scholarly journals SAT0571 OPTICAL SPECTRAL TRANSMISSION TO ASSESS THERAPY RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH ARTHRITIS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH CLINICAL, LABORATORY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY MARKERS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1244.1-1244
Author(s):  
K. Triantafyllias ◽  
C. Heller ◽  
M. De Blasi ◽  
M. Muthuraman ◽  
A. Schwarting
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Spectral Transmission ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Assessment Of Disease Activity

Background:Valid assessment of disease activity leads to outcome improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1). Optical spectral transmission (OST) is a modern diagnostic tool able to assess the blood-specific absorption of light transmitted through a tissue, promising quantification of inflammation in the finger and wrist joints of RA patients (commercial device: HandScan - Hemics, The Netherlands) (2).Objectives:To our knowledge, there are no data regarding the diagnostic value of OST in the evaluation of inflammatory activity changes during arthitis follow up.Thus, aims of this study were to examine the ability of OST to detect response to anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with arthritis and to explore OST associations with clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic (US) activity markers.Methods:OST measurements were performed in patients with active arthritides of the wrist and finger joints before and after administration of glucocorticoids (GC), during a disease flare. For the same points in time (a and b) patients and healthy controls underwent clinical, laboratory and joint US [Grey Scale (GSUS) - Power Doppler (PDUS)] examinations. OST-values before and after therapy were subsequently compared with their corresponding DAS28- and US-values. The distributions of Delta-PDUS und OST-values between the two time points were compared by Bayesian statistics. Moreover, OST diagnostic performance was tested by Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC).Results:We recruited 54 patients with active inflammatory arthritis: 39 RA, 4 gout, 7 peripheral spondylarthritides and 4 other miscellaneous arthritides (66.7% females) and 114 controls.Previous to therapy with GC, median OST was [OST(a):8.75(5.38-16.25, IQR)] and after therapy [OST(b):4.75(2.38-8.63, IQR)] (p<0.05). Similarly, DAS28 dropped significantly after GC therapy [DAS28(a):5.12(4.33-6.10, IQR) vs. DAS28(b):3.85(3.40-4.82),p<0.05)]. OST correlated moderately with PDUS at both time points: (a)rho=0.449and (b)rho=0.414, respectively (both;p<0.01). Moreover, OST correlated significantly with swollen joint count at both time points (a)rho=0.379and (b)rho=0.382,p<0.01respectively.OST and US performed similarly in the assessment of inflammatory changes caused by the administration of GC (same tendency in the change of OST values in83.2%of the cases). Furthermore, Bayesian statistic revealed no significant differences between OST and US for all 3 examined joint categories (MCP:p=0.81; PIP:p=0.74; wrists:p=0.60).In addition, ROC revealed that OST is a very good tool to distinguish patients with arthritis from healthy controls at both examination points [AUC(a):0.883(95% CI=0.83-0.94) and AUC(b):0.811(95% CI=0.74-0.881)].Conclusion:OST was able to assess response to therapy in arthritis patients comparable to US. Moreover, OST correlated with disease activity markers and could effectively differentiate between arthritis patients and controls. Therefore, OST could prove to be a valuable non-interventional time- and resource-saving diagnostic tool to assist arthritis monitoring.References:[1]Katchamart W, et al. Systematic monitoring of disease activity using an outcome measure improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1411–1415.[2]Onna M Van, et al. Assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using optical spectral transmission measurements, a non-invasive imaging technique. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:511–518.Figure 1.OST-, PDUS- and DAS28- values before and after GC therapy.Figure 2.OST- (group 1) und Ultrasound- (group 2) Bayesian distributions, means- and standard deviation-differences for MCP (A), PIP (B) and wrists (C).Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB1080 OPTICAL SPECTRAL TRANSMISSION IMAGING SCORES DECREASE AFTER ONE MONTH OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, ESPECIALLY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WHO RESPOND TO THERAPY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1829.2-1829
Author(s):  
A. Blanken ◽  
C. J. Van der Laken ◽  
M. Nurmohamed
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Spectral Transmission ◽  
Transmission Imaging ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Inflammatory Changes

