Extending Replacement Intervals of Elastomeric Components by Evaluating Samples Removed From Service

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenifer T. Marchesi ◽  
William J. McBrine ◽  
Vincent Roy
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Polymeric Materials ◽  
Life Cycle Management ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Power Cable ◽  
Original Material ◽  
Maintenance Schedule

Elastomers play an essential role in pressure vessels as seals, hoses, gaskets, diaphragms, liners and other critical components [1]. Some polymeric materials used for non-pressure applications such as electric power cable insulation have received much attention with respect to the effects of aging and life management, but many critical elastomeric pressure vessel components such as seals have not. Performance of these seals depends upon the effects of both time- and event-dependent aging. Understanding and addressing aging and degradation are fundamental to effective preventative maintenance and life-cycle management programs. Proper management of elastomers is necessary for performance requirements and for cost containment. In one of the case studies presented synthetic seals in engines were quite costly to change on the suggested OEM maintenance schedule where replacement intervals were based on assumed operating conditions applicable to other industries. When the actual service for these engines is as emergency diesel generators (EDGs, e.g., in nuclear power plants) the use is primarily in stand-by mode, and the usage is far different than that of the manufacturer’s target application. In this investigation the assessment of pressure seal performance was based on situation-specific operation and environmental parameters. This resulted in much longer replacement intervals. In another case study alternate materials were identified which are expected to improve performance over the original material.

Extending Replacement Intervals of Elastomeric Components by Evaluating Samples Removed From Service

2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenifer T. Marchesi ◽  
William J. McBrine ◽  
Vincent Roy
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Polymeric Materials ◽  
Life Cycle Management ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Power Cable ◽  
Original Material ◽  
Maintenance Schedule

Elastomers play an essential role in pressure vessels as seals, hoses, gaskets, diaphragms, liners, and other critical components. Polymeric materials used for nonpressure applications such as electric power cable insulation have received more attention, with respect to the effects of aging and life management, than critical elastomeric pressure vessel components such as seals. Performance of these seals depends upon the effects of both time- and event-dependent aging. Understanding and addressing aging and degradation are fundamental to effective preventative maintenance and life cycle management programs. Proper management of elastomers is necessary for performance requirements and for cost containment. In one of the case studies presented, synthetic seals in engines were quite costly to change on the suggested OEM (original equipment manufacturer) maintenance schedule, where replacement intervals were based on assumed operating conditions applicable to other industries. When the actual service for these engines is as emergency diesel generators (EDGs, e.g., in nuclear power plants), the use is primarily in stand-by mode, and the usage is far different than that of the manufacturer's target application. In this investigation, the assessment of pressure seal performance was based on situation-specific operation and environmental parameters. This resulted in much longer replacement intervals. In another case study, alternate materials were identified that are expected to improve performance over the original material.

Uncertainties in Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Calculations

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Simonen
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Flaw Detection ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Statistical Distributions ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Crack Growth Rates ◽  
Failure Probabilities

This paper addresses uncertainties in probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) calculations for pressure boundary components at commercial nuclear power plants. Such calculations can predict the probability that a component will have failed after a specified period of operation, but with large uncertainties that are difficult to quantify. PFM models only approximate details of as-built components as well as actual operating conditions over the lifetime of the component. Statistical distributions used as inputs to the calculations are subject to uncertainties, which also results in large uncertainties in calculated failure probabilities. This paper describes from the author’s perspective various uncertainties that are associated with PFM calculations. Efforts to quantify PFM uncertainties are described along with their impacts on calculated failure probabilities. Many uncertainties are explicitly addressed by statistical distributions for input parameters to the PFM models (e.g. crack growth rates, material strengths, probabilities of flaw detection, etc.). Other calculations have gone further by estimating uncertainties in the parameters of these statistical distributions along with uncertainties in parameters treated as deterministic inputs to the PFM models. Examples from the author’s experience with uncertainty analyses for pressure vessels and piping components are described.

Design, Analysis and System-Level Modelling of a Single Axis Capacitive Accelerometer

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakriya Mohammed ◽  
Owais Talaat Waheed ◽  
Ibrahim (Abe) M. Elfadel ◽  
Aveek Chatterjee ◽  
Mahmoud Rasras
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Noise Analysis ◽  
Linear Displacement ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
System Level ◽  
Complete Analysis ◽  
Capacitive Accelerometer ◽  
Static Capacitance ◽  
Cross Axis

