scholarly journals Changes in Striatal Signaling Induce Remodeling of RGS Complexes Containing Gβ5 and R7BP Subunits

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3033-3044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garret R. Anderson ◽  
Rafael Lujan ◽  
Kirill A. Martemyanov
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Neuronal Excitability ◽  
Reward Processing ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Striatal Neurons ◽  
Selective Degradation ◽  
Oxygenation Status ◽  
Molecular Plasticity

ABSTRACT Neurotransmitter signaling via G protein coupled receptors is crucially controlled by regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that shape the duration and extent of the cellular response. In the striatum, members of the R7 family of RGS proteins modulate signaling via D2 dopamine and μ-opioid receptors controlling reward processing and locomotor coordination. Recent findings have established that R7 RGS proteins function as macromolecular complexes with two subunits: type 5 G protein β (Gβ5) and R7 binding protein (R7BP). In this study, we report that the subunit compositions of these complexes in striatum undergo remodeling upon changes in neuronal activity. We found that under normal conditions two equally abundant striatal R7 RGS proteins, RGS9-2 and RGS7, are unequally coupled to the R7BP subunit, which is present in complex predominantly with RGS9-2 rather than with RGS7. Changes in the neuronal excitability or oxygenation status resulting in extracellular calcium entry, uncouples RGS9-2 from R7BP, triggering its selective degradation. Concurrently, released R7BP binds to mainly intracellular RGS7 and recruits it to the plasma membrane and the postsynaptic density. These observations introduce activity-dependent remodeling of R7 RGS complexes as a new molecular plasticity mechanism in striatal neurons and suggest a general model for achieving rapid posttranslational subunit rearrangement in multisubunit complexes.

scholarly journals Rgs4 is a regulator of mTOR activity required for motoneuron axon outgrowth and neuronal development in zebrafish

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Mikdache ◽  
Marie-José Boueid ◽  
Lorijn van der Spek ◽  
Emilie Lesport ◽  
Brigitte Delespierre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Neuronal Development ◽  
Axon Outgrowth ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
G Protein Coupled

AbstractThe Regulator of G protein signaling 4 (Rgs4) is a member of the RGS proteins superfamily that modulates the activity of G-protein coupled receptors. It is mainly expressed in the nervous system and is linked to several neuronal signaling pathways; however, its role in neural development in vivo remains inconclusive. Here, we generated and characterized a rgs4 loss of function model (MZrgs4) in zebrafish. MZrgs4 embryos showed motility defects and presented reduced head and eye sizes, reflecting defective motoneurons axon outgrowth and a significant decrease in the number of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous system. Forcing the expression of Rgs4 specifically within motoneurons rescued their early defective outgrowth in MZrgs4 embryos, indicating an autonomous role for Rgs4 in motoneurons. We also analyzed the role of Akt, Erk and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling cascades and showed a requirement for these pathways in motoneurons axon outgrowth and neuronal development. Drawing on pharmacological and rescue experiments in MZrgs4, we provide evidence that Rgs4 facilitates signaling mediated by Akt, Erk and mTOR in order to drive axon outgrowth in motoneurons and regulate neuronal numbers.

scholarly journals Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin E. Ahlers-Dannen ◽  
Mohammed Alqinyah ◽  
Christopher Bodle ◽  
Josephine Bou Dagher ◽  
Bandana Chakravarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [160, 377, 411, 415, 416, 512, 519, 312, 6].

scholarly journals Two Chimeric Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins Differentially Modulate Soybean Heterotrimeric G-protein Cycle

2012 ◽  
Vol 287 (21) ◽  
pp. 17870-17881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swarup Roy Choudhury ◽  
Corey S. Westfall ◽  
John P. Laborde ◽  
Naveen C. Bisht ◽  
Joseph M. Jez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Protein

scholarly journals Structural organization of a major neuronal G protein regulator, the RGS7-Gβ5-R7BP complex

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipak N Patil ◽  
Erumbi S Rangarajan ◽  
Scott J Novick ◽  
Bruce D Pascal ◽  
Douglas J Kojetin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Structural Organization ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Vast Number ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Multiple Domains ◽  
Organizational Features

