Cross-Cultural Validation of the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuzhong Li ◽  
Peter Harmer ◽  
Likang Chi ◽  
Naruepon Vongjaturapat
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Ego Orientation ◽  
Metric Invariant ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Mean Differences

It is becoming increasingly important to determine whether structural models of measures of sport and activity behavior developed in North America are invarant across different populations. This study assessed (a) the cross-cultural validity of the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) using male college students across the United States (n = 309), Thailand (n = 312), and Taiwan (n = 307); and (b) the factorial equivalence and structured latent mean differences of the TEOSQ in these samples. Using a confirmatory factor analytic procedure, the initial test of the hypothesized two-factor structure representing task and ego orientation yielded a good fit for each sample. The factor structure was further shown to be metric invariant across the three countries. Furthermore, tests of latent means showed significant differences between groups. The United States sample exhibited the highest levels of task and ego orientation, followed by the Taiwan and Thailand samples, respectively.

Cross–cultural Validity of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire Among Adults Across Five Countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 088626052096667
Author(s):  
Bojana M. Dinić ◽  
Adrian Raine ◽  
Aleksandar Vujić ◽  
Josanne D. M. van Dongen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Proactive Aggression ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Marginal Model ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Aggression Questionnaire

This study aims to test psychometric properties and factor invariance of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) for adults across five countries: Serbia ( N = 409), Mauritius ( N = 400), the United States ( N = 389), the Netherlands ( N = 372), and China ( N = 325). The results supported the two–factor structure across country samples, with a marginal model fit in Mauritius. Results also supported the congruent factor structure of Reactive Aggression scale across countries, while the Proactive Aggression scale can be considered as equal across samples from Serbia, the United States, and China, but not from Mauritius and the Netherland. Among items from the Proactive Aggression scale, those referring to open aggression aimed at obtaining social status and dominance, frightening or harming others, obtained the highest loadings across all samples and could be considered as the good representatives of adult proactive aggression. This is the first study in which cross-cultural validation of the RPQ among adults has been tested and results suggested that there are some cultural differences in expression of proactive aggression.

Career Calling in India and the United States

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey L. Autin ◽  
Blake A. Allan ◽  
Meenakshi Palaniappan ◽  
Ryan D. Duffy
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Career Calling

The present study examined the cross-cultural validity of instruments used to assess the experience of searching for, having, and living out a calling. Using a sample of 336 Americans and 327 Indians, we used structural equation modeling to assess measurement invariance of three common scales used to measure calling: the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ), the Brief Calling Scale, and the Living Calling Scale. Results showed partial measurement equivalence for the presence scale of the CVQ, indicating that it may be a valid measurement of within-group differences among Indian participants. Analyses on remaining scales showed borderline support for equivalence of factor structure and failed to demonstrate validity of cross-cultural comparisons. Implications for researchers and clinical practitioners are discussed.

Measurement Invariance of the Ruminative Responses Scale Across Gender

Assessment ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Whisman ◽  
Regina Miranda ◽  
David M. Fresco ◽  
Richard G. Heimberg ◽  
Elizabeth L. Jeglic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Covariance Structure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Latent Mean Differences ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Brooding And Reflection ◽  
Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Although women demonstrate higher levels of rumination than men, it is unknown whether instruments used to measure rumination have the same psychometric properties for women and men. To examine this question, we evaluated measurement invariance of the brooding and reflection subscales from the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) by gender, using data from four samples of undergraduates from three universities within the United States ( N = 4,205). A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis revealed evidence for configural, metric, and scalar invariance of the covariance structure of the 10-item version of the RRS. There were statistically significant latent mean differences between women and men, with women scoring significantly higher than men on both brooding and reflection. These findings suggest that the 10-item version of the RRS provides an assessment of rumination that is psychometrically equivalent across gender. Consequently, gender differences in brooding and reflection likely reflect valid differences between women and men.

Cross-Cultural Validity of the Ruminative Responses Scale in Argentina and the United States

Assessment ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernán G. Arana ◽  
Kenneth G. Rice
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Response Scale ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Cultural Implications ◽  
Group Self ◽  
Brooding And Reflection ◽  
The U.S

Although frequently used in the United States, the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) has not been extensively studied in cross-cultural samples. The present study evaluated the factor structure of Treynor et al.’s 10-item version of the RRS in samples from Argentina ( N = 308) and the United States ( N = 371). In addition to testing measurement invariance between the countries, we evaluated whether the maladaptive implications of rumination were weaker for the Argentinians than for the U.S. group. Self-critical perfectionism was the criterion in those tests. Partial scalar invariance supported an 8-item version of the RRS. There were no differences in factor means or factor correlations in RRS dimensions between countries. Brooding and Reflection were positively correlated with self-critical perfectionism in both countries, with no significant differences in the sizes of these relations between the two samples. Results are discussed in terms of psychometric and cross-cultural implications for rumination.

scholarly journals Internet Motives of Users in Jordan, UAE and KSA: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Web Motivation Inventory (WMI)

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Salim Khraim
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Arab Countries ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cultural Validation ◽  
The Web

<p>The aim of this study is to replicate the Web Motivation Inventory (WMI) in new context. To date, the scale has only been tested on consumers in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and South Korea. This research replicates the WMI using consumers from three Arab countries namely Jordan, UAE, and KSA. Results show that the same four-factor structure has been produced for the three countries, providing evidence of the scales cross cultural stability. Additional results show that there were differences in the four motives; research, communicate, surf, and shop in the three countries.</p>

