scholarly journals Calcareous nannofossils anchor chronologies for Arctic Ocean sediments back to 500 ka

Geology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1115-1119
Author(s):  
Matt O’Regan ◽  
Jan Backman ◽  
Eliana Fornaciari ◽  
Martin Jakobsson ◽  
Gabriel West
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Marine Sediments ◽  
Magnetic Polarity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Calcareous Nannofossils ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Considerable Uncertainty ◽  
Key Species ◽  
First Time ◽  
Age Constraints

Abstract Poor age control in Pleistocene sediments of the central Arctic Ocean generates considerable uncertainty in paleoceanographic reconstructions. This problem is rooted in the perplexing magnetic polarity patterns recorded in Arctic marine sediments and the paucity of microfossils capable of providing calibrated biostratigraphic biohorizons or continuous oxygen isotope stratigraphies. Here, we document the occurrence of two key species of calcareous nannofossils in a single marine sediment core from the central Arctic Ocean that provide robust, globally calibrated age constraints for sediments younger than 500 ka. The key species are the coccolithophores Pseudoemiliania lacunosa, which went extinct during marine isotope stage (MIS) 12 (478–424 ka), and Emiliania huxleyi, which evolved during MIS 8 (300–243 ka). This is the first time that P. lacunosa has been described in sediments of the central Arctic Ocean. The sedimentary horizons containing these age-diagnostic species can be traced, through lithostratigraphic correlation, across more than 450 km of the inner Arctic Ocean. They provide the first unequivocal support for proposed Pleistocene chronologies of sediment from this sector of the Arctic, and they constitute a foundation for developing and testing other geochronological tools for dating Arctic marine sediments.

Testing the synchronicity of Pleistocene biostratigraphic events in the central Arctic – Do we have a consistent biostratigraphic framework?  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flor Vermassen ◽  
Helen K. Coxall ◽  
Gabriel West ◽  
Matt O'Regan
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Sediment Cores ◽  
Age Determination ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Calcareous Nannofossils ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Eurasian Basin ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Amerasian Basin

<p>Harsh environmental and taphonomic conditions in the central Arctic Ocean make age-modelling for Quaternary palaeoclimate reconstructions challenging. Pleistocene age models in the Arctic have relied heavily on cyclostratigraphy using lithologic variability tied to relatively poorly calibrated foraminifera biostratigraphic events. Recently, the identification of <em>Pseudoemiliania lacunosa</em> in a sediment core from the Lomonosov Ridge, a coccolithophore that went extinct during marine isotope stage (MIS) 12 (478-424 ka), has been used to delineate glacial-interglacial units back to MIS 14 (~500 ka BP). Here we present a comparative study on how this nannofossil biostratigraphy fits with existing foraminifer biohorizons that are recognised in central Arctic Ocean sediments. A new core from the Alpha Ridge is presented, together with its lithologic variability and down-core compositional changes in planktonic and benthic foraminifera. The core exhibits an interval dominated by <em>Turborotalita egelida</em>, a planktonic foraminifer that is increasingly being adopted as a marker for MIS11 in sediment cores from the Amerasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. We show that the new age-constraints provided by calcareous nannofossils are difficult to reconcile with the proposed MIS 11 age for the <em>T. egelida</em> horizon. Instead, the emerging litho- and coccolith biostratigraphy implies that Amerasian Basin sediments predating MIS5 are older than the egelida-based age models suggest, i.e. that the <em>T. egelida</em> Zone is older than MIS11. These results expose uncertainties regarding the age determination of glacial-interglacial cycles in the Amerasian basin and point out that future work is required to reconcile the micro- and nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Amerasian and Eurasian basin.</p>

New paleomagnetic data on marine sediments from the Central Arctic Ocean

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Elkina ◽  
Thomas Frederichs ◽  
Walter Geibert ◽  
Jens Matthiessen ◽  
Frank Niessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Marine Sediments ◽  
Sediment Cores ◽  
Environmental Research ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Lomonosov Ridge ◽  
State University ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Great Debate ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

