Thermoelastic Stresses in Thick-Walled Vessels Under Thermal Transients via the Inverse Route

2006 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Segall

A common threat to thick-walled vessels and pipes is thermal shock from operational steady state or transient thermoelastic stresses. As such, boundary conditions must be known or determined in order to reveal the underlying thermal state. For direct problems where all boundary conditions (temperature or flux) are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable as shown by many studies. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. As a result, the inverse route is rarely used to determine thermal stresses. Moreover, most analytical solutions to the inverse problem rely on a host of assumptions that usually restrict their utility to time frames before the thermal wave reaches the natural boundaries of the structure. To help offset these limitations and at the same time solve for the useful case of a thick-walled cylinder exposed to thermal loading on the internal surface, the inverse problem was solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct solution to the heat equation. Once the inverse problem was solved in this fashion and the unknown boundary condition on the internal surface determined, the resulting polynomial was used with the generalized direct solution to determine the internal temperature and stress distributions as a function of time and radial position. For a thick-walled cylinder under an internal transient with external convection, excellent agreement was seen with known temperature histories. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature.

Author(s):  
A. E. Segall

A common threat to thick-walled vessels and pipes is thermal shock from operational steady-state or transient thermoelastic stresses. As such, boundary conditions must be known or determined in order to reveal the underlying thermal state. For direct problems where all boundary conditions are known, the procedure is relatively straightforward and mathematically tractable as shown by recent studies. Although more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is ill-posed and inherently sensitive to errors in the data. As a result, the inverse route is rarely used to determine thermal-stresses. Moreover, most analytical solutions to the inverse problem rely on a host of assumptions that usually restrict their utility to timeframes before the thermal wave reaches the natural boundaries of the structure. To help offset these limitations and at the same time solve for the useful case of a thick-walled cylinder exposed to thermal loading on the ID, the inverse problem was solved using a least-squares determination of polynomial coefficients based on a generalized direct-solution to the Heat Equation. Once the inverse problem was solved in this fashion and the unknown boundary-condition on the ID determined, the resulting polynomial was used with the generalized direct solution to estimate the internal temperature and stress distributions as a function of time and radial position. For a thick-walled cylinder under an internal transient with external convection, excellent agreement was seen with various measured temperature histories. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature.


Author(s):  
A. E. Segall ◽  
D. Engels ◽  
A. Hirsh

When thermal-shock is an issue, the underlying thermal- and stress-states are often difficult to determine because the boundary conditions must be known. For direct problems where the boundary conditions such as temperature or flux are known a priori, the procedure is usually mathematically tractable and can therefore be solved analytically. On the other hand, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined remotely is inherently ill-posed and therefore sensitive to errors. Moreover, there are only limited numbers of analytical solutions and they are usually restricted to timeframes before the thermal wave reaches the natural boundaries of the structure. Fortunately, generalized solutions based on either measured temperature- and/or strain-histories can be used to determine the underlying thermal excitation via a least-squares determination of coefficients that require the direct solution to enforce the data. Once the inverse problem is solved and the unknown boundary-condition determined, the resulting polynomial can then be used with the generalized Direct solution to determine the thermal- and stress-states as a function of time and position. For the two geometries explored (thick-walled cylinder under an internal transient with external convection and a slab with one adiabatic surface), excellent agreement was seen with various test cases for histories based on either temperature or strain. However, the strain-based solutions may be preferable since they do not suffer from time-lags associated with thermally thick structures. The derived solutions appear to be well suited for many thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties are independent of temperature.


2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Segall ◽  
D. Engels ◽  
A. Hirsh

Thermoelastic states as they pertain to thermal-shock are difficult to determine since the underlying boundary conditions must be known or measured. For direct problems where the boundary conditions such as temperature or flux, are known a priori, the procedure is mathematically tractable with many analytical solutions available. Although this is more practical from a measurement standpoint, the inverse problem where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data are ill-posed and therefore inherently sensitive to errors in the data. Moreover, the limited number of analytical solutions to the inverse problem rely on assumptions that usually restrict them to timeframes before the thermal wave reaches the natural boundaries of the structure. Fortunately, a generalized solution based on strain-histories can be used instead to determine the underlying thermal excitation via a least-squares determination of coefficients for generalized equations for strain. Once the inverse problem is solved and the unknown boundary condition on the opposing surface is determined, the resulting polynomial can then be used with the generalized direct solution to determine the thermal- and stress-states as a function of time and position. For the two geometries explored, namely a thick-walled cylinder under an internal transient with external convection and a slab with one adiabatic surface, excellent agreement was seen with various test cases. The derived solutions appear to be well suited for many thermal scenarios provided that the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. While polynomials were employed for the current analysis, transcendental functions and/or combinations with polynomials can also be used.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Segall ◽  
C. Drapaca ◽  
D. Engels ◽  
T. Zhu ◽  
H. Yang

