More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts

BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (aug03 1) ◽  
pp. c4193-c4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Roehr
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Engagement ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Quality Of Research

scholarly journals Sharing the Ideas of Meta – Science to Improve Quality of Research

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
UR Aryal ◽  
K Khanal
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Deductive Reasoning ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Social Dimension ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Interdisciplinary Science ◽  
Quality Of Research

Meta-Science is an interdisciplinary science which provides plenty of oppurtunity to cooperate on better understanding of micro-social dimension of science. It plays vital role to justify the conclusion, which helps to improve quality of research as well as to health services. There are various applications of meta-science for improving quality of research namely: applying theories of philosophy and different disciplines, the use of triangulation, inductive and deductive reasoning, ethical issues and finally fundamentals of scientific research. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v11i1.11032 Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.11(1) 2013: 75-77

scholarly journals A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais R. de Mattos Lourenco ◽  
Vasilis Pergialiotis ◽  
James M. N. Duffy ◽  
Constantin Durnea ◽  
Abdullatif Elfituri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Quality Of Research ◽  
Urgent Action

The Productivity of Australian Academics in Education

1994 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hattie ◽  
Murray Print ◽  
Krzysztof Krakowski
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Unit Of Analysis ◽  
Teaching Community ◽  
Departments Of Education ◽  
Australian Education ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Quality Of Research

The recent push towards ‘quality assurance’ classifies universities into six bands based on quality of research, teaching, community service, and processes to improve quality. This paper argues that the individual, rather than university and department, is the appropriate unit of analysis to make statements about quality. This conjecture is illustrated by using one criterion, productivity of publications in Australia by academics in education, as an index. The productivity of 2048 academics in education across the 32 universities with departments of education were matched with the 45 000 entries in the Australian Education Index. The individual highly productive academic had the most critical impact on overall productivity and it is suggested that the correct unit of analysis for quality assurance is more appropriately the individual and not the department or university.

scholarly journals How to improve quality of research in intensive care medicine

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus J. Schultz ◽  
Lieuwe D. Bos ◽  
Arjen M. Dondorp
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Medicine ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Quality Of Research

scholarly journals Pengaruh Research Attitude terhadap Pemenuhan Level of Reseach Urgensity sebagai Pengembangan Penalaran Pedagogis Mahasiswa Kependidikan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 435
Author(s):  
Fadila Fitria Wulandari ◽  
Tri Kuncoro ◽  
Tuwoso Tuwoso
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Likert Scale ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Simple Linear Regression ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Significant Linear Relationship ◽  
Quality Of Research

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research focused to find out level of compliance and effect of research attitude on the level of research urgency. Data analysis used simple linear regression 115 respondents. The research instrument used Likert scale from ATR to measure research attitude, Level of Research Urgensity instrument was developed. The results of analysis found significant linear relationship and effect between research attitude and level of research urgency of 56.7% and 43.3% influenced by other factors. So, that have to do further research on exploratory factors that affect level of research urgency in order to improve quality of research and accelerate study period.</p><strong>Abstrak:</strong><em> </em>Penelitian ini difokuskan untuk mengetahui secara detail tingkat pemenuhan dan pengaruh <em>research attitude</em> terhadap <em>level of research urgensity</em> dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Analisis data menggunakan regresi linear sederhana pada 115 responden. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan skala likert empat poin dari <em>ATR</em> untuk mengukur <em>research attitude</em>, instrumen <em>Level of Research Urgensity</em> dikembangkan secara mandiri. Hasil analisis diketahui terdapat hubungan linear signifikan serta pengaruh antara <em>research attitude</em> dan <em>level of research urgensity</em> sebesar 56,7% dan 43,3% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain. Jadi<strong>, </strong>perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut tentang eksplor faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap <em>level of research urgensity</em> guna meningkatkan kualitas penelitian dan akselerasi masa studi mahasiswa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document