scholarly journals Surveillance of Omadacycline Activity Tested against Clinical Isolates from the United States and Europe as Part of the 2016 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pfaller ◽  
Michael D. Huband ◽  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Robert K. Flamm
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Moraxella Catarrhalis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Viridans Group Streptococci

ABSTRACTOmadacycline was tested against 21,000 bacterial isolates collected prospectively from medical centers in Europe and the United States during 2016. Omadacycline was active againstStaphylococcus aureus(MIC50/MIC90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter), including methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA); streptococci (MIC50/MIC90, 0.06/0.12 mg/liter), includingStreptococcus pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci, and beta-hemolytic streptococci;Enterobacteriaceae, includingEscherichia coli(MIC50/MIC90, 0.5/2 mg/liter);Haemophilus influenzae(MIC50/MIC90, 1/1 mg/liter); andMoraxella catarrhalis(MIC50/MIC90, 0.25/0.25 mg/liter). Omadacycline merits further study in serious infections where resistant pathogens may be encountered.

scholarly journals Activity of Ceftaroline and Epidemiologic Trends in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from 43 Medical Centers in the United States in 2009

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 4154-4160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra S. Richter ◽  
Kristopher P. Heilmann ◽  
Cassie L. Dohrn ◽  
Fathollah Riahi ◽  
Andrew J. Costello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
High Level ◽  
Resistance Rates

ABSTRACTAStaphylococcus aureussurveillance program was initiated in the United States to examine thein vitroactivity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends. Susceptibility testing by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution was performed on 4,210 clinically significant isolates collected in 2009 from 43 medical centers. All isolates were screened formecAby PCR and evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) were analyzed for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes and the staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec(SCCmec) type. All isolates had ceftaroline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml with an MIC50of 0.5 and an MIC90of 1 μg/ml. The overall resistance rates, expressed as the percentages of isolates that were intermediate and resistant (or nonsusceptible), were as follows: ceftaroline, 1.0%; clindamycin, 30.2% (17.4% MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml; 12.8% inducible); daptomycin, 0.2%; erythromycin, 65.5%; levofloxacin, 39.9%; linezolid, 0.02%; oxacillin, 53.4%; tetracycline, 4.4%; tigecycline, 0%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1.6%; vancomycin, 0%; and high-level mupirocin, 2.2%. ThemecAPCR was positive for 53.4% of the isolates. The ceftaroline MIC90s were 0.25 μg/ml for methicillin-susceptibleS. aureusand 1 μg/ml for MRSA. Among the 2,247 MRSA isolates, 51% were USA300 (96.9% PVL positive, 99.7% SCCmectype IV) and 17% were USA100 (93.4% SCCmectype II). The resistance rates for the 1,137 USA300 MRSA isolates were as follows: erythromycin, 90.9%; levofloxacin, 49.1%; clindamycin, 7.6% (6.2% MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml; 1.4% inducible); tetracycline, 3.3%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 0.8%; high-level mupirocin, 2.7%; daptomycin, 0.4%; and ceftaroline and linezolid, 0%. USA300 is the dominant clone causing MRSA infections in the United States. Ceftaroline demonstrated potentin vitroactivity against recentS. aureusclinical isolates, including MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible, and linezolid-resistant strains.

scholarly journals Summary of Ceftaroline Activity against Pathogens in the United States, 2010: Report from the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) Surveillance Program

