scholarly journals Structure-Function Analysis of the Human TFIIB-Related Factor II Protein Reveals an Essential Role for the C-Terminal Domain in RNA Polymerase III Transcription

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 9406-9418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Saxena ◽  
Beicong Ma ◽  
Laura Schramm ◽  
Nouria Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
U6 Promoter ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Type 3

ABSTRACT The transcription factors TFIIB, Brf1, and Brf2 share related N-terminal zinc ribbon and core domains. TFIIB bridges RNA polymerase II (Pol II) with the promoter-bound preinitiation complex, whereas Brf1 and Brf2 are involved, as part of activities also containing TBP and Bdp1 and referred to here as Brf1-TFIIIB and Brf2-TFIIIB, in the recruitment of Pol III. Brf1-TFIIIB recruits Pol III to type 1 and 2 promoters and Brf2-TFIIIB to type 3 promoters such as the human U6 promoter. Brf1 and Brf2 both have a C-terminal extension absent in TFIIB, but their C-terminal extensions are unrelated. In yeast Brf1, the C-terminal extension interacts with the TBP/TATA box complex and contributes to the recruitment of Bdp1. Here we have tested truncated Brf2, as well as Brf2/TFIIB chimeric proteins for U6 transcription and for assembly of U6 preinitiation complexes. Our results characterize functions of various human Brf2 domains and reveal that the C-terminal domain is required for efficient association of the protein with U6 promoter-bound TBP and SNAPc, a type 3 promoter-specific transcription factor, and for efficient recruitment of Bdp1. This in turn suggests that the C-terminal extensions in Brf1 and Brf2 are crucial to specific recruitment of Pol III over Pol II.

scholarly journals Engineered mini H1 promoters with dedicated RNA Polymerase II or III activity

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.015386
Author(s):  
Zongliang Gao ◽  
Yme Ubeles van der Velden ◽  
Minghui Fan ◽  
Cynthia Alyssa van der Linden ◽  
Monique Vink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Polymerase Activity ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Non Coding Rna ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Short Hairpin Rnas

RNA polymerase III promoters such as 7SK, U6 and H1 are widely used for the expression of small non-coding RNAs, including short hairpin RNAs for RNAi experiments and guide RNAs for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. We previously reported dual RNA polymerase activity (Pol II/III) for the human H1 promoter and demonstrated that this promiscuous RNA polymerase use can be exploited for the simultaneous expression of both a non-coding RNA and an mRNA. However, this combination is not a desired feature in other experimental and therapeutic settings. To overcome this limitation of the H1 promoter we engineered a miniature H1/7SK hybrid promoter with minimal Pol II activity, thereby boosting the Pol III activity to a level that is higher than that of either parental promoter. In parallel, we also engineered small Pol II-specific H1 promoter variants and explored their use as general Pol II promoters for protein expression. The newly engineered promoter variants form an attractive alternative to the commonly-used H1 promoter in terms of activity and small promoter size, but also concerning safety by exclusive expression of the desired therapeutic transcript (either Pol II or Pol III, but not both).

scholarly journals The Selenocysteine tRNA Gene in Leishmania major Is Transcribed by both RNA Polymerase II and RNA Polymerase III

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma E. Padilla-Mejía ◽  
Luis E. Florencio-Martínez ◽  
Rodrigo Moreno-Campos ◽  
Juan C. Vizuet-de-Rueda ◽  
Ana M. Cevallos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Leishmania Major ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcriptional Analysis ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic tRNAs, transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III), contain boxes A and B as internal promoter elements. One exception is the selenocysteine (Sec) tRNA (tRNA-Sec), whose transcription is directed by an internal box B and three extragenic sequences in vertebrates. Here we report on the transcriptional analysis of the tRNA-Sec gene in the protozoan parasite Leishmania major . This organism has unusual mechanisms of gene expression, including Pol II polycistronic transcription and maturation of mRNAs by trans splicing, a process that attaches a 39-nucleotide miniexon to the 5′ end of all the mRNAs. In L. major , tRNA-Sec is encoded by a single gene inserted into a Pol II polycistronic unit, in contrast to most tRNAs, which are clustered at the boundaries of polycistronic units. 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends and reverse transcription-PCR experiments showed that some tRNA-Sec transcripts contain the miniexon at the 5′ end and a poly(A) tail at the 3′ end, indicating that the tRNA-Sec gene is polycistronically transcribed by Pol II and processed by trans splicing and polyadenylation, as was recently reported for the tRNA-Sec genes in the related parasite Trypanosoma brucei . However, nuclear run-on assays with RNA polymerase inhibitors and with cells that were previously UV irradiated showed that the tRNA-Sec gene in L. major is also transcribed by Pol III. Thus, our results indicate that RNA polymerase specificity in Leishmania is not absolute in vivo , as has recently been found in other eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Diversity in the signals required for nuclear accumulation of U snRNPs and variety in the pathways of nuclear transport.

