scholarly journals Identification of seven hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 making redundant contributions to transcriptional activation.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 5557-5571 ◽  
Author(s):  
B M Jackson ◽  
C M Drysdale ◽  
K Natarajan ◽  
A G Hinnebusch
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
High Level

GCN4 is a transcriptional activator in the bZIP family that regulates amino acid biosynthetic genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal 100 amino acids of GCN4 contains a potent activation function that confers high-level transcription in the absence of the centrally located acidic activation domain (CAAD) delineated in previous studies. To identify specific amino acids important for activation by the N-terminal domain, we mutagenized a GCN4 allele lacking the CAAD and screened alleles in vivo for reduced expression of the HIS3 gene. We found four pairs of closely spaced phenylalanines and a leucine residue distributed throughout the N-terminal 100 residues of GCN4 that are required for high-level activation in the absence of the CAAD. Trp, Leu, and Tyr were highly functional substitutions for the Phe residue at position 45. Combined with our previous findings, these results indicate that GCN4 contains seven clusters of aromatic or bulky hydrophobic residues which make important contributions to transcriptional activation at HIS3. None of the seven hydrophobic clusters is essential for activation by full-length GCN4, and the critical residues in two or three clusters must be mutated simultaneously to observe a substantial reduction in GCN4 function. Numerous combinations of four or five intact clusters conferred high-level transcription of HIS3. We propose that many of the hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 act independently of one another to provide redundant means of stimulating transcription and that the functional contributions of these different segments are cumulative at the HIS3 promoter. On the basis of the primacy of bulky hydrophobic residues throughout the activation domain, we suggest that GCN4 contains multiple sites that mediate hydrophobic contacts with one or more components of the transcription initiation machinery.

scholarly journals Extensive mutagenesis of a transcriptional activation domain identifies single hydrophobic and acidic amino acids important for activation in vivo.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
M B Sainz ◽  
S A Goff ◽  
V L Chandler
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Carboxyl Terminus ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Acidic Amino Acids

C1 is a transcriptional activator of genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes of the maize anthocyanin pigment pathway. C1 has an amino terminus homologous to Myb DNA-binding domains and an acidic carboxyl terminus that is a transcriptional activation domain in maize and yeast cells. To identify amino acids critical for transcriptional activation, an extensive random mutagenesis of the C1 carboxyl terminus was done. The C1 activation domain is remarkably tolerant of amino acid substitutions, as changes at 34 residues had little or no effect on transcriptional activity. These changes include introduction of helix-incompatible amino acids throughout the C1 activation domain and alteration of most single acidic amino acids, suggesting that a previously postulated amphipathic alpha-helix is not required for activation. Substitutions at two positions revealed amino acids important for transcriptional activation. Replacement of leucine 253 with a proline or glutamine resulted in approximately 10% of wild-type transcriptional activation. Leucine 253 is in a region of C1 in which several hydrophobic residues align with residues important for transcriptional activation by the herpes simplex virus VP16 protein. However, changes at all other hydrophobic residues in C1 indicate that none are critical for C1 transcriptional activation. The other important amino acid in C1 is aspartate 262, as a change to valine resulted in only 24% of wild-type transcriptional activation. Comparison of our C1 results with those from VP16 reveal substantial differences in which amino acids are required for transcriptional activation in vivo by these two acidic activation domains.

scholarly journals The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1220-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Drysdale ◽  
E Dueñas ◽  
B M Jackson ◽  
U Reusser ◽  
G H Braus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Hydrophobic Amino Acids ◽  
High Level

