Validation of the Proposed R6 Method for Assessing Non-Sharp Defects

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Horn ◽  
Sergio Cicero ◽  
Adam Bannister ◽  
Peter J. Budden
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Fatigue Cracks ◽  
Mechanical Damage ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Lack Of Fusion ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sharp Crack

Structural integrity assessment codes such as R6 [1] and BS7910 [2] provide guidance on the assessment of flaws that are assumed to be infinitely sharp using the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). In many cases, such as fatigue cracks, this assumption is appropriate, however it can be pessimistic for flaws that do not have sharp tips such as lack of fusion, porosity or mechanical damage. Several Notch Failure Assessment Diagram (NFAD) methods have been proposed in the literature to quantify the additional margins that may be present for non-sharp defects compared to the margins that would be calculated if the defect were assumed to be a sharp crack. This paper presents the second stage of validation work, using 3D Finite Element (FE) Analyses and a wide range of test data on non-sharp defects, to validate an NFAD method proposed for inclusion in R6 and to quantify the errors caused by various approximations in the method.

Development of Guidance for the Assessment of Non-Sharp Defects Using the Notch Failure Assessment Diagram

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Horn ◽  
Sergio Cicero ◽  
Adam Bannister ◽  
Peter J. Budden
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Fatigue Cracks ◽  
Mechanical Damage ◽  
Fe Analysis ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sharp Crack ◽  
Safety Assessments

Structural integrity assessment codes such as R6 [1] and BS7910 [2] provide guidance on the assessment of flaws that are assumed to be infinitely sharp using the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). In many cases, such as fatigue cracks, this assumption is appropriate, however it can be pessimistic for flaws that do not have sharp tips such as lack of fusion, porosity or mechanical damage. Several Notch Failure Assessment Diagram (NFAD) methods have been proposed in the literature to quantify the additional margins that may be present for non-sharp defects compared to the margins that would be calculated if the defect were assumed to be a sharp crack. This paper presents the first stage of on-going work to validate an NFAD method and to develop guidance for its application in safety assessments. The work uses 3D Finite Element (FE) Analysis in conjunction with a wide range of test data on non-sharp defects as a basis for validation. The paper also develops some practical guidance on the treatment of Lüders strain in the FE analysis of specimens containing notches instead of fatigue pre-cracks.

Limits of Applicability of the Notch Failure Assessment Diagram

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Horn ◽  
Chris Aird
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Notch Root ◽  
Fatigue Cracks ◽  
Mechanical Damage ◽  
Root Radius ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Notch Root Radius ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sharp Crack

Structural integrity assessment codes such as R6 [1] and BS7910 [2] provide guidance on the assessment of flaws that are assumed to be infinitely sharp using the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD). In many cases, such as fatigue cracks, this assumption is appropriate, however it can be pessimistic for flaws that do not have sharp tips such as those associated with lack of fusion, porosity or mechanical damage. Several Notch Failure Assessment Diagram (NFAD) methods have been proposed in the literature to quantify the additional margins that may be present for non-sharp defects compared to the margins that would be calculated if the defect were assumed to be a sharp crack. This paper uses mechanistic modelling to define the limits of applicability of the NFAD approach in terms of ρ/a, where ρ is the notch root radius and a is the notch depth. The work concludes that the NFAD can be used to assess notches with ρ/a values of up to unity.

Integrity Assessment of Subsea Pipeline Dent / Buckle Using ILI Data

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurumurthy Kagita ◽  
Gudimella G. S. Achary ◽  
Mahesh B. Addala ◽  
Balaji Srinivasan ◽  
Penchala S. K. Pottem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Mechanical Damage ◽  
Metal Loss ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Subsea Pipeline ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Finite Element Software

Abstract Mechanical damage in subsea pipelines in the form of local dents / buckles due to excessive bending deformation may severely threaten their structural integrity. A dent / buckle has two significant effects on the pipeline integrity. Notably, residual stresses are set up as result of the plastic deformation and stress concentrations are created due to change in pipe geometry caused by the denting / buckling process. To assess the criticality of a dent / buckle, which often can be associated with strain induced flaws in the highly deformed metal, integrity assessment is required. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the severity of dent / buckle in a 48” subsea pipeline and to make the rerate, repair or replacement decision. This paper presents a Level 3 integrity assessment of a subsea pipeline dent / buckle with metal loss, reported in in-line inspection (ILI), in accordance with Fitness-For-Service Standard API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. In this paper, the deformation process that caused the damage (i.e. dent / buckle) with metal loss is numerically simulated using ILI data in order to determine the magnitude of permanent plastic strain developed and to evaluate the protection against potential failure modes. For numerical simulation, elastic-plastic finite element analyses (FEA) are performed considering the material as well as geometric non-linearity using general purpose finite element software ABAQUS/CAE 2017. Based on the numerical simulation results, the integrity assessment of dented / buckled subsea pipeline segment with metal loss has been performed to assess the fitness-for-service at the operating loads.

