scholarly journals A spectrum of mechanisms for the assembly of the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 1049-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P George ◽  
L M Lira-DeVito ◽  
S L Wampler ◽  
J T Kadonaga
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Selective Inhibition ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Preinitiation Complex ◽  
Basal Transcription ◽  
Tata Box Binding Protein ◽  
Basal Transcription Factors

To explore the diversity in the mechanisms of basal transcription by RNA polymerase II, we have employed a novel biochemical approach that involves perturbation of the transcription reaction with exogenously added TFIIB or TATA box-binding protein (TBP). Under these conditions, we observe promoter-selective inhibition of transcription by excess TFIIB or excess TBP. This inhibition occurs at the level of basal transcription, because it is observed with minimal promoters that comprise only the TATA box and initiation site sequences as well as with preparations of basal transcription factors that have been purified to greater than 90% homogeneity. In addition, the excess basal factors inhibit the assembly of a functional preinitiation complex but do not inhibit transcription initiation from preassembled preinitiation complexes. A study of several promoters revealed a reciprocal trend in the promoter specificity of inhibition by excess TFIIB versus that by excess TBP. At opposite ends of this spectrum, promoters are strongly inhibited by excess TFIIB but not excess TBP and vice versa. These results reveal the existence of a spectrum of mechanisms for preinitiation complex assembly at different promoters. The mechanistic preference appears to be specified by the aggregate of basal promoter elements rather than by an individual component, such as the TATA box or initiation site sequence. This spectrum provides a new parameter by which differences in the function of minimal class II promoters can be analyzed in the context of both basal and regulated transcription.

Transcription initiation from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is positioned by HIP1 binding at the initiation site

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 653-661
Author(s):  
A L Means ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Sequence Element ◽  
Initiator Element

We have identified a sequence element that specifies the position of transcription initiation for the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Unlike the functionally analogous TATA box that directs RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription 30 nucleotides downstream, the positioning element of the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is located directly at the site of transcription initiation. By using DNase I footprint analysis, we have shown that a protein binds to this initiator element. Transcription initiated at the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element when 28 nucleotides were inserted between it and all other upstream sequences, or when it was placed on either side of the DNA helix, suggesting that there is no strict spatial requirement between the initiator and an upstream element. Although neither a single Sp1-binding site nor a single initiator element was sufficient for transcriptional activity, the combination of one Sp1-binding site and the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element cloned into a plasmid vector resulted in transcription starting at the initiator element. We have also shown that the simian virus 40 late major initiation site has striking sequence homology to the dihydrofolate reductase initiation site and that the same, or a similar, protein binds to both sites. Examination of the sequences at other RNA polymerase II initiation sites suggests that we have identified an element that is important in the transcription of other housekeeping genes. We have thus named the protein that binds to the initiator element HIP1 (Housekeeping Initiator Protein 1).

scholarly journals Yeast NC2 Associates with the RNA Polymerase II Preinitiation Complex and Selectively Affects Transcription In Vivo

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2736-2742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph V. Geisberg ◽  
Frank C. Holstege ◽  
Richard A. Young ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Preinitiation Complex ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Basal Transcription Factors

ABSTRACT NC2 (Dr1-Drap1 or Bur6-Ydr1) has been characterized in vitro as a general negative regulator of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription that interacts with TATA-binding protein (TBP) and inhibits its function. Here, we show that NC2 associates with promoters in vivo in a manner that correlates with transcriptional activity and with occupancy by basal transcription factors. NC2 rapidly associates with promoters in response to transcriptional activation, and it remains associated under conditions in which transcription is blocked after assembly of the Pol II preinitiation complex. NC2 positively and negatively affects approximately 17% of Saccharomyces cerevisiaegenes in a pattern that resembles the response to general environmental stress. Relative to TBP, NC2 occupancy is high at promoters where NC2 is positively required for normal levels of transcription. Thus, NC2 is associated with the Pol II preinitiation complex, and it can play a direct and positive role at certain promoters in vivo.

scholarly journals PPARβ/δ controls Mediator recruitment and transcription initiation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Legrand ◽  
Clemens L. Bretscher ◽  
Svenja Zielke ◽  
Bernhard Wilke ◽  
Michael Daude ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Inverse Agonist ◽  
Inverse Agonists ◽  
A Subunit ◽  
Basal Transcription Factors