GCN4 is a transcriptional activator in the bZIP family that regulates amino acid biosynthetic genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous work suggested that the principal activation domain of GCN4 is a highly acidic segment of approximately 40 amino acids located in the center of the protein. We conducted a mutational analysis of GCN4 with a single-copy allele expressed under the control of the native promoter and translational control elements. Our results indicate that GCN4 contains two activation domains of similar potency that can function independently to promote high-level transcription of the target genes HIS3 and HIS4. One of these domains is coincident with the acidic activation domain defined previously; the other extends over the N-terminal one-third of the protein. Both domains are partially dependent on the coactivator protein ADA2. Each domain appears to be composed of two or more small subdomains that have additive effects on transcription and that can cooperate in different combinations to promote high-level expression of HIS3 and HIS4. At least three of these subdomains are critically dependent on bulky hydrophobic amino acids for their function. Five of the important hydrophobic residues, Phe-97, Phe-98, Met-107, Tyr-110, and Leu-113, fall within a region of proposed sequence homology between GCN4 and the herpesvirus acidic activator VP16. The remaining three residues, Trp-120, Leu-123, and Phe-124, are highly conserved between GCN4 and its Neurospora counterpart, cpc-1. Because of the functional redundancy in the activation domain, mutations at positions 97 and 98 must be combined with mutations at positions 120 to 124 to observe a substantial reduction in activation by full-length GCN4, and substitution of all eight hydrophobic residues was required to inactivate full-length GCN4. These hydrophobic residues may mediate important interactions between GCN4 and one or more of its target proteins in the transcription initiation complex.

scholarly journals Transcriptional activation upon pheromone stimulation mediated by a small domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ste12p.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 6410-6418 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Pi ◽  
C T Chien ◽  
S Fields
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Map Kinase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Hybrid Proteins ◽  
High Level ◽  
Transcriptional Induction

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ste12p induces transcription of pheromone-responsive genes by binding to a DNA sequence designated the pheromone response element. We generated a series of hybrid proteins of Ste12p with the DNA-binding and activation domains of the transcriptional activator Gal4p to define a pheromone induction domain of Ste12p sufficient to mediate pheromone-induced transcription by these hybrid proteins. A minimal pheromone induction domain, delineated as residues 301 to 335 of Ste12p, is dependent on the pheromone mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway for induction activity. Mutation of the three serine and threonine residues within the minimal pheromone induction domain did not affect transcriptional induction, indicating that the activity of this domain is not directly regulated by MAP kinase phosphorylation. By contrast, mutation of the two tyrosines or their preceding acidic residues led to a high level of transcriptional activity in the absence of pheromone and consequently to the loss of pheromone induction. This constitutively high activity was not affected by mutations in the MAP kinase cascade, suggesting that the function of the pheromone induction domain is normally repressed in the absence of pheromone. By two-hybrid analysis, this minimal domain interacts with two negative regulators, Dig1p and Dig2p (also designated Rst1p and Rst2p), and the interaction is abolished by mutation of the tyrosines. The pheromone induction domain itself has weak and inducible transcriptional activity, and its ability to potentiate transcription depends on the activity of an adjacent activation domain. These results suggest that the pheromone induction domain of Ste12p mediates transcriptional induction via a two-step process: the relief of repression and synergistic transcriptional activation with another activation domain.

scholarly journals The Gcn4p Activation Domain Interacts Specifically In Vitro with RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme, TFIID, and the Adap-Gcn5p Coactivator Complex

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1711-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie M. Drysdale ◽  
Belinda M. Jackson ◽  
Richard McVeigh ◽  
Edward R. Klebanow ◽  
Yu Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Adapter Proteins ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Tata Box Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme

