scholarly journals Prospective feasibility study of indigo naturalis ointment for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003199
Author(s):  
Kenro Hirata ◽  
Yuka Yamada ◽  
Yasuo Hamamoto ◽  
Kazuyuki Tsunoda ◽  
Hiroshi Muramatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Secondary Infection ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Indigo Naturalis ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

ObjectivesIndigo naturalis, a herbal medicine effective against ulcerative colitis, exhibits anti-inflammatory effects and induces interleukin-22-mediated antimicrobial peptide production. Anti-inflammatory activity and the prevention of secondary infection are essential for the management of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM); therefore, we developed an indigo naturalis ointment to be administered topically for CIOM and evaluated its feasibility.MethodsWe performed a single-centre, open-label, prospective feasibility study from March 2017 to December 2018. The key eligibility criteria for the subjects were as follows: (1) receiving chemotherapy for a malignant tumour; (2) grade 1 or 2 CIOM and (3) receiving continuous oral care. The treatment protocol comprised topical indigo naturalis ointment application three times a day for 7 days. The primary endpoint assessed was feasibility. The secondary endpoints assessed were the changes in oral findings, oral cavity pain and safety.ResultsNineteen patients with CIOM were enrolled. The average feasibility (the proportion of prescribed applications that were carried out) observed in this study was 94.7%±8.9% (95% CI 90.5% to 99.0%), which was higher than the expected feasibility. The revised oral assessment guide scores of the mucous membrane domain and total scores were significantly improved. All patients reported a reduction in oral cavity pain, with a median pain resolution duration of 6 days. No serious adverse events were observed.ConclusionsThe indigo naturalis ointment was feasible, and showed the potential for efficacy and safety. Larger randomised controlled trials are needed to further assess the efficacy and safety of indigo naturalis compared with a placebo.Trial registration numberUMIN000024271.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and prevalence of molecular markers associated with artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Uganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ebong ◽  
Asadu Sserwanga ◽  
Jane Frances Namuganga ◽  
James Kapisi ◽  
Arthur Mpimbaza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Uncomplicated Malaria ◽  
Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background In Uganda, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is first-line therapy and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) second-line therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AL and DP in the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria and measured the prevalence of molecular markers of resistance in three sentinel sites in Uganda from 2018 to 2019. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, phase IV clinical trial. Children aged 6 months to 10 years with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with AL or DP and followed for 28 and 42 days, respectively. Genotyping was used to distinguish recrudescence from new infection, and a Bayesian algorithm was used to assign each treatment failure a posterior probability of recrudescence. For monitoring resistance, Pfk13 and Pfmdr1 genes were Sanger sequenced and plasmepsin-2 copy number was assessed by qPCR. Results There were no early treatment failures. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of AL ranged from 41.2 to 71.2% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of AL ranged from 87.2 to 94.4%. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of DP ranged from 95.8 to 97.9% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of DP ranged from 98.9 to 100%. The uncorrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 73.5 to 87.4% and the PCR-corrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 92.1 to 97.5%. There were no reported serious adverse events associated with any of the regimens. No resistance-associated mutations in the Pfk13 gene were found in the successfully sequenced samples. In the AL arm, the NFD haplotype (N86Y, Y184F, D1246Y) was the predominant Pfmdr1 haplotype, present in 78 of 127 (61%) and 76 of 110 (69%) of the day 0 and day of failure samples, respectively. All the day 0 samples in the DP arm had one copy of the plasmepsin-2 gene. Conclusions DP remains highly effective and safe for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. Recurrent infections with AL were common. In Busia and Arua, the 95% confidence interval for PCR-corrected AL efficacy fell below 90%. Further efficacy monitoring for AL, including pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended. Trial registration The trail was also registered with the ISRCTN registry with study Trial No. PACTR201811640750761

scholarly journals Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Telithromycin versus Doxycycline for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Scrub Typhus

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 2011-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Min Kim ◽  
Ki Dong Yu ◽  
Ji Hyun Lee ◽  
Hyun Kuk Kim ◽  
Seung-Hyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Scrub Typhus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
New Antibiotics

