scholarly journals OP0299 IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS HIGHER NUMBER OF COMORBIDITIES PREDICTS 6-MONTH INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO FIRST BIOLOGIC THERAPY AND EVENTUAL CATEGORIZATION OF THE DISEASE AS DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 184.2-184
Author(s):  
I. Flouri ◽  
A. Repa ◽  
N. Avgustidis ◽  
N. Kougkas ◽  
A. Eskitzis ◽  
...  

Background:Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) was recently defined by a EULAR study group (1) and, as a disease category it is largely complicated and under-researched. Patient comorbidities may play a significant role in the response to therapy with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and in the disease classification as D2T RA.Objectives:To evaluate the impact of comorbidities [studied as total Comorbidities Count (CC) and rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI)] on 6-month response to therapy with the first bDMARD in real-world clinical practice and on eventual disease designation as D2T RA.Methods:Prospective study of all RA patients who start any bDMARD in a tertiary centre University Hospital after their consent. All patient comorbidities [among a list of approximately 100 pre-specified major comorbidities] are registered by treating physicians. Response to therapy was defined as achievement of low disease activity or remission (LDA/Rem) according to simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) improvement of ≥ 0.25.D2T RA patient group was defined according to the EULAR definition of D2T RA and was compared to: a/ all other patients and b/ to a sub-group of patients designated as “well-controlled RA” (follow-up ≥2 years and ≥2 visits in the last year in LDA/Rem).Logistic regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding of age, sex, disease duration, seropositivity, number of previous synthetic DMARDs, type of 1st bDMARD initiated (TNF inhibitor vs. non-TNF inhibitor), co-administered methotrexate and corticosteroids (yes/no), baseline SDAI and HAQ and year of therapy start.Results:Analysis included 501 RA patients who received a total of 1098 bDMARD treatments. At 1st bDMARD treatment start, patients (women: 81%) had a median (IQR) age: 60 (51-68) years, disease duration: 5.4 (3-11) years, SDAI: 36 (28-46), HAQ: 1.0 (0.5-1.5), CC: 3 (2-6) και RDCI: 2 (0-3).In adjusted analyses, total comorbidity count (CC) ≤1 (vs ≥ 2) was predicting LDA/Rem at 6 months of therapy [OR (95%CI) = 4.1 (1.5-11), p=0.005], while RDCI=0 (vs. ≥ 1) was predicting HAQ improvement ≥ 0.25 [OR (95% CI) = 2.6 (1.2-6.7), p=0.046].During 2614 patient-years of follow-up, the disease in 98 patients could be classified as “D2T RA”, while 127 patients had “well-controlled RA”. Baseline independent predictors for D2T RA compared to all other patients were RDCI ≥ 1 (vs. 0) [OR = 3.3 (1.7-9.4), p = 0.024], female sex [OR =3.1 (1.01-9.5)] and age [OR = 0.97 (0.94-0.99)]. Multivariable analyses for predictors of “D2T” compared to “well-controlled” RA yielded similar results.Conclusion:In RA patients starting the first bDMARD treatment, a higher number of comorbidities at baseline is an independent predictor of lower 6-month response to therapy and final disease classification as “difficult-to-treat” RA.References:[1]Nagy G, Roodenrijs NM, Welsing PM, Kedves M, Hamar A, van der Goes MC, et al. EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan;80(1):31–5.Acknowledgements:Pancretan Health Association and Special Account for Research Grants (ELKE) – University of Crete.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1387.2-1387
Author(s):  
V. F. Boussougou ◽  
K. Nassar ◽  
S. Janani

Background:The management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases under biologics has raised many questions about the global management of patients in the time of COVID-19 pandemic. This period could have been particularly painful for the patients due to the virus itself, and to the difficulty to access to healthcare facilities due to the lockdown.Objectives:To assess the impact of the lockdown in patients under biologics.Methods:This is a descriptive study, conducted between 03/01/2021 and 07/31/2021 in the Department of Rheumatology of the University Hospital of Ibn Rochd in Casablanca. Inclusion criteria were all patients on biologics during the lockdown period. The number of painful, swollen joints, pain visual analogue scale, and disease activity were collected before and during the lockdown.Results:Thirty-one patients under biologics were included. The average age was 43.4 years. There were 17 males and 14 females (sex ratio M/F 1,21). Cormibidities were hypertension and type 2 diabetes (9.7%), hypertension and dyslipidemia (6.5%), arrhythmia (6.5%), smoking (9.7%), hypertension and dysthyroidism (3.2%). All the patients were under biologics with