Aerodynamic Design and Prototype Testing of a New Line of High Efficiency, High Pressure, 50% Reaction Steam Turbines

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Cotroneo ◽  
Tara A. Cole ◽  
Douglas C. Hofer
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Volume Flow ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Aerodynamic Design ◽  
Flow Paths ◽  
Low Volume

The aerodynamic design and prototype performance testing of a new line of high efficiency, high pressure (HP), 50% reaction steam turbines is described in some detail. Three designs were carried out that can be used in a repeating stage fashion to form high efficiency steam paths. The designs were performed employing a blade master concept. The masters can be aerodynamically scaled and cut to cover a wide range of applications while maintaining vector diagram integrity. Three equivalent prototype flow paths, one each for Gen 0, 1 and 2, masters were designed and tested in a Steam Turbine Test Vehicle (STTV). These prototype designs are representative of high pressure steam turbines for combined cycle power plants. Design of experiments is used to optimize the flow path, stage counts and diameters for production designs taking into account multidisciplinary design constraints. Four such Gen 1 steam path designs have been executed to date as part of a structured series of combined cycle power plants. [1-5] There are two A14 HEAT* (High Efficiency Advanced Technology) steam turbine HP flow paths for GE’s 107FA combined cycle power plants and two A15 HEAT HP flow paths for the 109FB. The larger of the A14 HEAT steam turbine HP’s has recently been performance tested at a customer site demonstrating world class efficiency levels of over 90% for this low volume flow combined cycle turbine [1]. HP volume flows are likely to drop even lower in the future with the need to go to higher steam inlet pressure for combined cycle efficiency improvements so steam path designs with high efficiency at low volume flow will be increasingly important.

Validation of Advanced Steam Turbine Technology: A Case Study of an Ultra Super Critical Steam Turbine Power Plant

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Quinkertz ◽  
Thomas Thiemann ◽  
Kai Gierse
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Operational Experience ◽  
Internal Cooling ◽  
Steam Turbines

High efficiency and flexible operation continue to be the major requirements for power generation because of the benefits of reduced emissions and reduced fuel consumption, i.e. reduced operating costs. Ultra super critical (USC) steam parameters are the basis for state of the art technology of coal fired power plants with highest efficiency. An important part of the development process for advanced steam turbines is product validation. This step involves more than just providing evidence of customer guaranteed values (e.g. heat rate or electric output). It also involves proving that the design targets have been achieved and that the operational experience is fed back to designers to further develop the design criteria and enable the next step in the development of highly sophisticated products. What makes product validation for large size power plant steam turbines especially challenging is the fact that, due to the high costs of the required infrastructure, steam turbine manufacturers usually do not have a full scope / full scale testing facility. Therefore, good customer relations are the key to successful validation. This paper describes an extensive validation program for a modern state of the art ultra supercritical steam turbine performed at an operating 1000 MW steam power plant in China. Several measuring points in addition to the standard operating measurements were installed at one of the high pressure turbines to record the temperature distribution, e.g. to verify the functionality of the internal cooling system, which is an advanced design feature of the installed modern high pressure steam turbines. Predicted 3D temperature distributions are compared to the actual measurements in order to verify and evaluate the design rules and the design philosophy applied. Conclusions are drawn regarding the performance of modern 3D design tools applied in the current design process and an outlook is given on the future potential of modern USC turbines.

Repowering and Retrofitting

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Pickard
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Free Market ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Project Planning ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Planning Stage ◽  
Reheat Steam ◽  
Plant Optimization

