scholarly journals Taking an integrated knowledge translation approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e026866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Jull ◽  
Ian D Graham ◽  
Elizabeth Kristjansson ◽  
David Moher ◽  
Jennifer Petkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Reporting Guideline ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

ObjectiveWe describe the use of an integrated knowledge translation (KT) approach in the development of the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials extension for equity (‘CONSORT-Equity 2017’), and advisory board-research team members’ (‘the team’) perceptions of the integrated KT process.DesignThis is an observational study to describe team processes and experience with a structured integrated KT approach to develop CONSORT-Equity 2017. Participant observation to describe team processes and a survey were used with the 38 team members.SettingUse of the CONSORT health research reporting guideline contributes to an evidence base for health systems decision-making, and CONSORT-Equity 2017 may improve reporting about health equity-relevant evidence. An integrated KT research approach engages knowledge users (those for whom the research is meant to be useful) with researchers to co-develop research evidence and is more likely to produce findings that are applied in practice or policy.ParticipantsResearchers adopted an integrated KT approach and invited knowledge users to form a team.ResultsAn integrated KT approach was used in the development of CONSORT-Equity 2017 and structured replicable steps. The process for co-developing the reporting guideline involved two stages: (1) establishing guiding features for co-development and (2) research actions that supported the co-development of the reporting guideline. Stage 1 consisted of four steps: finding common ground, forming an advisory board, committing to ethical guidance and clarifying theoretical research assumptions. Bound by the stage 1 guiding features of an integrated KT approach, stage 2 consisted of five steps during which studies for consensus-based reporting guidelines were conducted. Of 38 team members, 25 (67.5%) completed a survey about their perceptions of the integrated KT approach.ConclusionsAn integrated KT approach can be used to engage a team to co-develop reporting guidelines. Further study is needed to understand the use of an integrated KT approach in the development of reporting guidelines.

scholarly journals Collaborative health research partnerships: a survey of researcher and knowledge-user attitudes and perceptions

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Sibbald ◽  
Hosung Kang ◽  
Ian D. Graham
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Knowledge User ◽  
Funding Opportunities ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

Abstract Background Integrated knowledge translation describes the process of partnered research between different stakeholders with the goal of producing research that ultimately achieves a greater impact when put into practice. A better understanding of research partnerships and integrated knowledge translation has implications for future partnerships and collaborative initiatives in practice. Our research describes and expands upon previous work done to identify barriers and attitudes toward collaboration in the context of research funding opportunities that required researcher–knowledge-user partnerships. Methods A survey was sent out to researchers funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and knowledge-users who worked collaboratively on their research projects. There were two mirror versions of the survey, one for researchers and one for knowledge-users. Descriptive statistics, χ2 analysis and Mann–Whitney U analysis were used to understand the processes, barriers, perceived impact and sustainability of the partnerships. Results The results revealed that, although there were differences in the roles of researchers and knowledge-users, both groups felt very positive towards their partnerships. Some of the barriers identified as inhibiting effective partnerships were resource constraints (funding/time) and differences in contribution and involvement amongst team members. Despite these barriers, both researchers and knowledge-users felt that the partnership was not only sustainable, but also helped create an impact. Conclusions Our results provide useful information for funding agencies launching opportunities requiring or encouraging collaborative research projects between researchers and knowledge-users.

scholarly journals An Integrated Knowledge Translation Experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila T. Moodie ◽  
Marlene P. Bagatto ◽  
Linda T. Miller ◽  
Anita Kothari ◽  
Richard Seewald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

scholarly journals Building a Bridge to the Community: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Improving Participation in Community-Based Exercise for People After Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Bird ◽  
B William Mortenson ◽  
Francis Chu ◽  
Nicole Acerra ◽  
Eric Bagnall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

scholarly journals An integrated knowledge translation approach to develop a shared decision-making strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care: a qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jull ◽  
A. Hizaka ◽  
A. J. Sheppard ◽  
A. Kewayosh ◽  
P. Doering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

Background In relation to the general Canadian population, Inuit face increased cancer risks and barriers to health services use. In shared decision-making (sdm), health care providers and patients make health care decisions together. Enhanced participation in cancer care decisions is a need for Inuit. Integrated knowledge translation (kt) supports the development of research evidence that is likely to be patient-centred and applied in practice.Objective Using an integrated kt approach, we set out to promote the use of sdm by Inuit in cancer care.Methods An integrated kt study involving researchers with a Steering Committee of cancer care system partners who support Inuit in cancer care (“the team”) consisted of 2 theory-driven phases:■ using consensus-building methods to tailor a previously developed sdm strategy and developing training in the sdm strategy; and■ training community support workers (csws) in the sdm strategy and testing the sdm strategy with community members.Results The team developed a sdm strategy that included a workshop and a booklet with 6 questions for use by csws with patients. The sdm strategy (training and booklet) was finalized based on feedback from 5 urban-based Inuit csws who were recruited and trained in using the strategy. Trained csws were matched with 8 community members, and use of the sdm strategy was assessed during interviews, reported as 6 themes. Participants found the sdm strategy to be useful and feasible for use.Conclusions An integrated kt approach of structured research processes with partners developed a sdm strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care. Further work is needed to test the sdm strategy.

scholarly journals Improving Nutrition Care, Delivery, and Intakes Among Hospitalised Patients: A Mixed Methods, Integrated Knowledge Translation Study

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley Roberts ◽  
Lauren T. Williams ◽  
Ishtar Sladdin ◽  
Heidi Neil ◽  
Zane Hopper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Medical Ward ◽  
Integrated Knowledge Translation ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Nutrition Care ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Integrated Knowledge

Malnutrition is a common and complex problem in hospitals. This study used an integrated knowledge translation approach to develop, implement, and evaluate a multifaceted, tailored intervention to improve nutrition care, delivery, and intake among acute medical inpatients. This observational, pre-post study was conducted in a medical ward at a public hospital in Australia. The intervention was co-developed with key stakeholders and targeted three levels: individuals (nutrition intake magnets at patient bedsides), the ward (multidisciplinary hospital staff training), and the organisation (foodservice system changes). Observational data were collected pre- and post-intervention on patient demographics, food intakes, and the mealtime environment. Data were entered into SPSS and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Ethical approval was gained through the hospital and university ethics committees. A total of 207 patients were observed; 116 pre- and 91 post-intervention. After intervention implementation, patients’ mean energy and protein intakes (in proportion to their estimated requirements) were significantly higher and the number of patients eating adequately doubled (p < 0.05). In summary, a multifaceted, pragmatic intervention, tailored to the study context and developed and implemented alongside hospital staff and patients, seemed to be effective in improving nutrition practices and patient nutrition intakes on an acute medical ward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document