ABSTRACT New antibiotics are required to have the antibacterial activity against doxycycline-resistant Orientia tsutsugamushi. An in vitro sensitivity study showed that telithromycin was more effective than erythromycin for Rickettsia, Bartonella, and Coxiella burnetii. In this prospective, open-label, randomized trial, we enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. We compared the efficacy and safety of a 5-day telithromycin therapy with those of a 5-day doxycycline therapy at Chosun University Hospital or one of its two community-based affiliated hospitals (Jangheung Hospital and Cheomdan Hospital), which are all located in southwestern Korea, between September and December 2005. A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to either the telithromycin group (n = 47) or the doxycycline group (n = 45). After the treatment, fever control time was 20.45 ± 12.9 h in the telithromycin group and 22.60 ± 21.44 h in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). After the treatment, the cure rate was 100% in the telithromycin group and 97.8% in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in time elapsed until such symptoms as headache, myalgia, and rash disappeared. No serious adverse events or death were noted following the treatment in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse events. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of a 5-day once-a-day regimen of 800 mg telithromycin were equivalent to those of a 5-day twice-a-day regimen of 100 mg doxycycline in patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. Telithromycin could be considered a promising new antibacterial agent for patients with scrub typhus.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Artemether-Lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for The Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria and Prevalence of Molecular Markers Associated With Artemisinin and Partner Drug Resistance in Uganda

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ebong ◽  
Asadu Sserwanga ◽  
Jane Frances Namuganga ◽  
James Kapisi ◽  
Arthur Mpimbaza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasmodium Falciparum ◽  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Uncomplicated Malaria ◽  
Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background In Uganda, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is the first-line therapy and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) the second-line therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of AL and DP in the management of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and measured the prevalence of molecular markers of resistance in three sentinel sites from 2018–2019 in Uganda. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, phase IV clinical trial. Children aged 6 months to 10 years with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with AL or DP and followed for 28 and 42 days, respectively. Genotyping was used to distinguish recrudescence from new infection, and a Bayesian algorithm was used to assign each treatment failure a posterior probability of recrudescence. For monitoring resistance, Pfk13 and Pfmdr1 genes were Sanger sequenced and plasmepsin-2 copy number was assessed by qPCR. Results There were no early treatment failures. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of AL ranged from 41.2–71.2% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of AL ranged from 87.2–94.4%. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of DP ranged from 95.8–97.9% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of DP ranged from 98.9–100%. The uncorrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 73.5–87.4% and the PCR-corrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 92.1–97.5%. There were no reported serious adverse events associated with any of the regimens. No resistance-associated mutations in the Pfk13 gene were found in the successfully sequenced samples. In the AL arm, the NFD haplotype (N86Y, Y184F, D1246Y) was the predominant Pfmdr1 haplotype, present in 78 of 127 (61%) and 76 of 110 (69%) of the day 0 and day of failure samples, respectively. All the day 0 samples in the DP arm had one copy of the plasmepsin-2 gene. Conclusions DP remains highly effective and safe for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. Recurrent infections with AL were common. In Busia and Arua, the 95% confidence interval for PCR-corrected AL efficacy fell below 90%. Further efficacy monitoring for AL, including pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended. Trial registration: The trail was also registered with the ISRCTN registry with study Trial no PACTR201811640750761.

scholarly journals AN OPEN-LABEL MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF THE EFFICACY, TOLERABILITY, AND SAFETY OF THE NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG AMTOLMETIN GUACIL IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND DYSPEPSIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Tsvetkova ◽  
L. N. Denisov ◽  
A. N. Otteva ◽  
A. L. Dubikov ◽  
S. P. Yakupova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Objective: to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of amtolmetin guacil (AMG; Niselat®, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, India) versus previous therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and signs of dyspepsia.Subjects and methods. The open-label observational study included 220 patients aged 30–65 years who suffered from knee OA and intense pain during NSAID intake and had symptoms of dyspepsia in the absence of contraindications to the use of AMG. Among the comorbidities that generally occurred in 68% of the patients, there was a preponderance of hypertension (42%), lower extremity varicose veins (6.4%), and diabetes mellitus (6%). Treatment efficacy was evaluated using three domains of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), by also taking into account pain intensity and general health assessment on the visual analogue scale. A Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) scale was used to rate dyspepsia.Results and discussion. AMG had a marked analgesic effect confirmed by 40% or more pain reduction that occurred in 72.5% of the patients. The high analgesic effect of AMG was confirmed by a statistically significant (p <0.001) reduction in the WOMAC index (pain and stiffness) and by an increase in functional activity. There was a significant decrease in painless and painful signs of dyspepsia, as well as positive changes in the measures “overall assessment of dyspepsia severity” (p < 0.001) and “satisfaction with treatment”. Overall assessment of AMG tolerability was only positive: excellent (33%), good (56%), and satisfactory (11%). There were no serious adverse events (AE). AE were graded as moderate and mild in 8 and 82% of cases, respectively. AE were recorded in 7.7% of the patients. Conclusion. The findings suggest that AMG offers good prospects for knee OA treatment.

