while leaving the scaling exponent −1 unaffected. This effect of the pressure gradient on the streamwise spectra, as discussed in the present study (experiments as well as theory), is consistent with other recent studies in the literature that are focused on the structural aspects of turbulent boundary layer flows in pressure gradients (Harun et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 715, 2013, pp. 477–498); the present paper establishes the link between these two. The variability of ${A}_{1} $ accommodated in the present framework serves to clarify the ideas of universality of the ${ k}_{1}^{- 1} $ scaling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document