scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study

ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e000535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Dengina ◽  
Timur Mitin ◽  
Sergey Gamayunov ◽  
Sufia Safina ◽  
Yuliya Kreinina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Target Lesion

BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and checkpoint inhibitors have been established as effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but only a minority of patients achieve complete response. Additional strategies are necessary to improve these agents’ efficacy.MethodsPatients with stable disease for at least 4 months on TKI or checkpoint inhibitors were included. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was delivered to an organ with comparable lesions, where one lesion was in the treatment target and the other one was intentionally left untreated (control lesion). Response in both lesions was scored using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 criteria 2 months after completion of SBRT. The primary endpoint was the rate of SBRT adverse events, and the secondary endpoints included the rate of reduction in target lesion size.Results17 patients were enrolled (14 men and 3 women, median age: 54.5 years old). SBRT was delivered to the lungs (n=5), bones (n=4), lymph nodes (n=4), liver (n=1), primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n=1) and locally recurrent RCC (n=2). The equivalent dose in 2 Gy with an alpha to beta ratio of 2.6 was 114 Gy. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the cumulative rate of SBRT-related toxicity (grade 1) was 12% (n=2), consisting of oesophagitis and skin erythema. No grade 2 or higher toxicity was detected. Radiographic response in the target lesion was seen in 13 patients (76%), with complete response in 5 (29%) patients and partial response in 8 (47%), including abscopal effect in 1 patient. Control lesions remained stable in 16 patients. The difference between response in the target and control lesions as judged by the mean sizes of these lesions before and at 2 months after SBRT was statistically significant (p<0.01). Fraction size of 10 Gy or greater was associated with complete response (p<0.01).ConclusionExtracranial SBRT in patients with mRCC treated with TKI or checkpoint inhibitors is well tolerated and could be effective.Trial registration numberNCT02864615

scholarly journals Evolving Treatment Paradigm in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2017 ◽  
pp. 319-329
Author(s):  
David M. Gill ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Ulka Vaishampayan
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

The treatment paradigm for advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved rapidly since the arrival of targeted therapies and novel immunotherapies. mRCC was previously treated only with cytokines. However, discoveries of mutations affecting the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor gene (leading to increased expression of VEGF and hypoxia inducible factor/HIF-1) and of deregulations in the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway (resulting in tumor angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and tumor growth) have led to the development of numerous targeted therapies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has thus approved a total of nine targeted therapies since 2005, including VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib), a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF (bevacizumab), mTOR inhibitors (temsirolimus and everolimus), and a multityrosine kinase inhibitor (cabozantinib). Furthermore, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has again shifted the mRCC therapeutic landscape with the FDA’s approval of nivolumab. Herein, we discuss the unprecedented changes in the field of clear cell histology mRCC in both the first-line and salvage settings, and we also discuss future therapies and recommend a treatment paradigm on sequencing of these agents.

Paradigm towards Tailored Therapies and Complete Responses in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Mayer Fishman ◽  
Thomas Hutson ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Eric Jonasch ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose

In recent years, the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of targeted therapies. Multitargeted kinase inhibitors (such as sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, and axitinib), the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (such as everolimus and temsirolimus) have become the standard of care for the palliation of metastatic disease. Unfortunately, cumulative toxicities and the lack of marked benefits have prevented the combined use of most molecularly targeted agents. Selected patients with mRCC benefit from immunotherapy, as subsets of patients can experience long-term disease remission or complete response with high-dose interleukin-2. In order to optimize the value of immunotherapy, improvements in the selection of drugs and combinations with novel immunomodulatory agents must be pursued.

scholarly journals The Evaluation of Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Open Challenges in the Clinical Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Raimondi ◽  
Giovanni Randon ◽  
Pierangela Sepe ◽  
Melanie Claps ◽  
Elena Verzoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Disease Response

Immunotherapy has changed the therapeutic scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), however the evaluation of disease response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors is still an open challenge. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria are the cornerstone of response assessment to anti-neoplastic treatments, but the use of anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD1) and other immunotherapeutic agents has shown atypical patterns of response such as pseudoprogression. Therefore, immune-modified criteria have been developed in order to more accurately categorize the disease response, even though their use in the everyday clinical practice is still limited. In this review we summarize the available evidence on this topic, with particular focus on the application of immune-modified criteria in the setting of mRCC.

scholarly journals Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab/Ipilimumab in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Taylor C. Peak ◽  
Elena M. Fenu ◽  
Michael B. Rothberg ◽  
Christopher Y. Thomas ◽  
Ronald L. Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Effective Combination ◽  
The Face

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represents an effective combination of checkpoint inhibitors that can lead to a durable response with minimal toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We present a case of a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a patient with a 13.9 cm left renal mass and significant retroperitoneal and iliac lymphadenopathy, classified as intermediate-risk mRCC. We discuss and review the literature on complete responses after systemic therapy and the ability to predict who has undergone a complete response in the face of residual radiographic evidence of disease.

scholarly journals Combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the treatment of disseminated renal cell carcinoma. Realities and prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-52
Author(s):  
B. Ya. Alekseev ◽  
I. M. Shevchuk
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Line Of Therapy

The use of immunotherapeutic drugs as monotherapy and in various combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma has revolutionized the treatment of this disease. Thanks to the breakthrough studies carried out, the standard in the first line of therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is now a combination of checkpoint inhibitors, as well as an immuno-oncological agent with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.This article presents updated data from the CheckMate 214 study with a minimum follow-up of 42 months. A review of studies on the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the first line of therapy with the possibility of adding ipilimumab in case of progression of the disease on the background of monotherapy is carried out, as well as data on the use of a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the second line of treatment.Monotherapy with nivolumab has a certain effectiveness in a specific category of patients, for example, with potential intolerance to ipilim-umab or first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as in patients with a favorable prognosis.The combination of drugs nivolumab + ipilimumab is a highly effective treatment option in the first line of therapy with the potential for a sustained response in patients with RCC with an poor and intermediate risk, and in the second and subsequent lines requires further study.

Determinants of treatment for first-line immune-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a critical overview of recent evidence

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Francesco Massari
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Critical Overview ◽  
First Line Treatment

The last three decades have witnessed a revolution in the therapeutic scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), due to the advent of novel agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and the combination of both treatments. These strategies have reported unprecedented response rates, thus improving the clinical outcomes of mRCC patients, and current international guidelines support the use of immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease. However, more data are awaited to help clinicians in the decision-making process. Herein, we provide an overview of recently published results regarding immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in mRCC patients, critically discussing available data that could help in suggesting determinants of treatment in this setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document