ABSTRACT The Gcn4p activation domain contains seven clusters of hydrophobic residues that make additive contributions to transcriptional activation in vivo. We observed efficient binding of a glutathioneS-transferase (GST)–Gcn4p fusion protein to components of three different coactivator complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell extracts, including subunits of transcription factor IID (TFIID) (yeast TAFII20 [yTAFII20], yTAFII60, and yTAFII90), the holoenzyme mediator (Srb2p, Srb4p, and Srb7p), and the Adap-Gcn5p complex (Ada2p and Ada3p). The binding to these coactivator subunits was completely dependent on the hydrophobic clusters in the Gcn4p activation domain. Alanine substitutions in single clusters led to moderate reductions in binding, double-cluster substitutions generally led to greater reductions in binding than the corresponding single-cluster mutations, and mutations in four or more clusters reduced binding to all of the coactivator proteins to background levels. The additive effects of these mutations on binding of coactivator proteins correlated with their cumulative effects on transcriptional activation by Gcn4p in vivo, particularly with Ada3p, suggesting that recruitment of these coactivator complexes to the promoter is a cardinal function of the Gcn4p activation domain. As judged by immunoprecipitation analysis, components of the mediator were not associated with constituents of TFIID and Adap-Gcn5p in the extracts, implying that GST-Gcn4p interacted with the mediator independently of these other coactivators. Unexpectedly, a proportion of Ada2p coimmunoprecipitated with yTAFII90, and the yTAFII20, -60, and -90 proteins were coimmunoprecipitated with Ada3p, revealing a stable interaction between components of TFIID and the Adap-Gcn5p complex. Because GST-Gcn4p did not bind specifically to highly purified TFIID, Gcn4p may interact with TFIID via the Adap-Gcn5p complex or some other adapter proteins. The ability of Gcn4p to interact with several distinct coactivator complexes that are physically and genetically linked to TATA box-binding protein can provide an explanation for the observation that yTAFII proteins are dispensable for activation by Gcn4p in vivo.

scholarly journals Identifying a species-specific region of yeast TF11B in vivo.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 3651-3657 ◽  
Author(s):  
S P Shaw ◽  
J Wingfield ◽  
M J Dorsey ◽  
J Ma
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Specific Region ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Species Specific

The general transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) is required for RNA polymerase II transcription in eukaryotes. It provides a physical link between the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase and is a component previously suggested to respond to transcriptional activators in vitro. In this report, we compare the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and human forms of the protein in yeast cells to study their functional differences. We demonstrate that human TFIIB fails to functionally replace yeast TFIIB in yeast cells. By analyzing various human-yeast hybrid TFIIB molecules, we show that a 14-amino-acid region at the amino terminus of the first repeat of yeast TFIIB plays an important role in determining species specificity in vivo. In addition, we identify four amino acids in this region that are critical for an amphipathic helix unique to yeast TFIIB. By site-directed mutagenesis analyses we demonstrate that these four amino acids are important for yeast TFIIB's activity in vivo. Finally, we show that mutations in the species-specific region of yeast TFIIB can differentially affect the expression of genes activated by different activators in vivo. These results provide strong evidence suggesting that yeast TFIIB is involved in the process of transcriptional activation in living cells.

scholarly journals A Ligand Binding Domain Mutation in the Mouse Glucocorticoid Receptor Functionally Links Chromatin Remodeling and Transcription Initiation

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8146-8157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn A. Sheldon ◽  
Catharine L. Smith ◽  
Jack E. Bodwell ◽  
Allan U. Munck ◽  
Gordon L. Hager
Keyword(s):  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Ligand Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Process ◽  
Activation Domain

ABSTRACT We utilized the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (LTR) in vivo to understand how the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with a nucleosome-assembled promoter allows access of factors required for the transition from a repressed promoter to a derepressed, transcriptionally competent promoter. A mutation (C644G) in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the mouse GR has provided information regarding the steps required in the derepression/activation process and in the functional significance of the two major transcriptional activation domains, AF1 and AF2. The mutant GR activates transcription from a transiently transfected promoter that has a disordered nucleosomal structure, though significantly less well than the wild-type GR. With an integrated, replicated promoter, which is assembled in an ordered nucleosomal array, the mutant GR does not activate transcription, and it fails to induce chromatin remodeling of the MMTV LTR promoter, as indicated by nuclease accessibility assays. Together, these findings support a two-step model for the transition of a nucleosome-assembled, repressed promoter to its transcriptionally active, derepressed form. In addition, we find that the C-terminal GR mutation is dominant over the transcription activation function of the N-terminal GR activation domain. These findings suggest that the primary activation function of the C-terminal activation domain is different from the function of the N-terminal activation domain and that it is required for derepression of the chromatin-repressed MMTV promoter.

scholarly journals Analysis of DNA binding by the adenovirus type 5 E1A oncoprotein

