scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study: 10-year trend of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at Veteran Affairs Medical Centers

BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e002468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Ng ◽  
Adeline Chu ◽  
Myrna M Khan
Author(s):  
Autumn D Zuckerman ◽  
Josh DeClercq ◽  
Leena Choi ◽  
Nicole Cowgill ◽  
Kate McCarthy ◽  
...  

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose Adherence to self-administered biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is necessary for therapeutic benefit. Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) have reported high adherence rates across several disease states; however, adherence outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) populations have not yet been established. Methods We performed a multisite retrospective cohort study including patients with RA and 3 or more documented dispenses of bDMARDs from January through December 2018. Pharmacy claims were used to calculate proportion of days covered (PDC). Electronic health records of patients with a PDC of <0.8 were reviewed to identify reasons for gaps in pharmacy claims (true nonadherence or appropriate treatment holds). Outcomes included median PDC across sites, reasons for treatment gaps in patients with a PDC of <0.8, and the impact of adjusting PDC when accounting for appropriate therapy gaps. Results There were 29,994 prescriptions for 3,530 patients across 20 sites. The patient cohort was mostly female (75%), with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR], 42-63 years). The original(ie, prereview) median PDC was 0.94 (IQR, 0.83-0.99). Upon review, 327 patients had no appropriate treatment gaps identified, 6 patients were excluded due to multiple unquantifiable appropriate gaps, and 420 patients had an adjustment in the PDC denominator due to appropriate treatment gaps (43 instances of days’ supply adjusted based on discordant days’ supply information between prescriptions and physician administration instructions, 11 instances of missing fills added, and 421 instances of clinically appropriate treatment gaps). The final median PDC after accounting for appropriate gaps in therapy was 0.95 (IQR, 0.87-0.99). Conclusion This large, multisite retrospective cohort study was the first to demonstrate adherence rates across several HSSPs and provided novel insights into rates and reasons for appropriate gaps in therapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1781-1785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claiton Viegas Brenol ◽  
Rafael Mendonça Silva da Chakr ◽  
Nicole Pamplona Bueno Andrade ◽  
Mariana Toni ◽  
Ieda Maria Magalhães Laurindo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sae Ochi ◽  
Fumitaka Mizoguchi ◽  
Kazuhisa Nakano ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka

Abstract Background Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (dt-RA) is an emerging concept, the definition of which has been proposed based on global consensus. This study aimed to establish an evidence-based definition of dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to newly used biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the FIRST registry. An inadequate response to current b/tsDMARDs was defined as clinical disease activity index (CDAI) >10 at week 22 or termination of treatment within 22 weeks due to insufficient efficacy. Cut-off values were defined according to the number of past failures to DMARDs and dose of glucocorticoid. Responsiveness to newly used b/tsDMARDs were compared with respect to above- versus below- cut-off values. Hazards of treatment cessation within 22 weeks due to adverse events were also compared using the same thresholds. Results The cut-off values associated with significant differences in responsiveness to b/tsDMARD treatment were ≥ 2 failures to conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) treatment and ≥ 4 failures to b/tsDMARD treatment. Three or more failures to csDMARDs and concomitant use of glucocorticoid were significantly correlated with an increased hazard ratio of infection. Further analysis using clinical variables revealed that refractoriness to ≥ 2 previous csDMARDs was weakly associated with less improvement in ESR titre, while refractoriness to ≥ 4 previous b/tsDMARDs was associated with less improvement in HAQ. For both cut-offs, significant but weak association with GH was also observed. Conclusions We propose cut-off values of ≥ 2 failures to csDMARDs and/or ≥ 4 b/tsDMARDs to define dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to use of b/tsDMARDs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document