scholarly journals Scale-Resolving Simulations of Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades With Wall Roughness Using a Spectral-Element Method

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirban Garai ◽  
Laslo T. Diosady ◽  
Scott M. Murman ◽  
Nateri K. Madavan
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Computer Architecture ◽  
Spectral Element ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Wall Roughness ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Computational Capability

The accurate prediction of wall–roughness effects in turbomachinery is becoming critical as turbine designers address airfoil surface quality and degradation concerns arising from the shift to advanced ceramic matrix composite (CMC) or additively–manufactured airfoils operating in higher temperature environments. In this paper, a recently developed computational capability for accurate and efficient scale–resolving simulations of turbomachinery is extended to analyze the boundary–layer separation and transition characteristics in a rough–wall low–pressure turbine (LPT) cascade. The computational capability is based on an entropy–stable discontinuous–Galerkin spectral–element approach that extends to arbitrarily high orders of spatial and temporal accuracy, and is implemented in an efficient manner on a modern high–performance computer architecture. Results from the scale–resolving simulations of both smooth and rough airfoil cascades are presented and compared to previous experiments and numerical simulations. The results show that the suction–surface boundary layer undergoes laminar separation, transition, and turbulent reattachment for the smooth airfoil cascade, while in the presence of roughness the separation and transition behavior of the suction–surface boundary layer is substantially modified. The differences between the smooth and rough airfoil cascades are then highlighted by a detailed analysis of their respective turbulent flow fields.

Predicting the Profile Loss of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbines

2011 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Coull ◽  
Howard P. Hodson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Preliminary Design ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Blade Loading ◽  
Profile Loss

The overall efficiency of low pressure turbines is largely determined by the two-dimensional profile loss, which is dominated by the contribution of the suction surface boundary layer. This boundary layer typically features a laminar separation bubble and is subjected to an inherently unsteady disturbance environment. The complexity of the flow behavior makes it difficult to numerically predict the profile loss. To address this problem, an empirical method is proposed for predicting the boundary layer integral parameters at the suction surface trailing edge, allowing the profile loss to be estimated. Extensive measurements have been conducted on a flat plate simulation of the suction surface boundary layer. The disturbance environment of real machines was modeled using a moving bar wake generator and a turbulence grid. From this data set, empirically based methods have been formulated using physical principles for the prediction of the momentum thickness and shape factor at the suction surface trailing edge. The predictions of these methods may be used to estimate the profile loss of a given cascade, which achieves reasonable agreement with the available data. By parameterizing the shape of the suction surface velocity distribution, the method is recast as a preliminary design tool. Powerfully, this may be used to guide the selection of the key design parameters (such as the blade loading and velocity distribution shape) and enables a reasonable estimation of the unsteady profile loss to be made at a very early stage of design. To illustrate the capabilities of the preliminary design tool, different styles of velocity distribution are evaluated for fixed blade loading and flow angles. The predictions suggest that relatively “flat-top” designs will have the lowest profile loss but good performance can also be achieved with front-loaded “peaky” distributions. The latter designs are more likely to have acceptable incidence tolerance.

A Comparison of Three Low Pressure Turbine Designs

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian T. Wakelam ◽  
Martin Hoeger ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

As part of the current research, three low pressure turbine (LPT) geometries—which were designed with a common pitch, axial chord, inlet angle, and exit Mach number and to create the same nominal level of turning—are compared. Each of the LPT cascades was investigated under a range of Reynolds numbers, exit Mach numbers, and under the influence of a moving bar wake generator. Profile static pressure distributions, wake traverses at 5% and 40% axial chord downstream of the trailing edge, and suction side boundary layer traverses were used to compare the performance of the three designs. The total pressure losses are strongly dependent on both the maximum velocity location as well as the diffusion on the suction surface. The importance of the behavior of the pressure surface boundary layer turned out to be negligible in comparison. Cases with equivalent operating Reynolds number and suction side diffusion level are compared in terms of the total pressure losses that are generated. It is shown that a relationship between loss and suction side maximum velocity location exists. An optimum suction side maximum velocity location depends on the Reynolds number, diffusion factor, and wake passing frequency.

