scholarly journals PLK1 regulates the PrimPol damage tolerance pathway during the cell cycle

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (49) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Bailey ◽  
Rebecca Teague ◽  
Peter Kolesar ◽  
Lewis J. Bainbridge ◽  
Howard D. Lindsay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 2779-2788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brietta L. Pike ◽  
Suganya Yongkiettrakul ◽  
Ming-Daw Tsai ◽  
Jörg Heierhorst

ABSTRACT The Rad53 kinase plays a central role in yeast DNA damage checkpoints. Rad53 contains two FHA phosphothreonine-binding domains that are required for Rad53 activation and possibly downstream signaling. Here we show that the N-terminal Rad53 FHA1 domain interacts with the RNA recognition motif, coiled-coil, and SQ/TQ cluster domain-containing protein Mdt1 (YBl051C). The interaction of Rad53 and Mdt1 depends on the structural integrity of the FHA1 phosphothreonine-binding site as well as threonine-305 of Mdt1. Mdt1 is constitutively threonine phosphorylated and hyperphosphorylated in response to DNA damage in vivo. DNA damage-dependent Mdt1 hyperphosphorylation depends on the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases, and Mec1 can directly phosphorylate a recombinant Mdt1 SQ/TQ domain fragment. MDT1 overexpression is synthetically lethal with a rad53 deletion, whereas mdt1 deletion partially suppresses the DNA damage hypersensitivity of checkpoint-compromised strains and generally improves DNA damage tolerance. In the absence of DNA damage, mdt1 deletion leads to delayed anaphase completion, with an elongated cell morphology reminiscent of that of G2/M cell cycle mutants. mdt1-dependent and DNA damage-dependent cell cycle delays are not additive, suggesting that they act in the same pathway. The data indicate that Mdt1 is involved in normal G2/M cell cycle progression and is a novel target of checkpoint-dependent cell cycle arrest pathways.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Fasullo

Budding yeast has been a model organism for understanding how DNA damage is repaired and how cells minimize genetic instability caused by arresting or delaying the cell cycle at well-defined checkpoints. However, many DNA damage insults are tolerated by mechanisms that can both be error-prone and error-free. The mechanisms that tolerate DNA damage and promote cell division are less well-understood. This review summarizes current information known about the checkpoint response to agents that elicit both the G2/M checkpoint and the intra-S phase checkpoint and how cells adapt to unrepaired DNA damage. Tolerance to particular bulky DNA adducts and radiomimetic agents are discussed, as well as possible mechanisms that may control phosphatases that deactivate phosphorylated proteins.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Herskind ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Xiaolei Liu ◽  
Yingying Zhang ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 800-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devyani Haldar ◽  
Rohinton T. Kamakaka

ABSTRACT The packaging of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin is likely to be crucial for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Histone acetylation and deacetylation, which alter chromatin accessibility, have been implicated in DNA damage tolerance. Here we show that Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hst4, a homolog of histone deacetylase Sir2, participates in S-phase-specific DNA damage tolerance. Hst4 was essential for the survival of cells exposed to the genotoxic agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) as well as for cells lacking components of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. It was required for the deacetylation of histone H3 core domain residue lysine 56, since a strain with a point mutation of its catalytic domain was unable to deacetylate this residue in vivo. Hst4 regulated the acetylation of H3 K56 and was itself cell cycle regulated. We also show that MMS treatment resulted in increased acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 in wild-type cells and hst4Δ mutants had constitutively elevated levels of histone H3 K56 acetylation. Interestingly, the level of expression of Hst4 decreased upon MMS treatment, suggesting that the cell regulates access to the site of DNA damage by changing the level of this protein. Furthermore, we find that the phenotypes of both K56Q and K56R mutants of histone H3 were similar to those of hst4Δ mutants, suggesting that proper regulation of histone acetylation is important for DNA integrity. We propose that Hst4 is a deacetylase involved in the restoration of chromatin structure following the S phase of cell cycle and DNA damage response.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison K. Thurston ◽  
Catherine A. Radebaugh ◽  
Adam R. Almeida ◽  
Juan Lucas Argueso ◽  
Laurie A. Stargell

AbstractCells expend a large amount of energy to maintain their DNA sequence. DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoint activation, proofreading polymerases, and chromatin structure are ways in which the cell minimizes changes to the genome. During replication, the DNA damage tolerance pathway allows the replication forks to bypass damage on the template strand. This avoids prolonged replication fork stalling, which can contribute to genome instability. The DNA damage tolerance pathway includes two sub-pathways: translesion synthesis and template switch. Post-translational modification of PCNA and the histone tails, cell cycle phase, and local DNA structure have all been shown to influence sub-pathway choice. Chromatin architecture contributes to maintaining genome stability by providing physical protection of the DNA and by regulating DNA processing pathways. As such, chromatin-binding factors have been implicated in maintaining genome stability. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we examined the role of Spn1, a chromatin binding and transcription elongation factor, in DNA damage tolerance. Expression of a mutant allele of SPN1 results in increased resistance to the DNA damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, lower spontaneous and damage-induced mutation rates, along with increased chronological lifespan. We attribute these effects to an increased usage of the template switch branch of the DNA damage tolerance pathway in the spn1 strain. This provides evidence for a role of wild type Spn1 in promoting genome instability, as well as having ties to overcoming replication stress and contributing to chronological aging.


mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Glover ◽  
Catarina A. Marques ◽  
Olga Suska ◽  
David Horn

ABSTRACT Damaged DNA typically imposes stringent controls on eukaryotic cell cycle progression, ensuring faithful transmission of genetic material. Some DNA breaks, and the resulting rearrangements, are advantageous, however. For example, antigenic variation in the parasitic African trypanosome, Trypanosoma brucei, relies upon homologous recombination-based rearrangements of telomeric variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) genes, triggered by breaks. Surprisingly, trypanosomes with a severed telomere continued to grow while progressively losing subtelomeric DNA, suggesting a nominal telomeric DNA damage checkpoint response. Here, we monitor the single-stranded DNA-binding protein replication protein A (RPA) in response to induced, locus-specific DNA breaks in T. brucei. RPA foci accumulated at nucleolar sites following a break within ribosomal DNA and at extranucleolar sites following a break elsewhere, including adjacent to transcribed or silent telomeric VSG genes. As in other eukaryotes, RPA foci were formed in S phase and γH2A and RAD51 damage foci were disassembled prior to mitosis. Unlike in other eukaryotes, however, and regardless of the damaged locus, RPA foci persisted through the cell cycle, and these cells continued to replicate their DNA. We conclude that a DNA break, regardless of the damaged locus, fails to trigger a stringent cell cycle checkpoint in T. brucei. This DNA damage tolerance may facilitate the generation of virulence-enhancing genetic diversity, within subtelomeric domains in particular. Stringent checkpoints may be similarly lacking in some other eukaryotic cells. IMPORTANCE Chromosome damage must be repaired to prevent the proliferation of defective cells. Alternatively, cells with damage must be eliminated. This is true of human and several other cell types but may not be the case for single-celled parasites, such as trypanosomes. African trypanosomes, which cause lethal diseases in both humans and livestock, can actually exploit chromosomal damage to activate new surface coat proteins and to evade host immune responses, for example. We monitored responses to single chromosomal breaks in trypanosomes using a DNA-binding protein that, in response to DNA damage, forms nuclear foci visible using a microscope. Surprisingly, and unlike what is seen in mammalian cells, these foci persist while cells continue to divide. We also demonstrate chromosome replication even when one chromosome is broken. These results reveal a remarkable degree of damage tolerance in trypanosomes, which may suit the lifestyle of a single-celled parasite, potentially facilitating adaptation and enhancing virulence.


Author(s):  
Tai-Te Chao ◽  
John Sullivan ◽  
Awtar Krishan

Maytansine, a novel ansa macrolide (1), has potent anti-tumor and antimitotic activity (2, 3). It blocks cell cycle traverse in mitosis with resultant accumulation of metaphase cells (4). Inhibition of brain tubulin polymerization in vitro by maytansine has also been reported (3). The C-mitotic effect of this drug is similar to that of the well known Vinca- alkaloids, vinblastine and vincristine. This study was carried out to examine the effects of maytansine on the cell cycle traverse and the fine struc- I ture of human lymphoblasts.Log-phase cultures of CCRF-CEM human lymphoblasts were exposed to maytansine concentrations from 10-6 M to 10-10 M for 18 hrs. Aliquots of cells were removed for cell cycle analysis by flow microfluorometry (FMF) (5) and also processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). FMF analysis of cells treated with 10-8 M maytansine showed a reduction in the number of G1 cells and a corresponding build-up of cells with G2/M DNA content.


Author(s):  
Irwin I. Singer

Our previous results indicate that two types of fibronectin-cytoskeletal associations may be formed at the fibroblast surface: dorsal matrixbinding fibronexuses generated in high serum (5% FBS) cultures, and ventral substrate-adhering units formed in low serum (0.3% FBS) cultures. The substrate-adhering fibronexus consists of at least vinculin (VN) and actin in its cytoplasmic leg, and fibronectin (FN) as one of its major extracellular components. This substrate-adhesion complex is localized in focal contacts, the sites of closest substratum approach visualized with interference reflection microscopy, which appear to be the major points of cell-tosubstrate adhesion. In fibroblasts, the latter substrate-binding complex is characteristic of cultures that are arrested at the G1 phase of the cell cycle due to the low serum concentration in their medium. These arrested fibroblasts are very well spread, flattened, and immobile.


Author(s):  
Tetsuaki Osafune ◽  
Shuji Sumida ◽  
Tomoko Ehara ◽  
Eiji Hase ◽  
Jerome A. Schiff

Changes in the morphology of pyrenoid and the distribution of RuBisCO in the chloroplast of Euglena gracilis were followed by immunoelectron microscopy during the cell cycle in a light (14 h)- dark (10 h) synchronized culture under photoautotrophic conditions. The imrnunoreactive proteins wereconcentrated in the pyrenoid, and less densely distributed in the stroma during the light period (growth phase, Fig. 1-2), but the pyrenoid disappeared during the dark period (division phase), and RuBisCO was dispersed throughout the stroma. Toward the end of the division phase, the pyrenoid began to form in the center of the stroma, and RuBisCO is again concentrated in that pyrenoid region. From a comparison of photosynthetic CO2-fixation with the total carboxylase activity of RuBisCO extracted from Euglena cells in the growth phase, it is suggested that the carboxylase in the pyrenoid functions in CO2-fixation in photosynthesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document