Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Curves of Japan, the United States, and European Union Code and Standards

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Yukio Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
The United States ◽  
Austenitic Steels ◽  
Engineering Society ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
American Society

There are several codes, standards, handbooks, and guidelines for the nuclear power plant maintenance in Japan, the US, and EU. They include Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) and fatigue crack growth curves for crack growth calculation. In this paper, the authors selected five kinds of codes, standards and guidelines, and compared their fatigue crack growth curves for choice of the suitable curves. The feature of each curve was quantitatively evaluated. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME) maintenance rule and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code provide the fatigue crack growth formulae for both ferritic and austenitic steels and consider the environmental effects in some cases. The Fitness-for-Service Network (FITNET) curves are categorized in many kinds of metal, whereas the Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau (Germany) = Board of Trustees of Mechanical Engineering (FKM) guideline and Welding Engineering Society (WES) procedure provide the common properties generally applicable to steels.

Comparison of Fatigue Crack Growth Curves of Japan, the US and EU Code and Standards

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Yukio Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
Austenitic Steels ◽  
The Us ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Standards And Guidelines ◽  
Crack Growth Curve

There are several code and standards, handbooks and guidelines for the nuclear power plant maintenance in Japan, the US and EU. They include SCC and fatigue crack growth curve for crack growth calculation. In this paper the authors selected five kinds of codes, standards and guidelines and compared their fatigue crack growth curves for choice of the suitable curves. The feature of each curve was summarized quantitatively evaluated. JSME maintenance rule and ASME code provide the fatigue crack growth formulae for both ferritic and austenitic steels and consider the environmental effects in some cases. The FITNET curves are categorized in many kinds of metal whereas the FKM guideline and WES procedure provide the common properties applicable to steels generally.

Development of Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds for Austenitic Stainless Steels Exposed to Air Environment for ASME Code Section XI

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Saburo Usami
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Stress Ratio ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor Range ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
American Society ◽  
Growth Experiments

Fatigue crack growth thresholds ΔKth define stress intensity factor range below which cracks will not grow. The thresholds ΔKth are useful in industries to determine durability lifetime. Although massive fatigue crack growth experiments for stainless steels in air environment had been reported, the thresholds ΔKth are not codified at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI, as well as other fitness-for-service (FFS) codes and standards. Based on the investigation of a few FFS codes and review of literature survey of experimental data, the thresholds ΔKth exposed to air environment have been developed for the ASME Code Section XI. A guidance of the thresholds ΔKth for austenitic stainless steels in air at room and high temperatures can be developed as a function of stress ratio R.

Technical Basis of Fatigue Crack Growth Threshold for Stainless Steel in Air Environment for ASME Code Section XI

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Saburo Usami
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
American Society ◽  
Growth Threshold

The fatigue crack growth threshold is an important characteristic of crack growth assessment for the integrity of structural components. However, threshold values for austenitic stainless steels in air environment are not well provided in many fitness-for-service (FFS) codes, although extensive amount of fatigue crack growth tests data has been published. This paper focuses on fatigue crack growth threshold values for austenitic stainless steel in air environment at room and high temperatures. The paper introduces the current fatigue crack growth rates provided by the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Code Section XI and summarizes the available test data of fatigue crack growth thresholds based on the literature survey. The paper then discusses the applicability of the existing fatigue crack growth thresholds for stainless steels and proposes a new relation as a function of the stress ratio for use by the ASME Code Section XI.

Evaluation of Fatigue Crack Growth Curves in Existing Codes and a Proposed Modification Based on Experimental Data of Cr-Ni-Mo-V Steel Welded Joints

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Nan Du ◽  
Ming-Liang Zhu ◽  
Fu-Zhen Xuan ◽  
Shan-Tung Tu
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Welded Joints ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
Crack Growth Behavior ◽  
Fatigue Assessment ◽  
Crack Growth Model ◽  
Threshold Regime ◽  
Near Threshold

A comparison of currently available codes for assessment of fatigue crack growth, including ASME (America Society of Mechanical Engineers) SEC. XI, FKM (Forchungskuratorium Maschinenbau) guideline, WES (Japan Welding Engineering Society) 2805, BS7910 and JSME (The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers), was carried out by paying attention to the suitability of application and the easiness to obtain the parameters, based on fatigue crack growth data of Cr-Ni-Mo-V steel welded joints. Results showed that fatigue crack growth curves provided by the FKM or WES were good choice when few inputs were at hand while the curves in the BS7910, JSME and ASME were recommended for precise estimation. It was indicated that the assessment of welded joints solely by fatigue crack growth behavior at base metal part and the assessment of fatigue crack growth for the aged condition by as-received one both resulted in non-conservativeness, albeit dependent on the range of stress ratios, R. A new bilinear form of fatigue crack growth model independent of R was developed based on transition point occurred in the near-threshold regime. This constituted the bilinear approach to fatigue assessment, and thus contributed to the optimization of fatigue assessment in the near-threshold regime.

