scholarly journals Chitosan Augments Photodynamic Inactivation of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1883-1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuimin Tsai ◽  
Hsiung-Fei Chien ◽  
Tze-Hsien Wang ◽  
Ching-Tsan Huang ◽  
Yaw-Bee Ker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Photodynamic Inactivation ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Microbial Infections ◽  
Promising Treatment

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (PDI) was shown to be a promising treatment modality for microbial infections. This study explores the effect of chitosan, a polycationic biopolymer, in increasing the PDI efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria, includingStaphylococcus aureus,Staphylococcus epidermidis,Streptococcus pyogenes, and methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA), as well as the Gram-negative bacteriaPseudomonas aeruginosaandAcinetobacter baumannii. Chitosan at <0.1% was included in the antibacterial process either by coincubation with hematoporphyrin (Hp) and subjection to light exposure to induce the PDI effect or by addition after PDI and further incubation for 30 min. Under conditions in which Hp-PDI killed the microbe on a 2- to 4-log scale, treatment with chitosan at concentrations of as low as 0.025% for a further 30 min completely eradicated the bacteria (which were originally at ∼108CFU/ml). Similar results were also found with toluidine blue O (TBO)-mediated PDI in planktonic and biofilm cells. However, without PDI treatment, chitosan alone did not exert significant antimicrobial activity with 30 min of incubation, suggesting that the potentiated effect of chitosan worked after the bacterial damage induced by PDI. Further studies indicated that the potentiated PDI effect of chitosan was related to the level of PDI damage and the deacetylation level of the chitosan. These results indicate that the combination of PDI and chitosan is quite promising for eradicating microbial infections.

scholarly journals Recognition of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Muramyl Dipeptide by NOD2 Results in Potent Induction of MMP-9, Which Can Be Controlled by Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 4952-4958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marloes Vissers ◽  
Yvonne Hartman ◽  
Laszlo Groh ◽  
Dirk J. de Jong ◽  
Marien I. de Jonge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Muramyl Dipeptide ◽  
Tissue Inhibitor Of Metalloproteinase ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Potent Inducer ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

ABSTRACTMatrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) is a protease involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix collagen. Evidence suggests that MMP-9 is involved in pathogenesis duringStreptococcus pneumoniaeinfection. However, not much is known about the induction of MMP-9 and the regulatory processes involved. We show here that the Gram-positive bacteria used in this study induced large amounts of MMP-9, in contrast to the Gram-negative bacteria that were used. An important pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) for Gram-positive bacteria is muramyl dipeptide (MDP). MDP is a very potent inducer of MMP-9 and showed a dose-dependent MMP-9 induction. Experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Crohn's disease patients with nonfunctional NOD2 showed that MMP-9 induction byStreptococcus pneumoniaeand MDP is NOD2 dependent. Increasing amounts of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an important PAMP for Gram-negative bacteria, resulted in decreasing amounts of MMP-9. Moreover, the induction of MMP-9 by MDP could be counteracted by simultaneously adding LPS. The inhibition of MMP-9 expression by LPS was found to be regulated posttranscriptionally, independently of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), an endogenous inhibitor of MMP-9. Collectively, these data show thatStreptococcus pneumoniaeis able to induce large amounts of MMP-9. These high MMP-9 levels are potentially involved inStreptococcus pneumoniaepathogenesis.

scholarly journals Distinctive Binding of Avibactam to Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 752-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelhamid Asli ◽  
Eric Brouillette ◽  
Kevin M. Krause ◽  
Wright W. Nichols ◽  
François Malouin
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Penicillin Binding Proteins ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Fixed Concentration ◽  
Competition Assays

ABSTRACTAvibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that covalently acylates a variety of β-lactamases, causing inhibition. Although avibactam presents limited antibacterial activity, its acylation ability toward bacterial penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) was investigated.Staphylococcus aureuswas of particular interest due to the reported β-lactamase activity of PBP4. The binding of avibactam to PBPs was measured by adding increasing concentrations to membrane preparations of a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria prior to addition of the fluorescent reagent Bocillin FL. Relative binding (measured here as the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50]) to PBPs was estimated by quantification of fluorescence after gel electrophoresis. Avibactam was found to selectively bind to some PBPs. InEscherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Haemophilus influenzae, andS. aureus, avibactam primarily bound to PBP2, with IC50s of 0.92, 1.1, 3.0, and 51 μg/ml, respectively, whereas binding to PBP3 was observed inStreptococcus pneumoniae(IC50, 8.1 μg/ml). Interestingly, avibactam was able to significantly enhance labeling ofS. aureusPBP4 by Bocillin FL. In PBP competition assays withS. aureus, where avibactam was used at a fixed concentration in combination with varied amounts of ceftazidime, the apparent IC50of ceftazidime was found to be very similar to that determined for ceftazidime when used alone. In conclusion, avibactam is able to covalently bind to some bacterial PBPs. Identification of those PBP targets may allow the development of new diazabicyclooctane derivatives with improved affinity for PBPs or new combination therapies that act on multiple PBP targets.

scholarly journals Effect of Lactose Monolaurate on Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Bacteria

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 3465-3468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwini Wagh ◽  
Shujie Shen ◽  
Fen Ann Shen ◽  
Charles D. Miller ◽  
Marie K. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Antimicrobial Activities ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Lactose Monolaurate

ABSTRACTThe antimicrobial activities of sucrose monolaurate and a novel ester, lactose monolaurate (LML), were tested. Gram-positive bacteria were more susceptible than Gram-negative bacteria to both esters. The minimal bactericidal concentrations of LML were 5 to 9.5 mM forListeria monocytogenesisolates and 0.2 to 2 mM forMycobacteriumisolates.

scholarly journals Categorization of Bacterial Pathogens Present in Infected Wounds and their Antibiotic Resistance Profile Recovered from Patients Attending Rizgary Hospital-Erbil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Al-Naqshbandi ◽  
Hedy A. Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud A. Chawsheen ◽  
Haval H. Abdul Qader
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

Wound infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria can extend a patients’ debility and increase the expense of treatment in the long term; therefore, careful management of patients with wound infections is necessary to avoid complications. The usage of antimicrobial agent is a major factor in resistance development. This study aims to understand the causes of wound infections, as well as the criteria for diagnosing them for more sensible antibiotic prescribing. Samples from 269 wound patients were collected, and cultured for bacterial growth. Gram stain technique, bacterial identification via VITEK 2 compact system were investigated in this study. Gram negative bacteria accounted for 59.15% of the total isolates, while pathogenic gram positive bacteria accounted for 40.85% of total isolates. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the dominant pathogenic gram negative bacteria in wounds, while Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis are the dominant pathogenic gram positive bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed 100% resistance to the majority of antibiotic tested, including Ampicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, Aztreona, Ceftriaxone, and others. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are 100% resistant to Ampicillin, Ceftriaxone, and Cefotaxime. For more efficient antibiotic prescriptions, the causative microorganisms, and their current susceptibility patterns need to be mandated for testing before prescribing any antibiotics to patients. Prescriptions are frequently based solely on general information about the antibiotic's function, rather than on individual response variation to the pathogen and the antibiotic. Particularly when the common pathogens in this study show multidrug resistance in wounds.

scholarly journals Lipoproteins of Gram-Positive Bacteria: Key Players in the Immune Response and Virulence

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Thu Nguyen ◽  
Friedrich Götz
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Key Players ◽  
Toll Like Receptor 2 ◽  
Number Of Publications

SUMMARYSince the discovery in 1973 of the first of the bacterial lipoproteins (Lpp) inEscherichia coli, Braun's lipoprotein, the ever-increasing number of publications indicates the importance of these proteins. Bacterial Lpp belong to the class of lipid-anchored proteins that in Gram-negative bacteria are anchored in both the cytoplasmic and outer membranes and in Gram-positive bacteria are anchored only in the cytoplasmic membrane. In contrast to the case for Gram-negative bacteria, in Gram-positive bacteria lipoprotein maturation and processing are not vital. Physiologically, Lpp play an important role in nutrient and ion acquisition, allowing particularly pathogenic species to better survive in the host. Bacterial Lpp are recognized by Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) of the innate immune system. The important role of Lpp in Gram-positive bacteria, particularly in the phylumFirmicutes, as key players in the immune response and pathogenicity has emerged only in recent years. In this review, we address the role of Lpp in signaling and modulating the immune response, in inflammation, and in pathogenicity. We also address the potential of Lpp as promising vaccine candidates.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance Genes in the Plant Pathogen Dickeya dadantii