Background:Optical spectral transmission imaging (OST) is a new imaging method that measures inflammation in the hands of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. OST might be used to assess disease activity instead of disease activity score 28 (DAS28) or ultrasonography (US). The advantage of OST is that it is fast and not operator dependent. Up to now OST has only been investigated cross-sectionally and it is unknown if and to what extent OST can detect inflammatory changes due to anti-inflammatory treatment for RA.Objectives:To compare OST measurements before and after 1 month of biological treatment for RA and to compare these OST changes with changes on US and disease activity.Methods:The HandScan device from Hemics, the Netherlands, was used to measure OST scores for 13 RA patients before and after 1 month of anti-inflammatory therapy. Treatment included tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (n=10), tocilizumab (n=2) and tofacitinib (n=1). OST scores range from 0-66 (one score for both hands) and are based on bilateral wrist, MCP and PIP joints. US was performed in the same joints as OST and semi-quantitatively scored on a scale of 0-3 for grey-scale (GS) synovitis and power Doppler (PD) signal. Joint scores of GS synovitis or PD were summed, resulting is a total GS synovitis score and a total PD score, both also ranging from 0-66. Furthermore, tender joint count 28 (TJC28), swollen joint count 28 (SJC28), DAS28, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were determined. Response to therapy was defined as achieving the minimal clinically interesting improvement of DAS28 (DAS28 difference after 1 month > -1) as proposed by Ward et al. [1]Results:Baseline OST was 17.73 ± 6.10 and this significantly decreased to 16.01 ± 6.68 (difference -1.71, 95%CI 0.05-3.38, p=0.045) after 1 month of therapy. This decrease was only present in patients who responded to therapy (n=8; OST decreased from 17.24 ± 5.98 to 14.26 ± 5.65, p=0.01) and not in non-responders (n=5; OST increased from 18.52 ± 6.90 to 18.83 ± 7.87, p=0.03).In the total group, also DAS28 (difference -1.59, 95%CI 0.74-2.45, p=0.002), SJC28 (difference 4.62, 95%CI 1.50-7.73, p=0.007), ESR (Wilcoxon Rank p=0.008) and CRP (Wilcoxon Rank p=0.03) significantly decreased after 1 month of therapy, but TJC28 did not (difference 2.62, 95%CI -2.7-7.91, p=0.30).OST change after 1 month of therapy significantly correlated with TCJ28 change (table 1). For GS synovitis the correlation coefficient nearly reached statistical significance. Changes in all other disease activity parameters were not correlated with OST change.Table 1.Correlation of change in OST measurement with change in disease activity after 1 months of anti-inflammatory therapySpearman rp-valueTotal GS synovitis0.540.06Total PD0.220.47DAS280.350.25SJC280.290.33TJC280.630.02ESR-0.420.15CRP-0.230.45Conclusion:OST scores significantly decreased after 1 month of anti-inflammatory therapy and only in the RA group that responded well to this therapy. This indicates that OST is capable of detecting therapy induced inflammatory changes in the hands of RA patients. Larger studies are needed to further assess the monitoring value of OST for therapy efficacy in RA patients.References:[1]Ward et al. 2015 Clinically important changes in individual and composite measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity: thresholds applicable in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 74(9): p. 1691-6.Disclosure of Interests:Annelies Blanken: None declared, C.J. van der Laken: None declared, Michael Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Not related to this research, Consultant of: Not related to this research, Speakers bureau: Not related to this research

scholarly journals POS1405 OPTICAL SPECTRAL TRANSMISSION (HANDSCAN) IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: FIRST DATA ON DIAGNOSTIC VALUE AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND DISEASE ACTIVITY MARKERS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 985.1-985
Author(s):  
K. Triantafyllias ◽  
S. Liverakos ◽  
C. Noack ◽  
A. Schwarting
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Spectral Transmission ◽  
Grey Scale ◽  
Assessment Of Disease Activity

