scholarly journals Incentive programmes for smoking cessation: cluster randomized trial in workplaces in Thailand

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S White ◽  
Christopher Lowenstein ◽  
Nucharee Srivirojana ◽  
Aree Jampaklay ◽  
William H Dow
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Text Messaging ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Monetary Incentive ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Smoking Abstinence ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Objective To compare several monetary incentive programmes for promoting smoking abstinence among employees who smoke at workplaces in a middle income country. Design Parallel group, open label, assessor blinded, cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Large industrial workplaces in metropolitan Bangkok, Thailand. Participants Employees who smoked cigarettes and planned to quit within six months recruited from 101 worksite clusters (84 different companies). Interventions Worksites were digitally cluster randomized by an independent investigator to usual care or usual care plus one of eight types of incentive programmes. Usual care consisted of one time group counseling and cessation support through a 28 day text messaging programme. The incentive programmes depended on abstinence at three months and varied on three intervention components: refundable deposits, assignment to a teammate, and bonus size ($20 (£15; €17) or $40). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was biochemically verified seven day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were programme acceptance at enrollment and smoking abstinence at three months (end of intervention) and at six months. All randomized participants who had complete baseline information were included in intention-to-treat analyses; participants with missing outcomes were coded as continuing smokers. Results Between April 2015 and August 2016, the trial enrolled 4190 participants. Eighteen were omitted because of missing baseline covariates and death before the primary endpoint, therefore 4172 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Programme acceptance was relatively high across all groups: 58.7% (2451/4172) overall and 61.3% (271/442) in the usual care group. Abstinence rates at 12 months did not differ among deposit programmes (336/2253, 14.9%) and non-deposit programmes (280/1919, 14.6%; adjusted difference 0.8 points, 95% confidence interval −2.7 to 4.3, P=0.65), but were somewhat lower for team based programmes (176/1348, 13.1%) than individual based programmes (440/2824, 15.6%; −3.2 points, −6.6 to −0.2, P=0.07), and higher for $40 bonus programmes (322/1954, 16.5%) than programmes with no bonus (148/1198, 12.4%; 5.9 points, 2.1 to 9.7, P=0.002). The $40 individual bonus was the most efficacious randomization group at all endpoints. Intervention components did not strongly interact with each other. Conclusions Acceptance of monetary incentive programmes for promoting smoking abstinence was high across all groups. The $40 individual bonus programmes increased long term smoking abstinence compared with usual care, although several other incentive designs did not, such as team based programmes and deposit programmes. Incentive design in workplace wellness programmes might influence their effectiveness at reducing smoking rates in low resource settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02421224 ).

scholarly journals Effectiveness of upgraded maternity waiting homes and local leader training on improving institutional births: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Jimma, Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaameeta Kurji ◽  
Lakew Abebe Gebretsadik ◽  
Muluemebet Abera Wordofa ◽  
Sudhakar Morankar ◽  
Kunuz Haji Bedru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Safe Motherhood ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Local Leader ◽  
Maternity Waiting Homes ◽  
Leader Training ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background Maternity waiting homes (MWHs), residential spaces for pregnant women close to obstetric care facilities, are being used to tackle physical barriers to access. However, their effectiveness has not been rigorously assessed. The objective of this cluster randomized trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of functional MWHs combined with community mobilization by trained local leaders in improving institutional births in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Methods A pragmatic, parallel arm cluster-randomized trial was conducted in three districts. Twenty-four primary health care units (PHCUs) were randomly assigned to either (i) upgraded MWHs combined with local leader training on safe motherhood strategies, (ii) local leader training only, or (iii) usual care. Data were collected using repeat cross-sectional surveys at baseline and 21 months after intervention to assess the effect of intervention on the primary outcome, defined as institutional births, at the individual level. Women who had a pregnancy outcome (livebirth, stillbirth or abortion) 12 months prior to being surveyed were eligible for interview. Random effects logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of the interventions. Results Data from 24 PHCUs and 7593 women were analysed using intention-to-treat. The proportion of institutional births was comparable at baseline between the three arms. At endline, institutional births were slightly higher in the MWH + training (54% [n = 671/1239]) and training only arms (65% [n = 821/1263]) compared to usual care (51% [n = 646/1271]). MWH use at baseline was 6.7% (n = 256/3784) and 5.8% at endline (n = 219/3809). Both intervention groups exhibited a non-statistically significant higher odds of institutional births compared to usual care (MWH+ & leader training odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.75; leader training OR = 1.37, 97.5% CI 0.85 to 2.22). Conclusions Both the combined MWH+ & leader training and the leader training alone intervention led to a small but non-significant increase in institutional births when compared to usual care. Implementation challenges and short intervention duration may have hindered intervention effectiveness. Nevertheless, the observed increases suggest the interventions have potential to improve women’s use of maternal healthcare services. Optimal distances at which MWHs are most beneficial to women need to be investigated. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered on the Clinical Trials website (https://clinicaltrials.gov) on 3rd October 2017. The trial identifier is NCT03299491.

