scholarly journals Adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term risk of maternal renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M Barrett ◽  
Fergus P McCarthy ◽  
Karolina Kublickiene ◽  
Marie Evans ◽  
Sarah Cormican ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Meta Analyses

IntroductionAdverse pregnancy outcomes, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes (GDM) and preterm birth have been linked to maternal cardiovascular disease in later life. Pre-eclampsia (PE) is associated with an increased risk of postpartum microalbuminuria, but there is no clear consensus on whether HDP increases the risk of maternal chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Similarly, it is uncertain whether GDM, preterm birth and delivery of low birth-weight infants independently predict the risk of maternal renal disease in later life. The aims of this proposed systematic review and meta-analysis are to summarise the available evidence examining the association between adverse outcomes of pregnancy (HDP, GDM, preterm birth, delivery of low birth-weight infant) and later maternal renal disease and to synthesise the results of relevant studies.Methods and analysisA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science will be undertaken using a detailed prespecified search strategy. Two authors will independently review the titles and abstracts of all studies, perform data extraction and appraise the quality of included studies using a bias classification tool. Original case–control and cohort studies published in English will be considered for inclusion. Primary outcomes of interest will be CKD and ESKD; secondary outcomes will be hospitalisation for renal disease and deaths from renal disease. Meta-analyses will be performed to calculate the overall pooled estimates using the generic inverse variance method. The systematic review will follow the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The results will be shared through publication in a peer reviewed journal and through presentations at academic conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018110891

scholarly journals Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e042753
Author(s):  
Katie Thomson ◽  
Malcolm Moffat ◽  
Oluwatomi Arisa ◽  
Amrita Jesurasa ◽  
Catherine Richmond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Healthy Pregnancy ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
The Uk

ObjectiveThere has been an unprecedented rise in infant mortality associated with deprivation in recent years in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland. A healthy pregnancy can have significant impacts on the life chances of children. The objective of this review was to understand the association between individual-level and household-level measures of socioeconomic status and adverse pregnancy outcomes.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesNine databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Scopus, ASSIA, CINAHL, PsycINFO, BNI, MIDRIS and Google Scholar) for articles published between 1999 and August 2019. Grey literature searches were also assessed.Study selection criteriaStudies reporting associations between individual-level or household socioeconomic factors on pregnancy outcomes in the UK or Ireland.ResultsAmong the 82 353 search results, 53 821 titles were identified and 35 unique studies met the eligibility criteria. Outcomes reported were neonatal, perinatal and maternal mortality, preterm birth, birth weight and mode of delivery. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. There were significantly increased odds of women from lower levels of occupation/social classes compared with the highest level having stillbirth (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.59, I298.62%), neonatal mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.57, I297.09%), perinatal mortality (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.57, I298.69%), preterm birth (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.50, I270.97%) and low birth weight (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61, I299.85%). Limitations relate to available data, unmeasured confounders and the small number of studies for some outcomes.ConclusionsThis review identified consistent evidence that lower occupational status, especially manual occupations and unemployment, were significantly associated with increased risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes. Strategies to improve pregnancy outcomes should incorporate approaches that address wider determinants of health to provide women and families with the best chances of having a healthy pregnancy and baby and to decrease pregnancy-related health inequalities in the general population.PROSPERO registration numberPROSPERO CRD42019140893.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associations between Green and Blue Spaces and Birth Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selin Akaraci ◽  
Xiaoqi Feng ◽  
Thomas Suesse ◽  
Bin Jalaludin ◽  
Thomas Astell-Burt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Birth Outcomes ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Green Space ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Urban Greening ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Meta Analyses

Previous studies suggest that green and blue spaces may promote several health outcomes including birth outcomes. However, no synthesis of previous work has specifically asked policy-relevant questions of how much and what type is needed in every neighborhood to elicit these benefits at the population level. A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize thirty-seven studies on the association between residential green and blue spaces and pregnancy outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for birth weight (BW), small for gestational age (SGA), low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB). Increase in residential greenness was statistically significantly associated with higher BW [β = 0.001, 95%CI: (<0.001, 0.002)] and lower odds of SGA [OR = 0.95, 95%CI: (0.92, 0.97)]. Associations between green space and LBW and PTB were as hypothesized but not statistically significant. Associations between blue spaces and pregnancy outcomes were not evident. No study explicitly examined questions of threshold, though some evidence of nonlinearity indicated that moderate amounts of green space may support more favorable pregnancy outcomes. Policy-relevant green and blue space exposures involving theory-driven thresholds warrant testing to ensure future investments in urban greening promote healthier pregnancy outcomes.

