DD-032 The impact of computerised physician order entry on medication errors in chemotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A118.1-A118
Author(s):  
K Niiranen ◽  
R Silvennoinen ◽  
R Laaksonen ◽  
M Airaksinen ◽  
L Lehtonen
Author(s):  
Gisoo Alizadeh ◽  
Adineh Jafarzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Farough Khosravi

Background: Medical errors have dramatic clinical and economic consequences. Using various information technology can reduce medical errors and improve services’ quality via preventing medical errors. In this study, the role of a computerized medical order entry system was investigated in reducing medical errors. Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. The research question was formulated; then, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, keywords (such as medical errors, adverse event, physician order entry system and control) and search strategy were determined. International databases(Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) and manual searches were used. The studies that had the inclusion criteria were entered into the study and were evaluated qualitatively, then information of studies was extracted and summarized. Results: In total, 16 studies were included. Most studies were about medication errors and adverse medication events. So, it is possible to claim more confidently about reducing medication errors to adverse medication events, since in studies, the impact of this system on medication errors had been further discussed. Some studies have pointed to an increase in error reports due to better checking and error entry with this system, and in general, the positive impact of this action has been mentioned in minimizing errors, especially medication errors and adverse medication events. Positive and significant effects have also been reported on prescribing errors, especially medication prescriptions. Conclusion: Computerization of medical orders through its positive effects, can be considered a useful and appropriate intervention in increasing patient safety if implemented completely and correctly.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0134101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Hernandez ◽  
Elyes Majoul ◽  
Carlota Montes-Palacios ◽  
Marie Antignac ◽  
Bertrand Cherrier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e62.1-e62
Author(s):  
S Wimmer ◽  
I Toni ◽  
R Trollmann ◽  
W Rascher ◽  
A Neubert

BackgroundOne of the most critical steps in the medication process on paediatric wards is the drug prescription.1 Studies have shown that the use of electronic systems may improve the quality of prescribing and reduces medication errors in paediatric inpatients.2This study aims to investigate the impact of a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system (incl. decision support for dosing) on adverse drug reactions (ADR) and medication errors (ME) in comparison to paper-based prescribing and documentation.MethodsA prospective pre-post study was conducted at a general paediatric ward. All patients aged 17 years or younger that were treated for at least 24 hours during the study periods (5 months pre and post implementation) were observed. Adverse events were identified by intensive chart review.The primary outcome measure was the incidence of clinically relevant ADRs and MEs. Events were assessed regarding causality (WHO), severity (WHO and additionally Dean & Barber for MEs) and preventability (Shumock).3Results338 patients with medication were included in the paper-based prescribing cohort (phase I) and 320 patients with medication in the electronic prescribing cohort (phase II). Median age was 7 (IQR 2 - 14) and 6 (IQR 1 - 13), respectively. In each cohort patients received a median number of 4 different drugs.Potentially harmful MEs were less often observed in the cohort with electronic prescribing (n=231 vs. n=549). The mean number per patient significantly decreased from 1.62 to 0.72 (p< 0.05).During the hospitalisation 2.1% (n=7) patients in phase I and 2.8% (n=9) in phase II experienced clinically relevant ADRs whereof two (0.6%) in each cohort originated from MEs.ConclusionThe implementation of a CPOE system significantly reduces medication errors, particularly those potentially harming patients but has less impact on ADRs.ReferencesFortescue EB, Kaushal R, Landrigan CP, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4Pt 1):722–9.Maaskant JM, Vermeulen H, Apampa B, Fernando B, Ghaleb MA, Neubert A, et al. Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;3:Cd006208.Dean BS and Barber ND. A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56(1):57–62.Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Burrell ◽  
Candy Tsourounis ◽  
David Quan ◽  
Vicki Jue ◽  
Eunice Tam ◽  
...  

Background An internal evaluation of the inpatient pharmacy order entry database ( WORx) at a university hospital revealed that the nature of the reaction was documented for only 47% of patients with reported drug allergies/intolerance. Insufficient documentation of drug allergy/intolerance may result in administration of drugs that should not be prescribed. Similarly, valuable agents that should be used may not be prescribed due to an unnecessary fear of adverse drug reaction. More complete description of drug allergy/intolerance may result in more correct prescribing of medications. Objective Evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven protocol on the quality of drug allergy/intolerance documentation. Methods Four pre-intervention evaluations were conducted every 2 weeks documenting the completeness of drug allergy/intolerance information in the pharmacy order entry database. One week following the implementation of a pharmacist-driven protocol intended to improve the completeness of drug allergy/intolerance information, a series of 4 postintervention evaluations was repeated. Proportional analysis of pre- and postinterventional data was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results A total of 1,686 allergies from 2,174 patients were reviewed pre and post intervention. The frequency of complete drug allergy/intolerance documentation pre intervention was 52% to 62%. Following implementation of the hospitalwide, pharmacist-driven protocol, this rate increased to 60% to 76%. Pediatric services demonstrated the most substantial improvement, increasing from 53% to 79% to 67% to 93%. Blank reaction fields decreased by 10% in both age groups. Conclusion A pharmacy-driven initiative intended to improve the completeness of drug allergy/intolerance documentation was associated with modest success. Other mechanisms, including electronic health record systems with computerized physician order entry and decision support, are needed to improve the completeness of drug allergy/intolerance information.


2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-236
Author(s):  
Michael R. Cohen

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them in your inservice training programs. Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the USP Medication Errors Reporting Program, which is presented in cooperation with the Institute of Safe Medication Practices. If you have encountered medication errors and would like to report them, you may call USP toll-free, 24 hours a day, at 1-800-233-7767 (1-800-23-ERROR). Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writer's names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document