<p>Accurate dating of marine sediments from the Arctic Ocean remains a subject of great debate over the last decades. Due to the lack of adequate materials for biostratigraphy and stable isotope analyses, paleomagnetic reconstructions came into play here but though yielded ambiguous interpretations. Moreover, sedimentation rates in the Quaternary, determined for isolated morphological features in the Arctic Ocean, are often applied to the entire Arctic Ocean realm resulting in an inappropriate oversimplification of probably diverging regional depositional regimes.</p><p>Paleomagnetic studies on four long sediment cores, collected from the Mendeleev Ridge and the Lomonosov Ridge, complemented by the results from one core from the Podvodnikov Basin, have provided an opportunity to compare the sedimentation history of these profound structures in the Arctic Ocean. Cores PS72/396-5 and PS72/410-3 (Mendeleev Ridge), PS87/023-1, PS87/030-1 (Lomonosov Ridge) and PS87/074-3 (Podvodnikov Basin) were retrieved during expeditions of RV Polarstern in 2008, and 2014. Paleomagnetic, rock magnetic and physical properties measurements were carried out at the Center for Geo-Environmental Research and Modeling (GEOMODEL) of the Research Park in St. Petersburg State University, at the University of Bremen, and the Alfred Wegener Institute.</p><p>According to the results on the Mendeleev Ridge’s cores, complemented with 230Th excess study on core PS72/396-5, the Brunhes Matuyama boundary (0.78 Ma) is observed at the first meters below the seafloor. That, together with the Matuyama Gauss transition (2.58 Ma) recorded in both cores, implies the mean sedimentation rate in this area to be in the order of mm/kyr.</p><p>In contrast to the Mendeleev Ridge, the cores from the Lomonosov Ridge and the Podvodnikov Basin have shown a more complex paleomagnetic record with a relevant shift to negative inclinations significantly deeper downcore. This could signify a relevant difference in the sedimentation regimes between both ridges during the Quaternary.    </p>

scholarly journals Arctic Ocean stratification set by sea level and freshwater inputs since the last ice age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse R. Farmer ◽  
Daniel M. Sigman ◽  
Julie Granger ◽  
Ona M. Underwood ◽  
François Fripiat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Surface Waters ◽  
Ice Age ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Bering Strait ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Phytoplankton Productivity ◽  
Nitrate Consumption ◽  
Western Arctic ◽  
Last Ice Age

AbstractSalinity-driven density stratification of the upper Arctic Ocean isolates sea-ice cover and cold, nutrient-poor surface waters from underlying warmer, nutrient-rich waters. Recently, stratification has strengthened in the western Arctic but has weakened in the eastern Arctic; it is unknown if these trends will continue. Here we present foraminifera-bound nitrogen isotopes from Arctic Ocean sediments since 35,000 years ago to reconstruct past changes in nutrient sources and the degree of nutrient consumption in surface waters, the latter reflecting stratification. During the last ice age and early deglaciation, the Arctic was dominated by Atlantic-sourced nitrate and incomplete nitrate consumption, indicating weaker stratification. Starting at 11,000 years ago in the western Arctic, there is a clear isotopic signal of Pacific-sourced nitrate and complete nitrate consumption associated with the flooding of the Bering Strait. These changes reveal that the strong stratification of the western Arctic relies on low-salinity inflow through the Bering Strait. In the central Arctic, nitrate consumption was complete during the early Holocene, then declined after 5,000 years ago as summer insolation decreased. This sequence suggests that precipitation and riverine freshwater fluxes control the stratification of the central Arctic Ocean. Based on these findings, ongoing warming will cause strong stratification to expand into the central Arctic, slowing the nutrient supply to surface waters and thus limiting future phytoplankton productivity.

Arctic Ocean State-Changes: Self Interests and Common Interests

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 511-525
Author(s):  
Paul Arthur Berkman
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
International Governance ◽  
State Change ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Nation States ◽  
Free Region ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
State Changes

Abstract Environmental and geopolitical state-changes are the underlying first principles of the diverse stakeholder positioning in the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic Ocean is changing from an ice-covered region to an ice-free region during the summer, which is an environmental state-change. As provided under the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the central Arctic Ocean currently involves “High-Seas” (beyond the “Exclusive Economic Zones”) and the underlying “Area” of the deep-sea floor (beyond the “Continental Shelves”). Governance applications of this ‘donut’ demography – with international space surrounded by sovereign sectors – would be a geopolitical state-change in the Arctic Ocean. International governance strategies and applications for the central Arctic Ocean have far-reaching implications for the stewardship of other international spaces, which between Antarctica and the ocean beyond national jurisdictions account for nearly 75 percent of the Earth’s surface. In view of planetary-scale strategies for humankind, with frameworks such as climate, the Arctic Ocean underscores the challenges and opportunities to balance the governance of nation states and international spaces centuries into the future.

