scholarly journals Interaction of C/EBPbeta and v-Myb is required for synergistic activation of the mim-1 gene.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1316-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mink ◽  
U Kerber ◽  
K H Klempnauer
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Transcription Factor Family ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Synergistic Activation

The retroviral oncogene v-myb encodes a transcription factor (v-Myb) which activates the myelomonocyte-specific mim-1 gene, a natural myb target gene, by cooperating with members of the C/EBP transcription factor family. The finding that v-Myb, together with C/EBP, is sufficient to activate the mim-1 gene in heterologous cell types has implicated Myb and C/EBP as a bipartite molecular switch, which regulates the expression of myelomonocyte-specific genes. To understand the relationship between v-Myb and C/EBP in more detail, we have examined the molecular basis of the activation of the mim-1 promoter by v-Myb and C/EBPbeta, a member of the C/EBP transcription factor family highly expressed in myelomonocytic cells. We have identified a composite Myb and C/EBP response element which mediates synergistic activation of the mim-1 promoter by both factors and consists of closely spaced Myb- and C/EBP-binding sites. In vitro and in vivo protein-binding studies indicate that v-Myb and C/EBPbeta interact with each other via their DNA-binding domains. We show that this interaction is essential for the synergistic activation of the mim-1 promoter by v-Myb and C/EBPbeta. Our work therefore identifies C/EBPbeta as an interaction partner of v-Myb involved in myelomonocyte gene expression.

scholarly journals Cooperative binding of the Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF to repetitive ribosomal gene enhancers

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4980
Author(s):  
C D Putnam ◽  
C S Pikaard
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Ribosomal Gene ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer function in vertebrates. UBF is unusual in that it has multiple DNA-binding domains with homology to high-mobility-group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. However, a recognizable DNA consensus sequence for UBF binding is lacking. In this study, we have used gel retardation and DNase I footprinting to examine Xenopus UBF (xUBF) binding to Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene enhancers. We show that UBF has a minimum requirement for about 60 bp of DNA, the size of the short enhancer variant in X. laevis. Stronger UBF binding occurs on the longer enhancer variant (81 bp) and on multiple enhancers linked head to tail. In vivo, Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers exist in blocks of 10 alternating 60- and 81-bp repeats within the intergenic spacer. In vitro, UBF binds cooperatively to probes with 10 enhancers, with five intermediate complexes observed in titration experiments. This suggests that, on average, one UBF dimer binds every two enhancers. A single UBF dimer can produce a DNase I footprint ranging in size from approximately 30 to about 115 bp on enhancer probes of different lengths. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple DNA-binding domains or subdomains within UBF bind independently, forming more-stable interactions on longer probes.

scholarly journals Cooperative binding of the Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF to repetitive ribosomal gene enhancers.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4980 ◽  
Author(s):  
C D Putnam ◽  
C S Pikaard
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Ribosomal Gene ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer function in vertebrates. UBF is unusual in that it has multiple DNA-binding domains with homology to high-mobility-group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. However, a recognizable DNA consensus sequence for UBF binding is lacking. In this study, we have used gel retardation and DNase I footprinting to examine Xenopus UBF (xUBF) binding to Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene enhancers. We show that UBF has a minimum requirement for about 60 bp of DNA, the size of the short enhancer variant in X. laevis. Stronger UBF binding occurs on the longer enhancer variant (81 bp) and on multiple enhancers linked head to tail. In vivo, Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers exist in blocks of 10 alternating 60- and 81-bp repeats within the intergenic spacer. In vitro, UBF binds cooperatively to probes with 10 enhancers, with five intermediate complexes observed in titration experiments. This suggests that, on average, one UBF dimer binds every two enhancers. A single UBF dimer can produce a DNase I footprint ranging in size from approximately 30 to about 115 bp on enhancer probes of different lengths. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple DNA-binding domains or subdomains within UBF bind independently, forming more-stable interactions on longer probes.

scholarly journals Role of Papillomavirus E1 Initiator Dimerization in DNA Replication

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (13) ◽  
pp. 8661-8664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Schuck ◽  
Arne Stenlund
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Severe Effect ◽  
Origin Of Dna Replication ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

ABSTRACT Viral initiator proteins are polypeptides that form oligomeric complexes on the origin of DNA replication (ori). These complexes carry out a multitude of functions related to initiation of DNA replication, and although many of these functions have been characterized biochemically, little is understood about how the complexes are assembled. Here we demonstrate that loss of one particular interaction, the dimerization between E1 DNA binding domains, has a severe effect on DNA replication in vivo but has surprisingly modest effects on most individual biochemical activities in vitro. We conclude that the dimer interaction is primarily required for initial recognition of ori.

scholarly journals Fused protein domains inhibit DNA binding by LexA.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 3006-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Golemis ◽  
R Brent
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Dimerization Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Operator Binding

