Salazopyrin en-tabs: an enteric-coated case that is hard to take

1987 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 53.2-55

Sulphasalazine (Salazopyrin - Pharmacia) has been an established treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) for over 20 years. More recently its value as a disease-modifying drug in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become recognised again.1 All the clinical trials of the drug in RA have employed enteric-coated Salazopyrin EN-tabs rather than the plain tablets usually used in UC. The manufacturer emphasises that only this preparation (and not the plain tablets) ‘is indicated and approved for use in RA’. Why is the enteric coating essential in the treatment of RA but not in ulcerative colitis?

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001595
Author(s):  
Gerd R Burmester ◽  
Peter Nash ◽  
Bruce E Sands ◽  
Kim Papp ◽  
Lori Stockert ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo analyse adverse events (AEs) of special interest across tofacitinib clinical programmes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ulcerative colitis (UC) and psoriasis (PsO), and to determine whether the incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) of these events are consistent across diseases.MethodsThe analysis included data from patients exposed to ≥1 dose of tofacitinib in phase 1, 2, 3 or 3b/4 clinical trials and long-term extension (LTE) studies (38 trials) in RA (23 trials), PsA (3 trials), UC (5 trials) and PsO (7 trials). All studies were completed by or before July 2019, except for one ongoing UC LTE study (data cut-off May 2019). IRs were obtained for AEs of special interest.Results13 567 patients were included in the analysis (RA: n=7964; PsA: n=783; UC: n=1157; PsO: n=3663), representing 37 066 patient-years of exposure. Maximum duration of exposure was 10.5 years (RA). AEs within the ‘infections and infestations’ System Organ Class were the most common in all diseases. Among AEs of special interest, IRs were highest for herpes zoster (non-serious and serious; 3.6, 1.8, 3.5 and 2.4 for RA, PsA, UC and PsO, respectively) and serious infections (2.5, 1.2, 1.7 and 1.3 for RA, PsA, UC and PsO, respectively). Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mortality ratios (weighted for country) were ≤0.2 across cohorts.ConclusionsThe tofacitinib safety profile in this analysis was generally consistent across diseases and with longer term follow-up compared with previous analyses.


Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Ahmed ◽  
Giulia Bankov ◽  
Dan Casey ◽  
Martin Edward Perry

The drug infliximab has been a key milestone in the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis and the seronegative spondyloarthritides. Biosimilar drugs followed the originator, further improving access and diversity of therapy choice. Subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13) holds potential for greater patient flexibility by self administration, reducing travel and hospital attendance for infusion, particularly relevant at a time of pandemic. We highlight the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic basis of the subcutaneous device, clinical trials in rheumatology and gastroenterology and consider the safety and cost implications. Real-world switching data is required to confirm the efficacy data from clinical trials given the reduction in dosing flexibility compared with intravenous therapy.


Lupus ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
MJ Davis ◽  
AD Woolf

Antimalarials have been used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for over 40 years, the first report of suggestive efficacy being published in 1951. Over the years they have become part of the established treatment of RA being one of a category of drugs referred to as disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The onset of action with antimalarials is slow. Most patients use these drugs in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and analgesics. This article reviews the evidence for the efficacy of antimalarials, their place in comparison to other DMARDs and comments on the current use in RA as perceived in British rheumatology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 905.1-905
Author(s):  
M. Verstappen ◽  
E. Van Mulligen ◽  
P. De Jong ◽  
A. Van der Helm - van Mil