scholarly journals Near-Inertial Mixing in the Central Arctic Ocean

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 2031-2049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilker Fer
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Storm Event ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Wave Induced ◽  
The Waves ◽  
Inertial Energy ◽  
Made In

Abstract Observations were made in April 2007 of horizontal currents, hydrography, and shear microstructure in the upper 500 m from a drifting ice camp in the central Arctic Ocean. An approximately 4-day-long time series, collected about 10 days after a storm event, shows enhanced near-inertial oscillations in the first half of the measurement period with comparable upward- and downward-propagating energy. Rough estimates of wind work and near-inertial flux imply that the waves were likely generated by the previous storm. The near-inertial frequency band is associated with dominant clockwise rotation in time of the horizontal currents and enhanced dissipation rates of turbulent kinetic energy. The vertical profile of dissipation rate shows elevated values in the pycnocline between the relatively turbulent underice boundary layer and the deeper quiescent water column. Dissipation averaged in the pycnocline is near-inertially modulated, and its magnitude decays approximately at a rate implied by the reduction of energy over time. Observations suggest that near-inertial energy and internal wave–induced mixing play a significant role in vertical mixing in the Arctic Ocean.

Arctic Ocean Management and Indigenous Peoples: Recent Legal Developments

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-120
Author(s):  
Nigel Bankes
Keyword(s):  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Scientific Cooperation ◽  
Arctic Council ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Polar Code ◽  
Ocean Management ◽  
Marine Areas ◽  
Maritime Search And Rescue

This article examines recent legal developments in the management of human activities in Arctic marine areas and considers the extent to which these developments acknowledge or recognize the rights, roles and interests of Arctic Indigenous peoples. These developments include the negotiation of three treaties under the auspices of the Arctic Council: the Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic, (Arctic SAR Agreement), the Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Spill Preparedness and Response in the Arctic (Arctic MOSPA), and the Agreement on Enhancing International Arctic Scientific Cooperation (Arctic Science Agreement), the adoption of the Polar Code by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), and, most recently, the signature of the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (the CAOF Agreement). It also examines more recent practice under the Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears (ACPB).

scholarly journals Low-level jet characteristics over the Arctic Ocean in spring and summer

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 2125-2153
Author(s):  
L. Jakobson ◽  
T. Vihma ◽  
E. Jakobson ◽  
T. Palo ◽  
A. Männik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Temperature Inversion ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Jet Streams ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Turbulent Layer ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Jet ◽  
Jet Characteristics

Abstract. Low-level jets (LLJ) are important for turbulence in the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer, but their occurrence, properties, and generation mechanisms in the Arctic are not well known. We analysed LLJs over the central Arctic Ocean in spring and summer 2007 on the bases of data collected in the drifting ice station Tara. Instead of traditional radiosonde soundings, data from tethersonde soundings with a high vertical resolution were used. The Tara results showed a lower occurrence of LLJs (46%) than many previous studies over polar sea ice. Strong jet core winds contributed to growth of the turbulent layer. Complex relationship between the jet core height and the temperature inversion top height were detected: substantial correlation (r = 0.72; p < 0.01) occurred when the jet core was above the turbulent layer, but inside the turbulent layer there was no correlation. The most important forcing mechanism for LLJs was baroclinicity, which was responsible for generation of strong and warm LLJs, which on average occurred at lower altitudes than other jets. Baroclinic jets were mostly associated to transient cyclones instead of the climatological air temperature gradients. Besides baroclinicity, cases related to inertial oscillations, gusts, and fronts were detected. In approximately 50% of the observed LLJs the generation mechanism remained unclear, but in most of these cases the wind speed was strong in the whole vertical profile, the jet core representing only a weak maximum. Further research needs on LLJs in the Arctic include investigation of low-level jet streams and their effects on the sea ice drift and atmospheric moisture transport.

scholarly journals Benefits of sea ice thickness initialization for the Arctic decadal climate prediction skill in EC-Earth3