Cross-Cultural Investigation of a New Set of Scales for the Suicide Opinion Questionnaire

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Domino ◽  
Sulin Su ◽  
Di Shen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Factor Analytic ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Content Scales ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Mean Differences

There are a number of alternate ways to score the Suicide Opinion Questionnaire (SOQ). Two methods were compared in this study, a set of eight scales developed by content analysis, and a set of five scales developed by factor analysis; two samples, one from the United States ( N=218), and one from Taiwan ( N=291) were assessed. On all SOQ scales, significant mean differences were obtained between U.S. and Taiwanese samples. The patterns of intercorrelations suggest that despite their factor analytic genesis, several of the SOQ-F scales correlate significantly with each other as well as with the SOQ-C scales. The results support the cross-cultural applicability and reliability of the SOQ, and suggest that although the SOQ-F scales may represent interesting variables, they are not superior psychometrically to the original content scales.

scholarly journals Development, Construct Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Parasocial Relationship With Political Figures (PSR-P) Scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moh Abdul Hakim ◽  
James H. Liu
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Emotional Bonding ◽  
Parasocial Relationship

Abstract. Parasocial theory views ordinary people’s emotional bonding with political figures as a form of parasocial relationship (PSR). Despite the insights it offers, existing measures of PSR have been criticized conceptually and psychometrically. We developed a new scale of PSR with political figures (PSR-P) and examined the construct validity, factor replicability, and measurement invariance based on samples from culturally and politically diverse countries (i.e., Indonesia, New Zealand, and the United States). In three studies using a panel of experts ( N = 20; Study 1), a convenience adult sample ( N = 212; Study 2), and representative and cross-cultural samples ( N = 897; Study 3), we found that the four-item PSR-R scale provides satisfying construct validity, as well as a replicable factor structure and scalar invariance across countries. The PSR-P scale can be utilized to advance the measurement and application of parasocial theory in the field of social and political psychology. The policy implications of the findings are also discussed.

scholarly journals Measurement Invariance Analysis on the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale in a U.S. and Japanese College Sample

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-394
Author(s):  
Saki C. Nakai ◽  
Regan A. R. Gurung
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Behavioral Activation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Behavioral Inhibition System ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Configural Invariance

In the present study, we tested the factor structure of the 20-item Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale (RCBS; Cheek & Melichor, 1985) in a U.S. sample and used measurement invariance analysis to explore its cross-cultural validity in a previously collected Japanese sample (Sato et al., 2018). We additionally measured related personality traits (Big Five; Locus of Control, LOC; and Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System, BIS/BAS) to examine whether each predicted shyness. Participants were undergraduate students in the United States (N = 525) and Japan (N = 508). Exploratory factor analysis (n = 261) revealed a unidimensional structure for shyness to be the best fit. Measurement invariance analysis (n = 256 for United States) showed that the RCBS did not establish configural invariance, the weakest level in measurement invariance, suggesting that it may not be a cross-culturally valid and reliable tool to assess shyness. We thus did not perform any cross-cultural comparisons of variables, as initially intended. Results from a hierarchical multiple regression in the U.S. sample foundextraversion to negatively predict shyness, β = −.59, p < .001, and neuroticism, β = .18, p < .001, LOC (external), β = .14, p < .001, and BIS, β = .19, p < .001, to positively predict shyness. Gender was not a significant predictor, β = .09, p = .075. Future work may focus on the development of a Japanese shyness measure independent from U.S. conceptualizations to improve the cross-cultural validity and reliability of shyness measures.

A Cross-Cultural Examination of Fears of Death among Saudi Arabians

1986 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis D. Long
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Death And Dying ◽  
Saudi Arabian ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Fear Of Death ◽  
Saudi Arabian Students ◽  
Saudi Arabians

This article examines the factor structure of an eight-dimensional fear of death scale (Hoelter's multidimensional fear of death scale), which was translated into Arabic and administered to a sample of Saudi Arabian students temporarily living in the United States. The factor structure obtained in the present study only partially supports the factor structure first obtained by Hoelter (1979) for a United States sample, which was later replicated by Walkey (1982) for a New Zealand sample. The usefulness of Hoelter's eight fears of death and dying subscales in relation to Arabic populations is discussed.

Self-disclosure in same-sex friendship dyads from Australia, Japan, and the United States

1997 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 31-47
Author(s):  
Don Munro ◽  
Christine Riney
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
One Dimension ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Self Disclosure ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Males And Females

AbstractA total of 202 unmarried males and females from the United States, Japan and Australia were recruited through personal contacts and completed two copies of the Jourard (1958) Self Disclosure Questionnaire, one for a same-sex friend of the same nationality as themselves and one for an equally close friend in one of the other two countries. Psychometric and factor analyses indicated that the scale was acceptably internally consistent but possibly measures more than one dimension of self-disclosure. Sex differences in favour of higher disclosure by females was taken as indicative of cross-cultural validity. There were highly significant differences between countries in scores for both own-country and other-country friends, and a general bias towards disclosing more to own-country friends. However, Japanese respondents disclosed more to other-country friends, particularly Americans. While Australians showed little bias, there was a strong tendency to disclose less to them, particularly by Americans. These results are interpreted in terms of cultural values and communication norms. Further psychometric and substantive investigations of self-disclosure across cultures are suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document