Background:Current treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suggest tapering DMARDs.1Discontinuation of DMARD-treatment is of increasing interest, and DMARD-free remission (DFR) is regarded an important future outcome.2 3However, lack of knowledge on DFR prevalence, its sustainability, and the characteristics of patients achieving DFR currently hampers the use of DFR as primary outcome.Objectives:To increase the understanding of DFR in RA, and to support studies aiming to include this as primary outcome, we systematically reviewed the literature to determine prevalence and sustainability of DFR. Potential predictors of DFR were evaluated to increase insight in patient characteristics favourable for achieving this outcome.Methods:A systematic literature search was performed in March 2019 in multiple databases. All clinical trials and observational studies reporting on discontinuation of DMARDs in RA-patients in remission were included. Our quality assessment included a general assessment and assessment of the description of DFR. Prevalence of DFR and its sustainability, flares during tapering and after DMARD-stop were summarized. Also, potential predictors of achieving DFR were reviewed.Results:From 631 articles, 51 were included, comprising 14 clinical trials and 5 observational studies. DFR-definition differed, especially for the duration of DMARD-free state. Considering only high and moderate-quality studies, DFR was achieved in 5.0%-24.3%, and sustained DFR (duration>12 months) in 11.6%-19.4%. Flares occurred frequently during DMARD-tapering (41.8%-75.0%) and in the first year after achieving DFR (10.4%-11.8%), whilst late flares, >1 year after DMARD-stop, were infrequent (0.3%-3.5%). Many patient characteristics lacked association with DFR. Absence of auto-antibodies and shared epitope alleles increased the risk of achieving DFR.Conclusion:DFR is achievable in RA, and is sustainable in ~10%-20% of patients.1DFR can become an important outcome measure for clinical trials, and requires consistency in the definition. Considering the high rate of flares in the first year after DMARD-stop, a DMARD-free follow-up of >12 months is advisable to evaluate sustainability.References:[1] Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma Jea. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.Ann Rheum Dis2017;76(6):960-77. doi: annrheumdis-2016-210715 [pii];10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 [doi][2] Ajeganova S, van Steenbergen HW, van Nies JA, et al. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-free sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: an increasingly achievable outcome with subsidence of disease symptoms.Ann Rheum Dis2016;75(5):867-73. doi: annrheumdis-2014-207080 [pii];10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207080 [doi][3] Stamm TA, Machold KP, Aletaha D, et al. Induction of sustained remission in early inflammatory arthritis with the combination of infliximab plus methotrexate: the DINORA trial.Arthritis Res Ther2018;20(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1667-z [doi];10.1186/s13075-018-1667-z [pii]Acknowledgments:We would like to thank J. Schoones, librarian of Leiden University Medical Center, for constructing and carrying out the literature search.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Wen Bin Hou ◽  
Wei Jia Sun ◽  
Xiao Wen Zhang ◽  
Yuan Xi Li ◽  
You You Zheng ◽  
...  

Background. Ulcerative colitis (UC), a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, is characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, and mucopurulent bloody stool. In recent years, the incidence and prevalence of UC have been increasing consistently. Five-flavor Sophora falvescens enteric-coated capsule (FSEC), a licensed Chinese patent medicine, was specifically used to treat UC. This review was aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of FSEC for the treatment of UC. Methods. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing FSEC or FSEC plus conventional Western medicine with conventional Western medicine in participants with UC were included. Two authors screened all references, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data independently. Binary data were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and metric data as mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed by GRADE. Results. We included 15 RCTs (1194 participants, 763 in the FSEC group and 431 in the control group). The treatment duration ranged from 42 to 64 days. Twelve trials compared FSEC with conventional Western medicine, and two trials compared FSEC plus conventional medicine with conventional medicine. Another trial compared FSEC plus mesalazine with compound glutamine enteric capsules plus mesalazine. FSEC showed a higher clinical effective rate (improved clinical symptoms, colonoscopy results, and stools) (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.20; 729 participants; 8 trials; low-quality evidence) as well as the effective rate of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20; 452 participants; 5 trials; low-quality evidence) compared to mesalazine. There was no significant difference in the adverse events between FSEC and control groups. Conclusions. FSEC may show effectiveness in UC treatment compared to conventional medicine, and the use of FSEC may not increase the risk of adverse events. Due to the limited number of clinical trials and low methodological quality of the included trials, our findings must be interpreted with discretion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document