Low Pressure Turbine Relaminarization Bubble Characterization using Massively-Parallel Large Eddy Simulations

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shriram Jagannathan ◽  
Markus Schwänen ◽  
Andrew Duggleby
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reverse Flow ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Hairpin Vortices ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Large Eddy

The separation and reattachment of suction surface boundary layer in a low pressure turbine is characterized using large-eddy simulation at Ress = 69000 based on inlet velocity and suction surface length. Favorable comparisons are drawn with experiments using a high pass filtered Smagorinsky model for sub-grid scales. The onset of time mean separation is at s/so = 0.61 and reattachment at s/so = 0.81, extending over 20% of the suction surface. The boundary layer is convectively unstable with a maximum reverse flow velocity of about 13% of freestream. The breakdown to turbulence occurs over a very short distance of suction surface and is followed by reattachment. Turbulence near the bubble is further characterized using anisotropy invariant mapping and time orthogonal decomposition diagnostics. Particularly the vortex shedding and shear layer flapping phenomena are addressed. On the suction side, dominant hairpin structures near the transitional and turbulent flow regime are observed. The hairpin vortices are carried by the freestream even downstream of the trailing edge of the blade with a possibility of reaching the next stage. Longitudinal streaks that evolve from the breakdown of hairpin vortices formed near the leading edge are observed on the pressure surface.

Unsteady flow mechanism of the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct in low Reynolds number condition

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (9) ◽  
pp. 1507-1517
Author(s):  
Hongrui Liu ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Qiang Du ◽  
Guang Liu ◽  
Pei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Unsteady Flow ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds

Aggressive inter-turbine duct, which has ultra-high bypass ratio and ultra-short axial length, is widely applied in the modern turbofan engine because it can reduce engine weight and improve low-pressure rotor dynamic characteristics. However, the aggressive inter-turbine duct that has swirling flow, wake, shock, and tip clearance leakage flow of upstream high-pressure turbine, and even has structs in its flow channel, is liable to separate, especially in high-altitude low Reynolds number (Re) condition. In addition, its downstream low-pressure turbine is on the edge of separation too. In this paper, an integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct embedded with wide-chord low-pressure turbine nozzle is adopted to eliminate the aggressive inter-turbine duct's end-wall separation. Since there are many studies on suppressing the blade suction surface's separation by upstream wake, in this study inherent wake is utilized to suppress the boundary layer separation on low-pressure turbine nozzle's suction surface in the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct. The paper studies the unsteady flow mechanisms of the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct (especially the separation and transition mechanisms of low-pressure turbine nozzle's suction surface boundary layer) by the computatioinal simulation method.

Predicting the Profile Loss of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbines

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Coull ◽  
Howard P. Hodson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Preliminary Design ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Blade Loading ◽  
Profile Loss

The overall efficiency of Low Pressure (LP) turbines is largely determined by the two-dimensional profile loss, which is dominated by the contribution of the suction surface boundary layer. This boundary layer typically features a laminar separation bubble and is subjected to an inherently unsteady disturbance environment. The complexity of the flow behavior makes it difficult to numerically predict the profile loss. To address this problem, an empirical method is proposed for predicting the boundary layer integral parameters at the suction surface trailing edge, allowing the profile loss to be estimated. Extensive measurements have been conducted on a flat plate simulation of the suction surface boundary layer. The disturbance environment of real machines was modeled using a moving-bar wake generator and a turbulence grid. From this dataset, empirically based methods have been formulated using physical principles for the prediction of the momentum thickness and shape factor at the suction surface trailing edge. The predictions of these methods may be used to estimate the profile loss of a given cascade, which achieves reasonable agreement with the available data. By parameterizing the shape of the suction surface velocity distribution, the method is recast as a preliminary design tool. This may be used to guide the selection of the key design parameters (such as the blade loading and velocity distribution shape) and enables a reasonable estimation of the unsteady profile loss to be made at a very early stage of design. To illustrate the capabilities of the preliminary design tool, different styles of velocity distribution are evaluated for fixed blade loading and flow angles. The predictions suggest that relatively “flat-top” designs will have the lowest profile loss, but good performance can also be achieved with front-loaded “peaky” distributions. The latter designs are more likely to have acceptable incidence tolerance.

