Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: controversies, challenges and future directions

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosita Zakeri ◽  
Martin R Cowie

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprises almost half of the population burden of HF. Because HFpEF likely includes a range of cardiac and non-cardiac abnormalities, typically in elderly patients, obtaining an accurate diagnosis may be challenging, not least due to the existence of multiple HFpEF mimics and a newly identified subset of patients with HFpEF and normal plasma natriuretic peptide concentrations. The lack of effective treatment for these patients represents a major unmet clinical need. Heterogeneity within the patient population has triggered debate over the aetiology and pathophysiology of HFpEF, and the neutrality of randomised clinical trials suggests that we do not fully understand the syndrome(s). Dysregulated nitric oxide–cyclic guanosine monophosphate–protein kinase G signalling, driven by comorbidities and ageing, may be the fundamental abnormality in HFpEF, resulting in a systemic inflammatory state and microvascular endothelial dysfunction. Novel informatics platforms are also being used to classify HFpEF into subphenotypes, based on statistically clustered clinical and biological characteristics: whether such subclassification will lead to more targeted therapies remains to be seen. In this review, we summarise current concepts and controversies, and highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical practice. Novel treatments and disease management strategies are discussed, and the large gaps in our knowledge identified.

Kardiologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Ovchinnikov ◽  
A. D. Gvozdeva ◽  
Z. N. Blankova ◽  
A. A. Borisov ◽  
F. T. Ageev

Clinical and hemodynamic aggravation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is largely due to progression of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction. The key role in the normal maintenance of diastolic function is played by a high level of activity of the intracellular signaling axis, cyclic guanosine-monophosphate-protein kinase G, the activity of which is significantly reduced in HFpEF. The activity of this axis can be increased by increasing the bioavailability of natriuretic peptides by blocking the enzyme neutral endopeptidase (neprilisin), which is responsible for the destruction of natriuretic peptides.This review presents experimental and clinical data on the use of neprilysin inhibitors in HFpEF and addresses prospects of this treatment.


Author(s):  
Sherif F Nagueh

Abstract Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for at least half the cases of heart failure, currently diagnosed. There are several cardiac and non-cardiac manifestations of the syndrome. Structure and function abnormalities can include all four cardiac chambers. The left ventricle has abnormal systolic and diastolic functions which can be examined by invasive and non-invasive measurements. In addition, the left atrium enlarges with abnormal left atrial function, pulmonary hypertension occurs, and the right ventricle can develop hypertrophy, enlargement, and systolic dysfunction. There are a paucity of data on calcium handling in HFpEF patients. Growing literature supports the presence of abnormalities in titin and its phosphorylation, and increased interstitial fibrosis contributing to increased chamber stiffness. A systemic inflammatory state causing reduced myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate along with defects in the unfolded protein response have been recently reported. Diagnosis relies on signs and symptoms of heart failure, preserved ejection fraction, and detection of diastolic function abnormalities based on echocardiographic findings and abnormally elevated natriuretic peptide levels or invasive measurements of wedge pressure at rest or with exercise. There are currently two diagnostic algorithms: H2FPEF, and HFA-PEFF with limited data comparing their performance head to head in the same patient population. Despite the growing understanding of the syndrome’s pathophysiology, there have been little success in developing specific treatment for patients with HFpEF.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1085-1087
Author(s):  
Dimitrios M Konstantinou ◽  
Yiannis S Chatzizisis ◽  
George D Giannoglou

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Meshal Soni ◽  
Edo Y Birati

The clinical syndrome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unique in terms of etiologies, diagnostic criteria, costs, and treatment modalities when compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. There is an emerging paradigm shift that recognizes the clinical syndrome of HFpEF and its various phenotypes. Understanding these HFpEF phenotypes is crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of HFpEF, which in turn can further guide our management strategies. This review outlines the diagnostic criteria, introduces the common clinical phenotypes, and discusses treatments currently utilized in practice for the management of HFpEF.


Author(s):  
Senthil Selvaraj ◽  
Brian L. Claggett ◽  
Milton Packer ◽  
Faiez Zannad ◽  
Inder S. Anand ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dyslipidemia is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Sacubitril/valsartan improves insulin sensitivity and augments natriuretic peptide (NP) signaling, providing mechanisms by which sacubitril/valsartan may affect serum lipids. However, empiric data on these effects are lacking. Methods and Results We analyzed 4,744 participants from PARAGON‐HF with available screening lipids. During follow‐up visits, we analyzed the treatment effect on lipid levels and assessed for interaction by baseline lipid levels. At the 16‐week visit, we adjusted these treatment effects for the change in several biomarkers (including hemoglobin A1c and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)/creatinine [a biomarker of NP activation]). The average age was 73±8 years, 52% were women, 43% had diabetes mellitus, and 64% were on statin therapy. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan reduced triglycerides ‐5.0% (‐6.6%, ‐3.5%), increased high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐c) +2.6% (+1.7%, +3.4%), and increased low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐c) +1.7% (+0.4%, +3.0%). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced triglycerides most among those with elevated baseline levels (triglycerides≥200 mg/dL) (p‐interaction<0.001), and at 16‐weeks by ‐13.0% (‐18.1%, ‐7.6%), or ‐29.9 (‐44.3, ‐15.5) mg/dL, in this group. Adjusting for the change in urinary cGMP/creatinine significantly attenuated treatment effects on triglycerides and HDL‐c, but not LDL‐c, while adjusting for other biomarkers did not significantly alter the treatment effects. Conclusions Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces triglycerides compared with valsartan, an effect that was substantially stronger in those with elevated baseline triglycerides. Modest increases in HDL‐c and LDL‐c cholesterol were also observed with therapy. The underlying mechanism(s) of changes in HDL‐c and triglycerides are related to sacubitril/valsartan’s effects on NP activity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Loek van Heerebeek ◽  
Nazha Hamdani ◽  
Inês Falcão-Pires ◽  
Adelino F Leite-Moreira ◽  
Mark PV Begieneman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document