scholarly journals Scoping Review of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Reducing Medical Errors

Author(s):  
Gisoo Alizadeh ◽  
Adineh Jafarzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Farough Khosravi

Background: Medical errors have dramatic clinical and economic consequences. Using various information technology can reduce medical errors and improve services’ quality via preventing medical errors. In this study, the role of a computerized medical order entry system was investigated in reducing medical errors. Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. The research question was formulated; then, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, keywords (such as medical errors, adverse event, physician order entry system and control) and search strategy were determined. International databases(Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) and manual searches were used. The studies that had the inclusion criteria were entered into the study and were evaluated qualitatively, then information of studies was extracted and summarized. Results: In total, 16 studies were included. Most studies were about medication errors and adverse medication events. So, it is possible to claim more confidently about reducing medication errors to adverse medication events, since in studies, the impact of this system on medication errors had been further discussed. Some studies have pointed to an increase in error reports due to better checking and error entry with this system, and in general, the positive impact of this action has been mentioned in minimizing errors, especially medication errors and adverse medication events. Positive and significant effects have also been reported on prescribing errors, especially medication prescriptions. Conclusion: Computerization of medical orders through its positive effects, can be considered a useful and appropriate intervention in increasing patient safety if implemented completely and correctly.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milda Karvelytė ◽  
Janet Rogers ◽  
Gerard J. Gormley

Abstract Background Health professionals who have experienced ill-health appear to demonstrate greater empathy towards their patients. Simulation can afford learners opportunities to experience aspects of illness, but to date, there has been no overarching review of the extent of this practice or the impact on empathic skills. Objective To determine from the evidence—what is known about simulation-based learning methods of creating illness experiences for health professions and the impact on their empathic skills. Study selection Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework informed our scoping review of articles relevant to our research question. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) were searched, and a sample of 516 citations was screened. Following review and application of our exclusion criteria, 77 articles were selected to be included in this review. Findings Of the 77 articles, 52 (68%) originated from the USA, 37 (48%) of studies were qualitative based and 17 (22%) used a mixed-methods model. Of all the articles in our scope, the majority (87%) reported a positive impact and range of emotions evoked on learners. However, some studies observed more negative effects and additional debriefing was required post-simulation. Learners were noted to internalise perceived experiences of illness and to critically reflect on their empathic role as healthcare providers. Conclusions A diverse range of simulation methods and techniques, evoking an emotional and embodied experience, appear to have a positive impact on empathy and could be argued as offering a complementary approach in healthcare education; however, the long-term impact remains largely unknown.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0134101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Hernandez ◽  
Elyes Majoul ◽  
Carlota Montes-Palacios ◽  
Marie Antignac ◽  
Bertrand Cherrier ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sanchez Cuervo ◽  
A. Rojo Sanchis ◽  
C. Pueyo Lopez ◽  
E. Gomez de Salazar Lopez de Silanes ◽  
T. Gramage Caro ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Upperman ◽  
Patricia Staley ◽  
Kerri Friend ◽  
William Neches ◽  
David Kazimer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e62.1-e62
Author(s):  
S Wimmer ◽  
I Toni ◽  
R Trollmann ◽  
W Rascher ◽  
A Neubert

BackgroundOne of the most critical steps in the medication process on paediatric wards is the drug prescription.1 Studies have shown that the use of electronic systems may improve the quality of prescribing and reduces medication errors in paediatric inpatients.2This study aims to investigate the impact of a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system (incl. decision support for dosing) on adverse drug reactions (ADR) and medication errors (ME) in comparison to paper-based prescribing and documentation.MethodsA prospective pre-post study was conducted at a general paediatric ward. All patients aged 17 years or younger that were treated for at least 24 hours during the study periods (5 months pre and post implementation) were observed. Adverse events were identified by intensive chart review.The primary outcome measure was the incidence of clinically relevant ADRs and MEs. Events were assessed regarding causality (WHO), severity (WHO and additionally Dean & Barber for MEs) and preventability (Shumock).3Results338 patients with medication were included in the paper-based prescribing cohort (phase I) and 320 patients with medication in the electronic prescribing cohort (phase II). Median age was 7 (IQR 2 - 14) and 6 (IQR 1 - 13), respectively. In each cohort patients received a median number of 4 different drugs.Potentially harmful MEs were less often observed in the cohort with electronic prescribing (n=231 vs. n=549). The mean number per patient significantly decreased from 1.62 to 0.72 (p< 0.05).During the hospitalisation 2.1% (n=7) patients in phase I and 2.8% (n=9) in phase II experienced clinically relevant ADRs whereof two (0.6%) in each cohort originated from MEs.ConclusionThe implementation of a CPOE system significantly reduces medication errors, particularly those potentially harming patients but has less impact on ADRs.ReferencesFortescue EB, Kaushal R, Landrigan CP, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4Pt 1):722–9.Maaskant JM, Vermeulen H, Apampa B, Fernando B, Ghaleb MA, Neubert A, et al. Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;3:Cd006208.Dean BS and Barber ND. A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999;56(1):57–62.Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A118.1-A118
Author(s):  
K Niiranen ◽  
R Silvennoinen ◽  
R Laaksonen ◽  
M Airaksinen ◽  
L Lehtonen

2021 ◽  
pp. 016264342198997
Author(s):  
Sojung Jung ◽  
Ciara Ousley ◽  
David McNaughton ◽  
Pamela Wolfe

In this meta-analytic review, we investigated the effects of technology supports on the acquisition of shopping skills for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) between the ages of 5 and 24. Nineteen single-case experimental research studies, presented in 15 research articles, met the current study’s inclusion criteria and the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards. An analysis of potential moderators was conducted, and we calculated effect sizes using Tau-U to examine the impact of age, diagnosis, and type of technology on the reported outcomes for the 56 participants. The results from the included studies provide evidence that a wide range of technology interventions had a positive impact on shopping performance. These positive effects were seen for individuals across a wide range of ages and disability types, and for a wide variety of shopping skills. The strongest effect sizes were observed for technologies that provided visual supports rather than just auditory support. We provide an interpretation of the findings, implications of the results, and recommended areas for future research.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1019
Author(s):  
Barbara Frączek ◽  
Aleksandra Pięta ◽  
Adrian Burda ◽  
Paulina Mazur-Kurach ◽  
Florentyna Tyrała

The aim of this meta-analysis was to review the impact of a Paleolithic diet (PD) on selected health indicators (body composition, lipid profile, blood pressure, and carbohydrate metabolism) in the short and long term of nutrition intervention in healthy and unhealthy adults. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of 21 full-text original human studies was conducted. Both the PD and a variety of healthy diets (control diets (CDs)) caused reduction in anthropometric parameters, both in the short and long term. For many indicators, such as weight (body mass (BM)), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC), impact was stronger and especially found in the short term. All diets caused a decrease in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG), albeit the impact of PD was stronger. Among long-term studies, only PD cased a decline in TC and LDL-C. Impact on blood pressure was observed mainly in the short term. PD caused a decrease in fasting plasma (fP) glucose, fP insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the short run, contrary to CD. In the long term, only PD caused a decrease in fP glucose and fP insulin. Lower positive impact of PD on performance was observed in the group without exercise. Positive effects of the PD on health and the lack of experiments among professional athletes require longer-term interventions to determine the effect of the Paleo diet on athletic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document