1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Fischer ◽  
E Darzynkiewicz ◽  
S M Tahara ◽  
N A Dathan ◽  
R Lührmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Nuclear Targeting ◽  
Stringent Requirement ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Nuclear Localization Signals ◽  
U6 Snrna

The requirements for nuclear targeting of a number of U snRNAs have been studied by analyzing the behavior of in vitro-generated transcripts after microinjection into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes. Like the previously studied U1 snRNA, U2 snRNA is excluded from the nucleus when it does not have the 2,2,7mGpppN cap structure typical of the RNA polymerase II (pol II)-transcribed U snRNAs. Surprisingly, two other pol II-transcribed U snRNAs, U4 and U5, have a much less stringent requirement for the trimethyl cap structure. The gamma-monomethyl triphosphate cap structure of the RNA polymerase III-transcribed U6 snRNA, on the other hand, is shown not to play a role in nuclear targeting. Wheat germ agglutinin, which is known to prevent the import of many proteins into the nucleus, inhibits nuclear uptake of U6, but not of U1 or U5 snRNAs. Conversely, a 2,2,7mGpppG dinucleotide analogue of the trimethyl cap structure inhibits transport of the pol II U snRNAs, but does not detectably affect the transport of either U6 snRNA or a karyophilic protein. From these results it can be deduced that U6 enters the nucleus by a pathway similar or identical to that used by karyophilic proteins. The composite nuclear localization signals of the trimethyl cap-containing U snRNPs, however, do not function in the same way as previously defined nuclear targeting signals.

scholarly journals Functions of the N- and C-Terminal Domains of Human RAP74 in Transcriptional Initiation, Elongation, and Recycling of RNA Polymerase II

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2130-2142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Lei ◽  
Delin Ren ◽  
Ann Finkelstein ◽  
Zachary F. Burton
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Multiple Round ◽  
Major Late Promoter ◽  
Central Loop ◽  
Transcription Cycle ◽  
Terminal Domains

ABSTRACT Transcription factor IIF (TFIIF) cooperates with RNA polymerase II (pol II) during multiple stages of the transcription cycle including preinitiation complex assembly, initiation, elongation, and possibly termination and recycling. Human TFIIF appears to be an α2β2 heterotetramer of RNA polymerase II-associating protein 74- and 30-kDa subunits (RAP74 and RAP30). From inspection of its 517-amino-acid (aa) sequence, the RAP74 subunit appears to comprise separate N- and C-terminal domains connected by a flexible loop. In this study, we present functional data that strongly support this model for RAP74 architecture and further show that the N- and C-terminal domains and the central loop of RAP74 have distinct roles during separate phases of the transcription cycle. The N-terminal domain of RAP74 (minimally aa 1 to 172) is sufficient to deliver pol II into a complex formed on the adenovirus major late promoter with the TATA-binding protein, TFIIB, and RAP30. A more complete N-terminal domain fragment (aa 1 to 217) strongly stimulates both accurate initiation and elongation by pol II. The region of RAP74 between aa 172 and 205 and a subregion between aa 170 and 178 are critical for both accurate initiation and elongation, and mutations in these regions have similar effects on initiation and elongation. Based on these observations, RAP74 appears to have similar functions in initiation and elongation. The central region and the C-terminal domain of RAP74 do not contribute strongly to single-round accurate initiation or elongation stimulation but do stimulate multiple-round transcription in an extract system.

scholarly journals JMJD5 couples with CDK9 to release the paused RNA polymerase II