Background:Valid assessment of disease activity leads to improvement of long-term outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis (1). Optical spectral transmission (OST) is a modern diagnostic tool able to assess the blood-specific absorption of light transmitted through a tissue, promising quantification of inflammation in the finger and wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (commercial device: HandScan – Demcon/Hemics, The Netherlands) (2). Even though an increasing number of studies have evaluated diagnostic value of this new technology in RA patients (2,3), no data exist regarding psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Objectives:To examine for the first time the diagnostic value of OST in detecting inflammation in patients with PsA and to evaluate its relationship with disease activity markers and various epidemiological and anthropometric patient characteristics.Methods:OST-Measurements were performed in a group of PsA patients and a group of healthy controls. The difference between OST in the two groups was statistically examined and relationships of OST with clinical (tender / swollen joint counts, disease activity on a visual analogue scale) and serological disease activity markers were evaluated. Moreover, joint ultrasound (US) examinations were performed in a subgroup of PsA patients and OST associations with a Power Doppler- and a Grey Scale-US score were examined. Finally, relationships of OST with various anthropometric and epidemiologic parameters (BMI, hand-size, gender, age) were assessed.Results:We recruited 49 PsA patients [65.3% female; mean age 53.3 years (± 11.8 SD)] and 114 control subjects [77.2% female; mean age 46 years (± 12.8 SD)]. OST was statistically significantly higher in the patient group, compared to the control group [14.95 (12.04 - 17.18, IQR) vs. 10.31 (7.84 – 13.79, IQR); p<0.001]. OST correlated moderately-strongly with both examined US scores (Power Doppler-score: r = 0.5; p = 0.026 and Grey Scale-score: r = 0.52; p = 0.028). Moreover, OST showed a moderate, statistically significant association with C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0,298; p = 0,037). Finally, males had significantly higher OST values than females and OST associated moderately-weakly with body mass index (BMI) in the control group (rho = 0.24; p< 0.001).Conclusion:This is the first report of a possible diagnostic value of OST in patients with PsA. OST correlated with ultrasound and serological activity markers and may thus prove to be a useful tool of disease activity assessment, next to well established diagnostic modalities, such as the joint US. Correlations of OST with patient characteristics implicate the need to take also anthropometric and epidemiological patient characteristics into account when interprenting OST results in order to avoid confounding.References:[1]Katchamart W, et al. Systematic monitoring of disease activity using an outcome measure improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1411–1415.[2]Triantafyllias, et al. Diagnostic value of optical spectral transmission in rheumatoid arthritis: associations with clinical characteristics and comparison with joint ultrasonography. J Rheumatol 2020 1;47(9):1314-1322.[3]Onna M Van, et al. Assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using optical spectral transmission measurements, a non-invasive imaging technique. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:511–518.Disclosure of Interests:Konstantinos Triantafyllias Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Chugai, Stefanie Liverakos: None declared, Claudia Noack: None declared, Andreas Schwarting: None declared

The Influence of the Definition of Patient Global Assessment in Assessment of Disease Activity According to the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2326-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXIME DOUGADOS ◽  
MAHAUT RIPERT ◽  
PASCAL HILLIQUIN ◽  
PATRICE FARDELLONE ◽  
OLIVIER BROCQ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Very High ◽  
Assessment Of Disease Activity

Objective.Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the 4 items included in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for evaluation of activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the influence of the use of 3 different techniques of PGA on the assessment of disease activity.Methods.We evaluated 3 different DAS28 according to the technique of PGA in 108 patients with active RA before and after 12 weeks of etanercept therapy.Results.The reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation) between screening and baseline was very high and similar for the 3 DAS28. The percentage of patients in the different states of disease (from remission to higher disease activity) and the sensitivity to change across the 3 DAS28 scales were very similar.Conclusion.The different techniques of collection of PGA to be included in the DAS calculation yield similar results. However, an accepted, unequivocal technique should be encouraged in order to reduce heterogeneity in scoring DAS among patients with RA.

scholarly journals AB0655 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ACTIVITY BEFORE AND AFTER COVID-19 LOCKDOWN PERIOD

