scholarly journals Retrospective economic analysis of the transfer of services from hospitals to the community: an application to an enhanced eye care service

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e014089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mason ◽  
Cheryl Jones ◽  
Matt Sutton ◽  
Evgenia Konstantakopoulou ◽  
David F Edgar ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Antonio Barrenechea-Pulache ◽  
Andres Portocarrero-Bonifaz ◽  
Akram Hernández-Vásquez ◽  
Carlos Portocarrero-Ramos ◽  
Jenny Moscoso-Carrasco

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000671
Author(s):  
Danson Vasanthan Muttuvelu ◽  
Heidi Buchholt ◽  
Mads Nygaard ◽  
Marie Louise Roed Rasmussen ◽  
Dawn Sim

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the stratification of follow-up and referral pathways after implementation of a systematic cloud-based electronic-referral teleophthalmological service for optometry-initiated ocular posterior segment disease referrals to the Danish national eye care system.Methods and AnalysisA retrospective cohort study was conducted in the period from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2019. Patients with suspected ocular posterior segment disease reviewed by the telemedical ophthalmology service were included. The service stratified patients into the categories: no need for follow-up, follow-up by optometrist, follow-up by the telemedical service and referral to the national Danish eye care service.ResultsFrom a pool of 386 361 customers, 9938 patients were enrolled into this study. 19.5% of all patients were referred to the Danish national eye care system, while 80.5% of the patients in the telemedical service were not, in the period from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2019. 14.4% of the optometrist referrals did not need any follow-up, while a majority of 66.1% needed some follow-up either by the optometrist themselves or within the telemedical service.ConclusionOptometrist posterior segment disease referrals can be considerably reduced with a risk stratified approach and optimal use of technology. New models can improve and streamline the healthcare system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-447
Author(s):  
Prem Kumar SG ◽  
Sandip Banerjee ◽  
Sushami Pal ◽  
Sabitra Kundu ◽  
Sukanta Mishra ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0231616
Author(s):  
Efa Derecha Morka ◽  
Betelhem Temesgen Yibekal ◽  
Mebratu Mulusew Tegegne

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 582-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit Pokharel ◽  
Himal Kandel ◽  
Reshma Shrestha

To address this terrible situation, we propose the following solutions: in the short term, conduct regular eye health camps with appropriate management locally. In the long term, to strengthen primary eye care and integrate it into general health, by training primary health care workers in primary eye care (more specifically assessing visual acuity) establishing adequate referral channels. Currently, unfortunately, much of eye care service delivery remains centered on the district headquarters and accessible places, with other remote regions left unattended. We hope our report will awaken all concerned to the dire need for equitable eye care across the country.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalinder Sabherwal ◽  
Anand Chinnakaran ◽  
Ishaana Sood ◽  
Gaurav K Gary ◽  
Birendra P Singh ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED A vision center (VC) is a significant eye care service model to strengthen primary eye care services. VCs have been set up at the block level, covering a population of 150,000-250,000 in rural areas in North India. Inadequate use by rural communities is a major challenge to sustainability of these VCs. This not only reduces the community’s vision improvement potential but also impacts self-sustainability and limits expansion of services in rural areas. The current literature reports a lack of awareness regarding eye diseases and the need for care, social stigmas, low priority being given to eye problems, prevailing gender discrimination, cost, and dependence on caregivers as factors preventing the use of primary eye care. Our organization is planning an awareness-cum-engagement intervention—door-to-door basic eye checkup and visual acuity screening in VCs coverage areas—to connect with the community and improve the rational use of VCs. In this randomized, parallel-group experimental study, we will select 2 VCs each for the intervention arm and the control arm from among poor, low-performing VCs (ie, walk-in of ≤10 patients/day) in our 2 operational regions (Vrindavan, Mathura District, and Mohammadi, Kheri District) of Uttar Pradesh. Intervention will include door-to-door screening and awareness generation in 8-12 villages surrounding the VCs, and control VCs will follow existing practices of awareness generation through community activities and health talks. Data will be collected from each VC for 4 months of intervention. Primary outcomes will be an increase in the number of walk-in patients, spectacle advise and uptake, referral and uptake for cataract and specialty surgery, and operational expenses. Secondary outcomes will be uptake of refraction correction and referrals for cataract and other eye conditions. Differences in the number of walk-in patients, referrals, uptake of services, and cost involved will be analyzed. Background work involved planning of interventions and selection of VCs has been completed. Participant recruitment has begun and is currently in progress. Through this study, we will analyze whether our door-to-door intervention is effective in increasing the number of visits to a VC and, thus, overall sustainability. We will also study the cost-effectiveness of this intervention to recommend its scalability. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04800718; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04800718


Author(s):  
Yogesan Kanagasingam ◽  
Justin Boyle ◽  
Janardhan Vignarajan ◽  
Di Xiao ◽  
Ming Zhang
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien Tay ◽  
Elena Rochtchina ◽  
Paul Mitchell ◽  
Richard Lindley ◽  
Jie Jin Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document