scholarly journals Evaluation of long-term clinical and health service outcomes following coronary artery revascularisation in Western Australia (WACARP): a population-based cohort study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. e006337 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Gardner ◽  
J M Rankin ◽  
E Geelhoed ◽  
M Nguyen ◽  
M Newman ◽  
...  

IntroductionCoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are procedures commonly performed on patients with significant obstructive coronary artery disease to relieve symptoms of ischaemia, improve survival or both. Although the efficacy of both procedures at the individual level has been established, the impact of advances in coronary artery revascularisation procedures (CARP) on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness at the population level are yet to be assessed. Our aim is to evaluate a minimum of 6-year outcomes and costs for the total population of patients who had CARP in Western Australia (WA) in 2000–2005.Methods and analysisThis retrospective population cohort study will link clinical and administrative health data for a previously defined cohort including all patients in WA who had a CARP in the period 2000–2005. The cohort consists of 19 014 patients who had 21 175 procedures (15 429 PCI and 5746 CABG). We are now collecting a minimum of 6 years follow-up of morbidity and mortality data for the cohort using the WA Data Linkage System, clinical registries and hospital records, with 12 years follow-up for cases in the year 2000. Comparison of long-term outcomes for different CARP will be reported (PCI vs CABG; bare metal stents vs drug-eluting stents vs CABG). Cost-effectiveness analysis of CARP from the perspective of the healthcare sector will be performed using individual level cost data and average costs from Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethics approval from the University of Western Australia, the Western Australian Department of Health and all participating hospitals. Being a large population cohort study, approval included a waiver of informed consent. All findings will be presented at local, national and international healthcare/academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiro Barssoum ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Devesh Rai ◽  
Adnan Kharsa ◽  
Medhat Chowdhury ◽  
...  

Background: Long term outcomes of culprit multi-vessel and left main patients who presented with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well defined. Randomized trials comparing the two modalities constituted mainly of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). We performed a meta-analysis of studies that compared the long term outcomes of CABG vs. PCI in NSTE-ACS. Methods: Medline, EmCare, CINAHL, Cochrane databases were queried for relevant articles. Studies that included patients with SCAD and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Our primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3-5 years, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, re-infarction and repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was re-infarction at 3 to 5 years. We used the Paule-Mandel method with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin’s I 2 statistics. All statistical analysis was carried out using R version 3.6.2 Results: Four observational studies met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 6695 patients. At 3 to 5 years, the PCI group was associated with a higher risk of MACE as compared to CABG, (RR): 1.52, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.81, I 2 =0% (PANEL A). The PCI group also had a higher risk of re-infarctions during the period of follow up, RR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.38, I 2 =0% (PANEL B). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, CABG was associated with a lower risk of MACE and re-infarctions as compared to PCI during 3 to 5 years follow up period.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Zhe Zheng ◽  
Shiju Zhang ◽  
Xianqiang Wang ◽  
Huawei Gao ◽  
...  

Background: The prognostic and clinical value of preopeartive anemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery has recently been recognized. However, very limited information exists on the impact of preopeartive anemia on long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This study aimed at examining the degree to which preopeartive anemia affects long-term outcomes after isolated CABG surgery. Methods: A unicenter study was conducted on 5488 consecutive survivors of isolated CABG between January 1999 and December 2005. Preopeartive anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization definition (hemoglobin < 13g/dL for male; hemoglobin < 12g/dL for female). Long-term outcomes of interest were total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeated revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs=total mortality or MI or repeated revascularization). These outcomes were compared after adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors among the patients. Results: 1437 (26.2%) patients had preoperative anemia. After a mean follow-up of 43.3±18.3 months, preoperative anemia was found to be an independent risk factor for total mortality (hazard ration [HR]: 1.490; 95% CI: 1.074 to 2.067; p=0.017), MI (HR: 1.595; 95% CI: 1.028 to 2.474; p=0.037) and MACEs (HR: 1.363; 95% CI: 1.059 to 1.755; p=0.016). We also found that aspirins and beta-blockers were underused in patients with anemia during follow-up. Conclusions: Preopeartive anemia has a strong negative impact on long-term outcomes following isolated CABG. Our data also suggest that the incorporation of preoperative anemia into the risk assessments of long-term outcomes after CABG is recommended. Future intense and systematic studies are needed to help ensure high-quality cardiac care of patients with anemia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-690
Author(s):  
Tomas Andri Axelsson ◽  
Jonas A Adalsteinsson ◽  
Linda O Arnadottir ◽  
Dadi Helgason ◽  
Hera Johannesdottir ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our aim was to investigate the outcome of patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in a whole population with main focus on long-term mortality and complications. METHODS This was a nationwide retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent isolated primary CABG in Iceland between 2001 and 2016. Overall survival together with the composite end point of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was compared between patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes during a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of diabetes on both short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Of a total of 2060 patients, 356 (17%) patients had diabetes. Patients with diabetes had a higher body mass index (29.9 vs 27.9 kg/m2) and more often had hypertension (83% vs 62%) and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2, 21% vs 14%). Patients with diabetes had an increased risk of operative mortality [odds ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27–4.80] when adjusted for confounders. 5-Year overall survival (85% vs 91%, P &lt; 0.001) and 5-year freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were also inferior for patients with diabetes (77% vs 82%, P &lt; 0.001). Cox regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders showed that the diagnosis of diabetes significantly predicted all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% CI 1.53–2.29] and increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.23–1.75). CONCLUSIONS Patients with diabetes have significantly lower survival after CABG, both within 30 days and during long-term follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-148
Author(s):  
Victoria Sáenz ◽  
Nicolas Zuljevic ◽  
Cristina Elizondo ◽  
Iñaki Martin Lesende ◽  
Diego Caruso

