scholarly journals 113 The use of inertial measurement units for analyzing change of direction movement in sports: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki-Matti Alanen ◽  
Anu Raisanen ◽  
Lauren Benson ◽  
Kati Pasanen
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Change Of Direction ◽  
Measurement Units

scholarly journals The use of inertial measurement units for analyzing change of direction movement in sports: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
pp. 174795412110030
Author(s):  
 AM Alanen ◽  
AM Räisänen ◽  
LC Benson ◽  
K Pasanen
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Change Of Direction ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Ebsco Host

Change of direction movement is common in sports and the ability to perform this complex movement efficiently is related to athlete's performance. Wearable devices have been used to evaluate aspects of change of direction movement, but so far there are no clear recommendations on specific metrics to be used. The aims of this scoping review were to evaluate the reliability and validity of inertial measurement unit sensors to provide information on change of direction movement and to summarize the available evidence on inertial measurement units in analyzing change of direction movement in sports. A systematic search was employed in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO host), SPORTDiscus (EBSCO host), EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science to identify eligible studies. A complementary grey literature search was employed to locate non-peer reviewed studies. The risk of bias of the studies evaluating validity and/or reliability was evaluated using the AXIS tool. The initial search identified 15,165 studies. After duplicate removal and full-text screening 49 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 11 studies evaluating validity and/or reliability. There are promising results on the validity and reliability, but the number of studies is still small and the quality of the studies is limited. Most of the studies were conducted with pre-planned movements and participants were usually adult males. Varying sensor locations limits the ability to generalize these findings. Inertial measurement units (IMU) can be used to detect change of direction (COD) movements and COD heading angles with acceptable validity, but IMU measured or derived kinetic or kinematic variables present inconsistency and over-estimation. Studies can be improved with larger sample sizes and agreement on the metrics used and sensor placement. Future research should include more on-field studies.

scholarly journals Unobtrusive Sensors for the Assessment of Older Adult’s Frailty: A Scoping Review

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2983
Author(s):  
Antonio Cobo ◽  
Elena Villalba-Mora ◽  
Rodrigo Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
Xavier Ferre ◽  
Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Monitoring Applications ◽  
Healthcare Monitoring ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Hospitalized Older Adults

Ubiquity (devices becoming part of the context) and transparency (devices not interfering with daily activities) are very significant in healthcare monitoring applications for elders. The present study undertakes a scoping review to map the literature on sensor-based unobtrusive monitoring of older adults’ frailty. We aim to determine what types of devices comply with unobtrusiveness requirements, which frailty markers have been unobtrusively assessed, which unsupervised devices have been tested, the relationships between sensor outcomes and frailty markers, and which devices can assess multiple markers. SCOPUS, PUBMED, and Web of Science were used to identify papers published 2010–2020. We selected 67 documents involving non-hospitalized older adults (65+ y.o.) and assessing frailty level or some specific frailty-marker with some sensor. Among the nine types of body worn sensors, only inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the waist and wrist-worn sensors comply with ubiquity. The former can transparently assess all variables but weight loss. Wrist-worn devices have not been tested in unsupervised conditions. Unsupervised presence detectors can predict frailty, slowness, performance, and physical activity. Waist IMUs and presence detectors are the most promising candidates for unobtrusive and unsupervised monitoring of frailty. Further research is necessary to give specific predictions of frailty level with unsupervised waist IMUs.

scholarly journals Analysis of ergonomic and unergonomic human lifting behaviors by using Inertial Measurement Units

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kuschan ◽  
Henning Schmidt ◽  
Jörg Krüger
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Musculoskeletal System ◽  
Occupational Diseases ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Main Components

Abstract:This paper presents an analysis of two distinct human lifting movements regarding acceleration and angular velocity. For the first movement, the ergonomic one, the test persons produced the lifting power by squatting down, bending at the hips and knees only. Whereas performing the unergonomic one they bent forward lifting the box mainly with their backs. The measurements were taken by using a vest equipped with five Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) with 9 Dimensions of Freedom (DOF) each. In the following the IMU data captured for these two movements will be evaluated using statistics and visualized. It will also be discussed with respect to their suitability as features for further machine learning classifications. The reason for observing these movements is that occupational diseases of the musculoskeletal system lead to a reduction of the workers’ quality of life and extra costs for companies. Therefore, a vest, called CareJack, was designed to give the worker a real-time feedback about his ergonomic state while working. The CareJack is an approach to reduce the risk of spinal and back diseases. This paper will also present the idea behind it as well as its main components.

scholarly journals Inertial measurement units to estimate drag forces and power output during standardised wheelchair tennis coast-down and sprint tests

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Thomas Rietveld ◽  
Barry S. Mason ◽  
Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey ◽  
Lucas H. V. van der Woude ◽  
Sonja de Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Drag Forces ◽  
Measurement Units

scholarly journals Measurement of respiratory rate with inertial measurement units

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-240
Author(s):  
Simon Beck ◽  
Bernhard Laufer ◽  
Sabine Krueger-Ziolek ◽  
Knut Moeller
Keyword(s):  
Air Pollution ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Breathing Rate ◽  
Demographic Changes ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Respiratory Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units

AbstractDemographic changes and increasing air pollution entail that monitoring of respiratory parameters is in the focus of research. In this study, two customary inertial measurement units (IMUs) are used to measure the breathing rate by using quaternions. One IMU was located ventral, and one was located dorsal on the thorax with a belt. The relative angle between the quaternion of each IMU was calculated and compared to the respiratory frequency obtained by a spirometer, which was used as a reference. A frequency analysis of both signals showed that the obtained respiratory rates vary slightly (less than 0.2/min) between the two systems. The introduced belt can analyse the respiratory rate and can be used for surveillance tasks in clinical settings.

scholarly journals Camera and inertial sensor fusion for the PnP problem: algorithms and experimental results

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi D’Alfonso ◽  
Emanuele Garone ◽  
Pietro Muraca ◽  
Paolo Pugliese
Keyword(s):  
Pose Estimation ◽  
Good Accuracy ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Magnetic Vector ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Position And Orientation

AbstractIn this work, we face the problem of estimating the relative position and orientation of a camera and an object, when they are both equipped with inertial measurement units (IMUs), and the object exhibits a set of n landmark points with known coordinates (the so-called Pose estimation or PnP Problem). We present two algorithms that, fusing the information provided by the camera and the IMUs, solve the PnP problem with good accuracy. These algorithms only use the measurements given by IMUs’ inclinometers, as the magnetometers usually give inaccurate estimates of the Earth magnetic vector. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is assessed by numerical simulations and experimental tests. The results of the tests are compared with the most recent methods proposed in the literature.

scholarly journals Accuracy and Repeatability of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured with an Inertial Measurement Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1804
Author(s):  
Jorge Posada-Ordax ◽  
Julia Cosin-Matamoros ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
Laura Esteban-Gonzalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
High Speeds ◽  
Controlled Conditions ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Accuracy And Repeatability

In recent years, interest in finding alternatives for the evaluation of mobility has increased. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) stand out for their portability, size, and low price. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy and repeatability of a commercially available IMU under controlled conditions in healthy subjects. A total of 36 subjects, including 17 males and 19 females were analyzed with a Wiva Science IMU in a corridor test while walking for 10 m and in a threadmill at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h, 3.2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 4.8 km/h for one minute. We found no difference when we compared the variables at 4 km/h and 4.8 km/h. However, we found greater differences and errors at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and the latter one (1.6 km/h) generated more error. The main conclusion is that the Wiva Science IMU is reliable at high speeds but loses reliability at low speeds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document