Fatigue Crack Growth in SA508-CL2 Steel in a High Temperature, High Purity Water Environment

1974 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Gerber ◽  
J. D. Heald ◽  
E. Kiss
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Water Environment ◽  
Cyclic Frequency ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Temperature Rate

Fatigue crack growth tests were conducted with 1 in. (25.4 mm) plate specimens of SA508-CL2 steel in room temperature air, 550 deg F (288 deg C) air and in a 550 deg F (288 deg C), high purity, water environment. Zero-tension load controlled tests were run at cyclic frequencies as low as 0.037 CPM. Results show that growth rates in the simulated Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) water environment are 4 to 8 times faster than growth rates observed in 550 deg F (288 deg C) air and these rates are 8 to 15 times faster than the room temperature rate. In the BWR water environment, lowering the cyclic frequency from 0.37 CPM to 0.037 CPM caused only a slight increase in the fatigue crack growth rate. All growth rates measured in these tests were below the upper bound design curve presented in Section XI of the ASME Code.

Comparison of International Codes for a Fatigue Crack Growth Flaw Tolerance Sample Problem

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Sample Problem ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Typical Application ◽  
Flaw Tolerance ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
The Impact

Abstract As part of the development of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Case N-809 [1], a series of sample calculations were performed to gain experience in using the Code Case methods and to determine the impact on a typical application. Specifically, the application of N-809 in a fatigue crack growth analysis was evaluated for a large diameter austenitic pipe in a pressurized water reactor coolant system main loop using the current analytical evaluation procedures in Appendix C of Section XI of the ASME Code [2]. The same example problem was previously used to evaluate the reference fatigue crack growth curves during the development of N-809, as well as to compare N-809 methods to similar methods adopted by the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. The previous example problem used to evaluate N-809 during its development was embellished and has been used to evaluate additional proposed ASME Code changes. For example, the Electric Power Research Institute investigated possible improvements to ASME Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix L [3], and the previous N-809 example problem formed the basis for flaw tolerance calculations to evaluate those proposed improvements [4]. In addition, the ASME Code Section XI, Working Group on Flaw Evaluation Reference Curves continues to evaluate additional research data and related improvements to N-809 and other fatigue crack growth rate methods. As a part of these Code investigations, EPRI performed calculations for the Appendix L flaw tolerance sample problem using three international codes and standards to evaluate fatigue crack growth (da/dN) curves for PWR environments: (1) ASME Code Case N-809, (2) JSME Code methods [5], and (3) the French RSE-M method [6]. The results of these comparative calculations are presented and discussed in this paper.

scholarly journals Requirements and Variability Affecting the Durability of Bonded Joints

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhys Jones ◽  
Daren Peng ◽  
John G. Michopoulos ◽  
Anthony J. Kinloch
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fatigue Threshold ◽  
Growth Equation ◽  
Bonded Joints ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Structural Adhesives

This paper firstly reveals that when assessing if a bonded joint meets the certification requirements inherent in MIL-STD-1530D and the US Joint Services Standard JSSG2006 it is necessary to ensure that: (a) There is no yielding at all in the adhesive layer at 115% of design limit load (DLL), and (b) that the joint must be able to withstand design ultimate load (DUL). Secondly, it is revealed that fatigue crack growth in both nano-reinforced epoxies, and structural adhesives can be captured using the Hartman–Schijve crack growth equation, and that the scatter in crack growth in adhesives can be modelled by allowing for variability in the fatigue threshold. Thirdly, a methodology was established for estimating a valid upper-bound curve, for cohesive failure in the adhesive, which encompasses all the experimental data and provides a conservative fatigue crack growth curve. Finally, it is shown that this upper-bound curve can be used to (a) compare and characterise structural adhesives, (b) determine/assess a “no growth” design (if required), (c) assess if a disbond in an in-service aircraft will grow and (d) to design and life in-service adhesively-bonded joints in accordance with the slow-growth approach contained in the United States Air Force (USAF) certification standard MIL-STD-1530D.

Remaining Lives of Fatigue Crack Growths for Pipes With Subsurface Flaws and Subsurface-to-Surface Flaw Proximity Rules

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Genshichiro Katsumata ◽  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Valery Lacroix
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Surface Flaw ◽  
Japan Society ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Inner Surface ◽  
American Society

If a subsurface flaw is located near a component surface, the subsurface flaw is transformed into a surface flaw in accordance with a subsurface-to-surface flaw proximity rule. The recharacterization process from subsurface to surface flaw is adopted in all fitness-for-service (FFS) codes. However, the specific criteria of the recharacterizations are different among the FFS codes. Recently, the authors have proposed a new subsurface-to-surface flaw proximity rule based on experimental data and equivalent fatigue crack growth rate calculations. In this study, fatigue crack growth calculations were carried out for pipes with subsurface flaws, using the proximity rule provided in the current ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Section XI and JSME (The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers) codes and the proposed subsurface-to-surface flaw proximity rule. Different pipe sizes, flaw aspect ratios, and ligament distances from subsurface flaws to inner surface of pipes were taken into account. The results indicate the current proximity rule gives less conservative fatigue lives, when the aspect ratios of the subsurface flaws are small.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document