an average duration of 2 years distributed as follows: 3 patients on etanercept (9.67%), 8 patients on tocilizumab (28.8%), 10 patients on infliximab (32.25%), 5 patients on adalimumab (16.12%)), 4 patients under golimumab (12.90%), 1 under secukinumab (3.22%). Biologics were associated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in 38.7% (methotrexate 12.9%, salosopyrine25, 8%), corticosteroids in 25.7%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 16.1%. The disease activity before COVID-19 of the patients was: 48.39% weak activity, 35.4% remission, 16.13% moderate activity. No patient reported a flare of the disease. During lockdown, 5 patients reported a flare of their disease (16.12%) They were followed for: 2 spondyloarthritis, 1 rheumatoid arthritis, 1 psoriatic arthritis, 1 adult onset Still’s disease. All the patients have temporarily stopped their drugs because they couldn’t come to their appointments because of the lockdown.Conclusion:Our study notes that the patients who kept their follow-up during lockdown have maintained a control of their disease activity. Our results are consistent with the observations of a French study on the impact of lockdown on the activity of rheumatoid arthritis. However, those who couldn’t come to their control appointment due to the lockdown had a flare of their disease. This study remains limited due to the monocentric nature and the small size of our sample.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 900.1-900
Author(s):  
L. Diebold ◽  
T. Wirth ◽  
V. Pradel ◽  
N. Balandraud ◽  
E. Fockens ◽  
...  

Background:Among therapeutics used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Tocilizumab (TCZ) and Abatacept (ABA) are both biologic agents that can be delivered subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV). During the first COVID-19 lockdown in France, all patients treated with IV TCZ or IV ABA were offered the option to switch to SC administration.Objectives:The primary aim was to assess the impact of changing the route of administration on the disease activity. The second aim was to assess whether the return to IV route at the patient’s request was associated with disease activity variation, flares, anxiety, depression and low physical activity during the lockdown.Methods:We conducted a prospective monocentric observational study. Eligibility criteria: Adult ≥ 18 years old, RA treated with IV TCZ or IV ABA with a stable dose ≥3 months, change in administration route (from IV to SC) between March 16, 2020, and April 17, 2020. The following data were collected at baseline and 6 months later (M6): demographics, RA characteristics, treatment, history of previous SC treatment, disease activity (DAS28), self-administered questionnaires on flares, RA life repercussions, physical activity, anxiety and depression (FLARE, RAID, Ricci &Gagnon, HAD).The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a DAS28 variation>1.2 at M6. Analyses: Chi2-test for quantitative variables and Mann-Whitney test for qualitative variables. Factors associated with return to IV route identification was performed with univariate and multivariate analysis.Results:Among the 84 patients who were offered to switch their treatment route of administration, 13 refused to change their treatment. Among the 71 who switched (48 TCZ, 23 ABA), 58 had a M6 follow-up visit (13 lost of follow-up) and DAS28 was available for 49 patients at M6. Main baseline characteristics: female 81%, mean age 62.7, mean disease duration: 16.0, ACPA positive: 72.4%, mean DAS28: 2.01, previously treated with SC TCZ or ABA: 17%.At M6, the mean DAS28 variation was 0.18 ± 0.15. Ten (12.2%) patients had a DAS28 worsening>1.2 (ABA: 5/17 [29.4%] and TCZ: 5/32 [15.6%], p= 0.152) and 19 patients (32.8%) had a DAS28 worsening>0.6 (ABA: 11/17 [64.7%] and TCZ: 8/32 [25.0%], p= 0.007).At M6, 41 patients (77.4%) were back to IV route (26 TCZ, 15 ABA) at their request. The proportion of patients with a DAS28 worsening>1.2 and>0.6 in the groups return to IV versus SC maintenance were 22.5%, 42.5% versus 11.1% and 22.2% (p=0.4), respectively. The univariate analysis identified the following factors associated with the return to IV route: HAD depression score (12 vs 41, p=0.009), HAS anxiety score (12 vs 41, p=0.047) and corticosteroid use (70% vs 100%, p=0.021), in the SC maintenance vs return to IV, respectively.Conclusion:The change of administration route of TCZ and ABA during the first COVID-19 lockdown was infrequently associated with a worsening of RA disease. However, the great majority of the patients (77.4%) request to return to IV route, even without disease activity worsening. This nocebo effect was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1086.2-1087
Author(s):  
T. Okano ◽  
T. Koike ◽  
K. Inui ◽  
K. Mamoto ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
...  