Many studies of transcription activation employ fusions of activation domains to DNA binding domains derived from the bacterial repressor LexA and the yeast activator GAL4. Such studies often implicitly assume that DNA binding by the chimeric proteins is equivalent to that of the protein donating the DNA binding moiety. To directly investigate this issue, we compared operator binding by a series of LexA-derivative proteins to operator binding by native LexA, by using both in vivo and in vitro assays. We show that operator binding by many proteins such as LexA-Myc, LexA-Fos, and LexA-Bicoid is severely impaired, while binding of other LexA-derivative proteins, such as those that carry bacterially encoded acidic sequences ("acid blobs"), is not. Our results also show that DNA binding by LexA derivatives that contain the LexA carboxy-terminal dimerization domain (amino acids 88 to 202) is considerably stronger than binding by fusions that lack it and that heterologous dimerization motifs cannot substitute for the LexA88-202 function. These results suggest the need to reevaluate some previous studies of activation that employed LexA derivatives and modifications to recent experimental approaches that use LexA and GAL4 derivatives to detect and study protein-protein interactions.

The promoter of the CD19 gene is a target for the B-cell-specific transcription factor BSAP

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2662-2672
Author(s):  
Z Kozmik ◽  
S Wang ◽  
P Dörfler ◽  
B Adams ◽  
M Busslinger
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Specific Transcription Factor ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
B Lymphoid

The CD19 protein is expressed on the surface of all B-lymphoid cells with the exception of terminally differentiated plasma cells and has been implicated as a signal-transducing receptor in the control of proliferation and differentiation. Here we demonstrate complete correlation between the expression pattern of the CD19 gene and the B-cell-specific transcription factor BSAP in a large panel of B-lymphoid cell lines. The human CD19 gene has been cloned, and several BSAP-binding sites have been mapped by in vitro protein-DNA binding studies. In particular, a high-affinity BSAP-binding site instead of a TATA sequence is located in the -30 promoter region upstream of a cluster of heterogeneous transcription start sites. Moreover, this site is occupied by BSAP in vivo in a CD19-expressing B-cell line but not in plasma or HeLa cells. This high-affinity site has been conserved in the promoters of both human and mouse CD19 genes and was furthermore shown to confer B-cell specificity to a beta-globin reporter gene in transient transfection experiments. In addition, BSAP was found to be the only abundant DNA-binding activity of B-cell nuclear extracts that interacts with the CD19 promoter. Together, this evidence strongly implicates BSAP in the regulation of the CD19 gene.

Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jun ◽  
C. Desplan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The Pax proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators involved in many developmental processes in all higher eukaryotes. They are characterized by the presence of a paired domain (PD), a bipartite DNA binding domain composed of two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs, the PAI and RED domains. The PD is also often associated with a homeodomain (HD) which is itself able to form homo- and hetero-dimers on DNA. Many of these proteins therefore contain three HTH motifs each able to recognize DNA. However, all PDs recognize highly related DNA sequences, and most HDs also recognize almost identical sites. We show here that different Pax proteins use multiple combinations of their HTHs to recognize several types of target sites. For instance, the Drosophila Paired protein can bind, in vitro, exclusively through its PAI domain, or through a dimer of its HD, or through cooperative interaction between PAI domain and HD. However, prd function in vivo requires the synergistic action of both the PAI domain and the HD. Pax proteins with only a PD appear to require both PAI and RED domains, while a Pax-6 isoform and a new Pax protein, Lune, may rely on the RED domain and HD. We propose a model by which Pax proteins recognize different target genes in vivo through various combinations of their DNA binding domains, thus expanding their recognition repertoire.

Synergistic activation of a human promoter in vivo by transcription factor Sp1

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1935-1943
Author(s):  
G M Anderson ◽  
S O Freytag
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Human Promoter ◽  
Transcription Factor Sp1 ◽  
Synergistic Activation ◽  
Cellular Context

Many eucaryotic promoters contain multiple binding sites for sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. In some cases, these proteins have been shown to interact synergistically to activate transcription. In this study, we address the possibility that the transcription factor Sp1 can synergistically activate a native human promoter in a cellular context that closely resembles that of a single-copy gene. Using DNase I footprinting with affinity-purified Sp1, we show that the human argininosuccinate synthetase (AS) promoter contains three sites that bind Sp1 with different affinities. These binding sites were mutated to abolish Sp1 binding, individually and in all possible combinations, to generate a series of AS promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression constructs. Mutations designed to increase Sp1 binding were also introduced at each site. The in vivo transcriptional activity of these mutant AS promoter-CAT constructs was then measured in stably transfected human RPMI 2650 cell lines. Our results show that each of the three Sp1-binding sites contributes to full activation of the human AS promoter and that the relative contribution of each site correlates well with its in vitro affinity for Sp1. More importantly, we find that the three Sp1-binding sites when present in the same promoter activate transcription to a level that is 8 times greater than would be expected given their individual activities in the absence of the other two sites. Thus, we provide direct evidence that Sp1-binding sites in their native context in a human promoter can interact synergistically in vivo to activate transcription. The ability to activate transcription synergistically may be the reason that many cellular promoters have multiple Sp1-binding sites arranged in tandem and in close proximity.

