scholarly journals P108 Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid for systemic lupus erythematosus in children

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e63.1-e63
Author(s):  
D Zhang ◽  
V Elie ◽  
S Magreault ◽  
I Melki ◽  
V Baudouin ◽  
...  

BackgroundMycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is increasingly used in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Monitoring of its active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA), is performed for individual dosage adjustment of MMF and is based on determination of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC12h) of MPA. The objective of this monocentric study is to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MPA in paediatric patients with SLE or lupus nephritis.MethodsPatients with lupus treated by MMF between January 2009 and July 2018 were included. MPA plasma concentrations (T0, T0.5h, T1h, T2h, T3h, T8h and T12h) were determined by EMIT (enzyme-multiplied immunotechnique) and MPA AUC12h calculated according to trapezoid rule.ResultsTwenty-two patients were diagnosed with lupus at 11.5 ± 2.9 years. Clinical presentation was SLE (n=18) or isolated lupus nephritis (n=4). Treatments prior to MMF were steroids and/or immunosuppressants (endoxan, rituximab). Age at initiation of MMF (Cellcept®n=20, Myfortic®n=2) was 12.9 ± 2.6 years.PK of MPA was performed after 8.2 ± 14.8 months of treatment, under MMF dose of 840 ± 218 mg (577 ± 98 mg/m2). A large interindividual variability in MPA concentration-time profiles was observed with the following mean parameters: Cmax=4.60 ± 11.70 µg/mL, tmax=80 ± 77 min, trough plasma concentration (C0) = 2.30 ± 1.60 µg/mL and AUC0-12h=46.29 ± 17.39 µg*h/mL.ConclusionData on the PK of MPA in lupus children are limited. Our results show the high interindividual variability in MPA exposure after oral administration of MMF. Monitoring of exposure based on AUC in combination with immunological disease parameters will allow to individualise treatment to optimiseDisclosure(s)Nothing to disclose

Author(s):  
Yasuaki Mino ◽  
Takafumi Naito ◽  
Kumiko Shimoyama ◽  
Noriyoshi Ogawa ◽  
Junichi Kawakami

Background Mycophenolate mofetil has recently been reported to be effective against systemic lupus erythematosus. The influence of the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, the active form of mycophenolate mofetil and the major inactive mycophenolic acid phenolic glucuronide on the activity of the target enzyme inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase, is expected to be revealed. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Methods Fifty systemic lupus erythematosus patients in remission maintenance phase (29 received mycophenolate mofetil [MMF+] and 21 did not [MMF−]) were enrolled. Median and interquartile range of dose of mycophenolate mofetil were 1500 and 1000–1500 mg/day, respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the dependence between inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity and 25 predictor values including predose plasma concentrations of free mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid phenolic glucuronide. Results Median and interquartile range of predose total plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid and mycophenolic acid phenolic glucuronide were 2.73 and 1.43–5.73 and 25.5 and 13.1–54.7  µg/mL, respectively. Predose inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity was significantly higher in MMF+ than MMF− patients (median 38.3 and 20.6 nmoL xanthosine 5′-monophosphate/g haemoglobin/h, P<0.01). The plasma concentration of free mycophenolic acid phenolic glucuronide, complement fraction C3 and body weight were significant predictors accounting for interindividual variability in the inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity (adjusted R2 = 0.52, P < 0.01) in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions Predose inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity was higher in systemic lupus erythematosus patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy. Inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity may be determined by mycophenolic acid exposure and complement fraction C3 in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.


2018 ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Le Thuan Nguyen ◽  
Bui Bao Hoang

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems. The kidney appears to be the most commonly affected organ, especially nephrotic is a serious kidney injury. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathology are very useful for diagnosis, provide the means of predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in nephrotic patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of nephrotic patients with lupus treated in the Department of Nephrology Trung Vuong Hospital and Cho Ray Hospital between May/2014 and May/2017. Renal histopathological lesions were classified according to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society - ISN/RPS ’s 2003. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathological features were described. Results: Of 32 LN with nephritic range proteinuria cases studied, 93.7% were women. The 3 most common clinical manifestations were edema (93.8%), hypertension (96.8%) and pallor (68.9%), musculoskeletal manifestions (46.9%), malar rash (40.6%). There was significant rise in laboratory and immunological manifestions with hematuria (78.1%), Hb < 12g/dL (93.5%), increased Cholesterol (100%), and Triglycerid (87.5%), Creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL (87.5%), increased BUN 71.9%, ANA (+) 93.8%, Anti Ds DNA(+) 96.9%, low C3: 96.9%, low C4: 84.4%. The most various and severe features were noted in class IV with active tubulointerstitial lesions and high activity index. Conclusion: Lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria has the more severity of histopathological feature and the more severity of the more systemic organ involvements and laboratory disorders were noted. Key words: Systemic lupus, erythematosus (SLE) lupus nepphritis, clinical