At the start of this new century, environmental regulations and free-market economics are becoming the key drivers for the electricity generating industry. Advances in Gas Turbine (GT) technology, allied with integration and refinement of Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HRSG) and Steam Turbine (ST) plant, have made Combined Cycle installations the most efficient of the new power station types. This potential can also be realized, to equal effect, by adding GT’s and HRSG’s to existing conventional steam power plants in a so-called ‘repowering’ process. This paper presents the economical and environmental considerations of retrofitting the steam turbine within repowering schemes. Changing the thermal cycle parameters of the plant, for example by deletion of the feed heating steambleeds or by modified live and reheat steam conditions to suit the combined cycle process, can result in off-design operation of the existing steam turbine. Retrofitting the steam turbine to match the combined cycle unit can significantly increase the overall cycle efficiency compared to repowering without the ST upgrade. The paper illustrates that repowering, including ST retrofitting, when considered as a whole at the project planning stage, has the potential for greater gain by allowing proper plant optimization. Much of the repowering in the past has been carried out without due regard to the benefits of re-matching the steam turbine. Retrospective ST upgrade of such cases can still give benefit to the plant owner, especially when it is realized that most repowering to date has retained an unmodified steam turbine (that first went into operation some decades before). The old equipment will have suffered deterioration due to aging and the steam path will be to an archaic design of poor efficiency. Retrofitting older generation plant with modern leading-edge steam-path technology has the potential for realizing those substantial advances made over the last 20 to 30 years. Some examples, given in the paper, of successfully retrofitted steam turbines applied in repowered plants will show, by specific solution, the optimization of the economics and benefit to the environment of the converted plant as a whole.

Modern Reaction HP/IP Turbine Technology Advances and Experiences

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hurd ◽  
Frank Truckenmueller ◽  
Norbert Thamm ◽  
Helmut Pollak ◽  
Matthias Neef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Advanced Materials ◽  
Operational Experience ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Opposed Flow ◽  
Coal Market

Modern steam turbines of the author’s company are based on advanced technology such as high efficiency seals, 3D blading, single inner cylinders, and advanced materials. These technologies result in a compact opposed-flow HP/IP combined cylinder design with high long-term efficiency, reliability, and availability. This paper will illustrate the features, benefits, and operational experience of large steam turbines with advanced technologies using an opposed-flow HP/IP cylinder. The paper will also address the relative performance of this type of steam turbine against its predecessors. Specific examples will be examined: 350 MW fossil units in the Asian market, a typical 250 MW combined cycle steam turbine in the American market, a 700 MW three-cylinder class design for conventional steam plants developed for the global coal market, and a 600 MW steam turbine upgrade.

Coordinated Control of Gas and Steam Turbines for Efficient Fast Start-Up of Combined Cycle Power Plants

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Yoshida ◽  
Kazunori Yamanaka ◽  
Atsushi Yamashita ◽  
Norihiro Iyanaga ◽  
Takuya Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Stress ◽  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Stresses ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Coordinated Control ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Start Up

In the fast start-up for combined cycle power plants (CCPP), the thermal stresses of the steam turbine rotor are generally controlled by the steam temperatures or flow rates by using gas turbines (GTs), steam turbines, and desuperheaters to avoid exceeding the thermal stress limits. However, this thermal stress sensitivity to steam temperatures and flow rates depends on the start-up sequence due to the relatively large time constants of the heat transfer response in the plant components. In this paper, a coordinated control method of gas turbines and steam turbine is proposed for thermal stress control, which takes into account the large time constants of the heat transfer response. The start-up processes are simulated in order to assess the effect of the coordinated control method. The simulation results of the plant start-ups after several different cool-down times show that the thermal stresses are stably controlled without exceeding the limits. In addition, the steam turbine start-up times are reduced by 22–28% compared with those of the cases where only steam turbine control is applied.

Repowering Considerations for Converting Existing Power Plants to Combined Cycle Power Plants

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anup Singh ◽  
Don Kopecky
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Entire System ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Good Shape ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
Cost Studies

Most of the recent combined cycle plants have been designed and constructed as Greenfield Plants. These new plants have been designed mostly as Merchant Plants, owned and operated by Independent Power Producers. There is about 260,000 MW of conventional coal-fired and gas-fired capacity in the USA that is more than 30 years old. About 30,000 MW of conventional gas-fired capacity exists in the area of The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) with relatively poor heat rates in comparison to modern combined cycle plants. These plants are good candidates for HRSG repowering. In addition, there are several coal-fired units in the 200 MW range with steam turbines in relatively good shape or in a condition that can be refurbished and used in repowering. The installed cost of repowered (also called Brownfield) capacity is about 20%–40% less than for comparable Greenfield capacity. There are also other advantages to repowering. Since the site is already existing, it is easier to get the various environmental and construction permits. The efficiency of the repowered units will be significantly higher than the existing units in their current status thus increasing the overall performance of the entire system. The paper will discuss various considerations required for repowering, including steam turbine refurbishment, demolition/relocation of existing equipment, recent cost studies, and various considerations for equipment such as HRSGs.