The paper demonstrates the design and complete analysis of 1-axis MEMS capacitive accelerometer. The design is optimized for high linearity, high sensitivity, and low cross-axis sensitivity. The noise analysis is done to assure satisfactory performance under operating conditions. This includes the mechanical noise of accelerometer, noise due to interface electronics and noise caused by radiation. The latter noise will arise when such accelerometer is deployed in radioactive (e.g., nuclear power plants) or space environments. The static capacitance is calculated to be 4.58 pF/side. A linear displacement sensitivity of 0.012μm/g (g = 9.8m/s2) is observed in the range of ±15g. The differential capacitive sensitivity of the device is 90fF/g. Furthermore, a low cross-axis sensitivity of 0.024fF/g is computed. The effect of radiation is mathematically modelled and possibility of using these devices in radioactive environment is explored. The simulated noise floor of the device with electronic circuit is 0.165mg/Hz1/2.

scholarly journals Importance of Advanced Planning of Manufacturing for Nuclear Industry

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
Nick Shykinov ◽  
Robert Rulko ◽  
Dariusz Mroz
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Project Schedule ◽  
Nuclear Facilities ◽  
Project Completion ◽  
Advanced Planning ◽  
And Performance

Abstract In the context of energy demands by growing economies, climate changes, fossil fuel pricing volatility, and improved safety and performance of nuclear power plants, many countries express interest in expanding or acquiring nuclear power capacity. In the light of the increased interest in expanding nuclear power the supply chain for nuclear power projects has received more attention in recent years. The importance of the advanced planning of procurement and manufacturing of components of nuclear facilities is critical for these projects. Many of these components are often referred to as long-lead items. They may be equipment, products and systems that are identified to have a delivery time long enough to affect directly the overall timing of a project. In order to avoid negatively affecting the project schedule, these items may need to be sourced out or manufactured years before the beginning of the project. For nuclear facilities, long-lead items include physical components such as large pressure vessels, instrumentation and controls. They may also mean programs and management systems important to the safety of the facility. Authorized nuclear operator training, site evaluation programs, and procurement are some of the examples. The nuclear power industry must often meet very demanding construction and commissioning timelines, and proper advanced planning of the long-lead items helps manage risks to project completion time. For nuclear components there are regulatory and licensing considerations that need to be considered. A national nuclear regulator must be involved early to ensure the components will meet the national legal regulatory requirements. This paper will discuss timing considerations to address the regulatory compliance of nuclear long-lead items.

Thermal Design Options Using Uranium Carbide and Uranium Dicarbide in SCWR Uniformly-Heated Fuel Channel

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyland J. Allison ◽  
Lisa Grande ◽  
Sally Mikhael ◽  
Adrianexy Rodriguez Prado ◽  
Bryan Villamere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Thermal Design ◽  
Nuclear Fuels ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Bulk Fluid ◽  
Fuel Channel ◽  
Uranium Carbide

SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) options are one of the six reactor options identified in Generation IV International Forum (GIF). In these reactors the light-water coolant is pressurized to supercritical pressures (up to approximately 25 MPa). This allows the coolant to remain as a single-phase fluid even under supercritical temperatures (up to approximately 625°C). SCW Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) are of such great interest, because their operating conditions allow for a significant increase in thermal efficiency when compared to that of modern conventional water-cooled NPPs. Direct-cycle SCW NPPs do not require the use of steam generators, steam dryers, etc. allowing for a simplified NPP design. This paper shows that new nuclear fuels such as Uranium Carbide (UC) and Uranium Dicarbide (UC2) are viable option for the SCWRs. It is believed they have great potential due to their higher thermal conductivity and corresponding to that lower fuel centerline temperature compared to those of conventional nuclear fuels such as uranium dioxide, thoria and MOX. Two conditions that must be met are: 1) keep the fuel centreline temperature below 1850°C (industry accepted limit), and 2) keep the sheath temperature below 850°C (design limit). These conditions ensure that SCWRs will operate efficiently and safely. It has been determined that Inconel-600 is a viable option for a sheath material. A generic SCWR fuel channel was considered with a 43-element bundle. Therefore, bulk-fluid, sheath and fuel centreline and HTC profiles were calculated along the heated length of a fuel channel.

Alternative RTNDT for Linde 80 Weld Materials

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Yoon ◽  
J. B. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Curve Method

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides fracture toughness curves of ferritic pressure vessel steels that are indexed by a reference temperature for nil ductility transition (RTNDT). The ASME Code also prescribes how to determine RTNDT. The B&W Owners Group has reactor pressure vessels that were fabricated by Babcock & Wilcox using Linde 80 flux. These vessels have welds called Linde 80 welds. The RTNDT values of the Linde 80 welds are of great interest to the B&W Owners Group. These RTNDT values are used in compliance of the NRC regulations regarding the PTS screening criteria and plant pressure-temperature limits for operation of nuclear power plants. A generic RTNDT value for the Linde 80 welds as a group was established by the NRC, using an average of more than 70 RTNDT values. Emergence of the Master Curve method enabled the industry to revisit the validity issue surrounding RTNDT determination methods. T0 indicates that the dropweight test based TNDT is a better index than Charpy transition temperature based index, at least for the RTNDT of unirradiated Linde 80 welds. An alternative generic RTNDT is presented in this paper using the T0 data obtained by fracture toughness tests in the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range, in accordance with the ASTM E1921 standard.