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (33) ◽  
pp. 19888-19895
Author(s):  
Haolin Liu ◽  
Srinivas Ramachandran ◽  
Nova Fong ◽  
Tzu Phang ◽  
Schuyler Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription Start Sites ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal Domain ◽  
Pol Ii Pausing ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal ◽  
Heptad Repeats

More than 30% of genes in higher eukaryotes are regulated by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) promoter proximal pausing. Pausing is released by the positive transcription elongation factor complex (P-TEFb). However, the exact mechanism by which this occurs and whether phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain of Pol II is involved in the process remains unknown. We previously reported that JMJD5 could generate tailless nucleosomes at position +1 from transcription start sites (TSS), thus perhaps enable progression of Pol II. Here we find that knockout of JMJD5 leads to accumulation of nucleosomes at position +1. Absence of JMJD5 also results in loss of or lowered transcription of a large number of genes. Interestingly, we found that phosphorylation, by CDK9, of Ser2 within two neighboring heptad repeats in the carboxyl-terminal domain of Pol II, together with phosphorylation of Ser5 within the second repeat, HR-Ser2p (1, 2)-Ser5p (2) for short, allows Pol II to bind JMJD5 via engagement of the N-terminal domain of JMJD5. We suggest that these events bring JMJD5 near the nucleosome at position +1, thus allowing JMJD5 to clip histones on this nucleosome, a phenomenon that may contribute to release of Pol II pausing.

scholarly journals Proximal sequence element-binding transcription factor (PTF) is a multisubunit complex required for transcription of both RNA polymerase II- and RNA polymerase III-dependent small nuclear RNA genes.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 2019-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Yoon ◽  
S Murphy ◽  
L Bai ◽  
Z Wang ◽  
R G Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Sequence Element ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Proximal Sequence Element ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Class Iii Genes ◽  
Pol Iii

The proximal sequence element (PSE), found in both RNA polymerase II (Pol II)- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes, is specifically bound by the PSE-binding transcription factor (PTF). We have purified PTF to near homogeneity from HeLa cell extracts by using a combination of conventional and affinity chromatographic methods. Purified PTF is composed of four polypeptides with apparent molecular masses of 180, 55, 45, and 44 kDa. A combination of preparative electrophoretic mobility shift and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analyses has conclusively identified these four polypeptides as subunits of human PTF, while UV cross-linking experiments demonstrate that the largest subunit of PTF is in close contact with the PSE. The purified PTF activates transcription from promoters of both Pol II- and Pol III-transcribed snRNA genes in a PSE-dependent manner. In addition, we have investigated factor requirements in transcription of Pol III-dependent snRNA genes. We show that in extracts that have been depleted of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and associated factors, recombinant TBP restores transcription from U6 and 7SK promoters but not from the VAI promoter, whereas the highly purified TBP-TBP-associated factor complex TFIIIB restores transcription from the VAI but not the U6 or 7SK promoter. Furthermore, by complementation of heat-treated extracts lacking TFIIIC activity, we show that TFIIIC1 is required for transcription of both the 7SK and VAI genes, whereas TFIIIC2 is required only for transcription of the VAI gene. From these observations, we conclude (i) that PTF and TFIIIC2 function as gene-specific as gene-specific factors for PSE-and B-box-containing Pol III genes, respectively, (ii) that the form of TBP used by class III genes with upstream promoter elements differs from the from used by class III genes with internal promoters, and (iii) that TFIIIC1 is required for both internal and external Pol III promoters.

scholarly journals A carboxy-terminal basic region controls RNA polymerase III transcription factor activity of human La protein.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 5823-5832 ◽  
Author(s):  
J L Goodier ◽  
H Fan ◽  
R J Maraia
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription Factor Activity ◽  
Factor Activity ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
La Protein ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Basic Region