From an analytical standpoint, a majority of calculations use known boundary conditions (temperature or flux) and the so-called direct route to determine internal temperatures, strains, and/or stresses. For such problems where the thermal boundary condition is known a priori, the analytical procedure and solutions are tractable for the linear case where the thermophysical properties are independent of temperature. On the other hand, the inverse route where the boundary conditions must be determined from remotely determined temperature and/or flux data is much more difficult mathematically, as well as inherently sensitive to data errors (i.e., ill-posed). When solutions are available, they are often restricted to a harsh, albeit unrealistic step change in temperature or flux and/or are only valid for relatively short time frames before temperature changes occur at the far boundary. While the two approaches may seem to be at odds with each other, a generalized direct solution based on polynomial temperature or strain-histories can also be used to determine unknown boundary conditions via least-squares determination of coefficients. Once the inverse problem (and unknown boundary condition) is solved via these coefficients, the resulting polynomial can then be used with the generalized direct solution to determine the thermal- and stress-states as a function of time and position. When used for both thick slabs and tubes, excellent agreement was seen for various test cases. In fact, the derived solutions appear to be well suited for many thermal scenarios, provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties that do not vary with temperature. Since temperature dependent properties can certainly be an issue that affects accuracy in these types of calculations, some recent analytical procedures for both direct and inverse solutions are also discussed.


Author(s):  
Albert E. Segall ◽  
Craig C. Schoof ◽  
Daniel E. Yastishock

Abstract Thick plates that are thermally loaded on one surface with convection on the other are often encountered in engineering practice. Given this wide utility and the limitations of most existing solutions to an adiabatic boundary condition, generalized direct thermal solutions were first derived for an arbitrary surface loading as modeled by a polynomial and its coefficients on the loaded surface with convection on the other. Once formulated, the temperature solutions were then used with elasticity relationships to determine the resulting thermal stresses. Additionally, the Inverse thermal problem was solved using a least-squares determination of the aforementioned polynomial coefficients based on the direct-solution and temperatures measured at the surface with convection. Previously published relationships for a thick-walled cylinder with internal heating/cooling and external convection are also included for comparison. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for complicated thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties do not vary with temperature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. Segall ◽  
Craig C. Schoof ◽  
Daniel E. Yastishock

Abstract Thick plates that are thermally loaded on one surface with convection on the other are often encountered in engineering practice. Given this wide utility and the limitations of most existing solutions to an adiabatic boundary condition, generalized direct thermal solutions were first derived for an arbitrary surface loading as modeled by a polynomial and its coefficients on the loaded surface with convection on the other. Once formulated, the temperature solutions were then used with elasticity relationships to determine the resulting thermal stresses. Additionally, the inverse thermal problem was solved using a least-squares type determination of the aforementioned polynomial coefficients based on the direct-solution and temperatures measured at the surface with convection. Previously published relationships for a thick-walled cylinder with internal heating/cooling and external convection are also included for comparison. Given the versatility of the polynomial solutions advocated, the method appears well suited for complicated thermal scenarios provided the analysis is restricted to the time interval used to determine the polynomial and the thermophysical properties do not vary with temperature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 727-738
Author(s):  
Victor Sadovnichii ◽  
Yaudat Talgatovich Sultanaev ◽  
Azamat Akhtyamov

AbstractWe consider a new class of inverse problems on the recovery of the coefficients of differential equations from a finite set of eigenvalues of a boundary value problem with unseparated boundary conditions. A finite number of eigenvalues is possible only for problems in which the roots of the characteristic equation are multiple. The article describes solutions to such a problem for equations of the second, third, and fourth orders on a graph with three, four, and five edges. The inverse problem with an arbitrary number of edges is solved similarly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
El Mustapha Ait Ben Hassi ◽  
Salah-Eddine Chorfi ◽  
Lahcen Maniar

Abstract We study an inverse problem involving the restoration of two radiative potentials, not necessarily smooth, simultaneously with initial temperatures in parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions. We prove a Lipschitz stability estimate for the relevant potentials using a recent Carleman estimate, and a logarithmic stability result for the initial temperatures by a logarithmic convexity method, based on observations in an arbitrary subdomain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document