Lifetime Management of EDF PWR Pressure Vessels and Pipings

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Hedin ◽  
J. C. Legendre
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Destructive Testing ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Cast Stainless Steel ◽  
Non Destructive

Lifetime management of EDF PWR vessels and pipings are one of the main technical key points of safety and competitivness. This paper describes the EDF global approach in this field, which is applied to the nuclear fleet i.e 58 nuclear power plants, and particularly to the first 34 three loops, as far as lifetime is concerned: • operating procedures and routine maintenance, special maintenance and ten years safety reassessment, • engineering analysis, based on feed back experience, scientific knowledge, degradations mechanisms, causes and consequences management, • operating loadings decrease, • complementary deterministic and cost-benefit analysis, • fit for service justifications, • anticipation strategy to prepare future, based on Non Destructive Testing investigations, ability to repair and/or to replace components, in situ expertises, ... Some examples are given: lifetime management of reactor vessels heads and bottom penetrations of pressure vessels, fit for service of cast stainless steel primary pipings, primary nozzles and auxiliary pipings special maintenance.

Environmental Fatigue Test of CF8M With a Small Autoclave Simulating PWR Conditions

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il-Seok Jeong ◽  
Gag-Hyeon Ha ◽  
Tae-Ryoung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Cyclic Strain ◽  
Fatigue Tests ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Measuring Instruments ◽  
Pressurized Water Reactor ◽  
Pressurized Water

To develop a fatigue design curve of cast stainless steel CF8M used in primary piping material of nuclear power plants, low-cycle fatigue tests have been conducted by Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI). A small autoclave simulated the environment of a pressurized water reactor (PWR), 15 MPa and 315 °C. Fatigue life was measured in terms of the number of cycles with the variation of strain amplitudes at 0.04%/s strain rate. A small autoclave of 1 liter and cylindrical solid fatigue specimens were used for the strain-controlled low cycle environmental fatigue tests to make the experiments convenient. However, it was difficult to install displacement measuring instruments at the target length of the specimens inside the autoclave. To mitigate the difficulty displacement data measured at the shoulders of the specimen were calibrated based on the data relation of the target and shoulder length of the specimen during hot air test conditions. KEPRI developed a test procedure to perform low cycle environmental fatigue tests in the small autoclave. The procedure corrects the cyclic strain hardening effect by performing additional tests in high temperature air condition. KEPRI verified that the corrected test result agreed well with that of finite element method analysis. The process of correcting environmental fatigue data would be useful for producing reliable fatigue curves using a small autoclave simulating the operating conditions of a PWR.

Background on Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System Setpoints for Pressure-Temperature Curves

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey C. Poehler ◽  
Gary L. Stevens ◽  
Anees A. Udyawar ◽  
Amy Freed
Keyword(s):  
Low Temperature ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Pressurized Water Reactors ◽  
Documentation System ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
System Pressure ◽  
Water Reactors

Abstract ASME Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix G (ASME-G) provides a methodology for determining pressure and temperature (P-T) limits to prevent non-ductile failure of nuclear reactor pressure vessels (RPVs). Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) refers to systems in nuclear power plants that are designed to prevent inadvertent challenges to the established P-T limits due to operational events such as unexpected mass or temperature additions to the reactor coolant system (RCS). These systems were generally added to commercial nuclear power plants in the 1970s and 1980s to address regulatory concerns related to LTOP events. LTOP systems typically limit the allowable system pressure to below a certain value during plant operation below the LTOP system enabling temperature. Major overpressurization of the RCS, if combined with a critical size crack, could result in a brittle failure of the RPV. Failure of the RPV could make it impossible to provide adequate coolant to the reactor core and result in a major core damage or core melt accident. This issue affected the design and operation of all pressurized water reactors (PWRs). This paper provides a description of an investigation and technical evaluation regarding LTOP setpoints that was performed to review the basis of ASME-G, Paragraph G-2215, “Allowable Pressure,” which includes provisions to address pressure and temperature limitations in the development of P-T curves that incorporate LTOP limits. First, high-level summaries of the LTOP issue and its resolution are provided. LTOP was a significant issue for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) starting in the 1970s, and there are many reports available within the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) documentation system for this topic, including Information Notices, Generic Letters, and NUREGs. Second, a particular aspect of LTOP as related to ASME-G requirements for LTOP is discussed. Lastly, a basis is provided to update Appendix G-2215 to state that LTOP setpoints are based on isothermal (steady-state) conditions. This paper was developed as part of a larger effort to document the technical bases behind ASME-G.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document