Allowable Axial Flaw Sizes for Stainless Steel Pipes Derived From Limit Load Criteria and Failure Assessment Diagram Procedure

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Katsumasa Miyazaki ◽  
Gery M. Wilkowski ◽  
Douglas A. Scarth
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Limit Load ◽  
High Fracture Toughness ◽  
High Fracture ◽  
Steel Pipes ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Axial Part ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Asme Code

Piping containing flaws that exceed the Acceptance Standards of Section XI of the ASME Code is evaluated using analytical procedures described in Section XI to determine plant operability for the evaluated time period. Subarticle IWB-3640 of Section XI provides allowable axial and circumferential part-through-wall flaws determined from limit load criteria. ASME Section XI Code Case N-494-3 also provides evaluation procedures based on use of a failure assessment diagram to determine allowable flaw sizes. To understand the allowable flaw sizes determined by the limit load criteria and the failure assessment diagram procedure, anstenitic stainless steel pipes with axial part-through-wall flaws with a wide range of pipe diameters were analyzed. The allowable flaw depth based on limit load from Code Case N-494-3 was determined to be very close to that determined from IWB-3640 of Section XI, when the predicted failure mode is elastic-plastic fracture. It was found that the allowable flaw depths derived from the failure assessment diagram procedure of Code Case N-494-3, are lower, but are not significantly different, from those determined from the limit load criteria of IWB-3640. This is due to the relatively high fracture toughness that was used for the austenitic stainless steel.

Structural Integrity Assessment of Notched Components

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Cicero ◽  
Virginia Madrazo ◽  
Isidro Carrascal ◽  
Miguel Laporta
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Notch Effect ◽  
Single Edge ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Notched Components ◽  
Notch Analysis

This paper analyzes the notch effect and presents a methodology, based on failure assessment diagrams and the notch analysis approaches based on the theory of critical distances, for the structural integrity assessment of notched components, which allows more accurate structural analyses to be made. The methodology is applied to a set of tests performed on PMMA single edge notched bending (senb) specimens, providing better results than those obtained when the analysis is performed considering that notches behave as cracks.

On the Constraint-Based Failure Assessment of Surface Cracks in T-Plate Welded Joints

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
R. Bell ◽  
S. B. Lambert
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Welded Joints ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Constraint Effect ◽  
Engineering Structures ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Failure Predictions ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint

The loss of crack tip constraint leads to enhanced resistance to both cleavage and ductile tearing. However, conventional failure assessment schemes (CEGB-R6, BS-7910) use lower bound toughness obtained from highly constrained test specimens. Cracks in many real engineering structures are not highly constrained, which makes failure predictions using conventional failure assessment schemes based on lower bound fracture toughness values overly pessimistic. Excessive pessimism in the structural assessment can lead to unwarranted repair or decommissioning of structures, and thus cause unneeded cost and inconvenience. Recent developments on constraint-based fracture mechanics have enabled the practical assessment of defective components including the constraint effect. For example, the recent revision of R6 and the newly developed structural integrity assessment procedures for European industry (SINTAP) have suggested a framework for failure assessments including the constraint effect. In this paper, the constraint-based failure assessment of surface cracked T-plate welded joints under tension load is presented. Different issues including the constraint-based failure assessment diagrams, the treatment of combining primary and the secondary loads, and the calculation of stress intensity factors, limit loads and constraint parameters for surface cracked T-plate joints are discussed. It is demonstrated that when the lower constraint effect is properly accounted for, the maximum allowable tensile stress level increases substantially.