scholarly journals Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at higher risk of adverse outcomes in the community: interim analyses from the PRINCIPLE trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ly-Mee Yu ◽  
Mona Bafadhel ◽  
Jienchi Dorward ◽  
Gail Hayward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Budesonide Group ◽  
Inhaled Budesonide

BACKGROUND Inhaled budesonide has shown efficacy for treating COVID-19 in the community but has not yet been tested in effectiveness trials. METHODS We performed a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomized controlled trial involving people aged ≥65 years, or ≥50 years with comorbidities, and unwell ≤14 days with suspected COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE). Participants were randomized to usual care, usual care plus inhaled budesonide (800μg twice daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints are time to first self-reported recovery, and hospitalization/death related to COVID-19, both measured over 28 days from randomisation and analysed using Bayesian models. RESULTS The trial opened on April 2, 2020. Randomization to inhaled budesonide began on November 27, 2020 and was stopped on March 31, 2021 based on an interim analysis using data from March 4, 2021. Here, we report updated interim analysis data from March 25, 2021, at which point the trial had randomized 4663 participants with suspected COVID-19. Of these, 2617 (56.1%) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive and contributed data to this interim budesonide primary analysis; 751 budesonide, 1028 usual care and 643 to other interventions. Time to first self-reported recovery was shorter in the budesonide group compared to usual care (hazard ratio 1.208 [95% BCI 1.076 - 1.356], probability of superiority 0.999, estimated benefit [95% BCI] of 3.011 [1.134 - 5.41] days). Among those in the interim budesonide primary analysis who had the opportunity to contribute data for 28 days follow up, there were 59/692 (8.5%) COVID-19 related hospitalizations/deaths in the budesonide group vs 100/968 (10.3%) in the usual care group (estimated percentage benefit, 2.1% [95% BCI -0.7% - 4.8%], probability of superiority 0.928). CONCLUSIONS In this updated interim analysis, inhaled budesonide reduced time to recovery by a median of 3 days in people with COVID-19 with risk factors for adverse outcomes. Once 28 day follow up is complete for all participants randomized to budesonide, final analyses of time to recovery and hospitalization/death will be published. (Funded by the National Institute of Health Research/ United Kingdom Research Innovation [MC_PC_19079]; PRINCIPLE ISRCTN number, ISRCTN86534580.)

scholarly journals Effect of PEP flute self-care versus usual care in early covid-19: non-drug, open label, randomised controlled trial in a Danish community setting

