Testing Safety and Performance Indicators in an Assessment of the Long-Term Performance of the Geological Disposal of Spent Fuel in Boom Clay

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Sillen ◽  
Jan Marivoet ◽  
Wim Cool ◽  
Peter de Preter
Keyword(s):  
Dose Rate ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Individual ◽  
High Level ◽  
Clay Formation

The classical numerical output, or indicator, from assessments of the long-term safety of geological disposal systems for high-level radioactive waste is the individual effective dose rate. This indicator is an estimate of the possible individual health detriment and it is commonly compared to regulatory limits for assessing the safety of other nuclear activities as well, such as medical and industrial activities. As a safety indicator, the individual dose rate provides an estimate of the overall safety of the disposal system. However, because of the time frames involved in safety assessments of geological disposal systems, the need arises of complementary safety indicators that could be less affected by uncertainties like those associated with future human behaviour or the effects of climate change on the biosphere and the aquifers. Such alternative safety indicators can be, for example, radionuclide concentrations in the groundwater or fluxes to the biosphere due to a repository. Safety indicators only tell how globally safe a disposal system is. For confidence building, performance indicators can be used in addition to tell how the system works. In particular, performance indicators such as fluxes, activities or activity concentrations of selected radionuclides can show how the different components of the system fulfil their safety functions and contribute to the overall safety. The SPIN project of the European Commission assessed the usefulness of seven safety indicators and fourteen performance indicators by testing them in four actual assessments of disposal systems in granite formations. In this paper, indicators calculated from an assessment of the disposal of spent fuel in the poorly indurated Boom Clay formation are presented. Conclusions from the SPIN project that hold for repositories in clays are highlighted, as well as results that illustrate differences between the granite and clay disposal options. Finally, various performance and safety indicators are combined into a logical sequence to comprehensively present, and explain, the results of a safety assessment.

Safety Assessment of Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste in Boom Clay: Relation With the Radionuclide Inventory

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Van Iseghem ◽  
Jan Marivoet
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
High Level Waste ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
High Level Radioactive Waste ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
High Level ◽  
Clay Formation ◽  
Parameter Values

This paper discusses the impact of the parameter values used for the transport of radionuclides from high-level radioactive waste to the far-field on the long-term safety of a proposed geological disposal in the Boom Clay formation in Belgium. The methodology of the Safety Assessment is explained, and the results of the Safety Assessment for vitrified high-level waste and spent fuel are presented. The radionuclides having the strongest impact on the dose-to-man for both HLW glass and spent fuel are 79Se, 129I, 126Sn, 36Cl, and 99Tc. Some of them are volatile during the vitrification process, other radionuclides are activation products, and for many of them there is no accurate information on their inventory in the waste form. The hypotheses in the selection of the main parameter values are further discussed, together with the status of the R&D on one of the main dose contributing radionuclides (79Se).

Methodology in Corrosion Testing of Container Materials for Radioactive Waste Disposal in a Geological Clay Repository

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Kursten ◽  
Frank Druyts ◽  
Pierre Van Iseghem
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Corrosion Behaviour ◽  
Open Circuit ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Engineered Barriers ◽  
High Level ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic

Abstract The current worldwide trend for the final disposal of conditioned high-level, medium-level and long-lived alpha-bearing radioactive waste focuses on deep geological disposal. During the geological disposal, the isolation between the radioactive waste and the environment (biosphere) is realised by the multibarrier principle, which is based on the complementary nature of the various natural and engineered barriers. One of the main engineered barriers is the metallic container (overpack) that encloses the conditioned waste. In Belgium, the Boom Clay sediment is being studied as a potential host rock formation for the final disposal of conditioned high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent fuel. Since the mid 1980’s, SCK•CEN has developed an extensive research programme aimed at evaluating the suitability of a wide variety of metallic materials as candidate overpack material for the disposal of HLW. A multiple experimental approach is applied consisting of i) in situ corrosion experiments, ii) electrochemical experiments (cyclic potentiodynamic polarisation measurements and monitoring the evolution of ECORR as a function of time), and iii) immersion experiments. The in situ corrosion experiments were performed in the underground research facility, the High Activity Disposal Experimental Site, or HADES, located in the Boom clay layer at a depth of 225 metres below ground level. These experiments aimed at predicting the long-term corrosion behaviour of various candidate container materials. It was believed that this could be realised by investigating the medium-term interactions between the container materials and the host formation. These experiments resulted in a change of reasoning at the national authorities concerning the choice of over-pack material from the corrosion-allowance material carbon steel towards corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless steels. The main arguments being the severe pitting corrosion during the aerobic period and the large amount of hydrogen gas generated during the subsequent anaerobic period. The in situ corrosion experiments however, did not allow to unequivocally quantify the corrosion of the various investigated candidate overpack materials. The main shortcoming was that they did not allow to experimentally separate the aerobic and anaerobic phase. This resulted in the elaboration of a new laboratory programme. Electrochemical corrosion experiments were designed to investigate the effect of a wide variety of parameters on the localised corrosion behaviour of candidate overpack materials: temperature, SO42−, Cl−, S2O32−, oxygen content (aerobic - anaerobic),… Three characteristic potentials can be derived from the cyclic potentiodynamic polarisation (CPP) curves: i) the open circuit potential, OCP, ii) the critical potential for pit nucleation, ENP, and iii) the protection potential, EPP. Monitoring the open circuit potential as a function of time in clay slurries, representative for the underground environment, provides us with a more reliable value for the corrosion potential, ECORR, under disposal conditions. The long-term corrosion behaviour of the candidate overpack materials can be established by comparing the value of ECORR relative to ENP and EPP (determined from the CPP-curves). The immersion tests were developed to complement the in situ experiments. These experiments aimed at determining the corrosion rate and to identify the corrosion processes that can occur during the aerobic and anaerobic period of the geological disposal. Also, some experiments were elaborated to study the effect of graphite on the corrosion behaviour of the candidate overpack materials.

The Implementing Geological Disposal Technology Platform: Key Challenges in Research and Development in Radioactive Waste Management

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Delay ◽  
Jiri Slovak ◽  
Raymond Kowe
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Waste Management ◽  
Added Value ◽  
High Level Waste ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Technology Platform ◽  
Joint Activities ◽  
The Individual ◽  
High Level

The Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform (IGD-TP) was launched in November 2009 to tackle the remaining research, development and demonstration (RD&D) challenges with a view to fostering the implementation of geological disposal programmes for high-level and long-lived waste in Europe. The IGD-TP’s Vision is that “by 2025, the first geological disposal facilities for spent fuel, high-level waste and other long-lived radioactive waste will be operating safely in Europe”. Aside from most of European waste management organisations, the IGD-TP now has 110 members covering most of the RD&D actors in the field of implementing geological disposal of radioactive waste in Europe. The IGD-TP Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), that defines shared RD&D priorities with an important cooperative added value, is used as a basis for the Euratom programme. It provides a vehicle to emphasise RD&D and networking activities that are important for establishing safety cases and fostering disposal implementation. As the IGD-TP brings together the national organisations which have a mandate to implement geological disposal and act as science providers, its SRA also ensures a balance between fundamental science, implementation-driven RD&D and technological demonstration. The SRA is in turn supported by a Deployment Plan (DP) for the Joint Activities to be carried out by the Technology Platform with its members and participants. The Joint Activities were derived from the individual SRA Topics and prioritized and assigned a timeline for their implementation. The deployment scheme of the activities is updated on a yearly basis.

Static dissolution tests of α-doped UO2 under repository relevant conditions: Influence of Boom Clay and α-activity on fuel dissolution rates

2006 ◽  
Vol 932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Salah ◽  
Christelle Cachoir ◽  
Karel Lemmens ◽  
Norbert Maes
Keyword(s):  
Clay Fraction ◽  
Dissolution Kinetics ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Dissolution Rates ◽  
Retention Capacity ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Dissolution Tests ◽  
Clay Formation ◽  
Α Activity

