Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Providencia rettgeri

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e243908
Author(s):  
Nupur B Patel ◽  
Gaurav Jain ◽  
Saurabh Chandrakar ◽  
Beeraling Ningappa Walikar

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. We report a case of VAP caused by Providencia rettgeri in a postoperative 58-year-old man with prepyloric perforation. The patient’s ICU stay was complicated by VAP. As the organism was carbapenem resistant, high-dose extended infusion of meropenem along with cefepime was started. Early identification and treatment helped in successful weaning of the patient from the ventilator. Providencia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with an increase in resistance pattern. This case highlights the rarity and importance of Providencia as a cause of VAP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195
Author(s):  
Eshwar Rajesh ◽  
Radhika Katragadda ◽  
C P Ramani

With an occurrence ranging from 6-52%, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common ICU acquired infection, accounting for a significant portion of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). VAP is pneumonia that develops after a period of more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation or endotracheal intubation. To isolate and identify the potential pathogens causing VAP and to study their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Endotracheal aspiration (ETA) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were collected from patients on mechanical ventilation >48 hours. Bacterial isolates were identified based on culture colony characteristics and biochemical parameters. Antibiotic susceptibility profile was determined for these isolates by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical and laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2020 guidelines and studied. The collected data was entered in Excel, and analyzed by using SPSS version 16. Among the isolates, the most common were (31.31%) and (31.31%). These were followed by (22.22%), (7.07%), (3.03%) and (3.03%) and (2.02%).Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) microbes causing VAP are on the increase. The patient population at risk will benefit by the application of the results of this study. The antibiotic resistance pattern of these isolates will aid clinicians in selecting the appropriate antimicrobial agents. Hence, it can lead to decreased mortality and morbidity due to life-threatening VAP.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S746-S746
Author(s):  
Cecilia G Carvalhaes ◽  
Rodrigo E Mendes ◽  
Robert K Flamm ◽  
Helio S Sader

Abstract Background Cefepime–tazobactam (FEP-TAZ) is in clinical development at 2g/2g q8 hours administered over 90 minutes (high-dose extended infusion). We compared the susceptibility (S) of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) from patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) and pneumonia (PN) against FEP-TAZ, piperacillin–tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), and ceftolozane–tazobactam (C-T). Methods In 2018, 3,389 GNB isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from patients with BSIs (1,349) and PN (2,040) in 40 United States (US) medical centers, and tested by reference broth microdilution methods for S against FEP-TAZ (TAZ at fixed 8 mg/L), PIP-TAZ, C-T, and comparators. The percentage of isolates inhibited at ≤8 mg/L (CLSI, cefepime high dose) and at ≤ 16 mg/L (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic [PK/PD] S breakpoint based on extended infusion and high dosage) of FEP-TAZ were evaluated. Results FEP-TAZ (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 mg/L) was the most active TAZ combination against Enterobacterales (ENT) with a spectrum similar to that of meropenem (MEM; 99.3/97.2%S for BSI/PN), ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI; 99.8/99.9%S), and amikacin (AMK; 99.3/98.3%S) and retained good activity against ceftriaxone-non-S (CRO-NS) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) ENT (table). Among the β-lactams (BLMs) tested, only FEP-TAZ (57.1/58.6% [BSI/PN] inhibited at ≤ 16 mg/L) and CAZ-AVI (71.4/96.6%S) were active against carbapenem-resistant ENT (CRE). CAZ-AVI (96.7/95.2%S for BSI/PN) and C-T (96.5/94.5%S) were the most active BLMs tested against P. aeruginosa (PSA), followed by FEP-TAZ (95.0/92.1% inhibited a ≤ 16 mg/L), FEP (89.3/78.2%S), and CAZ (85.1/79.0%S). FEP-TAZ (77.8/77.3% inhibited at ≤ 16 mg/L), C-T (81.2/82.9%S), and CAZ-AVI (77.8/84.5%S) retained activity against MEM-NS PSA. FEP-TAZ was the most active BLM against Acinetobacter spp. when the proposed PK/PD breakpoint was applied. Conclusion S rates were markedly lower among isolates from PN compared with BSI. FEP-TAZ was the most active TAZ combination tested against GNB isolated from patients with BSI and PN from US hospitals and exhibited greater spectrum than the carbapenems. The results of this study support further clinical development of high-dose extended-infusion FEP-TAZ for treatment of GNB infections. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S649-S650
Author(s):  
Miki Takemura ◽  
Yoshinori Yamano ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin developed to treat serious carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) infections. Methods In CREDIBLE-CR (NCT02714595), adults with serious infections caused by CR GN pathogens received CFDC 2 g, q8h, 3-h infusion, or best available therapy (BAT). In APEKS-NP (NCT03032380), adults with nosocomial pneumonia received CFDC or high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem (each 2 g, q8h, 3-h infusion). All treatments were given for 7‒14 days (extendable to 21 days). Biospecimens were collected before the first dose of study drug and at subsequent visits for assessments, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to various antibiotics, including CFDC and carbapenems, were determined. Isolates with an increased MIC were evaluated by RT-PCR or whole genome sequencing (WGS) for CFDC resistance-related genes or mutations. Results for genetically related isolates with an elevated MIC during therapy are shown. Results On-therapy ≥4-fold CFDC MIC increase was found in 12 out of 106 (CREDIBLE-CR; Table 1) and 7 out of 159 (APEKS-NP; Table 2) isolates, respectively. For most isolates, CFDC MIC increased by 4–8-fold but remained ≤4 µg/mL. Specific mutations which could explain CFDC MIC increases were found in only 3 isolates. Mutations in iron-transport related genes were not identified. Mutation in CFDC target gene PBP-3 was identified in 1 A. baumannii isolate. Class-C enzyme mutation was observed in 2 isolates (CREDIBLE-CR: PDC-30 in P. aeruginosa; APEKS-NP: ACT-17 in E. cloacae), although the contribution to CFDC MIC increase has not been confirmed. In the BAT arm in CREDIBLE-CR, 6 out of 46 isolates had ≥4-fold MIC increase; all post-treatment isolates were resistant to BAT agents (Table 1), although WGS was not conducted for these isolates. In the meropenem arm in APEKS-NP, 5 out of 164 isolates had ≥4-fold MIC increase (Table 2). Table 1. MIC changes in CREDIBLE-CR Table 2. MIC changes in APEKS-NP Conclusion Among isolates with ≥4-fold MIC increase during CFDC treatment, actual CFDC MIC values remained relatively low for most isolates. Frequency of MIC increase in BAT or meropenem arms was similar to that of CFDC, but the magnitude was greater. Acquisition of contributory mechanism has not been identified except for the mutation in PBP 3 and some β-lactamases. Disclosures Miki Takemura, MSc, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee)