AbstractRepression of transcription by nuclear receptors involves NCOR and SMRT corepressor complexes, which harbour the deacetylase HDAC3 as a subunit. Both deacetylase-dependent and -independent repression mechanisms have been reported for these complexes. In the absence of ligands, the nuclear receptor PPARβ/δ recruits NCOR and SMRT and represses expression of its canonical targets including the ANGPTL4 gene. Agonistic ligands cause corepressor dissociation and enable enhanced induction of transcription by coactivators. Vice versa, recently developed synthetic inverse agonists lead to augmented corepressor recruitment and repression that dominates over activating stimuli. Both basal repression of ANGPTL4 and reinforced repression elicited by inverse agonists are partially insensitive to HDAC inhibition. This raises the question of how PPARβ/δ represses transcription mechanistically.Here, we show that the PPARβ/δ inverse agonist PT-S264 impairs transcription initiation in human cells. Inverse agonist-bound PPARβ/δ interferes with recruitment of Mediator, RNA polymerase II, and TFIIB, but not with recruitment of other basal transcription factors, to the ANGPTL4 promoter. We identify NCOR as the main ligand-dependent interactor of PPARβ/δ in the presence of PT-S264. In PPARβ/δ knockout cells, reconstitution with PPARβ/δ mutants deficient in basal repression recruit less NCOR, SMRT, and HDAC3 to chromatin, concomitant with increased binding of RNA polymerase II. PT-S264 restores binding of NCOR, SMRT, and HDAC3, resulting in diminished polymerase II binding and transcriptional repression. In the presence of HDAC inhibitors, ligand-mediated repression of PPARβ/δ target genes is only partially relieved. Our findings corroborate deacetylase-dependent and -independent repressive functions of HDAC3-containing complexes. Deacetylase-independent repression mediated by binding of inverse agonists to PPARβ/δ involve NCOR/SMRT recruitment and interference with Mediator, TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II binding.

Core promoter-selective RNA polymerase II transcription

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Gross ◽  
Thomas Oelgeschläger
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rnap Ii

The initiation of mRNA synthesis in eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process that requires the assembly of general transcription factors and RNAP II (RNA polymerase II; also abbreviated as Pol II) into a pre-initiation complex at the core promoter. The core promoter is defined as the minimal DNA region that is sufficient to direct low levels of activator-independent (basal) transcription by RNAP II in vitro. The core promoter typically extends approx. 40 bp up- and down-stream of the start site of transcription and can contain several distinct core promoter sequence elements. Core promoters in higher eukaryotes are highly diverse in structure, and each core promoter sequence element is only found in a subset of genes. So far, only TATA box and INR (initiator) element have been shown to be capable of directing accurate RNAP II transcription initiation independent of other core promoter elements. Computational analysis of metazoan genomes suggests that the prevalence of the TATA box has been overestimated in the past and that the majority of human genes are TATA-less. While TATA-mediated transcription initiation has been studied in great detail and is very well understood, very little is known about the factors and mechanisms involved in the function of the INR and other core promoter elements. Here we summarize our current understanding of the factors and mechanisms involved in core promoter-selective transcription and discuss possible pathways through which diversity in core promoter architecture might contribute to combinatorial gene regulation in metazoan cells.

Assembly of RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes before assembly of nucleosomes allows efficient initiation of transcription on nucleosomal templates

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3114-3121
Author(s):  
J A Knezetic ◽  
G A Jacob ◽  
D S Luse
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Chromatin Assembly ◽  
Nucleosome Assembly ◽  
Preinitiation Complex ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Initiation Of Transcription ◽  
Dna Template

We have previously shown that assembly of nucleosomes on the DNA template blocks transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. In the studies reported here, we demonstrate that assembly of a complete RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex before nucleosome assembly results in nucleosomal templates which support initiation in vitro as efficiently as naked DNA. Control experiments prove that our observations are not the result of slow displacement of nucleosomes by the transcription machinery during chromatin assembly, nor are they an artifact of inefficient nucleosome deposition on templates already bearing an RNA polymerase. Thus, the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex appears to be resistant to disruption by subsequent nucleosome assembly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document