Background:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), biologics treatment is one of the effective treatment options. Usually, there is no difference in therapeutic effect regardless of which biologics is used, but the effect for joint synovitis is unknown. Recently, ultrasound (US) has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA.Objectives:The aim of this study was to compare the improvement of US findings between TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors at first biologics in patients with RA.Methods:Fifty-four RA patients who started the first biologics from September 2016 to December 2018 were included in this longitudinal study (SPEEDY study, UMIN000028260). All the patients were performed clinical examination, blood test and US examination at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). GS score and PD score (both 0-108 points) were defined as the sum of each score. The change of disease activity and US findings were compared between TNF group and non-TNF group.Results:Among 54 cases, 32 patients were used TNF inhibitor and 22 were non-TNF inhibitor. Age and duration of RA were significantly higher in the non-TNF group, and MTX dose was significantly lower in the non-TNF group. The baseline inflammatory markers tended to be higher in the non-TNF group and the disease activity was also higher in the non-TNF group. However, the US findings showed no significant difference in both GS and PD between two groups at baseline. US improvement ratio was no difference between TNF group and non-TNF group at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks in both GS and PD score. Regardless of the type of biologics, patients with long-term disease duration tended to have poor improvement in US synovial fingings.Table 1.Baseline patient and disease characteristicsTNF (n=32)non-TNF (n=22)P valueFemale patients, n (%)21 (65.6)16 (72.7)0.767Age (years)63.5±15.471.0±9.00.030Disease duration (years)6.5±8.213.0±11.70.032CRP (mg/dl)1.8±2.53.0±3.20.170DAS28-ESR5.0±1.45.8±1.20.022GS score26.1±18.831.8±21.10.313PD score17.6±11.423.1±14.60.150Figure 1.GS and PD improvement ratio at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeksConclusion:There was no difference in the US findings improvement between patients with TNF inhibitor and non-TNF inhibitor at first biologics in patients with RA.References:[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.[2]Nishino A, Kawashiri SY, Koga T, et al. Ultrasonographic Efficacy of Biologic andTargeted Synthetic Disease-ModifyingAntirheumatic Drug Therapy in RheumatoidArthritis From a Multicenter RheumatoidArthritis Ultrasound Prospective Cohort in Japan. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70:1719-26.Acknowledgements:We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Rika Morinaka, Hatsue Ueda and Tomomi Iwahashi for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 478.2-479
Author(s):  
L. Zhang ◽  
C. van der Tog ◽  
A. den Broeder ◽  
T. Mellors ◽  
E. Connolly-Strong ◽  
...  

