Special delivery by “armored” CAR-T

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (457) ◽  
pp. eaav0334
Author(s):  
Steven M. Jay

The integration of immune checkpoint blockade with CAR-T cell therapy improves antitumor efficacy with potential for reduced side effects.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Wang ◽  
Gurbakhash Kaur ◽  
Alexander I. Sankin ◽  
Fuxiang Chen ◽  
Fangxia Guan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Akhoundi ◽  
Mahsa Mohammadi ◽  
Seyedeh Saeideh Sahraei ◽  
Mohsen Sheykhhasan ◽  
Nashmin Fayazi

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cell therapy has shown great potential in the immunotherapy of patients with hematologic malignancies. In spite of this striking achievement, there are still major challenges to overcome in CAR T cell therapy of solid tumors, including treatment-related toxicity and specificity. Also, other obstacles may be encountered in tackling solid tumors, such as their immunosuppressive microenvironment, the heterogeneous expression of cell surface markers, and the cumbersome arrival of T cells at the tumor site. Although several strategies have been developed to overcome these challenges, aditional research aimed at enhancing its efficacy with minimum side effects, the design of precise yet simplified work flows and the possibility to scale-up production with reduced costs and related risks is still warranted.Conclusions Here, we review main strategies to establish a balance between the toxicity and activity of CAR T cells in order to enhance their specificity and surpass immunosuppression. In recent years, many clinical studies have been conducted that eventually led to approved products. To date, the FDA has approved two anti-CD19 CAR T cell products for non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy, i.e., axicbtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. With all the advances that have been made in the field of CAR T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies therapy, ongoing studies are focused on optimizing its efficacy and specificity, as well as reducing the side effects. Also, the efforts are poised to broaden CAR T cell therapeutics for other cancers, especially solid tumors.


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewelina Grywalska ◽  
Barbara Sosnowska-Pasiarska ◽  
Jolanta Smok-Kalwat ◽  
Marcin Pasiarski ◽  
Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej ◽  
...  

Despite the significant progress of modern anticancer therapies, multiple myeloma (MM) is still incurable for the majority of patients. Following almost three decades of development, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy now has the opportunity to revolutionize the treatment landscape and meet the unmet clinical need. However, there are still several major hurdles to overcome. Here we discuss the recent advances of CAR T-cell therapy for MM with an emphasis on future directions and possible risks. Currently, CAR T-cell therapy for MM is at the first stage of clinical studies, and most studies have focused on CAR T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), but other antigens such as cluster of differentiation 138 (CD138, syndecan-1) are also being evaluated. Although this therapy is associated with side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, and relapses have been observed, the benefit–risk balance and huge potential drive the ongoing clinical progress. To fulfill the promise of recent clinical trial success and maximize the potential of CAR T, future efforts should focus on the reduction of side effects, novel targeted antigens, combinatorial uses of different types of CAR T, and development of CAR T cells targeting more than one antigen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20024-e20024
Author(s):  
Nathan W. Sweeney ◽  
Eduardo Franco Hernandez ◽  
Nolan Cole ◽  
Scott Ryan Goldsmith ◽  
Zachary Crees ◽  
...  

e20024 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are in clinical development for multiple myeloma (MM). Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) can provide valuable insights into how patients perceive the relative risks and benefits of these new therapies. This study aimed to evaluate CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) patients. Methods: We utilized HealthTree Cure Hub for Multiple Myeloma to analyze patient-reported data from 17 patients who participated in CAR T-cell clinical trials. In this study, we examined total prior lines of therapy, time to next treatment (TNT), overall survival (OS), patient-reported toxicity and severity, and patient-reported outcomes (myeloma reduction or no myeloma reduction). The Kaplan-Meier model was used to calculate overall survival. The severity of toxicity was assessed using a 1 to 10 scale (1 = minimal and 10 = severe). Results: Our analysis of the 17 patients found a median of 10 lines of therapy prior to CAR T-cell treatment. Ten patients had no new treatments to report at the time of this study, 5 patients reported new treatment with a median TNT of 15.9 months, and for 2 patients we did not have data. The median OS was 24 months (95% CI 21-30 months). The probability that a patient remained alive at 2 years was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.195, 1). Four of the 17 patients died with a median of 22.5 months post-CAR T-cell therapy. Two of these patients died without reporting a change in treatment. There was a total of 36 different side effects reported by patients as a result of the therapy. Table lists the side effects experienced by 2 or more patients and the corresponding average severity. Finally, 76% of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy reported a reduction in their myeloma, four of these patients had m-protein levels reported and saw an average decrease of 93%. Of the remaining patients, three (18%) reported little to no reduction in their myeloma, and one patient (6%) did not know their response at the time of this analysis. Conclusions: Our investigation of patient-reported results suggests an emerging and viable immunotherapy treatment option for RRMM, with encouraging outcomes and manageable side effects. Future directions include analysis of genetics and treatment options post CAR T-cell therapy. These data highlight the expedited benefit of using PROs via an online platform, like HealthTree Cure Hub, to assess new therapeutics in the research community.[Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19068-e19068
Author(s):  
Vishal Jindal ◽  
Padmastuti Akella ◽  
Paramarajan Piranavan ◽  
Ahmad Daniyal Siddiqui

e19068 Background: CAR (Chimeric Antigen Receptor) T cell therapy is a promising therapy with significant benefits. But cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicities (NT) are major obstacles in its success. In this study we did mixed method analysis of literature to explore side effect profile of Anti CD19-CAR T cell therapy in hematological malignancies. Methods: A review of literature was done to find appropriate studies on Medline database. Total 11 studies were selected on the basis of 1) Anti CD19-CAR T cell therapy 2) Lymphodepletion 3) Sample size equal to or more than 15, 4) Hematological Malignancies 5) Detailed toxicities mentioned. Data was extremely heterogenous for metanalysis therefore results were descriptively formatted using summary texts and tables. Results: Total patient count was 452, out of them 59% had ALL, 35.61% had NHL and 5.30% had CLL. Majority of studies used second generation CAR T cells (n = 10, 90.1). CAR T cell dosage protocol was variable among studies and it range from 1 X 105 to 1 X 107 cells. CRS occurred in 82.7%, with grade 1-2 CRS in 58.4% and grade 3-4 CRS in 24.3%. CRS presented early (range of median = 2.5 – 4 days) and recovers completely generally with in 1st week (range of median = 4.8 - 8 days). NT are seen in 45.6%, with grade 1-2 NT in 20.6% and grade 3-4 NT in 25.0%. NT have variable presentations, encephalopathy was seen in 22.65% of patients and 3.22% had seizures. For management of side effects 28.6% patients required ICU level of care and 21.86% required pressor support. Tocilizumab was used in 30.7%. Total 10 patients (2.2%) died due to side effects and out of them 6 (1.32%) due to CRS and 4 (0.88%) due to NT. Clinically significant associations were shown between tumor grade and CRS (n = 6, 54.5%), IL-6 and CRS (n = 8, 72.7%), CRP (C reactive Protein) and CRS (n =6, 54.5%), and CRS and NT (n = 7, 63.6%) (Table). Conclusions: This study concludes that CRS and NT are most common side effects of CAR T cell therapy. Most of the time they are completely reversible and manageable with tocilizumab and steroid therapy. Levels of IL6, Interferon gamma, CRP and ferritin are elevated in CRS patients. Therefore, can be used as biomarkers. NT and CRS are also associated with each other and likely share the pathological pathway. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 144-157
Author(s):  
Xianhui Chen ◽  
Shuai Yang ◽  
Si Li ◽  
Yun Qu ◽  
Hsuan-Yao Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document