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (21) ◽  
pp. 6423-6430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Pandin ◽  
Martine Caroff ◽  
Guy Condemine
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Soft Rot ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Dickeya Dadantii ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
New Genes

ABSTRACTModification of teichoic acid through the incorporation ofd-alanine confers resistance in Gram-positive bacteria to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). This process involves the products of thedltXABCDgenes. These genes are widespread in Gram-positive bacteria, and they are also found in a few Gram-negative bacteria. Notably, these genes are present in all soft-rot enterobacteria (PectobacteriumandDickeya) whosedltDXBACoperons have been sequenced. We studied the function and regulation of these genes inDickeya dadantii.dltBexpression was induced in the presence of the AMP polymyxin. It was not regulated by PhoP, which controls the expression of some genes involved in AMP resistance, but was regulated by ArcA, which has been identified as an activator of genes involved in AMP resistance. However,arcAwas not the regulator responsible for polymyxin induction of these genes in this bacterium, which underlines the complexity of the mechanisms controlling AMP resistance inD. dadantii. Two other genes involved in resistance to AMPs have also been characterized,phoSandphoH.dltB,phoS,phoH, andarcAbut notdltDmutants were more sensitive to polymyxin than the wild-type strain. Decreased fitness of thedltB,phoS, andphoHmutants in chicory leaves indicates that their products are important for resistance to plant AMPs.IMPORTANCEGram-negative bacteria can modify their lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) to resist antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Soft-rot enterobacteria (DickeyaandPectobacteriumspp.) possess homologues of thedltgenes in their genomes which, in Gram-positive bacteria, are involved in resistance to AMPs. In this study, we show that these genes confer resistance to AMPs, probably by modifying LPSs, and that they are required for the fitness of the bacteria during plant infection. Two other new genes involved in resistance were also analyzed. These results show that bacterial resistance to AMPs can occur in bacteria through many different mechanisms that need to be characterized.

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Ag- and Au-Nanoparticles Loaded TiO2 Nanotubes

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1416-1425
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Arkusz ◽  
Ewa Paradowska ◽  
Marta Nycz ◽  
Justyna Mazurek-Popczyk ◽  
Katarzyna Baldy-Chudzik
Keyword(s):  
Gold Nanoparticles ◽  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Metallic Nanoparticles ◽  
Antibacterial Properties ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Live Bacteria

Current research on the antibacterial properties of implant surfaces has focused on using titanium nanotubes (TNTs) with diameters of 100 and 200 nm, which simultaneously show the best antibacterial properties, poor osseointegration, and ability to immobilize proteins. Therefore, the research aimed to develop an implantable material based on titanium dioxide nanotubes with a diameter of 50 nm doped with silver (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), indicating good absorption and antibacterial properties. Moreover, metallic nanoparticles deposited by varying methods should maintain sphericity and lack of agglomeration. For this purpose, the surface charge, wettability, stability of nanoparticles, and antibacterial properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, i. e., Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus mutans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , were performed. Obtained results indicate a greater resistance to leaching of silver nanoparticles compared to gold nanoparticles. These results are reflected in microbiological studies, both into the time and the effectiveness of the implantable material's antibacterial activity. A greater antibacterial effect of AgNPs than AuNPs has been confirmed. Also, AgNPs inhibit the multiplication of Gram-negative bacteria to a greater extent than Gram-positive bacteria. It has been proven that the TNT platforms deposited with metal nanoparticles via the voltammetric method are more effective in deactivating microorganisms. Besides, the results have proven that smaller TNTs effectively reduce live bacteria as nanotubes with a diameter of 100 and 200 nm.

scholarly journals Increasing the Antimicrobial Activity of Nisin-Based Lantibiotics against Gram-Negative Pathogens

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Li ◽  
Manuel Montalban-Lopez ◽  
Oscar P. Kuipers
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Lipid Ii