Failure Prediction of Curved Wide Plates Using the Strain-Based Failure Assessment Diagram With Correction for Constraint and Notch Radius

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Horn ◽  
Mikhail Trull ◽  
Stijn Hertelé
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Experimental Approach ◽  
Fatigue Cracks ◽  
Failure Prediction ◽  
Plastic Strains ◽  
Notch Radius ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Low Constraint ◽  
High Plastic

The strain-based failure assessment diagram (SB-FAD) has been developed for predicting failure from flaws in components subjected to high plastic strains. In this paper, a combined numerical and experimental approach is used to apply the SB-FAD to predict failure from a series of API 5L grades X80 and X100 curved wide plate (CWP) specimens with shallow notches machined into the pipe girth weld. For the CWP specimens tested in this work, the SB-FAD in its unmodified form resulted in over-conservative predictions of failure. This is attributed to the SB-FAD assuming high constraint conditions and the presence of a sharp fatigue crack, whereas the CWP specimens tested in this work were low constraint and contained a shallow machined notch without fatigue cracks. A modification of the SB-FAD is then proposed to account for nonsharp defects loaded to high plastic strains under conditions of low constraint. The resulting predictions of the modified SB-FAD show significantly reduced conservatism compared to the unmodified SB-FAD.

Validation of a Finite Element Toolbox for Studying Flaw Interaction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry E. Coules
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Linear Elastic ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Parametric Studies ◽  
Elastic Crack

Abstract Structural integrity assessment often requires the interaction of multiple closely-spaced cracks or flaws in a structure to be considered. Although many procedures for structural integrity assessment include rules for determining the significance of flaw interaction, and for re-characterising interacting flaws, these rules can be difficult to validate in a fracture mechanics framework. int_defects is an open-source MATLAB toolbox which uses the Abaqus finite element suite to perform large-scale parametric studies in cracked-body analysis. It is designed to allow developers of assessment codes to check the accuracy of simplified interaction criteria under a wide range of conditions, e.g. for different interacting flaw geometries, material models and loading cases. int_defects can help analysts perform parametric studies to determine linear elastic crack tip stress field parameters, elastic-plastic parameters and plastic limit loads for simple three-dimensional cracked bodies relevant to assessment codes. This article focusses on the validation of int_defects using existing fracture mechanics results. Through a set of validation examples, int_defects is shown to produce accurate results for a very wide range of cases in both linear and non-linear cracked-body analysis. Nevertheless, it is emphasised that users of this software should be conscious of the inherent limitations of LEFM and EPFM theory when applied to real fracture processes, and effects such as constraint loss should be considered when formulating interaction criteria.

Instrumented Indentation Technique to Measure Flow Properties: A Novel Way to Enhance the Accuracy of Integrity Assessment

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Il Jang ◽  
Yeol Choi ◽  
Yun-Hee Lee ◽  
Jung-Suk Lee ◽  
Dongil Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Crack Detection ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Instrumented Indentation ◽  
Flow Properties ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Indentation Technique ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Similar Vein ◽  
Non Destructive

While most in-field technologies for structural integrity diagnosis focus on precise crack detection, the instrumented indentation technique has emerged as one of the most practically useful technologies for non-destructive and quantitative in-field measurement of mechanical properties. In a similar vein, here an advanced indentation technique for determining tensile properties and its application to structural integrity assessment are introduced and discussed. This novel indentation technique can enhance the accuracy of fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment by application to failure assessment diagram (FAD) construction.

Structural Integrity Assessment of Notched Components Using the Master Curve Methodology and Failure Assessment Diagrams

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiberio Garcia ◽  
Sergio Cicero ◽  
Virginia Madrazo
Keyword(s):  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Apparent Fracture Toughness ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Crack Type ◽  
Fracture Tests ◽  
Cracked Specimens ◽  
Notched Components

This paper proposes a methodology for the structural integrity assessment of notched components. It combines failure assessment diagrams and a notch analysis approach based on the application of the Master Curve methodology for the prediction of the apparent fracture toughness of ferritic-pearlitic steels in notched conditions. This approach considers a new parameter named the notch reference temperature (T0N), which is different from the reference temperature (T0) obtained in cracked specimens and varies with the notch radius. With this purpose, the methodology has been applied to a set of fracture tests on steel S275JR, with notch radii ranging from 0 mm (crack-type defects) up to 2.0 mm and testing temperatures from −120°C up to 40°C. The methodology improves significantly the results obtained under the assumption that notches behave as cracks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document