Background:Following RA treatment recommendations, most people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) begin targeted therapy with TNF inhibitors (TNFi), even though inadequate response to TNFi therapies is widespread. Treatment changes from one medication to the next are currently fueled by disease-activity measures and eventually result in disease control for most patients; however, this “trial-and-error” approach wastes precious time on ineffective treatments. A delay in reaching treat-to-target goals has a negative effect on patient burden and, possibly, disease progression.1 Useful predictors for TNFi response have been challenging to identify but a specific molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) test was shown to be predictive for inadequate response to TNFi therapies.2 The impact of such identification has the potential to result in improved patient outcomes, but further validation would be welcome, especially for response criteria other than ACR50, and in a stringent treat-to-target setting with lower baseline disease activity.Objectives:To validate the predictive value of the MSRC test in identifying those patients who do not meet EULAR good response criteria after 6 months of TNFi treatment.Methods:Data from a prospective cohort study conducted in the Sint Maartenskliniek (Nijmegen, the Netherlands) of RA patients who started adalimumab or etanercept TNFi as their first biologic were included.3 Baseline RNA samples and clinical assessments were used to identify patients who had a molecular signature1 of non-response to TNFi therapy. Outcomes were calculated at six months using DAS28-CRP-based EULAR good response, and high and low confidence responders and non-responders were identified using Monte Carlo simulation with 2,000 repeats and 70% precision cut off. Outcome measurements were blinded for test results. Treatment switch before 6 months was imputed as non-response. Odds ratios and area under the ROC curve (AUC) assessments were used to evaluate the ability of the MSRC test to predict inadequate response at 6 months against EULAR good response criteria.Results:A total of 68 out of 88 RA patients were identified to have a high-confidence response status and were included in analyses (Table 1). EULAR good response was observed in 45.5% (31/68) of patients. Patients were stratified according to detection of a molecular signature of non-response with an AUC of 0.61. The odds that a patient with the molecular signature of non-response at baseline failed to achieve a EULAR good response at 6 months was four times greater than that of a patient lacking the molecular signature (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.2-13.3).Table 1.Patient demographicsCharacteristicRA patients (N = 68)Age, median (SD)57 (11)Female, n (%)43 (63.2)CCP positive, n (%)34 (50.0)RF positive, n (%)38 (55.9)Prescribed adalimumab at baseline, n (%)11 (16.2)Prescribed etanercept at baseline, n (%)57 (83.8)Conclusion:In this validation study, the molecular signature of non-response identified patients who did not fulfill the EULAR good response criteria to TNFi therapies. The patient selection process for this study had limitations; additional analysis in an alternative cohort would further verify the performance of the MSRC test. Nevertheless, the test, previously validated for ACR50, now has been validated using EULAR good response in a treat-to-target setting.References:[1]Schipper LG et al, Time to achieve remission determines time to be in remission. Arthritis Res Ther 201[2]Mellors T, et al. Clinical Validation of a Blood-Based Predictive Test for Stratification of Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Network and Systems Medicine 2020[3]Tweehuysen L et al. Predictive value of ex-vivo drug-inhibited cytokine production for clinical response to biologic DMARD therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019Disclosure of Interests:Lixia Zhang Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Celeste van der Tog: None declared, Alfons den Broeder Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Cellgene, Roche, Biogen, Lilly, Novartis, Celltrion Sanofi, Gilead., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Cellgene, Roche, Biogen, Lilly, Novartis, Celltrion Sanofi, Gilead., Ted Mellors Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Erin Connolly-Strong Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Johanna Withers Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Alex Jones Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Viatcheslav Akmaev Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 733.2-734
Author(s):  
I. Flouri ◽  
N. Kougkas ◽  
N. Avgustidis ◽  
A. Repa ◽  
A. Eskitzis ◽  
...  