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Tian ◽  
Shuting Yang ◽  
Mehdi Pasha Karami ◽  
François Massonnet ◽  
Tim Kruschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Climate Prediction ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Prediction Skill ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Ice Volume ◽  
Arctic Sea

Abstract. A substantial part of Arctic climate predictability at interannual time scales stems from the knowledge of the initial sea ice conditions. Among all the variables characterizing sea ice, sea ice volume, being a product of sea ice area/concentration (SIC) and thickness (SIT), is the most sensitive parameter for climate change. However, the majority of climate prediction systems are only assimilating the observed SIC due to lack of long-term reliable global observation of SIT. In this study the EC-Earth3 Climate Prediction System with anomaly initialization to ocean, SIC and SIT states is developed. In order to evaluate the benefits of specific initialized variables at regional scales, three sets of retrospective ensemble prediction experiments are performed with different initialization strategies: ocean-only; ocean plus SIC; and ocean plus SIC and SIT initialization. The increased skill from ocean plus SIC initialization is small in most regions, compared to ocean-only initialization. In the marginal ice zone covered by seasonal ice, skills regarding winter SIC are mainly gained from the initial ocean temperature anomalies. Consistent with previous studies, the Arctic sea ice volume anomalies are found to play a dominant role for the prediction skill of September Arctic sea ice extent. Winter preconditioning of SIT for the perennial ice in the central Arctic Ocean results in increased skill of SIC in the adjacent Arctic coastal waters (e.g. the Laptev/East Siberian/Chukchi Seas) for lead time up to a decade. This highlights the importance of initializing SIT for predictions of decadal time scale in regional Arctic sea ice. Our results suggest that as the climate warming continues and the central Arctic Ocean might become seasonal ice free in the future, the controlling mechanism for decadal predictability may thus shift from being the sea ice volume playing the major role to a more ocean-related processes.

scholarly journals Arctic sea ice anomalies during the MOSAiC winter 2019/20

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Dethloff ◽  
Wieslaw Maslowski ◽  
Stefan Hendricks ◽  
Younjoo Lee ◽  
Helge F. Goessling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Central Arctic Ocean ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation

Abstract. As the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) project went into effect during the winter of 2019/2020, the Arctic Oscillation (AO) has experienced some of the largest shifts from a highly negative index in November 2019 to an extremely positive index during January-February-March (JFM) 2020. Here we analyse the sea ice thickness (SIT) distribution based on CryoSat-2/SMOS satellite data augmented with results from the hindcast simulation by the fully coupled Regional Arctic System Model (RASM) for the time period from November 2019 through March 2020. A notable result of the positive AO phase during JFM 2020 were large SIT anomalies, up to 1.3 m, which emerged in the Barents-Sea (BS), along the northeastern Canadian coast and in parts of the central Arctic Ocean. These anomalies appear to be driven by nonlinear interactions between thermodynamic and dynamic processes. In particular, in the Barents- and Kara Seas (BKS) they are a result of an enhanced ice growth connected with the colder temperature anomalies and the consequence of intensified atmospheric-driven sea ice transport and deformations (i.e. divergence and shear) in this area. Low-pressure anomalies, which developed over the Eastern Arctic during JFM 2020, increased northerly winds from the cold Arctic Ocean to the BS and accelerated the southward drift of the MOSAiC ice floe. The satellite-derived and model-simulated sea ice velocity anomalies, which compared well during JFM 2020, indicate a strong acceleration of the Transpolar Drift relative to the mean for the past decade, with intensified speeds up to 6 km/day. As a consequence, sea ice transport and deformations driven by atmospheric wind forcing accounted for bulk of SIT anomalies, especially in January and February 2020. The unusual AO shift and the related sea ice anomalies during the MOSAiC winter 2019/20 are within the range of simulated states in the forecast ensemble. RASM intra-annual ensemble forecast simulations, forced with different atmospheric boundary conditions from November 1, 2019 through April 30, 2020, show a pronounced internally generated variability in the sea ice volume. A comparison of the respective SIT distribution and turbulent heat fluxes during the positive AO phase in JFM 2020 and the negative AO phase in JFM 2010 further corroborates the conclusion, that winter sea ice conditions of the Arctic Ocean can be significantly altered by AO variability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document