scholarly journals Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes-related microvascular disease and risks of disease progression in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. e1003856
Author(s):  
Sophie Relph ◽  
Trusha Patel ◽  
Louisa Delaney ◽  
Soha Sobhy ◽  
Shakila Thangaratinam
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Microvascular Disease ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background The rise in the global prevalence of diabetes, particularly among younger people, has led to an increase in the number of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes, many of whom have diabetes-related microvascular complications. We aimed to estimate the magnitude of the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes or disease progression in this population. Methods and findings We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal and perinatal complications in women with type 1 or 2 diabetic microvascular disease and the risk factors for worsening of microvascular disease in pregnancy using a prospective protocol (PROSPERO CRD42017076647). We searched major databases (January 1990 to July 2021) for relevant cohort studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We summarized the findings as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random effects meta-analysis. We included 56 cohort studies involving 12,819 pregnant women with diabetes; 40 from Europe and 9 from North America. Pregnant women with diabetic nephropathy were at greater risk of preeclampsia (OR 10.76, CI 6.43 to 17.99, p < 0.001), early (<34 weeks) (OR 6.90, 95% CI 3.38 to 14.06, p < 0.001) and any preterm birth (OR 4.48, CI 3.40 to 5.92, p < 0.001), and cesarean section (OR 3.04, CI 1.24 to 7.47, p = 0.015); their babies were at increased risk of perinatal death (OR 2.26, CI 1.07 to 4.75, p = 0.032), congenital abnormality (OR 2.71, CI 1.58 to 4.66, p < 0.001), small for gestational age (OR 16.89, CI 7.07 to 40.37, p < 0.001), and admission to neonatal unit (OR 2.59, CI 1.72 to 3.90, p < 0.001) than those without nephropathy. Diabetic retinopathy was associated with any preterm birth (OR 1.67, CI 1.27 to 2.20, p < 0.001) and preeclampsia (OR 2.20, CI 1.57 to 3.10, p < 0.001) but not other complications. The risks of onset or worsening of retinopathy were increased in women who were nulliparous (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.40, p < 0.001), smokers (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.27, p = 0.008), with existing proliferative disease (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.04, p = 0.022), and longer duration of diabetes (weighted mean difference: 4.51 years, 95% CI 2.26 to 6.76, p < 0.001) than those without the risk factors. The main limitations of this analysis are the heterogeneity of definition of retinopathy and nephropathy and the inclusion of women both with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Conclusions In pregnant women with diabetes, presence of nephropathy and/or retinopathy appear to further increase the risks of maternal complications.

The influence of disease activity on pregnancy outcomes in women with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-A Kim ◽  
Young-Han Kim ◽  
Jaeyoung Chun ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Soo Jung Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Spontaneous Abortion ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background & Aims Robust evidence regarding the impact of disease activity on pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD is crucial for both clinicians and patients in preparing a birth plan. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the pooled influences of disease activity on pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE library to identify articles comparing pregnancy outcomes between active and inactive IBD at the time of conception or during pregnancy. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to pool estimates and report odds ratios (ORs). Results A total of 28 studies were identified as eligible for the meta-analysis. In women with active IBD, the pooled ORs for low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), spontaneous abortion, and stillbirths were 3.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-8.02), 2.42 (95% CI 1.74-3.35), 1.48 (95% CI 1.19-1.85), 1.87 (95% CI 1.17-3.0), and 2.27 (95% CI 1.03-5.04) compared to women with inactive IBD, respectively. In the subgroup analysis based on disease type, women with active ulcerative colitis had an increased risk of LBW, preterm birth, and spontaneous abortion. Women with active Crohn’s disease had a higher risk of preterm birth, SGA, and spontaneous abortion. Conclusions Active IBD during the periconception period and pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our data suggest that pregnancy should be planned when the disease is quiescent, and continuous disease control is important even during pregnancy.

scholarly journals Hemoglobin Concentration and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bunyarit Sukrat ◽  
Chumpon Wilasrusmee ◽  
Boonying Siribumrungwong ◽  
Mark McEvoy ◽  
Chusak Okascharoen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
The Third

Objective. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of hemoglobin effect on the pregnancy outcomes.Methods. We searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1, 1990 to April 10, 2011. Observational studies addressing association between hemoglobin and adverse pregnancy outcomes were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A mixed logistic regression was applied to assess the effects of hemoglobin on preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age.Results. Seventeen studies were included in poolings. Hemoglobin below 11 g/dL was, respectively, 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02–1.19), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03–1.32), and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05–1.24) times higher risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age than normal hemoglobin in the first trimester. In the third trimester, hemoglobin below 11 g/dL was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.08–1.58) times higher risk of low birth weight. Hemoglobin above 14 g/dL in third trimester decreased the risk of preterm term with ORs of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26–0.97), but it might be affected by publication bias.Conclusions. Our review suggests that hemoglobin below 11 g/dl increases the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small gestational age in the first trimester and the risk of low birth weight in the third trimester.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukainah Al Khalaf ◽  
Elizabeth Bodunde ◽  
Gillian M. Maher ◽  
Éilis J. O'reilly ◽  
Fergus P. Mccarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document