Background:Long-term observational studies of patients under biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapies in routine clinical practice can provide us with important data regarding patients with comorbidities, who are usually excluded from randomized controlled studies.Objectives:To study the impact of comorbidities in the outcome (response and persistence to therapy) of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving bDMARDs in real-world clinical practice.Methods:Prospective study of all patients who start a bDMARD in a tertiary centre University Hospital after their consent. All patient comorbidities [among a list of approximately 100 pre-specified major comorbidities] are registered by treating physicians at baseline and during follow-up.Comorbidities were studied as total Comorbidities Count (CC) and rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI). Statistical analyses were performed using logistic and Cox regression models, adjusting for the potential confounding of age, sex, disease duration, diagnosis (axial vs. peripheral SpA), number of previous conventional synthetic and biologic DMARDs, year of therapy start, and co-administered methotrexate and corticosteroids (yes/no). Analyses of response to therapy also included baseline BASDAI or ASDAS indices as confounding variables.Results:A total of 603 biologic treatments (1st: 298, 2nd: 157, ≥3rd: 148) were analyzed. Half (51%) of the patients were female, 413 patients had axial SpA (AxSpA) and 190 peripheral SpA (perSpA). At baseline, median (IQR) age: 48 (38-57) years, disease duration: 11 (4-19) years, CC: 2 (1-4) and RDCI: 1 (0-2). Both comorbidity indices were significantly higher in perSpA compared to AxSpA (p<0.001).At 6 months of therapy, 31% of patients with AxSpA achieved BASDAI50 and 39% had ASDAS-ESR < 2.1. Higher CC was an independent predictor of insufficient response according to BASDAI50 [OR (95%) = 0.70 (0.52-0.94), p=0.019] and higher RDCI was predicting failure to achieve ASDAS-ESR < 2.1 [OR (95%) = 0.59 (0.37-0.94), p=0.027]. Other independent predictors of non-response were age, longer disease duration and (for ASDAS-ESR<2.1) higher baseline disease activity.During 1405 patient-years of follow-up, 349 (58%) treatments were discontinued. The adjusted hazard ratio for bDMARD discontinuation within the first 2 years of treatment due to insufficient response was doubled in patients with CC ≥2 versus those with CC ≤1 [HR = 2.27 (1.14-4.53), p=0.020] or with RDCI ≥1 (vs. RDCI = 0) [HR = 2.23 (1.22-4.07), p=0.009]. Comorbidities’ indices were not significant predictors of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events.Conclusion:The presence of comorbidities in patients with SpA is an independent predictor for insufficient 6-month response to bDMARDs and resultant treatment discontinuation due to failure.Acknowledgements:This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme «Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning» in the context of the project “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers - 2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 216-223
Author(s):  
Mohamed Baraka ◽  
Hossam ElDessouky ◽  
Alaa Abdel Azeez Labeeb ◽  
Eman Ezzat ◽  
Asmaa ElDessouky

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune systemic disease with a wide clinical presentation. The laryngeal manifestations are often masked by the articular disability often experienced in the early and late stages of the disease. Objective: Association between different laryngeal complaints and videolaryngoscopic laryngeal alterations in patients with RA, and disease activity and duration. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 79 patients with RA. All subjects were recruited from the out-patient clinic of physical medicine, rehabilitation, and rheumatology in Al-Menoufia University Hospitals during the period from March 2015 to March 2017. All patients were subjected to both phoniatric and rheumatological assessment. Results: Patients with phonasthenic symptoms and globus pharynges had significantly (p=0.01, 0.008 respectively) higher disease duration than patients without. No significant association found between rheumatoid arthritis duration and different videolaryngoscopic laryngeal alterations, patient’s self-assessment of the impact of laryngeal complaints on their lives, and auditory perceptual assessment (APA) of patient’s voice characters. As regards rheumatoid disease's activity no significant correlation has been established (p>0.05) with different laryngeal complaints except for patients in remission who had higher prevalence of intermittent dysphonia than patients with low activities. Rheumatoid disease's activity had no significant association with different laryngeal findings except those with moderate activity; they had significantly higher prevalence of vocal folds nodules than patients with high activity and patients in remission. Conclusion: A significant association between the disease's duration and presence of laryngeal complaints, dysphonia, and its persistence has been established. Also, patients with phonasthenic symptoms and globus pharynges had significantly higher disease duration than patients without. Rheumatoid diseases activity had significant association with different laryngeal complaints in patients with remission that had higher prevalence of intermittent dysphonia than patients with low activities. No significant association between the disease activity and different laryngeal findings that has been found except for patients with DAS-28>3.2, they had significantly higher prevalence of rheumatoid nodules.