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e066952
Author(s):  
Annette Mollerup ◽  
Marius Henriksen ◽  
Sofus Christian Larsen ◽  
Anita Selmer Bennetzen ◽  
Mette Kildevæld Simonsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Objective To determine whether positive expiratory pressure (PEP) by PEP flute self-care is effective in reducing respiratory symptoms among community dwelling adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection and early stage covid-19. Design Non-drug, open label, randomised controlled trial. Setting Capital Region and Region Zealand in Denmark from 6 October 2020 to 26 February 2021. Participants Community dwelling adults, able to perform self-care, with a new SARS-CoV-2 infection (verified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests) and symptoms of covid-19. Intervention Participants were randomised to use PEP flute self-care in addition to usual care or have usual care only. Randomisation was based on permuted random blocks in a 1:1 ratio, stratified for sex and age (<60 or ≥60 years). The PEP self-care group was instructed to use a PEP flute three times per day during the 30 day intervention. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was a change in symptom severity from baseline to day 30, as assessed by the self-reported COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) assessment test (CAT), which was adjusted for baseline values and stratification factors. Participants completed the CAT test questionnaire every day online. Secondary outcomes were self-reported urgent care visits due to covid-19, number of covid-19 related symptoms, and change in self-rated health, all within 30-days’ follow-up. Results 378 participants were assigned to the PEP flute self-care intervention (n=190) or usual care only (n=188). In the PEP self-care group, the median number of days with PEP flute use was 21 days (interquartile range 13-25). For the intention-to-treat population, a group difference was observed in changes from baseline in CAT scores of −1.2 points (95% confidence interval −2.1 to −0.2; P=0.017) in favour of the PEP flute self-care group. At day 30, the PEP flute self-care group also reported less chest tightness, less dyspnoea, more vigour, and higher level of daily activities, but these differences were small, and no consistent effects were seen on the secondary outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions In community dwelling adults with early covid-19, PEP flute self-care had a significant, yet marginal and uncertain clinical effect on respiratory symptom severity, as measured by CAT scores. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04530435 .

Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Piette ◽  
Michel Nougairède ◽  
Valerie Vuong ◽  
Beatrice Crickx ◽  
Viet-Thi Tran
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Referral Letter ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Images ◽  
Store And Forward ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p < 0.011). Discussion We showed that a simple store-and-forward teledermatology intervention significantly reduced the delay before beginning care (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02122432).

scholarly journals A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Prevention of Covid-19 Transmission and Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oriol Mitja ◽  
Maria Ubals ◽  
Marc Corbacho ◽  
Andrea Alemany ◽  
Clara Suner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Definitive Evidence ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Background Current strategies for preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections are limited to non-pharmacological interventions. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been proposed as a postexposure therapy to prevent Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) but definitive evidence is lacking. Methods We conducted an open-label, cluster-randomized trial including asymptomatic contacts exposed to a PCR-positive Covid-19 case in Catalonia, Spain. Clusters were randomized to receive no specific therapy (control arm) or HCQ 800mg once, followed by 400mg daily for 6 days (intervention arm). The primary outcome was PCR-confirmed symptomatic Covid-19 within 14 days. The secondary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection, either symptomatically compatible or a PCR-positive result regardless of symptoms. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed up to 28 days. Results The analysis included 2,314 healthy contacts of 672 Covid-19 index cases identified between Mar 17 and Apr 28, 2020. A total of 1,198 were randomly allocated to usual care and 1,116 to HCQ therapy. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of PCR-confirmed, symptomatic Covid-19 disease (6.2% usual care vs. 5.7% HCQ; risk ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.54-1.46]), nor evidence of beneficial effects on prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission (17.8% usual care vs. 18.7% HCQ). The incidence of AEs was higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm (5.9% usual care vs 51.6% HCQ), but no treatment-related serious AEs were reported. Conclusions Postexposure therapy with HCQ did not prevent SARS-CoV-2 disease and infection in healthy individuals exposed to a PCR-positive case. Our findings do not support HCQ as postexposure prophylaxis for Covid-19.