scholarly journals The promoter of the CD19 gene is a target for the B-cell-specific transcription factor BSAP.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2662-2672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Kozmik ◽  
S Wang ◽  
P Dörfler ◽  
B Adams ◽  
M Busslinger
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Specific Transcription Factor ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
B Lymphoid

The CD19 protein is expressed on the surface of all B-lymphoid cells with the exception of terminally differentiated plasma cells and has been implicated as a signal-transducing receptor in the control of proliferation and differentiation. Here we demonstrate complete correlation between the expression pattern of the CD19 gene and the B-cell-specific transcription factor BSAP in a large panel of B-lymphoid cell lines. The human CD19 gene has been cloned, and several BSAP-binding sites have been mapped by in vitro protein-DNA binding studies. In particular, a high-affinity BSAP-binding site instead of a TATA sequence is located in the -30 promoter region upstream of a cluster of heterogeneous transcription start sites. Moreover, this site is occupied by BSAP in vivo in a CD19-expressing B-cell line but not in plasma or HeLa cells. This high-affinity site has been conserved in the promoters of both human and mouse CD19 genes and was furthermore shown to confer B-cell specificity to a beta-globin reporter gene in transient transfection experiments. In addition, BSAP was found to be the only abundant DNA-binding activity of B-cell nuclear extracts that interacts with the CD19 promoter. Together, this evidence strongly implicates BSAP in the regulation of the CD19 gene.

scholarly journals Murine clusterin: molecular cloning and mRNA localization of a gene associated with epithelial differentiation processes during embryogenesis

1993 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
LE French ◽  
A Chonn ◽  
D Ducrest ◽  
B Baumann ◽  
D Belin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Heparin Binding ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Cell Layers

Clusterin is a broadly distributed glycoprotein constitutively expressed by various tissues and cell types, that has been shown to be involved in cell-cell adhesion and expressed during cellular differentiation in vitro. To assess the suggested participation of clusterin in these processes in vivo, we have cloned the cDNA encoding murine clusterin and studied the cellular distribution of clusterin mRNA during murine embryogenesis. Sequence analysis of the cDNA encoding murine clusterin revealed 92 and 75% sequence identity with the rat and human cDNAs, respectively, and conservation of the predicted structural features which include alpha-helical regions and heparin-binding domains. From 12.5 d of development onwards, the clusterin gene is widely expressed in developing epithelia, and selectively localized within the differentiating cell layers of tissues such as the developing skin, tooth, and duodenum where proliferating and differentiating compartments are readily distinguished. In addition, transient and localized clusterin gene expression was detected in certain morphogenetically active epithelia. In the lung, abundant gene transcripts were detected in cuboidal epithelial cells of the terminal lung buds during branching morphogenesis, and in the kidney, clusterin gene expression in the epithelial cells of comma and S-shaped bodies coincided with the process of polarization. Our results demonstrate the in vivo expression of the clusterin gene by differentiating epithelial cells during murine embryogenesis, and provide novel evidence suggesting that clusterin may be involved in the differentiation and morphogenesis of certain epithelia.

scholarly journals Specific Interaction between the Initiator Protein (Rep) and Origin of Plasmid ColE2-P9

2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (3) ◽  
pp. 1061-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Han ◽  
M. Yagura ◽  
T. Itoh
Keyword(s):  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Replication Assay ◽  
Initiator Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Biochemical Analyses ◽  
Half Turn ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

ABSTRACT The replication initiator protein (Rep) of plasmid ColE2-P9 (ColE2) is multifunctional. We are interested in how Rep binds to the origin (Ori) to perform various functions. We used the wild type and variants of Rep to study the Rep-Ori interaction by both in vitro and in vivo approaches, including biochemical analyses of protein-DNA interactions and an in vivo replication assay. We identified three regions (I, II, and III) of Rep, located in the C-terminal half, and three corresponding binding sites (I, II, and III) in Ori which are important for Rep-Ori interaction. We showed that region I, containing a putative helix-turn-helix motif, is necessary and sufficient for specific Ori recognition, interacting with site I of the origin DNA from the major groove. Region II interacts with site II of the origin DNA, from the adjacent minor groove in the left half of Ori, and region III interacts with site III, next to the template sequence for primer synthesis, which is one and one-half turn apart from site I on the opposite surface of the origin DNA. A putative linker region located between the two DNA binding domains (regions II and III) was identified, which might provide Rep an extended conformation suitable for binding to the two separate sites in Ori. Based on the results presented in this paper, we propose a model for Rep-Ori interaction in which Rep binds to Ori as a monomer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document