Human La protein has been shown to serve as a transcription factor for RNA polymerase III (pol III) by facilitating transcription termination and recycling of transcription complexes. In addition, La binds to the 3' oligo(U) ends common to all nascent pol III transcripts, and in the case of B1-Alu RNA, protects it from 3'-end processing (R. J. Maraia, D. J. Kenan, and J. D. Keene, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2147-2158, 1994). Others have previously dissected the La protein into an N-terminal domain that binds RNA and a C-terminal domain that does not. Here, deletion and substitution mutants of La were examined for general RNA binding, RNA 3'-end protection, and transcription factor activity. Although some La mutants altered in a C-terminal basic region bind RNA in mobility shift assays, they are defective in RNA 3'-end protection and do not support transcription, while one C-terminal substitution mutant is defective only in transcription. Moreover, a C-terminal fragment lacking RNA binding activity appears able to support low levels of transcription by pol III. While efficient multiround transcription is supported only by mutants that bind RNA and contain a C-terminal basic region. These analyses indicate that RNA binding contributes to but is not sufficient for La transcription factor activity and that the C-terminal domain plays a role in transcription that is distinguishable from simple RNA binding. The transcription factor activity of La can be reversibly inhibited by RNA, suggesting the potential for feedback inhibition of pol III transcription.

scholarly journals RNA Polymerase II Carboxy-Terminal Domain Phosphorylation Is Required for Cotranscriptional Pre-mRNA Splicing and 3′-End Formation

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (20) ◽  
pp. 8963-8969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Bird ◽  
Diego A. R. Zorio ◽  
David L. Bentley
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Mrna Splicing ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Carboxy Terminal Domain ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

ABSTRACT We investigated the role of RNA polymerase II (pol II) carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylation in pre-mRNA processing coupled and uncoupled from transcription in Xenopus oocytes. Inhibition of CTD phosphorylation by the kinase inhibitors 5,6-dichloro-1β-d-ribofuranosyl-benzimidazole and H8 blocked transcription-coupled splicing and poly(A) site cleavage. These experiments suggest that pol II CTD phosphorylation is required for efficient pre-mRNA splicing and 3′-end formation in vivo. In contrast, processing of injected pre-mRNA was unaffected by either kinase inhibitors or α-amanitin-induced depletion of pol II. pol II therefore does not appear to participate directly in posttranscriptional processing, at least in frog oocytes. Together these experiments show that the influence of the phosphorylated CTD on pre-mRNA splicing and 3′-end processing is mediated by transcriptional coupling.

scholarly journals The Myc Transactivation Domain Promotes Global Phosphorylation of the RNA Polymerase II Carboxy-Terminal Domain Independently of Direct DNA Binding

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2059-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria H. Cowling ◽  
Michael D. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

ABSTRACT Myc is a transcription factor which is dependent on its DNA binding domain for transcriptional regulation of target genes. Here, we report the surprising finding that Myc mutants devoid of direct DNA binding activity and Myc target gene regulation can rescue a substantial fraction of the growth defect in myc −/− fibroblasts. Expression of the Myc transactivation domain alone induces a transcription-independent elevation of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) C-terminal domain (CTD) kinases cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) and CDK9 and a global increase in CTD phosphorylation. The Myc transactivation domain binds to the transcription initiation sites of these promoters and stimulates TFIIH binding in an MBII-dependent manner. Expression of the Myc transactivation domain increases CDK mRNA cap methylation, polysome loading, and the rate of translation. We find that some traditional Myc transcriptional target genes are also regulated by this Myc-driven translation mechanism. We propose that Myc transactivation domain-driven RNA Pol II CTD phosphorylation has broad effects on both transcription and mRNA metabolism.

scholarly journals Induced RPB1 depletion reveals a direct gene-specific control of RNA Polymerase III function by RNA Polymerase II

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Gerber ◽  
Keiichi Ito ◽  
Chi-Shuen Chu ◽  
Robert G. Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Serum Starvation ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Direct Gene ◽  
Specific Regulation

SummaryIncreasing evidence suggests that tRNA levels are dynamically and specifically regulated in response to internal and external cues to modulate the cellular translational program. However, the molecular players and the mechanisms regulating the gene-specific expression of tRNAs are still unknown. Using an inducible auxin-degron system to rapidly deplete RPB1 (the largest subunit of RNA Pol II) in living cells, we identified Pol II as a direct gene-specific regulator of tRNA transcription. Our data suggest that Pol II transcription robustly interferes with Pol III function at specific tRNA genes. This activity was further found to be essential for MAF1-mediated repression of a large set of tRNA genes during serum starvation, indicating that repression of tRNA genes by Pol II is dynamically regulated. Hence, Pol II plays a direct and central role in the gene-specific regulation of tRNA expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document