Evaluation of a collaborative protocolized approach by community pharmacies and general medical practitioners for an Australian minor ailments scheme: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dineen-Griffin ◽  
Victoria Garcia Cardenas ◽  
Kylie Williams ◽  
Shalom Isaac Benrimoj
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Minor Ailments ◽  
Cluster Randomized

BACKGROUND Internationally, governments have been investing in supporting pharmacists to take on an expanded role to support self-care for health system efficiency. There is consistent evidence that minor ailment schemes (MAS) promote efficiencies within the healthcare system. The cost savings and health outcomes demonstrated in the UK and Canada opens up new opportunities for pharmacists to effect sustainable changes through MAS delivery in Australia. OBJECTIVE This trial is evaluating the clinical, economic and humanistic impact of an Australian minor ailments service (AMAS), compared with usual pharmacy care in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Western Sydney, Australia. METHODS The cluster-randomized controlled trial design has an intervention and a control group, comparing individuals receiving a structured intervention with those receiving usual care for specific common ailments. Participants will be community pharmacies, general practices and patients located in Western Sydney Primary Health Network region. 30 community pharmacies will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control group. Each will recruit 24 patients seeking, aged 18 years or older, presenting to the pharmacy in person with a symptom-based or product-based request for one of the following ailments (reflux, cough, common cold, headache (tension or migraine), primary dysmenorrhoea and low back pain). Intervention pharmacists will deliver protocolized care to patients using clinical treatment pathways with agreed referral points and collaborative systems boosting clinician-pharmacist communication. Patients recruited in control pharmacies will receive usual care. The co-primary outcomes are rates of appropriate use of nonprescription medicines and rates of appropriate medical referral. Secondary outcomes include self-reported symptom resolution, time to resolution of symptoms, health services resource utilization and EQ VAS. Differences in the primary outcomes between groups will be analyzed at the individual patient level accounting for correlation within clusters with generalized estimating equations. The economic impact of the model will be evaluated by cost analysis compared with usual care. RESULTS The study began in July 2018. At the time of submission, 30 community pharmacies have been recruited. Pharmacists from the 15 intervention pharmacies have been trained. 27 general practices have consented. Pharmacy patient recruitment began in August 2018 and is ongoing and monthly targets are being met. Recruitment will be completed March 31st, 2019. CONCLUSIONS This study may demonstrate the utilization and efficacy of a protocolized intervention to manage minor ailments in the community, and will assess the clinical, economic and humanistic impact of this intervention in Australian pharmacy practice. Pharmacists supporting patient self-care and self-medication may contribute greater efficiency of healthcare resources and integration of self-care in the health system. The proposed model and developed educational content may form the basis of a MAS national service, with protocolized care for common ailments using a robust framework for management and referral. CLINICALTRIAL Registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) and allocated the ACTRN: ACTRN12618000286246. Registered on 23 February 2018.

Roxadustat for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease incident to dialysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Provenzano ◽  
Evgeny Shutov ◽  
Liubov Eremeeva ◽  
Svitlana Korneyeva ◽  
Lona Poole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Epoetin Alfa ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Background We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat vs. epoetin alfa for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) related anemia in patients new to dialysis. Methods This was a phase 3, open-label, epoetin alfa-controlled trial. Eligible adults were on hemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis for ≥2 weeks and ≤4 months before randomization and had mean hemoglobin ≤10.0 g/dL. Primary endpoints were mean hemoglobin (g/dL) change from baseline averaged over weeks 28–52 regardless of rescue therapy (non-inferiority criterion: lower limit of 95% CI for treatment difference &gt; −0.75) and percentage of patients achieving a hemoglobin response between weeks 1–24 censored for rescue therapy (non-inferiority margin for between-group difference: −15%). Adverse events were monitored. Results The intention-to-treat population included patients randomized to roxadustat (n = 522) or epoetin alfa (n = 521). Mean (SD) hemoglobin changes from baseline averaged over weeks 28–52 were 2.57 (1.27) and 2.36 (1.21) in the roxadustat and epoetin alfa groups. Roxadustat was non-inferior (least-squares mean difference: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.29]) to epoetin alfa. Percentages of patients with a hemoglobin response were 88.2% and 84.4% in the roxadustat and epoetin alfa groups. Roxadustat was non-inferior to epoetin alfa (treatment-group difference: 3.5% [95% CI: −0.7%, 7.7%]). Adverse event rates were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions Roxadustat was efficacious for correcting and maintaining hemoglobin levels compared to epoetin alfa. Roxadustat had an acceptable safety profile.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Measures to Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Patients with Community-Associated Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections: A Randomized Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Fritz ◽  
Bernard C. Camins ◽  
Kimberly A. Eisenstein ◽  
Joseph M. Fritz ◽  
Emma K. Epplin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Intranasal Mupirocin ◽  
Mupirocin Ointment ◽  
Hygiene Education ◽  
To Receive

