scholarly journals P14: DOXYCYCLINE: A RARE CAUSE OF DRUG INDUCED PANCREATITIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 822.3-823
Author(s):  
M Pourmorteza ◽  
H Virk ◽  
D Yoon ◽  
I Riaz ◽  
A Rai ◽  
...  

Purpose of StudyDrug-induced pancreatitis (DIP) is a rare clinicopathologic entity. We report a 58-year-old female who developed DIP secondary to administration of doxycycline.Methods UsedA 48 year old female with a history of hypertension presented to the hospital with complains of nausea/vomiting, right upper-quadrant gnawing abdominal pain, 8/10 in intensity with radiation to the back. She denied exacerbating factors, use of alcohol, tobacco and drug. Patient also denied diarrhea, constipation and changes in skin or stool color. On examination patient was hypertensive (155/95) with a heart rate of 102. She had epigastric/right upper quadrant tenderness on superficial palpation, hypoactive bowel sounds without any palpable organs, rebound tenderness or rigidity. Serum lipase was elevated at 2508 IU/L, negative pregnancy and insignificant urinalysis findings. Liver function tests, lipid panel, chemistry panel and hematologic panel were within normal limits. Radiologic investigations with abdominal ultrasound depicted mild proximal dilatation of the common bile duct with smooth tapering of the duct distally indicating status post-cholecystectomy. Contrast enhanced computed tomography scan revealed mild enlargement of the body of the pancreas with adjacent peripancreatic fatty infiltration consistent with acute pancreatitis. Upon further questioning patient explains recent diagnosis (7 days) of tibial orthopedic hardware infection as she was prescribed doxycycline 200 mg twice a day in anticipation of irrigation of infected site. After confirmation, and discontinuation of doxycycline, our patient recovered and has been disease-free for over a month.Summary of ResultsDrug-induced pancreatitis is uncommon etiology of acute pancreatitis, which is responsible for 0.1%–2% of all the acute pancreatitis cases. Among adverse drug reactions, pancreatitis is often-ignored because of the difficulty in implicating a drug as its cause.ConclusionsIn our vastly evolving pharmacotherapy world, DIP should be included in the differential of idiopathic pancreatitis, especially after other common causes have been ruled out.

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-47
Author(s):  
Shiv Vansh Bharti ◽  
Anup Sharma

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis a disorder that has numerous causes and an obscure pathogenesis. It can be a serious abdominal emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Cholelithiasis is most common cause of acute pancreatitis and excessive alcohol consumption is second most frequent cause which together account for approximately 80% of underlying etiology. The detection of biliary etiology is crucial to delivery of definitive therapy to prevent repeated attacks of acute pancreatitis. During an attack of acute pancreatitis, elevation of alanine aminotransferase to >150 IU/L is a predictive factor for biliary cause of acute pancreatitis. Aims: To investigate the predictive value of raised alanine aminotransferase in determining biliary etiology in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis. Methods: A prospective study was done among 70 patients who were admitted in surgery department over a period of one year with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Peak alanine aminotransferase within 48 hours of presentation was recorded. The diagnosis was based on typical clinical presentation of acute pancreatitis combined with an increase in serum amylase levels ≥ 3 times the upper limit of the laboratory reference value. All biliary cases were confirmed by abdominal ultrasonography. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.9 ±15.7 years (19-88 years). Acute pancreatitis was common in 31-40 years of age group. Among them, 40(57.1%) were male and 30(42.9%) were female. Forty two (60%) patients had biliary pancreatitis, 20(28.5%) had alcoholic pancreatitis, 2(2.8%) patients had drug induced pancreatitis and 6(8.5%) patients had idiopathic pancreatitis. Mean alanine aminotransferase for biliary pancreatitis was 205.9U/L, while cases with other etiologies (alcoholic 58.4U/L; drug induced 62.6 U/L; and idiopathic 48.3 U/L) showed significantly lower values (p=0.001). Conclusion: An elevated alanine aminotransferase strongly supports a diagnosis of gallstones in acute pancreatitis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Yao ◽  
C Briggs ◽  
P Labib