2002 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Avvakumov ◽  
Majdina Sahbegovic ◽  
Zhiying Zhang ◽  
Michael Shuen ◽  
Joe S. Mymryk
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Adenovirus Type ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Adenovirus Type 5

Adenovirus type 5 E1A proteins interact with cellular regulators of transcription to reprogram gene expression in the infected or transformed cell. Although E1A also interacts with DNA directly in vitro, it is not clear how this relates to its function in vivo. The N-terminal conserved regions 1, 2 and 3 and the C-terminal portions of E1A were prepared as purified recombinant proteins and analyses showed that only the C-terminal region bound DNA in vitro. Deletion of E1A amino acids 201–220 inhibited binding and a minimal fragment encompassing amino acids 201–218 of E1A was sufficient for binding single- and double-stranded DNA. This portion of E1A also bound the cation-exchange resins cellulose phosphate and carboxymethyl Sepharose. As this region contains six basic amino acids, in vitro binding of E1A to DNA probably results from an ionic interaction with the phosphodiester backbone of DNA. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown that expression of a strong transcriptional activation domain fused to a DNA-binding domain can inhibit growth. Although fusion of the C-terminal region of E1A to a strong transcriptional activation domain inhibited growth when expressed in yeast, this was not mediated by the DNA-binding domain identified in vitro. These data suggest that E1A does not bind DNA in vivo.

scholarly journals The regulatory domain of human heat shock factor 1 is sufficient to sense heat stress.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
E M Newton ◽  
U Knauf ◽  
M Green ◽  
R E Kingston
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Heat Shock Factor ◽  
Acid Activation ◽  
Regulatory Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Control Temperature ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domains

Heat shock factor (HSF) activates transcription in response to cellular stress. Human HSF1 has a central regulatory domain which can repress the activity of its activation domains at the control temperature and render them heat shock inducible. To determine whether the regulatory domain works in tandem with specific features of the HSF1 transcriptional activation domains, we first used deletion and point mutagenesis to define these activation domains. One of the activation domains can be reduced to just 20 amino acids. A GAL4 fusion protein containing the HSF 1 regulatory domain and this 20-amino-acid activation domain is repressed at the control temperature but potently activates transcription in response to heat shock. No specific amino acids in this activation domain are required for response to the regulatory domain; in particular, none of the potentially phosphorylated serine and threonine residues are required for heat induction, implying that heat-induced phosphorylation of the transcriptional activation domains is not required for induction. The regulatory domain is able to confer heat responsiveness to an otherwise completely heterologous chimeric activator that contains a portion of the VP16 activation domain, suggesting that the regulatory domain can sense heat in the absence of other portions of HSF1.

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2832-2839
Author(s):  
A S Ponticelli ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

The promoter region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that direct transcription initiation to two sites designated +1 and +13. On the basis of differences between their nucleotide sequences and their responsiveness to upstream promoter elements, it has previously been proposed that TC and TR promote transcription by different molecular mechanisms. To begin a study of his3 transcription in vitro, we used S. cerevisiae nuclear extracts together with various DNA templates and transcriptional activator proteins that have been characterized in vivo. We demonstrated accurate transcription initiation in vitro at the sites used in vivo, transcriptional activation by GCN4, and activation by a GAL4 derivative on various gal-his3 hybrid promoters. In all cases, transcription stimulation was dependent on the presence of an acidic activation region in the activator protein. In addition, analysis of promoters containing a variety of TR derivatives indicated that the level of transcription in vitro was directly related to the level achieved in vivo. The results demonstrated that the in vitro system accurately reproduced all known aspects of in vivo his3 transcription that depend on the TR element. However, in striking contrast to his3 transcription in vivo, transcription in vitro yielded approximately 20 times more of the +13 transcript than the +1 transcript. This result was not due to inability of the +1 initiation site to be efficiently utilized in vitro, but rather it reflects the lack of TC function in vitro. The results support the idea that TC and TR mediate transcription from the wild-type promoter by distinct mechanisms.

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document