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 2933-2940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Therapeutic Decision Making ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACTTheAssessingWorldwideAntimicrobialResistanceEvaluation (AWARE) surveillance program is a sentinel resistance monitoring system designed to track the activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents. In the United States, a total of 8,434 isolates were collected during the 2010 surveillance program from 65 medical centers distributed across the nine census regions (5 to 10 medical centers per region). All organisms were isolated from documented infections, including 3,055 (36.2%) bloodstream infections, 2,282 (27.1%) respiratory tract infections, 1,965 (23.3%) acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, 665 (7.9%) urinary tract infections, and 467 (5.5%) miscellaneous other infection sites. Ceftaroline was the most potent β-lactam agent tested against staphylococci. The MIC90values were 1 μg/ml for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA; 98.4% susceptible) and 0.5 μg/ml for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Ceftaroline was 16- to 32-fold more potent than ceftriaxone against methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal strains. All staphylococcus isolates (S. aureusand CoNS) were inhibited at ceftaroline MIC values of ≤2 μg/ml. Ceftaroline also displayed potent activity against streptococci (MIC90, 0.015 μg/ml for beta-hemolytic streptococci; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml for penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae). Potent activity was also shown against Gram-negative pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae,Haemophilus parainfluenzae, andMoraxella catarrhalis). Furthermore, wild-type strains ofEnterobacteriaceae(non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing strains and non-AmpC-hyperproducing strains) were often susceptible to ceftaroline. Continued monitoring through surveillance networks will allow for the assessment of the evolution of resistance as this new cephalosporin is used more broadly to provide clinicians with up-to-date information to assist in antibiotic stewardship and therapeutic decision making.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Contemporary Bacterial Pathogens from the United States and Europe, 2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
H. S. Sader ◽  
P. R. Rhomberg ◽  
R. K. Flamm
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Viridans Group Streptococci ◽  
Gram Positive Cocci

ABSTRACT The in vitro activities of delafloxacin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 6,485 bacterial isolates collected from medical centers in Europe and the United States in 2014 were tested. Delafloxacin was the most potent agent tested against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci, and beta-hemolytic streptococci and had activity similar to that of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against certain members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Overall, the broadest coverage of the tested pathogens (Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli) was observed with meropenem and tigecycline in both Europe and the United States. Delafloxacin was shown to be active against organisms that may be encountered in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, respiratory infections, and urinary tract infections.

scholarly journals Surveillance of Omadacycline Activity Tested against Clinical Isolates from the United States and Europe: Report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2016 to 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pfaller ◽  
Michael D. Huband ◽  
Dee Shortridge ◽  
Robert K. Flamm
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Klebsiella Oxytoca ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests

ABSTRACT Omadacycline is a broad-spectrum aminomethylcycline approved in October 2018 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired pneumonia as both an oral and intravenous once-daily formulation. In this report, the activities of omadacycline and comparators were tested against 49,000 nonduplicate bacterial isolates collected prospectively during 2016 to 2018 from medical centers in Europe (24,500 isolates, 40 medical centers [19 countries]) and the United States (24,500 isolates, 33 medical centers [23 states and all 9 U.S. census divisions]). Omadacycline was tested by broth microdilution following the methods in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M07 (Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, 11th ed., 2018). Omadacycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter) inhibited 98.6% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates at ≤0.5 mg/liter, including 96.3% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates and 99.8% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates. Omadacycline potency was comparable for Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/liter), viridans group streptococci (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/liter), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/liter), regardless of species and susceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, or tetracycline. Omadacycline was active against all Enterobacterales tested (MIC50/90, 1/8 mg/liter; 87.5% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/liter) except Proteus mirabilis (MIC50/90, 16/>32 mg/liter) and indole-positive Proteus spp. (MIC50/90, 8/32 mg/liter) and was most active against Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/liter), Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/liter), and Citrobacter spp. (MIC50/90, 1/4 mg/liter). Omadacycline inhibited 92.4% of Enterobacter cloacae species complex and 88.5% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates at ≤4 mg/liter. Omadacycline was active against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter), regardless of β-lactamase status, and against Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, ≤0.12/0.25 mg/liter). The potent activity of omadacycline against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria indicates that omadacycline merits further study in serious infections in which multidrug resistance and mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections may be a concern.

scholarly journals Bloodstream Infections Due to Candida Species: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998

2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
R. N. Jones ◽  
G. V. Doern ◽  
H. S. Sader ◽  
S. A. Messer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
The United States ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
International Program ◽  
The Third ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance

ABSTRACT An international program of surveillance of bloodstream infections (BSI) in the United States, Canada, and Latin America detected 306 episodes of candidemia in 34 medical centers (22 in the United States, 6 in Canada, and 6 in Latin America) in 1997 and 328 episodes in 34 medical centers (22 in the United States, 5 in Canada, and 7 in Latin America) in 1998. Of the 634 BSI, 54.3% were due to Candida albicans, 16.4% were due to C. glabrata, 14.9% were due to C. parapsilosis, 8.2% were due to C. tropicalis, 1.6% were due to C. krusei, and 4.6% were due to other Candida spp. The percentage of BSI due to C. albicans decreased very slightly in the United States between 1997 and 1998 (56.2 to 54.4%;P = 0.68) and increased in both Canada (52.6 to 70.1%; P = 0.05) and Latin America (40.5 to 44.6%;P = 0.67). C. glabrata was the second most common species observed overall, and the percentage of BSI due toC. glabrata increased in all three geographic areas between 1997 and 1998. C. parapsilosis was the third most prevalent BSI isolate in both Canada and Latin America, accounting for 7.0 and 18.5% of BSI, respectively. Resistance to fluconazole (MIC, ≥64 μg/ml) and itraconazole (MIC, ≥1.0 μg/ml) was observed infrequently in both 1997 (2.3 and 8.5%, respectively) and 1998 (1.5 and 7.6%, respectively). Among the different species ofCandida, resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole was observed in C. glabrata and C. krusei, whereas isolates of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were all highly susceptible to both fluconazole (98.9 to 100% susceptible) and itraconazole (96.4 to 100% susceptible). Isolates from Canada and Latin America were generally more susceptible to both triazoles than U.S. isolates were. Continued surveillance appears necessary to detect these important changes.

scholarly journals Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from Patients with Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997)

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary V. Doern ◽  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Michael A. Pfaller ◽  
Kari Kugler ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae ◽  
Moraxella Catarrhalis ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Resistance Rates

Between February and June of 1997, a large number of community-acquired respiratory tract isolates of Haemophilus influenzae (n = 1,077) and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 503) from 27 U.S. and 7 Canadian medical centers were characterized as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Overall prevalences of β-lactamase production were 33.5% in H. influenzae and 92.2% in M. catarrhalis with no differences noted between isolates recovered in the United States and those from Canada. Among a total of 21 different antimicrobial agents tested, including six cephalosporins, a β-lactamase inhibitor combination, three macrolides, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), rifampin, chloramphenicol, five fluoroquinolones, and quinupristin-dalfopristin, resistance rates of >5% with H. influenzae were observed only with cefaclor (12.8%) and TMP-SMX (16.2%).

scholarly journals Dalbavancin Activity When Tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated in Medical Centers on Six Continents (2011 to 2014)

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 3419-3425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
Jason E. Schuchert ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
The United States ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Antimicrobial Surveillance

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, was approved for use in 2014 by regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. The activity of dalbavancin was also widely assessed by determination of its activity againstStreptococcus pneumoniaeclinical isolates collected from patients on six continents monitored during two time intervals (2011 to 2013 and 2014). A total of 18,186 pneumococcal isolates were obtained from 49 nations and submitted to a monitoring laboratory as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for reference susceptibility testing. The potency of dalbavancin againstS. pneumoniaewas consistent across the years that it was monitored, with the MIC50and MIC90being 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively, and all isolates were inhibited by ≤0.12 μg/ml. The activity of dalbavancin was not adversely influenced by nonsusceptibility to β-lactams (ceftriaxone or penicillin), macrolides, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, or tetracyclines or multidrug resistance (MDR). Regional variations in dalbavancin activity were not detected, butS. pneumoniaestrains isolated in the Asia-Pacific region were more likely to be nonsusceptible to penicillin and ceftriaxone as well as to be MDR than strains isolated in North or South America and Europe. Direct comparisons of potency illustrated that dalbavancin (MIC50and MIC90, 0.015 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively) was 16-fold or more active than vancomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/ml), linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), levofloxacin (MIC50, 1 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (MIC90, 1 μg/ml), and penicillin (MIC90, 2 μg/ml). In conclusion, dalbavancin had potent and consistent activity against this contemporary (2011 to 2014) collection ofS. pneumoniaeisolates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document