Abstract Introduction Current guidelines for acute pancreatitis advocate abdominal ultrasound (AUS) as the first-line imaging investigation to identify if gallstones are the cause of pancreatitis. However, many patients have a history of cholecystectomy or present with known gallstones and deranged liver function tests (LFTs). In these patients, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is indicated due to its higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting choledocholithiasis. Method This retrospective audit reviewed all consecutive patients who presented to the surgical assessment unit with acute pancreatitis over one month. Their past surgical history, bloods and imaging were reviewed. Results Of the 30 patients, seventeen (57%) had no previous cholecystectomy or known gallstones, nine (30%) had previous cholecystectomy and eight (27%) had known gallstones, seven (88%) of which presented with deranged LFTs. Of the seventeen patients who should have had AUS first (n = 17), thirteen (76%) had AUS first, none had MRCP first and four (24%) had computerised tomography (CT) first. Of the patients in whom MRCP was indicated first-line (n = 13), seven (54%) had AUS first, none had MRCP first, four (31%) had CT first and two (15%) went straight to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography having had recent outpatient MRCPs. In the seven patients in whom MRCP was indicated but AUS was performed first, six (86%) underwent subsequent MRCP. Conclusions MRCP should be considered the first line imaging investigation for patients presenting with acute pancreatitis and a history of cholecystectomy or known gallstones with deranged LFTs, as AUS rarely prevents the need for subsequent MRCP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Giovanna Minissale ◽  
Maurizio Soresi ◽  
Massimo Galia ◽  
Francesco Agnello ◽  
Lydia Giannitrapani ◽  
...  

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is often a trial even to expert clinicians, because sometimes diagnosis is not easy to be made. Guidelines of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) yielded in 2014, help to better understand the problem. The diagnosis of DILI is made through a detailed evaluation of clinical, serological, radiological and histological aspects. Biochemical data include liver function tests that allow to assess the pattern of damage, such as hepatocellular, cholestatic and mixed liver injury; serological data include testing for major and possibly minor hepatotropic viruses, non-organ specific autoantibodies. Clinical scenario might include jaundice, nausea, vomiting and extra-hepatic manifestations such as fever, pruritus, rash and eosinophilia. Investigation of the potential culprit drugs should involve firstly the temporal relationship between intake of the medication and onset of symptoms, thus the improvement after drug withdrawal. Overall, to complete the diagnostic evaluation, an abdominal ultrasound can be performed, as well as measurement of liver stiffness by transient elastography, and finally liver biopsy, which still represents the most accurate method to definitely assess liver damage. Sometimes, in such cases, computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance could help in the diagnosis of cases presenting with focal lesions of the liver, with cholestatic-like disease or vascular alterations, such as veno-occlusive disease. DILI diagnostic criteria help clinicians thinking of liver injury induced by drug, excluding other causes of liver disease. According to severity of liver damage and type of drug, it is possible to carefully predict the patient’s outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e0019
Author(s):  
Tzvika Porges ◽  
◽  
Tali Shafat ◽  
Iftach Sagy ◽  
Dan Schwarzfuchs ◽  
...  

Objective: Acute pancreatitis is a serious diagnosis with an increasing incidence in the Western world. In this study we sought to investigate the incidence of idiopathic AP and to compare clinical and prognostic characteristics of idiopathic cases with cases of AP with known etiology. Methods: In this retrospective study of adult hospitalized patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis between 2012 and 2015, a comparison was made between admissions of patients with known etiology and those for whom no cause was found. Primary outcome was defined as composite outcome of 30-day mortality and complications. Results:Among 560 admissions of 437 patients with a primary diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the main factors identified were gallstones (51.2%) and idiopathic pancreatitis (35.9%), with alcohol ranked third at only 4.8%. Mortality rate within 30 days of hospitalization was 2.9% and within one year was 7.1%. Use of lipid-lowering, anti-hypertensive, and anti-diabetic medications was more frequent among patients with “idiopathic” disease (70%, 68%, and 33% versus 59%, 56%, and 27%, respectively). Patients admitted with idiopathic AP, in comparison to patients with known AP etiology, had milder disease with shorter hospital stay (3 days versus 4, respectively), and less re-admission in 30 days (7.5% versus 21.2%). Idiopathic AP patients had better prognosis in terms of 30-day death and complication (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.08–0.40, P<0.001). Conclusion: Idiopathic disease is common among acute pancreatitis patients; the two study groups differed in severity of disease and prognosis. Common use of medications with doubtful value suggests possible under-diagnosis of drug-induced acute idiopathic pancreatitis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Shailesh Simkhada ◽  
Parashuram Mishra