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1360.1-1360
Author(s):  
M. Jordhani ◽  
D. Ruci ◽  
F. Skana ◽  
E. Memlika
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Musculoskeletal Diseases ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
World Population ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Das 28 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Background:The COVID-19 global pandemic has had a great impact on world population due to morbidity, mortality and restriction measures in order to stop the progression of COVID-19.Patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletic diseases, and especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, being one of the vulnerable classes of chronic patients, were recommended to follow the government’s rules1.Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate DAS-28-ESR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis before and after lockdown period.Methods:This is a multi-center observational study including 85 patients which were evaluated before and after lockdown for their disease activity score according to DAS-28-ESR score. They had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis more than 5 years ago. A thorough physical examination was performed before and after the lockdown period. It included examination of tender and swollen joints and patient’s global health. They were completed with all required laboratory data, including erythrosedimentation rate. For a more accurate calculation, DAS-28-ESR was used in an electronic version. Patients with other inflammatory or infective diseases were excluded from the study. All data were statistically evaluated using statistical tests such as t-student test.Results:The first group (the one before lockdown) had an average DAS-28-ESR of 4.7 while after the lockdown period, the average DAS-28-ESR was 5.16.After statistically evaluating all data, it was found that there exists a significant difference between DAS-28-ESR score before and after COVID-19 lockdown (p=0.0011).Conclusion:Our study showed that lockdown period due to COVID-19 pandemic, has aggravated disease activity in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. This may be consequence of various causes such as physical inactivity and difficulty to follow-up or to take the medication properly.References:[1]Landewé RB, Machado PM, Kroon F, et al, EULAR provisional recommendations for the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the context of SARS-CoV-2, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2020;79:851-858.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals AB1119 U9: A NOVEL CLINICALLY ORIENTED ULTRASONOGRAPHIC SCALE AS A USEFUL MARKER FOR MONITORING THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (MULTI CENTERS STUDY)

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1848.2-1849
Author(s):  
M. A. Mortada ◽  
H. Eitta ◽  
R. Elmallah ◽  
A. Radwan ◽  
A. Elsaman
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Das 28 ◽  
Significant Difference

Background:Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography (MSUS) is now a widely used tool for monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although there are many proposed sets of composite scores, a fixed set of joints may not be an ideal tool to assess a disease like RA, which affects many joints and tendons in different presentations. In previous study (1) U9 score was proven to be correlated with disease activity parameters.Objectives:To determine whether US assessment using U9 score is useful for monitoring response to treatment for RA or not?Methods:A prospective, multicenter study were conducted in period from July 2019 to December 2019. All recruited RA patients were subjected to: Disease activity assessment by clinical disease activity indices (CDAI and DAS28 ESR). Functional status assessment by (HAQ) and ultrasonographic assessment using U9 score which include 8 joints (bilateral wrists,2ndMCP,3RDMCP and knees) plus most clinically affected joint or tendon (one joint or one tendon). Most clinically affected joints from 48 joints. Any affected tendons could be choosing. All targeted joints were evaluated according to EULAR guidlines and by EULAR/ OMERACT combined score (0-3). Targeted tendons were scored (0-3).All patients received their treatment (biologic and non biologic DMARDs) according to the decision of the treating physicians. No specific therapy is needed. CDAI and DAS28 ESR, HAQ and U9 score were repeated after 3 months to detect the response to change after receiving the therapy.Results:One hundred and forty patients (23.6% were male) with mean age 39.26±11.30 were recruited from 4 tertiary referral university hospitals.There was a significant difference (<0.001) between the first and second visits as regards clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic parameters. DAS 28 decreased form (5.29±1.21) to (3.95±0.99), ESR decreased from (42.12±15.24) to (26.84±12.32), HAQ2 improved from (0.652±0.350) to (0.510±0.237) and U9 total US score decreased from (13.56±5.18) to (8.02±4.28).There was significant correlation between U9 ultrasonographic score and clinical parameters at both visits (table 1).Table 1.correlation between U9 ultrasonographic score and clinical parameters.U9 at 1stvisitU9 at 2ndvisitDAS-28Pearson Correlation(P value)0.806<0.0010.790<0.001CDAIPearson Correlation(P value)0.787<0.0010.773<0.001HAQPearson Correlation(P value)0.431<0.0010.317<0.001We found that the most suitable cut-off value of U9 score to predict high disease activity was 11.5 (sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 80.6%), cut off value for moderate disease activity was 5.5(sensitivity 83.2% and specificity 88%) and cut off value for low disease activity was 3.5 (sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity 57.1%). These results are summarized in the following table:Conclusion:U9 ultrasonographic score is very useful method for evaluating the monitoring the response of treatment.References:[1]Mortada, et al. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2019;78:1009.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals POS0583 ENGINEERED GLOVE TO EVALUATE THE SPEED OF THE HANDS’ MOVEMENTS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 524.3-525
Author(s):  
M. Patanè ◽  
L. Carmisciano ◽  
E. Hysa ◽  
E. Gotelli ◽  
A. Signori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Test System ◽  
Movement Speed ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Activity Class ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Opposition Movements