Background.Despite a paucity of evidence, decolonization measures are prescribed for outpatients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI).Objective.Compare the effectiveness of 4 regimens for eradicating S. aureus carriage.Design.Open-label, randomized controlled trial. Colonization status and recurrent SSTI were ascertained at 1 and 4 months.Setting.Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's Hospitals, St. Louis, Missouri, 2007–2009.Participants.Three hundred patients with community-onset SSTI and S. aureus colonization in the nares, axilla, or inguinal folds.Interventions.Participants were randomized to receive no therapeutic intervention (control subjects) or one of three 5-day regimens: 2% mupirocin ointment applied to the nares twice daily, intranasal mupirocin plus daily 4% chlorhexidine body washes, or intranasal mupirocin plus daily dilute bleach water baths.Results.Among 244 participants with 1-month colonization data, modified intention-to-treat analysis revealed S. aureus eradication in 38% of participants in the education only (control) group, 56% of those in the mupirocin group (P = .03 vs controls), 55% of those in the mupirocin and chlorhexidine group (P = .05), and 63% off those in the mupirocin and bleach group (P = .006). Of 229 participants with 4-month colonization data, eradication rates were 48% in the control group, 56% in the mupirocin only group (P = .40 vs controls), 54% in the mupirocin and chlorhexidine group (P = .51), and 71% in the mupirocin and bleach group (P = .02). At 1 and 4 months, recurrent SSTIs were reported by 20% and 36% of participants, respectively.Conclusions.An inexpensive regimen of dilute bleach baths, intranasal mupirocin, and hygiene education effectively eradicated S. aureus over a 4-month period. High rates of recurrent SSTI suggest that factors other than endogenous colonization are important determinants of infection.Trial Registration.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00513799.

scholarly journals Does #Tamojunto alter the dynamic between drug use and school violence among youth? Secondary analysis from a large cluster-randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Cogo-Moreira ◽  
Julia D. Gusmões ◽  
Juliana Y. Valente ◽  
Michael Eid ◽  
Zila M. Sanchez
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
School Violence ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Random Intercept ◽  
Carry Over ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Use Behavior

AbstractThe present study investigated how intervention might alter the relationship between perpetrating violence and later drug use. A cluster-randomized controlled trial design involving 72 schools (38 intervention, 34 control) and 6390 students attending grades 7 and 8 was employed in Brazil. Drug use and violence were assessed at three points. A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model examined the reciprocal association between drug use and school violence domains across the three data collection waves. For both groups, we found that the cross-lagged effect of perpetration on further drug use in adolescents was stronger than the reverse, but the interrelationship was not statistically significant between #Tamojunto and control schools. The carry-over effects of drug use and violence were also not significantly different between groups. There is a lack of evidence showing that #Tamojunto can modify the dynamics between drug use and school violence across the 21-month period. The direction of the causal effect (i.e., the more perpetration behavior, the more subsequent drug use behavior) is present, but weak in both groups. The trial registration protocol at the national Brazilian Register of Clinical Trials (REBEC) is #RBR-4mnv5g.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document