Author(s):  
Mahila Monajati ◽  
Shahram Ala ◽  
Masoud Aliyali ◽  
Roya Ghasemian ◽  
Fatemeh Heidari ◽  
...  

Background: Meropenem standard doses are based on the minimum inhibitory concentration of sensitive pathogens and the pharmacokinetic parameter of not critically ill patients. We compared the efficacy of high versus standard dose of meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: 24 out of 34 eligible patients were randomized to receive meropenem 3 g q8h (high dose group, 11 patients) or 2 g q8h (standard dose group, 13 patients) as a 3h infusion. Primary outcome was considered as clinical success that was defined as stable hemodynamic, improved sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, stable or improved PaO2/FiO2 after 7 days. A sputum culture was taken before intervention. Results: Clinical success rate was not significantly different between the high and standard dose group (54.5% vs. 38.5%, P= 0.431). There was a significant difference in reduction of clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) compared to high dose with standard group (P=0.038). SOFA score declined significantly in high dose group through the study (P=0.006). A shorter duration of VAP treatment was recorded in high dose group (P=0.061). We did not observe any significant adverse event related to meropenem. Acinetobacter spp. (34.8%), Klebsiella spp. (32.6%) and, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.5%) isolated more frequently from sputum cultures. Conclusion: Treatment with high dose of meropenem seems to be safe. However, it did not provide significantly higher clinical success rate in comparison with the standard dose, but could be considered as an appropriate empirical treatment in patients with severe infection due to reducing in SOFA and CPIS.


Author(s):  
David W Wareham ◽  
M H F Abdul Momin ◽  
Lynette M Phee ◽  
Michael Hornsey ◽  
Joseph F Standing

Abstract Background β-Lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations are widely used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Cefepime has not been widely studied in combination with BLIs. Sulbactam, with dual BL/BLI activity, has been partnered with very few BLs. We investigated the potential of cefepime/sulbactam as an unorthodox BL/BLI combination against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Methods In vitro activity of cefepime/sulbactam (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1) was assessed against 157 strains. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the PTA with a number of simulated cefepime combination regimens, modelled across putative cefepime/sulbactam breakpoints (≤16/≤0.25 mg/L). Results Cefepime/sulbactam was more active (MIC50/MIC90 8/8–64/128 mg/L) compared with either drug alone (MIC50/MIC90 128 to >256 mg/L). Activity was enhanced when sulbactam was added at 1:1 or 1:2 (P < 0.05). Reduction in MIC was most notable against Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales (MIC 8/8–32/64 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling highlighted that up to 48% of all isolates and 73% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of ≤16/≤8 mg/L may be treatable with a high-dose, fixed-ratio (1:1 or 1:2) combination of cefepime/sulbactam. Conclusions Cefepime/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) displays enhanced in vitro activity versus MDR Gram-negative pathogens. It could be a potential alternative to existing BL/BLI combinations for isolates with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of 16/8 mg/L either as a definitive treatment or as a carbapenem-sparing option.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document