scholarly journals A Phase 3 Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Efficacy and Safety Study of Immune Globulin (Human) 10% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guntis Karelis ◽  
Rodica Balasa ◽  
Jan L. De Bleecker ◽  
Tima Stuchevskaya ◽  
Andres Villa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Immune Globulin ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety Study ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Patients Experience

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular transmission. Exacerbations may involve increasing bulbar weakness and/or sudden respiratory failure, both of which can be critically disabling. Management of MG exacerbations includes plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); they are equally effective, but patients experience fewer side effects with IVIG. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immune globulin caprylate/chromatography purified (IGIV-C) in subjects with MG exacerbations. Methods: This prospective, open-label, non-controlled 28-day clinical trial was conducted in adults with MG Foundation of America class IVb or V status. Subjects received IGIV-C 2 g/kg over 2 consecutive days (1 g/kg/day) and were assessed for efficacy/safety on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from Baseline in quantitative MG (QMG) score to Day 14. Secondary endpoints of clinical response, Baseline to Day 14, included at least a 3-point decrease in QMG and MG Composite and a 2-point decrease in MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL). Results: Forty-nine subjects enrolled. The change in QMG score at Day 14 was significant (p < 0.001) in the Evaluable (–6.4, n = 43) and Safety (–6.7, n = 49) populations. Among evaluable subjects, Day 14 response rates were 77, 86, and 88% for QMG, MG Composite, and MG-ADL, respectively. IGIV-C showed good tolerability with no serious adverse events. Conclusions: The results of this study show that IGIV-C was effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of MG exacerbations.

Haemostatic efficacy and safety of bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa are comparable in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major surgery

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 726-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasad Mathew ◽  
Leonard Valentino ◽  
Michael Sumner ◽  
Stephanie Seremetis ◽  
Keith Hoots ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viia ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Orthopedic Procedures ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

SummaryBolus infusion (BI) recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administration is safe and effective in the surgical management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors but has not been compared directly with continuous infusion (CI). We conducted an open-label, randomized, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa administered by BI or CI for the surgical management of haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX. Safety was compared with that of a control group of noninhibitor patients receiving FVIII or FIX concentrates for major surgery. All inhibitor subjects received an initial bolus dose of 90 μg/kg rFVIIa and were then randomly assigned to BI (n=12) or CI (n=12). The BI group received 90 μg/kg rFVIIa every two hours (h) during surgery through day 5, then every four hours for days 6–10. The CI group received 50 μg/kg/h rFVIIa through day 5, then 25 mg/kg/h for days 6–10. The control group (n=12) received FVIII or FIX per institutional protocols. Twenty-two major surgeries included orthopedic procedures on the knee (n=13), hip (n=3), and abdominal/pelvis procedures (n=4). One patient with an autoimmune FVIII inhibitor randomized to the BI arm was excluded from efficacy analysis. Haemostatic efficacy of rFVIIa in each group was comparable: effective in 8/11 and 9/12 subjects in the BI and CI arms, respectively, and ineffective in three subjects in each arm. Serious adverse events were related to continued or increased bleeding. In conclusion, haemostatic efficacy and safety of BI and CI of rFVIIa are comparable for the surgical management of haemophilia subjects with inhibitors.

scholarly journals A randomized phase II trial of efficacy and safety of the immunotherapy ALECSAT as an adjunct to radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Werlenius ◽  
Giuseppe Stragliotto ◽  
Michael Strandeus ◽  
Malin Blomstrand ◽  
Helena Carén ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background There is an urgent need for effective treatments against glioblastoma (GBM). In this trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of an adoptive cell-based immunotherapy. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed GBM were recruited at four study sites in Sweden. The patients were randomized 1:2 to receive either radiotherapy (RT), 60 Gy/30 fractions, with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) only, or RT and TMZ with addition of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumor (ALECSAT) in an open-label phase II trial. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were survival and safety of ALECSAT. Results Sixty-two patients were randomized to either RT and TMZ alone (n=22) or RT and TMZ with ALECSAT (n=40). Median age was 57 years (range 38-69), 95% of the patients were in good performance status (WHO 0-1). There was no significant difference between the study arms (SOC vs. ALECSAT + SOC) in PFS (7.9 vs. 7.8 months; HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.70, 2.36; P=0.42), or in median overall survival (OS) (18.3 vs. 19.2 months; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58, 2.31; P=0.67). The treatment groups were balanced in terms of serious adverse events (52.4% vs. 52.5%), but adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more common in the experimental arm (81.0% vs. 92.5%). Conclusion Addition of ALECSAT immunotherapy to standard treatment with radiochemotherapy was well tolerated but did not improve PFS or OS for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document