Signaling by the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays fundamental role in a vast number of essential physiological functions. Precise control of GPCR signaling requires action of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that deactivate heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins are elaborately regulated and comprise multiple domains and subunits, yet structural organization of these assemblies is poorly understood. Here, we report a crystal structure and dynamics analyses of the multisubunit complex of RGS7, a major regulator of neuronal signaling with key roles in controlling a number of drug target GPCRs and links to neuropsychiatric disease, metabolism, and cancer. The crystal structure in combination with molecular dynamics and mass spectrometry analyses reveals unique organizational features of the complex and long-range conformational changes imposed by its constituent subunits during allosteric modulation. Notably, several intermolecular interfaces in the complex work in synergy to provide coordinated modulation of this key GPCR regulator.

scholarly journals High-resolution structure of RGS17 suggests a role for Ca2+ in promoting the GTPase-activating protein activity by RZ subfamily members

2019 ◽  
Vol 294 (20) ◽  
pp. 8148-8160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monita Sieng ◽  
Michael P. Hayes ◽  
Joseph B. O'Brien ◽  
C. Andrew Fowler ◽  
Jon C. Houtman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Protein Activity ◽  
Gtpase Activating Proteins ◽  
Ability To Act ◽  
Binding Surface ◽  
High Resolution Structure ◽  
Resolution Structure

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling through their ability to act as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for activated Gα subunits. Members of the RZ subfamily of RGS proteins bind to activated Gαo, Gαz, and Gαi1–3 proteins in the nervous system and thereby inhibit downstream pathways, including those involved in Ca2+-dependent signaling. In contrast to other RGS proteins, little is known about RZ subfamily structure and regulation. Herein, we present the 1.5-Å crystal structure of RGS17, the most complete and highest-resolution structure of an RZ subfamily member to date. RGS17 cocrystallized with Ca2+ bound to conserved positions on the predicted Gα-binding surface of the protein. Using NMR chemical shift perturbations, we confirmed that Ca2+ binds in solution to the same site. Furthermore, RGS17 had greater than 55-fold higher affinity for Ca2+ than for Mg2+. Finally, we found that Ca2+ promotes interactions between RGS17 and activated Gα and decreases the Km for GTP hydrolysis, potentially by altering the binding mechanism between these proteins. Taken together, these findings suggest that Ca2+ positively regulates RGS17, which may represent a general mechanism by which increased Ca2+ concentration promotes the GAP activity of the RZ subfamily, leading to RZ-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ signaling.

scholarly journals Probing the mutational landscape of regulators of G protein signaling proteins in cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (617) ◽  
pp. eaax8620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent DiGiacomo ◽  
Marcin Maziarz ◽  
Alex Luebbers ◽  
Jillian M. Norris ◽  
Pandu Laksono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Gpcr Signaling ◽  
Mutational Landscape ◽  
Binding Interface

The advent of deep-sequencing techniques has revealed that mutations in G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways in cancer are more prominent than was previously appreciated. An emergent theme is that cancer-associated mutations tend to cause enhanced GPCR pathway activation to favor oncogenicity. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are critical modulators of GPCR signaling that dampen the activity of heterotrimeric G proteins through their GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity, which is conferred by a conserved domain dubbed the “RGS-box.” Here, we developed an experimental pipeline to systematically assess the mutational landscape of RGS GAPs in cancer. A pan-cancer bioinformatics analysis of the 20 RGS domains with GAP activity revealed hundreds of low-frequency mutations spread throughout the conserved RGS domain structure with a slight enrichment at positions that interface with G proteins. We empirically tested multiple mutations representing all RGS GAP subfamilies and sampling both G protein interface and noninterface positions with a scalable, yeast-based assay. Last, a subset of mutants was validated using G protein activity biosensors in mammalian cells. Our findings reveal that a sizable fraction of RGS protein mutations leads to a loss of function through various mechanisms, including disruption of the G protein–binding interface, loss of protein stability, or allosteric effects on G protein coupling. Moreover, our results also validate a scalable pipeline for the rapid characterization of cancer-associated mutations in RGS proteins.

scholarly journals R4 RGS proteins: Regulation of G-protein signaling and beyond

2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geetanjali Bansal ◽  
Kirk M. Druey ◽  
Zhihui Xie
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Signaling ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document