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Aerodynamic Excitation of a Model Low-Pressure Steam Turbine Stage Operating Under Low Volume Flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Megerle ◽  
Timothy Stephen Rice ◽  
Ivan McBean ◽  
Peter Ott
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Volume Flow ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Excitation Mechanism ◽  
Low Volume

The diversification of power generation methods within existing power networks has increased the requirement for operational flexibility of plants employing steam turbines. This has led to the situation where steam turbines may operate at very low volume flow conditions for extended periods of time. Under operating conditions where the volume flow through the last stage moving blades (LSMBs) of a low-pressure (LP) steam turbine falls below a certain limit, energy is returned to the working fluid rather than being extracted. This so-called “ventilation” phenomenon produces nonsynchronous aerodynamic excitation, which has the potential to lead to high dynamic blade loading. The aerodynamic excitation is often the result of a rotating phenomenon, with similarities to a rotating stall, which is well known in compressors. Detailed unsteady pressure measurements have been performed in a single stage model steam turbine operated with air under ventilation conditions. The analysis revealed that the rotating excitation mechanism observed in operating steam turbines is reproduced in the model turbine. A 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method has been applied to simulate the unsteady flow in the air model turbine. The numerical model consists of the single stage modeled as a full annulus, along with the axial-radial diffuser. An unsteady CFD analysis has been performed with sufficient rotor revolutions to obtain globally periodic flow. The simulation reproduces the main characteristics of the phenomenon observed in the tests. The detailed insight into the dynamic flow field reveals information on the nature of the excitation mechanism. The calculations further indicate that the LSMB tip clearance flow has little or no effect on the characteristics of the mechanism for the case studied.

Effect of Inlet Steam Temperature on the HP Section Efficiency of a Steam Turbine

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiping Fu ◽  
Thomas Winterberger
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Control Valve ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Steam Temperature ◽  
Load Range ◽  
Lp Turbine ◽  
The Relationship

Steam turbines for modern fossil and combined cycle power plants typically utilize a reheat cycle with High Pressure (HP), Intermediate Pressure (IP), and Low Pressure (LP) turbine sections. For an HP turbine section operating entirely in the superheat region, section efficiency can be calculated based on pressure and temperature measurements at the inlet and exhaust. For this case HP section efficiency is normally assumed to be a constant value over a load range if inlet control valve position and section pressure ratio remain constant. It has been observed that changes in inlet steam temperature impact HP section efficiency. K.C. Cotton stated that ‘the effect of throttle temperature on HP turbine efficiency is significant’ in his book ‘Evaluating and Improving Steam Turbine Performance’ (2nd Edition, 1998). The information and conclusions provided by K.C. Cotton are based on test results for large fossil units calculated with 1967 ASME steam tables. Since the time of Mr. Cotton’s observations, turbine configurations have evolved, more accurate 1997 ASME steam tables have been released, and our ability to quickly analyze large quantities of data has greatly increased. This paper studies the relationship between inlet steam temperature and HP section efficiency based on both 1967 and 1997 ASME steam tables and recent test data, which is analyzed computationally to reveal patterns and trends. With the efficiencies of various inlet pressure class HP section turbines being calculated with both 1967 and 1997 ASME steam tables, a comparison reveals different characteristics in the relationship between inlet steam temperature and HP section efficiency. Recommendations are made on how the results may be used to improve accuracy when testing and trending HP section performance.