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common surgical presentation and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Gallstones and excessive alcohol consumption are the most frequent causes of AP. Aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of raised ALT (Alanine aminotransferase) in determining biliary etiology in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.Materials and Methods: All patients admitted in the surgical ward of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital with the diagnosis of AP were studied prospectively over a period of 1 year between 2014and 2015. Peak ALT within 48 h of presentation was recorded. Etiology was determined on the basis of history, Abdominal Ultrasound (AUS) and other relevant investigations.Results: A total of 80 patients of AP were included in the study. Among them, 46 (57.5%) patients had biliary pancreatitis, 18(22.5%) had alcoholic pancreatitis, 4(5%) patients had drug induced pancreatitis and 12(15%) patients had idiopathic pancreatitis. 46(57.5%) were male and 34(42.5%) were female. Mean ALT for biliary pancreatitis was 212.5U/L, for alcoholic was 58 U/L, for drug induced was 71 U/L and for idiopathic was 43 U/L. When compared between biliary and non-biliary pancreatitis, it was statistically significant( p value < 0.00). Biliary was the most common etiology followed by alcoholic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV) and negative predictive value(NPV) of alanine aminotransferase with cut off of 100 U/L for biliary pancreatitis was 65%, 94%, 91.5% and 72.8% respectively.Conclusion: An elevated ALT strongly supports a diagnosis of gallstones in Acute Pancreatitis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Federico Puccini Leoni ◽  
Tina Pelligra ◽  
Simonetta Citi ◽  
Veronica Marchetti ◽  
Eleonora Gori ◽  
...  

Abdominal ultrasound examinations (AUEs) are commonly used in the diagnostic evaluation of canine acute pancreatitis (AP). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and monitor the ultrasonographic changes observed in dogs with clinically suspected AP on consecutive AUEs. The study population was constituted by 38 client-owned dogs hospitalized for no less than 48 h from January 2016 to December 2019. Dogs included in this study were suspected of AP based on the clinical examination and abnormal rapid specific canine pancreatic lipase test performed at admission. Dogs were submitted to two AUEs, the first on the first day of hospitalization, and the second between 40–52 h after the first one. Twelve dogs had both AUEs suggestive of AP. Fourteen dogs received an ultrasonographic diagnosis of AP exclusively on the second AUE. Twelve dogs remained negative on both the first and the second AUE. In 26 out of 38 patients the second AUE was suggestive of AP. If a patient is suspected of AP, it is advisable to carry out ultrasonographic monitoring at least within the first 52 h after admission, since ultrasonographic signs of AP may only become observable later after hospitalization.


Diagnosis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wycliffe Mbagaya ◽  
Joanne Foo ◽  
Ahai Luvai ◽  
Claire King ◽  
Sarah Mapplebeck ◽  
...  

AbstractMacrocomplexes between immunoglobins and aspartate aminotransferase (macro-AST) may result in persistently increased AST concentration. The presence of macro-AST in patients has been implicated in unnecessary investigations of abnormal liver function tests. We report the case of a 44-year-old female who presented to the rheumatology clinic with a 12-months’ history of constant widespread pain affecting her limbs and was found to have an elevated AST concentration. Further information from her GP revealed a 14-years’ history of elevated AST with otherwise normal liver function. Previous abdominal ultrasound and two liver biopsies carried out 2 years apart were normal. This prompted further analytical investigation by the biochemistry department which identified macro-AST as the cause. This case illustrates that persistently raised isolated AST concentration with no other abnormal indices may warrant macroenzyme analysis potentially avoiding unnecessary invasive investigations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 152-157
Author(s):  
Snezana Tesic-Rajkovic ◽  
Biljana Radovanovic-Dinic ◽  
Tatjana Jevtovic-Stoimenov

Introduction. Alcoholic acute pancreatitis occurs in 10% of alcoholics, who take more than 80g alcohol daily. Different biochemical markers are used to diagnose acute pancreatitis, and some of them may help in establishing etiology of acute pancreatitis. Material and Methods. This study is a prospective review of 21 patients. All patients were hospitalized at the Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology or at the Department for Surgery of the Clinical Centre of Nis in the period from August 1st 2009 to March 1st 2010 with diagnosis of acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Detailed anamnesis, clinical examination, biochemical analyses and ultrasonography of the upper abdomen were done in all patients. All patients provided data on alcohol abuse. Results. The analysis of the corresponding biochemical parameters revealed a statistically significant correlation between the following values: serum amylase and serum lipase (R=0.964674; p<0.001), cholesterol and triglycerides (R=0.93789; p<0.001), total and direct bilirubin (R=0.857899; p<0.001) and between aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (R=0.824461, p<0.001) in patients with alcoholic acute pancreatitis. In addition, there was a statistically significant correlation between the values of serum amylase and urinary amylase (R=0.582742, p<0.001). Discussion. The analysis of biochemical markers showed that some of them were significant for beforehand diagnosis of alcoholic acute pancreatitis, which is in accordance with other studies. Conclusion Some biochemical parameters can be potential predictors of alcoholic acute pancreatitis (lipase/amylase ratio >2, greater ratio of aspartate aminotransferase/ alanine aminotransferase, enhanced triglycerides and values of mean corpuscular volume.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document