ABSTRACTSince reprocessing is no longer the reference policy in Belgium, studies on the direct disposal of spent fuel in a clay formation have gained increased interest in the last years. In order to determine to what extent the clay properties and the α-activity influence the dissolution kinetics of spent fuel for the long term disposal, static dissolution tests have been performed on 5 different types of α-doped UO2, representing a PWR fuel with a burn-up of 45 or 55 GWd · tHM−1 and fuel ages ranging between 150 and 90,000 years, in different Boom Clay (BC) media at room temperature and in an anoxic atmosphere for 90 to 720 days. The uranium activity in the clay fraction over time was found to be much higher than the U-activity in the leachates, which has been mainly ascribed to the high retention capacity of the BC. The average dissolution rate between 0 and 90 days obtained for the 5 types of α-doped UO2 were all found to be high and quite similar at ~263 µg · m−2 · d−1and a “longer-term” rate (181 to 720 days) ranging between zero and 15 µg · m−2· d−1. These results suggest that the activity of the fuels does not seem to have an effect on the UO2 dissolution rates under the considered test conditions. In order to study the partition/redistribution of U during UO2dissolution, sequential extraction experiments were performed. Results of the latter have provided a better mechanistic understanding of BC/spent fuel interaction processes as well as information on the role of the different minerals controlling the U-retention/immobilization.

The Second Safety Assessment and Feasibility Interim Report (SAFIR 2 Report) on HLW Disposal in Boom Clay: Overview of the Belgian Programme

2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gens ◽  
Philippe Lalieux ◽  
Peter De Preter ◽  
Ann Dierckx ◽  
Johan Bel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Technical Feasibility ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
Clay Formation ◽  
Main Barrier

ABSTRACTONDRAF/NIRAS – the Belgian radioactive waste management agency – has published in 2001 the SAFIR 2 report on request of the authorities. The SAFIR 2 report is to be considered as a state-of-the art report and not as a complete safety case. This report gives an overview of the Belgian R&D program related to the geological disposal of HLW and ILW for the period 1990–2000 in the Boom Clay (reference host rock). The three main outcomes of the SAFIR 2 report on which this paper will be more specifically focusing, are the following (including results reported after 2000): long-term safety functions, confirmation of the role of the Boom Clay formation as the main barrier and identification of practical difficulties with respect to technical feasibility (repository design).

Functional Requirements and Performance Assessment: Application to the Case of Spent Fuel Disposal in Clay

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Marivoet ◽  
Xavier Sillen ◽  
Peter De Preter
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Diffusion ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Functional Requirements ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Safety Function ◽  
Clay Formation

Abstract Geological repository systems for the disposal of radioactive waste are based on a multi-barrier design. Individual barriers contribute in different ways to the overall long-term performance of the repository system, and furthermore, the contribution of each barrier can considerably change with time. In a systematic analysis of the functional requirements for achieving long-term safety a number of basic safety functions can be defined: physical confinement, retardation / slow release, dispersion / dilution and limited accessibility. In the case of the geological disposal of spent fuel in a clay formation a series of barriers are designed or chosen to contribute to the realisation of the basic safety functions. The physical confinement is realised by the watertight, high-integrity container, which prevents contact between groundwater and the confined radionuclides. In first instance the retardation / slow release function is realised by the slow dissolution of the waste matrix and by the limited solubility of many elements in the near field. However, the natural clay barrier provides the main contribution to this safety function. The migration of radionuclides through the Boom Clay is mainly due to molecular diffusion, which is an extremely slow process. Furthermore, many elements are strongly sorbed by the clay minerals what makes their migration even much slower. The dispersion / dilution function mainly occurs in the aquifer and the rivers draining the aquifer in the surroundings of the disposal system. Various performance indicators are used to quantify the contributions of each safety function and to explain the functioning of the repository system.