2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (12) ◽  
pp. 1609-1615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Aletaha ◽  
Jen-fue Maa ◽  
Su Chen ◽  
Sung-Hwan Park ◽  
Dave Nicholls ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine if disease duration and number of prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) affect response to therapy in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsAssociations between disease duration or number of prior DMARDs and response to therapy were assessed using data from two randomised controlled trials in patients with established RA (mean duration, 11 years) receiving adalimumab+methotrexate. Response to therapy was assessed at week 24 using disease activity outcomes, including 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and proportions of patients with 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses.ResultsIn the larger study (N=207), a greater number of prior DMARDs (>2 vs 0–1) was associated with smaller improvements in DAS28(CRP) (–1.8 vs –2.2), SDAI (–22.1 vs –26.9) and HAQ-DI (–0.43 vs –0.64) from baseline to week 24. RA duration of >10 years versus <1 year was associated with higher HAQ-DI scores (1.1 vs 0.7) at week 24, but results on DAS28(CRP) and SDAI were mixed. A greater number of prior DMARDs and longer RA duration were associated with lower ACR response rates at week 24. Data from the second trial (N=67) generally confirmed these findings.ConclusionsNumber of prior DMARDs and disease duration affect responses to therapy in patients with established RA. Furthermore, number of prior DMARDs, regardless of disease duration, has a limiting effect on the potential response to adalimumab therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Siheme OUALI ◽  
Khalida ZEMRI ◽  
Ferial SELLAM ◽  
Noria HARIR ◽  
Zahira BENIASSA ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the relationships between anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibodies status and clinical characteristics, disease severity, radiological damages and laboratory assessment in Algerian patients with Rheumatoid arthritis, as well as their importance like a predictive factor for the diagnosis of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: 281 patients diagnosed with RA according to ACR 1987 criteria in the  internal medicine and Functional Rehabilitation departments (the University Hospital of Sidi Bel Abbes) were enrolled in the study based on medical records including age, gender, disease duration, disease activity score (DAS28), joint damages, laboratory tests and treatment. All data were processed and analyzed via SPSS 22.0. Results: 86.5% of patients were females with a mean age and disease duration of respectively 52.665±12.3477, 4.19±4.050.  Patients with Anti-CCP positive (79.7%) presented a high disease activity (p<0.0001), a long disease duration (p=0.016) and a erosion damages (p<0.0001). we did not found any significant relation between gender, hands damages and CRP..A logistic regression showed that the presence of Anti-CCP was associated with Erosion, disease activity, age and RF presence. Conclusion: There was a strong relation between Anti-CCP antibodies status and the development of RA in Algerian patients. It could be considered as a useful predictor of disease severity.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1401.3-1401
Author(s):  
H. Bettaieb ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
M. Sellami ◽  
O. Kmar ◽  
...  

Background:During rheumatoid arthritis (RA), initiating conventional synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (csDMARD) at the early stages of the disease is a mandatory condition to achieve DMARD-free sustained remission (1). Limited data studying the relationship between RA treatment delay and disease activity are available.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the impact of csDMARD initiation delay during RA on disease activity.Methods:This is a cross-sectional study including patients with RA (ACR/EULAR criteria).Delays were collected from patients’ interview and were represented respectively by D1, D2 and D3. D1 stands for the lag time separating the first RA symptom onset and rheumatologist consultation. D2 stands for the lag time separating the first RA symptom onset and RA diagnosis. D3 stands for lag time separating the first RA symptom onset and csDMARD initiation. Disease activity was evaluated by: Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), number of tender joints, number of swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Disease Activity Score28 (DAS28).The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Student’s t test, chi (2) test, and Spearman correlation using the SPSS statistical package. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.Results:The study included 100 RA patients (86 women and 14 men), with a mean age of 56.5 ± 12.4 years. The mean age at the onset of RA was 47.5 ± 12.4 years. Median D1, D2 and D3 were respectively 12 months [0-242], 15.7 months [2-252] and 18 months [2-270].Methotrextate was prescribed in 86% of cases. At RA diagnosis, the median values for the following parameters were: VAS 80 [30-100], number of tender joints 10[0-28], number of swollen joints 5 [0-17], ESR 43mm/hour [6-133], CRP 14.1 mg/l [1-120], DAS28 (ESR) 5.22 [2-7.52] and DAS28 (CRP) 4.6 [1-6.93]. After one year of follow-up, the median parameters of the disease activity were respectively: VAS 60 [0-100], number of tender joints 6[0-28], number of swollen joints 2 [0-22], ESR 32 mm/hour [2-106], CRP 7.5 mg/l [1.2-94], DAS28 (ESR) 4.1 [1.4-7.1] and DAS28 (CRP) 3.7 [1.68-6.22]. Significant positive correlation was found between delays in csDMARD initiation and DAS28 (CRP) scores over the first year (p=0.02, r=0.29).Conclusion:In this study, delays in treatment were associated with higher DAS28 (CRP) scores after one year of follow-up. Our results suggest that early identification and treatment of RA leads to improved outcomes and even improved rates of drug-free remission.References:[1]Van Nies JA, Krabben A, Schoones JW, et al. What is the evidence for the presence of a therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:861–70.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1716-1717
Author(s):  
M. Rato ◽  
F. Pinheiro ◽  
S. Garcia ◽  
B. M. Fernandes ◽  
S. Ganhão ◽  
...  