Introduction: Hospitalization represents a major factor that may precipitate the loss of functional status and the cascade into dependence. The main objective of our study was to determine the effect of functional status measured before hospital admission on survival at one year after hospitalization in elderly patients. Methods: Prospective cohort study of adult patients (over 65 years of age) admitted to either the general ward or intensive Care units (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Main exposure was the pre-admission functional status determined by means of the modified “VIDA” questionnaire, which evaluates the instrumental activities of daily living. We used a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the effect of prior functional status on time to all-cause death while controlling for measured confounding. Secondarily, we analyzed the effect of post-discharge functional decline on long-term outcomes. Results: 297 patients were included in the present study. 12.8% died during hospitalization and 86 patients (33.2%) died within one year after hospital discharge. Functional status prior to hospital admission, measured by the VIDA questionnaire (e.g., one point increase), was associated with a lower hazard of all-cause mortality during follow-up (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.94–0.98). Finally, functional decline measured at 15 days after hospital discharge, was associated with higher risk of all-cause death during follow-up (HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.09–4.37) Conclusion: Pre-morbid functional status impacts long term outcomes after unplanned hospitalizations in elderly adults. Future studies should confirm these findings and evaluate the potential impact on clinical decision-making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wai H Lim ◽  
Germaine Wong ◽  
Helen L Pilmore ◽  
Stephen P McDonald ◽  
Steven J Chadban

Circulation ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 112 (9_supplement) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Williams ◽  
Lawrence H. Muhlbaier ◽  
Jacob N. Schroder ◽  
Jonathan A. Hata ◽  
Eric D. Peterson ◽  
...  

Background— Surgeons have adopted off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in an effort to reduce the morbidity of surgical revascularization. However, long-term outcome of OPCAB compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains poorly defined. Methods and Results— Using logistic regression analysis and proportional hazards modeling, short-term and long-term outcomes (perioperative mortality and complications, risk-adjusted survival, and survival/freedom from revascularization) were investigated for patients who underwent OPCAB (641 patients) and CABG-cardiopulmonary bypass (5026 patients) from 1998 to 2003 at our institution. For these variables, follow-up was 98% complete. OPCAB patients were less likely to receive transfusion (odds ratio for OPCAB, 0.80; P =0.037), and there were trends toward improvement in other short-term outcomes compared with CABG-cardiopulmonary bypass. Long-term outcomes analysis demonstrated no difference in survival, but OPCAB patients were more likely to require repeat revascularization (OPCAB hazard ratio, 1.29; P =0.020). Conclusions— OPCAB patients were less likely to receive transfusion during their hospitalization for surgery but had higher risk for revascularization in follow-up. These results highlight the need for a large randomized, controlled trial to compare these 2 techniques.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Van Veenendaal ◽  
Ingeborg Van der Meulen ◽  
Marisa Onrust ◽  
Wolter Paans ◽  
Willem Dieperink ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDThe COVID-19 pandemic causes high rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. After ICU-discharge patients and family members can suffer from persisting impairments known as ‘Post Intensive Care Syndrome’ (PICS) and PICS-family. Since COVID-19 is relatively new, there is barely any knowledge on the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU-survivors and their family members.OBJECTIVESThis study aims to gain insight in the long-term physical, social and psychological functioning of COVID-19 ICU-survivors and their family members at three- and six-months following ICU discharge.METHODSA single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted in COVID-19 ICU-survivors and their family members. Enrolled participants received questionnaires at three and six months after ICU discharge. The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey, Clinical Frailty Scale, spirometry tests, McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF6+), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and return to work were used to evaluate physical, social and psychological functioning.RESULTSSixty COVID-19 ICU-survivors and 78 family members participated. Physical functioning was impaired in ICU-survivors as reflected by a score of 33.3 (IQR 16.7-66.7) and 50 (IQR 16.7-83.3) on the physical functioning subscale at 3- and 6-months follow-up respectively. Diffusion lung capacity was reduced in 69% of patients. Ninety percent of the ICU-survivors reported persistent symptoms after 6 months. Social functioning was impaired as 90% of the COVID-19 ICU-survivors did not reach their pre-ICU employment level, 6 months after ICU-discharge. Psychological functioning in ICU-survivors was normal. Family members experienced worse employment status in 35% and 34% including a decrease in employment rate of 18.3% and 7.4% at 3- and 6-months post ICU-discharge, respectively. Psychologically, 63% of the family members reported ongoing impaired well-being due to the COVID-19 related mandatory physical distance to their relatives.CONCLUSIONWe have shown that COVID-19 ICU-survivors suffer from a prolonged burden of disease, prominent in physical- and social functioning, worse employment status and persisting symptoms in 90%. In addition, family members also report long term effects expressed by a reduction in return to work and impaired well-being. Further research needs to extend the follow up and to study the effects of standardized rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients and their family members.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document