Boundary Layer Development in the BR710 and BR715 LP Turbines—The Implementation of High-Lift and Ultra-High-Lift Concepts

2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Howell ◽  
H. P. Hodson ◽  
V. Schulte ◽  
R. D. Stieger ◽  
Heinz-Peter Schiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Unsteady Boundary Layer ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Cold Flow ◽  
Layer Behavior ◽  
Lp Turbine

This paper describes a detailed study into the unsteady boundary layer behavior in two high-lift and one ultra-high-lift Rolls-Royce Deutschland LP turbines. The objectives of the paper are to show that high-lift and ultra-high-lift concepts have been successfully incorporated into the design of these new LP turbine profiles. Measurements from surface mounted hot film sensors were made in full size, cold flow test rigs at the altitude test facility at Stuttgart University. The LP turbine blade profiles are thought to be state of the art in terms of their lift and design philosophy. The two high-lift profiles represent slightly different styles of velocity distribution. The first high-lift profile comes from a two-stage LP turbine (the BR710 cold-flow, high-lift demonstrator rig). The second high-lift profile tested is from a three-stage machine (the BR715 LPT rig). The ultra-high-lift profile measurements come from a redesign of the BR715 LP turbine: this is designated the BR715UHL LP turbine. This ultra-high-lift profile represents a 12 percent reduction in blade numbers compared to the original BR715 turbine. The results from NGV2 on all of the turbines show “classical” unsteady boundary layer behavior. The measurements from NGV3 (of both the BR715 and BR715UHL turbines) are more complicated, but can still be broken down into classical regions of wake-induced transition, natural transition and calming. The wakes from both upstream rotors and NGVs interact in a complicated manner, affecting the suction surface boundary layer of NGV3. This has important implications for the prediction of the flows on blade rows in multistage environments.

Separation Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Synthetic Vortex Generator Jets

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Vortex Generator ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Local Skin ◽  
Free Stream Turbulence ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Vortex Generator Jets

Oscillating vortex generator jets have been used to control boundary layer separation from the suction side of a low-pressure turbine airfoil. A low Reynolds number (Re = 25,000) case with low free-stream turbulence has been investigated with detailed measurements including profiles of mean and fluctuating velocity and turbulent shear stress. Ensemble averaged profiles are computed for times within the jet pulsing cycle, and integral parameters and local skin friction coefficients are computed from these profiles. The jets are injected into the mainflow at a compound angle through a spanwise row of holes in the suction surface. Preliminary tests showed that the jets were effective over a wide range of frequencies and amplitudes. Detailed tests were conducted with a maximum blowing ratio of 4.7 and a dimensionless oscillation frequency of 0.65. The outward pulse from the jets in each oscillation cycle causes a disturbance to move down the airfoil surface. The leading and trailing edge celerities for the disturbance match those expected for a turbulent spot. The disturbance is followed by a calmed region. Following the calmed region, the boundary layer does separate, but the separation bubble remains very thin. Results are compared to an uncontrolled baseline case in which the boundary layer separated and did not reattach, and a case controlled passively with a rectangular bar on the suction surface. The comparison indicates that losses will be substantially lower with the jets than in the baseline or passively controlled cases.