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long-term, progressive, and disabling autoimmune disease1. The disease activity can be quantified by the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count – C reactive protein (DAS28crp)2; the evaluation of disability function (DF) is actually mainly performed only by subjective Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) like Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)3; to investigate the functional aspects of RA hands it is usually used the grip strength (GS)4. However, in the scientific literature no tool, which objectively evaluates movement speed, has been reported. The Hand Test System (HTS, ETT) is an engineered glove (RAGLOVE), nowadays applied for neuroscience studies to evaluate hand motility5Objectives:To objectively evaluate the RA hand’s speed of the fine movements, through the HTS and to compared with a group of age and sex matched healthy controls. To verify the correspondence with the HAQ, DAS28, GS.Methods:55 consecutives RA patients (pts) (6 males, age 61 ± 16 years, mean duration of disease 12 ± 8 years), classified according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria6, and 50 matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. After consent, all participants undergone HTS test that recognizes the touches between the finger tips during the opposition movements of the hands in standard sequences of movements, after dressed the glove. A multiple finger evaluation (MFE) and a single finger evaluation (SFE) were performed using a dedicated software that provided the physician the following quantitative parameters: Touch Duration (TD), Inter Tapping Interval (ITI) and Movement Rate (MR). Average time for hand 2 minutes. RA pts compiled the HAQ, performed the GS and a DAS28cpr was performed.The student’s t-test was used to compare the glove’s parameters between the groups whereas the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to verify potential differences between the populations. In order to evaluate the single correlations, the r and p values of Pearson were employed.Results:For MFE, glove parameters TD and ITI were significantly higher in RA pts than HCs, whereas; MR was significantly lower in RA pts compared to HCs (all p <0.001).For SFE non-affected fingers (not swollen and not tender) of RA pts performed better than a clinically affected fingers, but in any case significantly worse than average HCs fingers (p < 0.001).There is a statistically significant correlation between the GS and MR (r= 0.39 p=0.003) and TD (r=-0.33 p=0.015).TD, ITI e MR of RA pts showed a significant correlation with the total score of the HAQ (r = 0.56, r = 0.39, r = -0.56, all p < 0.001;). DAS28, considered as a continuous variable, proved to be significantly correlated with the TD (r = 0.36, p = 0.009). When the RA patients were grouped according to the disease activity by DAS28cpr7, there was an increase of one third of the TD’s logarithm for each increase in the activity class (linear regression with ordinal predictors, beta = 0.33; 95%CI 0.03, 0.63,p < 0.0297). Finally, even RA pts in remission showed a TD significantly higher compared with HCs (p= 0.034).Conclusion:The RAGLOVE is shown as a new safe and fast tool to evaluate a new objective parameter in the hand’s functionality: the speed of finger movements. In RA pts, an inversely proportional correlation emerges between the speed of movement and disease activity.The significant correlation found with HAQ, highlights the loss of motility of the hands as one of the main determinant of disability. The RAGLOVE is now tested in RA patients undergoing treatment.References:[1]Hakkinen et al Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;[2]Van Der Heijde et al J of Rheum. 1993;[3]Fries et al Arthritis Rheum. 1980;[4]Mathiowetz et al J Hand Surg Am. 1984;[5]Carmisciano et al Eur J Neurol. 2020;[6]Aletaha et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;[7]Aletaha et al Arthritis Rheum 2005.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document