Performance Assessment of Geological Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste in a Plastic Clay formation

2002 ◽  
Vol 713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Marivoet ◽  
Xavier Sillen ◽  
Dirk Mallants ◽  
Peter De Preter
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Performance Assessments ◽  
High Level Waste ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Scenario Development ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Site Characterisation ◽  
High Level ◽  
Clay Formation ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTIn Belgium the possibilities to dispose of high-level waste in the plastic Boom Clay formation has been studied since 1975. Consequently many results of the site characterisation programme are already available. Various performance assessments have been carried out dealing with the disposal of high-level waste arising from reprocessing and with direct disposal of spent fuel. The performance assessment consists of two main steps: scenario development and consequence analyses. The scenario analysis is based on a catalogue of features, events and processes (FEPs) having the potential to influence the behaviour of the repository system. Two main groups of scenarios are distinguished. The normal evolution scenario, including a number of variants, treats the FEPs that are fairly sure to take place. Altered evolution scenarios focus on FEPs having a probability of occurrence lower than one but that might influence the performance of the repository system. For the impact analyses, a robust concept approach was introduced, which focused the analyses on a limited number of well-characterised barriers and processes. The impact analyses are complemented with sensitivity and uncertainty analyses based on deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

Spent fuel dissolution in Belgian Supercontainer conditions: source term and compatibility

2012 ◽  
Vol 1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lemmens ◽  
Th. Mennecart ◽  
C. Cachoir
Keyword(s):  
Host Rock ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Surface Areas ◽  
Diffusion Controlled ◽  
Radiological Safety ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Radionuclide Release

ABSTRACTIn the frame of the Safety and Feasibility Case 1 development, the Belgian agency for radioactive waste (ONDRAF/NIRAS) has to demonstrate that the geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel in the Boom Clay host rock following the Supercontainer design provides sufficient radiological safety in the long term. This safety relies on the containment of the radionuclides by the overpack, the limitation of radionuclide release from the waste matrix, the diffusion controlled transport of the radionuclides, and their low solubility and sorption on the Boom Clay host rock. This paper presents an evaluation of the main processes considered for the limitation of radionuclide release by the Spent Fuel in Supercontainer conditions, characterized by the presence of a concrete buffer and hyperalkaline pore water. We present a description of the main expected processes with their potential impact on the fuel alteration mechanisms, and potential reference fuel matrix alteration rates and effective fuel surface areas for use in safety and performance assessment models.

Static dissolution tests of α-doped UO2 under repository relevant conditions: Influence of Boom Clay and α-activity on fuel dissolution rates

2006 ◽  
Vol 932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Salah ◽  
Christelle Cachoir ◽  
Karel Lemmens ◽  
Norbert Maes
Keyword(s):  
Clay Fraction ◽  
Dissolution Kinetics ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Dissolution Rates ◽  
Retention Capacity ◽  
Boom Clay ◽  
Dissolution Tests ◽  
Clay Formation ◽  
Α Activity

ABSTRACTSince reprocessing is no longer the reference policy in Belgium, studies on the direct disposal of spent fuel in a clay formation have gained increased interest in the last years. In order to determine to what extent the clay properties and the α-activity influence the dissolution kinetics of spent fuel for the long term disposal, static dissolution tests have been performed on 5 different types of α-doped UO2, representing a PWR fuel with a burn-up of 45 or 55 GWd · tHM−1 and fuel ages ranging between 150 and 90,000 years, in different Boom Clay (BC) media at room temperature and in an anoxic atmosphere for 90 to 720 days. The uranium activity in the clay fraction over time was found to be much higher than the U-activity in the leachates, which has been mainly ascribed to the high retention capacity of the BC. The average dissolution rate between 0 and 90 days obtained for the 5 types of α-doped UO2 were all found to be high and quite similar at ∼263 µg · m−2· d−1and a “longer-term” rate (181 to 720 days) ranging between zero and 15 µg · m−2· d−1. These results suggest that the activity of the fuels does not seem to have an effect on the UO2 dissolution rates under the considered test conditions. In order to study the partition/redistribution of U during UO2dissolution, sequential extraction experiments were performed. Results of the latter have provided a better mechanistic understanding of BC/spent fuel interaction processes as well as information on the role of the different minerals controlling the U-retention/immobilization.

Specific outcomes of the research on the spent fuel long-term evolution in interim dry storage and deep geological disposal

2006 ◽  
Vol 352 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ferry ◽  
C. Poinssot ◽  
C. Cappelaere ◽  
L. Desgranges ◽  
C. Jegou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Evolution ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Dry Storage ◽  
Term Evolution ◽  
Deep Geological Disposal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document