ABSTRACTLantibiotics are ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified antimicrobial compounds containing lanthionine and methyl-lanthionine residues. Nisin, one of the most extensively studied and used lantibiotics, has been shown to display very potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria, and stable resistance is rarely observed. By binding to lipid II and forming pores in the membrane, nisin can cause the efflux of cellular constituents and inhibit cell wall biosynthesis. However, the activity of nisin against Gram-negative bacteria is much lower than that against Gram-positive bacteria, mainly because lipid II is located at the inner membrane, and the rather impermeable outer membrane in Gram-negative bacteria prevents nisin from reaching lipid II. Thus, if the outer membrane-traversing efficiency of nisin could be increased, the activity against Gram-negative bacteria could, in principle, be enhanced. In this work, several relatively short peptides with activity against Gram-negative bacteria were selected from literature data to be fused as tails to the C terminus of either full or truncated nisin species. Among these, we found that one of three tails (tail 2 [T2; DKYLPRPRPV], T6 [NGVQPKY], and T8 [KIAKVALKAL]) attached to a part of nisin displayed improved activity against Gram-negative microorganisms. Next, we rationally designed and reengineered the most promising fusion peptides. Several mutants whose activity significantly outperformed that of nisin against Gram-negative pathogens were obtained. The activity of the tail 16 mutant 2 (T16m2) construct against several important Gram-negative pathogens (i.e.,Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Acinetobacter baumannii,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Enterobacter aerogenes) was increased 4- to 12-fold compared to that of nisin. This study indicates that the rational design of nisin can selectively and significantly improve its outer membrane-permeating capacity as well as its activity against Gram-negative pathogens.IMPORTANCELantibiotics are antimicrobial peptides that are highly active against Gram-positive bacteria but that have relatively poor activity against most Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we modified the model lantibiotic nisin by fusing parts of it to antimicrobial peptides with known activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The appropriate selection of peptidic moieties that could be attached to (parts of) nisin could lead to a significant increase in its inhibitory activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Using this strategy, hybrids that outperformed nisin by displaying 4- to 12-fold higher levels of activity against relevant Gram-negative bacterial species were produced. This study shows the power of modified peptide engineering to alter target specificity in a desired direction.

scholarly journals Potassium Iodide Potentiates Antimicrobial Photodynamic Inactivation Mediated by Rose Bengal in In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Wen ◽  
Xiaoshen Zhang ◽  
Grzegorz Szewczyk ◽  
Ahmed El-Hussein ◽  
Ying-Ying Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Potassium Iodide ◽  
Rose Bengal ◽  
Green Light ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Photodynamic Inactivation ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT Rose bengal (RB) is a halogenated xanthene dye that has been used to mediate antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation for several years. While RB is highly active against Gram-positive bacteria, it is largely inactive in killing Gram-negative bacteria. We have discovered that addition of the nontoxic salt potassium iodide (100 mM) potentiates green light (540-nm)-mediated killing by up to 6 extra logs with the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the Gram-positive bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and the fungal yeast Candida albicans. The mechanism is proposed to be singlet oxygen addition to iodide anion to form peroxyiodide, which decomposes into radicals and, finally, forms hydrogen peroxide and molecular iodine. The effects of these different bactericidal species can be teased apart by comparing the levels of killing achieved in three different scenarios: (i) cells, RB, and KI are mixed together and then illuminated with green light; (ii) cells and RB are centrifuged, and then KI is added and the mixture is illuminated with green light; and (iii) RB and KI are illuminated with green light, and then cells are added after illumination with the light. We also showed that KI could potentiate RB photodynamic therapy in a mouse model of skin abrasions infected with bioluminescent P. aeruginosa.

Rapid demonstration of septic or infectious arthritis due to Gram-negative bacteria

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 686-687
Author(s):  
Jacob S. Hanker ◽  
Paul R. Gross ◽  
Beverly L. Giammara
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Arthritis ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Infectious Arthritis ◽  
Bacterial Arthritis ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

Blood cultures are positive in approximately only 50 per cent of the patients with nongonococcal bacterial infectious arthritis and about 20 per cent of those with gonococcal arthritis. But the concept that gram-negative bacteria could be involved even in chronic arthritis is well-supported. Gram stains are more definitive in staphylococcal arthritis caused by gram-positive bacteria than in bacterial arthritis due to gram-negative bacteria. In the latter situation where gram-negative bacilli are the problem, Gram stains are helpful for 50% of the patients; they are only helpful for 25% of the patients, however, where gram-negative gonococci are the problem. In arthritis due to gram-positive Staphylococci. Gramstained smears are positive for 75% of the patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document