System and Solenoid Valve Interaction Leading to Spurious Opening

Author(s):  
Alton Reich

In a pressurized water reactor the high pressure system vent lines from the pressurizer and reactor are routed to a common header that can be emptied to the refueling water storage tank or a drain tank. During plant testing the valves are operated in the following sequence: the pressurizer isolation valve is opened to pressurize the common header, the pressurizer isolation valve is closed, then the drain tank isolation valve is opened. This sequence of valve operation verifies that the valves open and close properly — opening the pressurizer isolation valve allows steam to enter the common header and is verified by pressure indication via a pressure transducer, and opening the drain tank isolation valve decreases the pressure in the common header and verifies that the pressurizer isolation valve closed properly. During this sequence of valve actuation, the other solenoid valves in the system are subject to transient steam pressures. During one test sequence an isolation valve to the refueling water storage tank indicated that it was not closed for a period of several seconds. Since there is only one pressure transducer in the common header, a systemlevel analysis was performed to obtain a more detailed understanding of the transient pressures in the common header, and how that might affect solenoid valve performance.

2020 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 107029
Author(s):  
Pin Wu ◽  
Zhichao Wang ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Zhaowei Xu ◽  
Yingxia Yang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Manga ◽  
Timothy G. Ngobi ◽  
Lawrence Okeny ◽  
Pamela Acheng ◽  
Hidaya Namakula ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Household water storage remains a necessity in many communities worldwide, especially in the developing countries. Water storage often using tanks/vessels is envisaged to be a source of water contamination, along with related user practices. Several studies have investigated this phenomenon, albeit in isolation. This study aimed at developing a systematic review, focusing on the impacts of water storage tank/vessel features and user practices on water quality. Methods Database searches for relevant peer-reviewed papers and grey literature were done. A systematic criterion was set for the selection of publications and after scrutinizing 1106 records, 24 were selected. These were further subjected to a quality appraisal, and data was extracted from them to complete the review. Results and discussion Microbiological and physicochemical parameters were the basis for measuring water quality in storage tanks or vessels. Water storage tank/vessel material and retention time had the highest effect on stored water quality along with age, colour, design, and location. Water storage tank/vessel cleaning and hygiene practices like tank/vessel covering were the user practices most investigated by researchers in the literature reviewed and they were seen to have an impact on stored water quality. Conclusions There is evidence in the literature that storage tanks/vessels, and user practices affect water quality. Little is known about the optimal tank/vessel cleaning frequency to ensure safe drinking water quality. More research is required to conclusively determine the best matrix of tank/vessel features and user practices to ensure good water quality.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 4741
Author(s):  
María Gasque ◽  
Federico Ibáñez ◽  
Pablo González-Altozano

This paper demonstrates that it is possible to characterize the water temperature profile and its temporal trend in a hot water storage tank during the thermal charge process, using a minimum number of thermocouples (TC), with minor differences compared to experimental data. Four experimental tests (two types of inlet and two water flow rates) were conducted in a 950 L capacity tank. For each experimental test (with 12 TC), four models were developed using a decreasing number of TC (7, 4, 3 and 2, respectively). The results of the estimation of water temperature obtained with each of the four models were compared with those of a fifth model performed with 12 TC. All models were tested for constant inlet temperature. Very acceptable results were achieved (RMSE between 0.2065 °C and 0.8706 °C in models with 3 TC). The models were also useful to estimate the water temperature profile and the evolution of thermocline thickness even with only 3 TC (RMSE between 0.00247 °C and 0.00292 °C). A comparison with a CFD model was carried out to complete the study with very small differences between both approaches when applied to the estimation of the instantaneous temperature profile. The proposed methodology has proven to be very effective in estimating several of the temperature-based indices commonly employed to evaluate thermal stratification in water storage tanks, with only two or three experimental temperature data measurements. It can also be used as a complementary tool to other techniques such as the validation of numerical simulations or in cases where only a few experimental temperature values are available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document