Detached Eddy Simulation of Rotating Instabilities in a Low-Pressure Model Steam Turbine Operating Under Low Volume Flow Conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilgit Ercan ◽  
Damian M. Vogt
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Volume Flow ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Detached Eddy Simulation ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Flow Physics ◽  
Part Load ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Low Volume

Abstract Rotating instability (RI) in steam turbines is a phenomenon occurring during operation at very low volume flow conditions. Whereas RI is well-known in compressors, it is rather uncommon in turbines, where it is limited to the last stages of low-pressure steam turbines. The phenomenon has been studied numerically by means of viscous 3D CFD simulations employing mainly URANS equations. Given the possible difficulties to accurately predict heavily separated flows using such methods, this paper deals with the question whether the more sophisticated Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (iDDES) model is applicable in an industrial environment and whether it is capable of capturing the complex unsteady flow physics in a more realistic manner. For this purpose, the commercial CFD solver STAR-CCM+ is employed. A three-stage low-pressure model steam turbine featuring a non-axisymmetric inlet and an axial-radial diffuser is used as a test object. In order to capture the asymmetry, the model spans the full annulus and comprises the inlet section, all three stages, the diffuser as well as the exhaust hood. URANS and iDDES simulations have been performed at various low-volume flow part-load operating points and compared to test data. Unsteady pressure fluctuations at the casing as well as time-resolved probe traverse data have been used to validate the simulations. It is found that both models capture the overall flow physics well and that the iDDES model is superior at the most extreme part-load operating condition. In addition to the model accuracy and applicability of the CFD tool used, the paper discusses the challenges encountered during simulation setup as well as during initialization.

Mechanical Design of Highly Loaded Large Steam Turbines

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Lu¨ckemeyer ◽  
H. Almstedt ◽  
T.-U. Kern ◽  
H. Kirchner
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Mechanical Design ◽  
Ductile Failure ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Integral Approach ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Creep Fatigue

There are no internationally recognized standards, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code or European boiler and pipe codes, for the mechanical design of large steam turbine components in combined cycle power plants, steam power plants and nuclear power plants. One reason for this is that the mechanical design of steam turbines is very complex as the steam pressure is only one of many aspects which need to be taken into account. In more than one hundred years of steam turbine history the manufacturers have developed internal mechanical design philosophies based on both experience and research. As the design of steam turbines is pushed to its limits with greater lifetimes, efficiency improvements and higher operating flexibility requested by customers, the validity and accuracy of these design philosophies become more and more important. This paper describes an integral approach for the structural analysis of large steam turbines which combines external design codes, material tests, research on the material behavior in co-operation with universities and experience gained from the existing fleet to derive a substantiated design philosophy. The paper covers the main parameters that need to be taken into account such as pressure, rotational forces and thermal loads and displacements, and identifies the relevant failure mechanisms such as creep fatigue, ductile failure and creep fatigue crack growth. It describes the efforts taken to improve the accuracy for materials already used in power plants today and materials with possible future use such as advanced steels or nickel based alloys.

Development of Steam Turbines for State of the Art Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPP)

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Quinkertz ◽  
Simon Hecker
Keyword(s):  
Steam Turbine ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Plant Evolution ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Electricity Grid ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Intermediate Pressure

In order to reduce CO2 emissions, reduce capital costs and increase the percentage of renewable energy in the electricity grid, common drivers of fossil power plant evolution continue to be efficiency, increased electricity output and operating flexibility. For CCPP, the efficiency level has reached more than 60%. Besides new and updated gas turbine frames, an improved bottoming cycle also contributes to this achievement. Without increasing steam temperatures above 565°C, improving steam turbine inner efficiency and enhancing the cold end, the overall efficiency of >60% would not be feasible. Extensive thermodynamic optimization is required to determine steam temperatures and condenser pressures. In addition, from a design standpoint, an optimum product strategy has to be developed. In order to minimize risks with future designs, both the practical and theoretical experiences from both ultra super critical applications at coal-fired steam power plants as well as from the CCPP steam turbine fleet have to be incorporated. For advanced technologies and components appropriate validation programs have to be defined. This paper presents the approach being taking to develop steam turbines for CCPP with modern gas turbines and it also displays the operating results of the first unit. Operational validation included the thermal behaviour of the high and intermediate pressure parts, a new last stage blade for the low pressure turbine and a patented start-up procedure. In particular, the paper focuses on the validation of three dimensional CFD calculations of the high and intermediate pressure turbine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document