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ivan Gamez-Nava ◽  
Valeria Diaz-Rizo ◽  
Edsaul Emilio Perez-Guerrero ◽  
Jose Francisco Muñoz-Valle ◽  
Ana Miriam Saldaña-Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To date, the association of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and serum adipokines with lupus nephritis is controversial. Objective To assess the utility of serum MIF, leptin, adiponectin and resistin levels as markers of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in lupus nephritis. Methods Cross-sectional study including 196 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 52 healthy controls (HCs). Disease activity was assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Renal SLE involvement was investigated by renal-SLEDAI. MIF, adiponectin, leptin and resistin levels were quantified by ELISA. We assessed the correlations of quantitative variables by Spearman correlation (rs). Multivariable linear regression adjusted the variables associated with the severity of proteinuria. Results SLE patients had higher MIF (p = 0.02) and adiponectin (p < 0.001) than HCs. Patients with renal SLE involvement (n = 43) had higher adiponectin (19.0 vs 13.3 μg/mL, p = 0.002) and resistin (10.7 vs 8.9 ng/mL, p = 0.01) than patients with non-renal SLE (n = 153). Proteinuria correlated with high adiponectin (rs = 0.19, p < 0.009) and resistin (rs = 0.26, p < 0.001). MIF (rs = 0.27, p = 0.04). Resistin correlated with increased creatinine (rs = 0.18, p = 0.02). High renal-SLEDAI correlated with adiponectin (rs = 0.21, p = 0.004). Multiple linear regression showed that elevated adiponectin (p = 0.02), younger age (p = 0.04) and low MIF (p = 0.02) were associated with the severity of proteinuria. Low MIF and high adiponectin levels interacted to explain the association with the severity of proteinuria (R2 = 0.41). Conclusions High adiponectin combined with low MIF concentrations int+eract to explain the severity of proteinuria in renal SLE. These findings highlight the relevance of adiponectin, resistin and MIF as markers of LN.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1048.1-1048
Author(s):  
W. Hu

Background:Classical lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by glomerular immune complex(IC) deposition with glomerular proliferation, basement membrane destruction and cell infiltration. Non-IC mediated renal injury with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was also reported in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE-renal TMA), but most studies were reported in patients with both LN and renal TMA.Objectives:In this study, clinical features and outcomes of SLE-renal TMA in absence of obvious IC in SLE patients were analyzed.Methods:Patients with glomerular TMA and/or vascular TMA in the absence of obvious subendothelial or epithelial immune deposits were screened out from 2332 biopsied in SLE patients who underwent first renal biopsy from January 2005 to August 2016. Their clinical, histological features and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.Results:In 2332 renal biopsies obtained from SLE patients, 257 (11.0%) showed renal TMA, of which 237 showed both renal TMA and LN, and 20 biopsies had only renal TMA (SLE-renal TMA). There were 2 males and 18 females with an average age of (25 ± 10) years. The median course of SLE and LN were 3.0(1.0, 6.0) and 0.8(0.5, 1.9) months. All 20 patients deserved acute kidney injury, of which 11 (55%) needed renal replacement therapy (RRT) and 12 (60%) were nephrotic syndrome. Blood system involvement was found in all cases, including 13 cases (65.0%) with TMA triad (microvascular hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase).Pathological examination showed that 17 cases (85.0%) had both glomerular TMA and vascular TMA. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy showed that 8 cases (40%) had no IC deposition in glomerulus and 12 cases (60%) had only IC deposition in mesangium. Acute tubulointerstitial lesions in patients requiring RRT were more serious than those no needing for RRT((43.6±24.9) %vs(21.7±20.1) %,P=0.047). The fusion range of foot process was positively correlated with proteinuria (r2= 0.347,P=0.006).All patients received high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Four patients received plasma exchange and three patients received gamma globulin, respectively. Eleven patients requiring RRT all stop RRT in a median time of 16.0 (9.0, 30.0) days. During a median follow-up of 58.0 (36.0, 92.3) months, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 15 cases, partial remission in 4 cases and no remission in 1 case. Six cases (30%) relapsed. No case died or progressed to end stage renal disease.Conclusion:Renal injury characterized by TMA is not uncommon in SLE renal biopsy cases. The clinical manifestation is special and the renal injury is serious. The renal outcome is good by intensive immunosuppressive therapy. It should be considered as a unique type of renal injury in SLE.References:[1]Moake JL. Thrombotic microangiopathies. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347(8): 589-600.[2]Anders HJ, Weening JJ. Kidney disease in lupus is not always ‘lupus nephritis’. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(2): 108.[3]Song D, Wu LH, Wang FM, et al. The spectrum of renal thrombotic microangiopathy in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(1): R12.[4]Hu WX, Liu ZZ, Chen HP, Zhang HT, Li LS, Liu ZH. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis with thrombotic microangiopathy. Lupus. 2010. 19(14): 1591-8.[5]Tomov S, Lazarchick J, Self SE, Bruner ET, Budisavljevic MN. Kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with SLE treated with romiplostim. Lupus. 2013. 22(5): 504-9.[6]Li C, Yap D, Chan G, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Clinico-pathological Correlations in Lupus Nephritis with Kidney Biopsy Showing Thrombotic Microangiopathy. J Rheumatol. 2019 .[7]Chen MH, Chen MH, Chen WS, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study in North Taiwan. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011. 50(4): 768-75.[8]Park MH, AUID- Oho, Caselman N, Ulmer S, Weitz IC, AUID- Oho. Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy associated with lupus nephritis. Blood Adv. 2018. 2(16): 2090-2094.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332098345
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ida Celia ◽  
Roberta Priori ◽  
Bruna Cerbelli ◽  
Francesca Diomedi-Camassei ◽  
Vincenzo Leuzzi ◽  
...  

