scholarly journals Social and structural determinants of injecting-related bacterial and fungal infections among people who inject drugs: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e049924
Author(s):  
Thomas D Brothers ◽  
Dan Lewer ◽  
Matthew Bonn ◽  
Duncan Webster ◽  
Magdalena Harris

IntroductionInjecting-related bacterial and fungal infections are a common complication among people who inject drugs (PWID), associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Invasive infections, including infective endocarditis, appear to be increasing in incidence. To date, preventive efforts have focused on modifying individual-level risk behaviours (eg, hand-washing and skin-cleaning) without much success in reducing the population-level impact of these infections. Learning from successes in HIV prevention, there may be great value in looking beyond individual-level risk behaviours to the social determinants of health. Specifically, the risk environment conceptual framework identifies how social, physical, economic and political environmental factors facilitate and constrain individual behaviour, and therefore influence health outcomes. Understanding the social and structural determinants of injecting-related bacterial and fungal infections could help to identify new targets for prevention efforts in the face of increasing incidence of severe disease.Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a systematic review. We will review studies of PWID and investigate associations between risk factors (both individual-level and social/structural-level) and the incidence of hospitalisation or death due to injecting-related bacterial infections (skin and soft-tissue infections, bacteraemia, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess and others). We will include quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. Using directed content analysis, we will code risk factors for these infection-related outcomes according to their contributions to the risk environment in type (social, physical, economic or political) and level (microenvironmental or macroenvironmental). We will also code and present risk factors at each stage in the process of drug acquisition, preparation, injection, superficial infection care, severe infection care or hospitalisation, and outcomes after infection or hospital discharge.Ethics and disseminationAs an analysis of the published literature, no ethics approval is required. The findings will inform a research agenda to develop and implement social/structural interventions aimed at reducing the burden of disease.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021231411.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Calderoni ◽  
Elisa Superchi ◽  
Tommaso Comunale ◽  
Gian Maria Campedelli ◽  
Martina Marchesi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathi N. Miner ◽  
Jessica M. Walker ◽  
Mindy E. Bergman ◽  
Vanessa A. Jean ◽  
Adrienne Carter-Sowell ◽  
...  

Increasing the representation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is one of our nation's most pressing imperatives. As such, there has been increased lay and scholarly attention given to understanding the causes of women's underrepresentation in such fields. These explanations tend to fall into two main groupings: individual-level (i.e., her) explanations and social-structural (i.e., our) explanations. These two perspectives offer different lenses for illuminating the causes of gender inequity in STEM and point to different mechanisms by which to gain gender parity in STEM fields. In this article, we describe these two lenses and provide three examples of how each lens may differentially explain gender inequity in STEM. We argue that the social-structural lens provides a clearer picture of the causes of gender inequity in STEM, including how gaining gender equity in STEM may best be achieved. We then make a call to industrial/organizational psychologists to take a lead in addressing the societal-level causes of gender inequality in STEM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ediomo-Ubong E. Nelson ◽  
Gboyega E. Abikoye

In this article, we report findings of a qualitative study on structural, relational, and subjective determinants of injecting risks. Forty-one current people who inject drugs (PWIDs) were recruited through snowball sampling in Uyo, Nigeria. They were interviewed with a loosely structured interview guide. We employed inductive and thematic analysis of interview transcripts. PWIDs recognize the risk of viral transmission through sharing of syringes. As countermeasures, they inject with sterile syringes, refuse to borrow syringes, and disinfect borrowed syringes. Risk reduction efforts are undermined by withdrawal, pleasure seeking, public injecting settings, policing, social networks, and intimate relationships. These factors create a risk environment for viral transmission. Pleasure-seeking and risk reduction practices show agency and subjectivity, counterbalancing current emphasis on structural determinants of injecting risks. Findings indicate the need for policy reforms, needle and syringe provision, oral drug substitution, safe injecting environments, and peer education. Interventions should build on PWIDs’ agency and risk management practices.


Author(s):  
Taissa Pereira de Araújo ◽  
Milena M. de Moraes ◽  
Vânia Magalhães ◽  
Cláudia Afonso ◽  
Cristina Santos ◽  
...  

Ultra-processed food (UPF) can be harmful to the population’s health. To establish associations between UPF and health outcomes, food consumption can be assessed using availability data, such as purchase lists or household budget surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to search studies that related UPF availability with noncommunicable diseases or their risk factors. PRISMA guidelines were used. Searches were performed in PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science in February 2021. The search strategy included terms related to exposure (UPF) and outcomes (noncommunicable diseases and their risk factors). Studies that assessed only food consumption at an individual level and did not present health outcomes were excluded. Two reviewers conducted the selection process, and a third helped when disagreement occurred. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the studies’ quality; 998 records were analyzed. All 11 eligible studies were ecological and assessed overweight and obesity as a health outcome, only one showed no positive association with UPF availability. Two studies included the prevalence of diabetes as an outcome, however no significant association was found with UPF availability. Studies relating UPF availability and health outcomes are focused on overweight and obesity. It is necessary to further explore the relationship between other health outcomes and UPF availability using purchase or sales data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonor Guariguata ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
Natasha Sobers ◽  
Ian Hambleton ◽  
T. Alafia Samuels ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pakpoom Phoompoung ◽  
Sabina Herrera ◽  
Armelle Pérez Cortés Villalobos ◽  
Farid Foroutan ◽  
Ani Orchanian‐Cheff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document