Physical Explanations of Tip Leakage Flow Field in an Axial Compressor Rotor

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Inoue ◽  
Masato Furukawa ◽  
Kazuhisa Saiki ◽  
Kazutoyo Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Vortex Core ◽  
Leakage Flow ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Tip Leakage Vortex ◽  
Tip Leakage ◽  
Compressor Rotor ◽  
Vortex Lines

Structure of a tip leakage flow field in an axial compressor rotor has been investigated by detailed numerical simulations and appropriate post-processing. Physical explanations of the structure are made in terms of vortex-core identification, normalized helicity, vortex-lines, limiting streamlines, etc. The onset of the discrete tip leakage vortex is located on the suction surface at some distance from the leading edge. The vortex core with high vorticity is generated from a shear layer between the leakage jet flow and the main flow. The streamlines in the leakage flow are coiling around the vortex core. All the vortex-lines in the tip leakage vortex core link to ones in the suction surface boundary layer. The other vortex-lines in the suction surface boundary layer link to the vortex-lines in the pressure surface boundary layer and in the casing wall boundary layer. There are two mechanisms to reduce intensity of the tip leakage vortex: one is reduction of discharged vorticity caused by the linkage of vortex-lines between the suction surface and casing wall boundary layers, and another is diffusion of vorticity from the tip leakage vortex. Relative motion of the endwall has a substantial influence on the structure of the leakage flow field. In the case of a compressor rotor, it intensifies streamwise vorticity of the leakage vortex but reduces leakage flow loss.

Separated Flow Measurements on a Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Airfoil Surface ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

Boundary layer separation, transition and reattachment have been studied on a new, very high lift, low-pressure turbine airfoil. Experiments were done under low freestream turbulence conditions on a linear cascade in a low speed wind tunnel. Pressure surveys on the airfoil surface and downstream total pressure loss surveys were documented. Velocity profiles were acquired in the suction side boundary layer at several streamwise locations using hot-wire anemometry. Cases were considered at Reynolds numbers (based on the suction surface length and the nominal exit velocity from the cascade) ranging from 25,000 to 330,000. In all cases the boundary layer separated, but at high Reynolds number the separation bubble remained very thin and quickly reattached after transition to turbulence. In the low Reynolds number cases, the boundary layer separated and did not reattach, even when transition occurred. This behavior contrasts with previous research on other airfoils, in which transition, if it occurred, always induced reattachment, regardless of Reynolds number.

Loss reduction on ultra high lift low-pressure turbine blades using selective roughness and wake unsteadiness

2007 ◽  
Vol 111 (1118) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Howell ◽  
K. M. Roman
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Steady Flow ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Profile Losses ◽  
Lp Turbine

This paper describes how it is possible to reduce the profile losses on ultra high lift low pressure (LP) turbine blade profiles with the application of selected surface roughness and wake unsteadiness. Over the past several years, an understanding of wake interactions with the suction surface boundary layer on LP turbines has allowed the design of blades with ever increasing levels of lift. Under steady flow conditions, ultra high lift profiles would have large (and possibly open) separation bubbles present on the suction side which result from the very high diffusion levels. The separation bubble losses produced by it are reduced when unsteady wake flows are present. However, LP turbine blades have now reached a level of loading and diffusion where profile losses can no longer be controlled by wake unsteadiness alone. The ultra high lift profiles investigated here were created by attaching a flap to the trailing edge of another blade in a linear cascade — the so called flap-test technique. The experimental set-up used in this investigation allows for the simulation of upstream wakes by using a moving bar system. Hotwire and hotfilm measurements were used to obtain information about the boundary-layer state on the suction surface of the blade as it evolved in time. Measurements were taken at a Reynolds numbers ranging between 100,000 and 210,000. Two types of ultra high lift profile were investigated; ultra high lift and extended ultra high lift, where the latter has 25% greater back surface diffusion as well as a 12% increase in lift compared to the former. Results revealed that distributed roughness reduced the size of the separation bubble with steady flow. When wakes were present, the distributed roughness amplified disturbances in the boundary layer allowing for more rapid wake induced transition to take place, which tended to eliminate the separation bubble under the wake. The extended ultra high lift profile generated only slightly higher losses than the original ultra high lift profile, but more importantly it generated 12% greater lift.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document