Proteinuria is one of the most typical manifestations of kidney involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). We report the case of a 23-year-old woman with a 6-year-long history of SLE presenting with proteinuria after a three-year remission on hydroxychloroquine. Kidney histological examination showed alterations inconsistent with lupus nephritis and suggestive of hydroxychloroquine toxicity or Fabry disease. The latter was confirmed by genetic assay.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 611.1-611
Author(s):  
M. Plüß ◽  
S. Hakroush ◽  
N. Niebusch ◽  
B. Tampe ◽  
P. Korsten

Background:Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in about 30-60% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). LN is associated with increased mortality. Currently, the diagnosis relies on histopathologic characteristics according to the ISN/RPS classification (1). This classification relies heavily on glomerular changes and may not accurately reflect all changes occurring in LN. For the description of transplanted kidney, the BANFF classification has been established which, in addition to glomerular changes, also incorporates tubular pathologies (2).Objectives:With the present study, we aim to describe histopathologic changes according to the BANFF classification in a single-center cohort of LN patients.Methods:We retrospectively recorded epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data of 58 patients with LN over a ten-year period. Histopathologic diagnoses according to ISN/RPS classification or the former WHO classification were also documented. We then re-analyzed representative kidney samples according to the BANFF classification and performed Spearman rank correlation for BANFF findings and creatinine at biopsy and 12 months as well as proteinuria at biopsy and at 12 months.Results:We analyzed 58 patients with LN. 9 were male, 49 were female. Median age was 38 (15-78) years. According to ISN/RPS, 3 had class I LN, 6 had class II, 14 had class III, 16 had class IV, 6 had class V, and 0 had class VI. Median eGFR at biopsy was 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (13-137). According to the BANFF classification, tubulointerstitial inflammation (ti) was associated with creatinine at 12 months. Proteinuria at 12 months was associated with interstitial fibrosis (ci) (Figure 1).Conclusion:In LN, the current ISN/RPS classification puts emphasis on glomerular changes. Nevertheless, for the long-term outcome, tubulointerstitial changes (tubulointerstitial inflammation and interstitial fibrosis) may at least be as important as glomerular changes. These findings have to be corroborated in larger cohorts with prespecified renal endpoints.References:[1]Weening et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. JASN 2004.[2]Jeong HY. Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection: Banff classification and beyond. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2020.Disclosure of Interests:Marlene Plüß: None declared, Samy Hakroush: None declared, Noah Niebusch: None declared, Björn Tampe: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Chugai, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Chugai, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Lilly, Gilead, Grant/research support from: GSK


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document