Background:Spinal mobility is assessed frequently in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) usingBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index(BASMI) to provide baseline measurement, monitor changes over time and to assess the impact of clinical interventions. BASMI comprises 4 measures of spinal mobility (cervical rotation, tragus-to-wall distance, modified Schober’s test and lumbar lateral flexion) and one hip mobility measurement (intermalleolar distance).Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate the time-course change of BASMI in PsA patients after 6 months ofBiologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug(bDMARD) therapy. The authors also pretend to evaluated, at baseline and after 6 months of treatment, the association between BASMI, disease activity scores and physical function.Methods:An observational retrospective study was performed in patients with PsA under bDMARD followed in the Rheumatology department of a tertiary university hospital. Were included patients treated with only one bDMARD. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register. For spinal mobility calculation BASMI was used. Disease activity was evaluated withAnkylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score(ASDAS) andBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index(BASDAI). Physical function was assessed withBath Functional Index(BASFI). The variation of BASMI, ASDAS, BASDAI and BASFI was calculated as the difference between values registered at 6 months and at baseline and presented as Δ. Correlations between ΔBASMI, ΔASDAS and ΔBASFI was calculated using Pearson test.Results:A total of 55 patients were included. Thirty patients were males (54.5%). The mean age at diagnosis was 44.6 ± 12.6 years and the median disease duration at start of bDMARD was 5.4 years (min: 0.30; max: 25.5). In total, 19 (34.5%) patients had predominant axial involvement, 36 (65.5%) peripheric and 36 (65.5%) enthesopathic. Almost all patients fulfilled the CASPAR criteria for PsA (n=50, 90.9%). According to ASDAS criteria, at the baseline 20 patients (36.4%) had high disease activity and 34 (61,8%) very high. The most used bDMARD was etanercept (n=21, 38,3%) followed by golimumab (n=19, 34.5%) and adalimumab (n=8, 14.5%). Three patients were treated with infliximab, two with certolizumab and other two with secukinumab. Forty-one patients (75.9%) were concomitantly treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs. Axial PsA patients had more limitations in spinal mobility (BASMI mean 4.5 ± 1.5) and more functional limitation (BASFI mean 6.8±1.9) than patients with predominant peripheric involvement (BASMI mean 3.3± 1.2, p=0.004; BASFI mean 5.4±3, p=0,0048). Statistically significant differences in ASDAS and BASDAI in these two groups were not observed (p=0.332 and p=0.605, respectively). For all patients, BASMI did not vary significantly (p=0.691) at baseline (mean 3.7± 1.4) and after 6 months (mean 3.8±1.3) of treatment. Although the ΔBASMI for etanercept was negative (mean -0.12±0.9) and for golimumab positive (0.14±0.8), it was not statistically significant. At baseline there is a significant positive association between BASMI and ASDAS (r=0.435, p=0.001), BASMI and BASDAI (r=0.567, p<0.001) and BASMI and BASFI (r=0.510, p<0.001). However, there was not a statistically significant association between ΔBASMI and: ΔASDAS, ΔBASDAI and ΔBASFI (r=0.158; p=0.269, r=0.019; p=0.096 and r=0.121; p=0.397, respectively).Conclusion:In PsA patients treated with bDMARDs, at least in short-term follow-up, BASMI does not improve with time. Changes in BASMI did not correlate with changes in activity disease and in functional outcome. Studies with longer follow-up and with more patients are needed to better evaluate these associations.Disclosure of Interests:Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Rita Gaio: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Alexandra Bernardo: None declared, Lúcia Costa: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document