scholarly journals Axitinib plus avelumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a stratified, open-label, single-center phase 2 clinical trial (GliAvAx)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001146
Author(s):  
Gil Awada ◽  
Laila Ben Salama ◽  
Jennifer De Cremer ◽  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
Lydia Fischbuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Corticosteroid Dose

BackgroundNo treatment demonstrated to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) in a randomized trial. Combining axitinib with the programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking monoclonal antibody avelumab may result in synergistic activity against rGB.MethodsAdult patients with rGB following prior surgery, radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were stratified according to their baseline use of corticosteroids. Patients with a daily dose of ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) initiated treatment with axitinib (5 mg oral two times per day) plus avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks) (Cohort-1). Patients with a higher baseline corticosteroid dose initiated axitinib monotherapy; avelumab was added after 6 weeks of therapy if the corticosteroid dose could be tapered to ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (Cohort-2). Progression-free survival at 6 months (6-m-PFS%), per immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria, served as the primary endpoint.ResultsBetween June 2017 and August 2018, 54 patients (27 per cohort) were enrolled and initiated study treatment (median age: 55 years; 63% male; 91% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–1). Seventeen (63%) patients treated in Cohort-2 received at least one dose of avelumab. The 6-m-PFS% was 22.2% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI 3.8% to 33.2%) in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively; median overall survival was 26.6 weeks (95% CI 20.8 to 32.4) in Cohort-1 and 18.0 weeks (95% CI 12.5 to 23.5) in Cohort-2. The best objective response rate was 33.3% and 22.2% in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively, with a median duration of response of 17.9 and 19.0 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were dysphonia (67%), lymphopenia (50%), arterial hypertension and diarrhea (both 48%). There were no grade 5 adverse events.ConclusionThe combination of avelumab plus axitinib has an acceptable toxicity profile but did not meet the prespecified threshold for activity justifying further investigation of this treatment in an unselected population of patients with rGB.

185 Camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial carcinoma:a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A199-A199
Author(s):  
Hong Liu ◽  
Shuhuai Niu ◽  
Zhaohui Fang ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Qianying Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival

BackgroundPatients with recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial carcinoma have poor prognosis and few treatment options. Blocking the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands is a promising treatment strategy. Camrelizumab is a humanised anti-programmed death-1 (anti PD-1) antibody. This study aimed to assess the anti-tumour activity and safety of camrelizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial carcinoma.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis for recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial carcinoma patients. Eligible patients were aged 28–73 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 2. Patients received camrelizumab alone(200 mg iv d1 q2w)or in combination with chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response (ORR). The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and safety.ResultsA total of 21 patients were enrolled between September 20, 2019, and July 8, 2020. 18 patients were evaluated for efficacy and 21 patients were available for safety analysis. For 18 evaluated patients, the ORR and DCR was 50% (9/18) and 83.3% (15/18), respectively. In addition, 4 patients received camrelizumab monotherapy with the ORR of 0% (0/4) and DCR of 25% (1/4), and 14 patients received camrelizumab combination therapy with the ORR of 64.3% (9/14) and DCR of 100% (14/14). 16 of 21 patients were still receiving the treatment, the median PFS was not yet achieved. Exploratory analysis showed that patients with reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) had the higher objective response rate than those without RCCEP (57.1% vs 45.5%). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47.6% (10/21) of patients, and the most common adverse events were RCCEP (33.3%), rash (14.3%), dry skin (9.5%). Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events occurred in 4.8% (1/21) of patients.ConclusionsCamrelizumab showed antitumour activity in recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial carcinoma with manageable toxicities. Camrelizumab combination therapy had better efficacy compared with monotherapy. RCCEP occurrence was positively associated with outcomes of camrelizumab. Further studies are needed to verify this data.

scholarly journals Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without Veliparib in Patients With Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and a Germline BRCA/PALB2 Mutation

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (13) ◽  
pp. 1378-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen M. O’Reilly ◽  
Jonathan W. Lee ◽  
Mark Zalupski ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
Jennifer Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Palb2 Mutation

PURPOSE Five percent to 9% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) develop in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 (g BRCA/PALB2+) mutation. Phase IB data from a trial that used cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib treatment demonstrated a high response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) in this population. We designed an open-label, randomized, multicenter, two-arm phase II trial to investigate cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without veliparib in g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had untreated g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC with measurable stage III to IV disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Treatment for patients in arm A consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 3 and 10; treatment for patients in arm B was the same as that for patients in arm A, and arm A also received veliparib 80 mg orally twice per day on days 1 to 12 cycled every 3 weeks. The primary end point was RRs of arm A and arm B evaluated separately using a Simon two-stage design. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, DCR, OS, safety, and correlative analyses. RESULTS Fifty patients were evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis. The RR for arm A was 74.1% and 65.2% for arm B ( P = .55); both arms exceeded the prespecified activity threshold. DCR was 100% for arm A and 78.3% for arm B ( P = .02). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months for arm A (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.5 months) and 9.7 months for arm B (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months; P = .73). Median OS for arm A was 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 24.3 months) and 16.4 months for arm B (95% CI, 11.7 to 23.4 months; P = .6). Two-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 30.6% (95% CI, 17.8% to 44.4%), and 3-year OS rate was 17.8% (95% CI, 8.1% to 30.7%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities for arm A versus arm B were 13 (48%) versus seven (30%) for neutropenia, 15 (55%) versus two (9%) for thrombocytopenia, and 14 (52%) versus eight (35%) for anemia. CONCLUSION Cisplatin and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in advanced g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. Concurrent veliparib did not improve RR. These data establish cisplatin and gemcitabine as a standard approach in g BRCA/ PALB2+ PDAC.

LAPACT: An open-label, multicenter phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) in patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS477-TPS477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Jill Lacy ◽  
Scot D. Dowden ◽  
Javier Sastre ◽  
Venu Gopal Bathini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors

TPS477 Background: In pts with LAPC, more effective systemic therapies may be associated with improved local control, delay of metastasis, and overall survival (OS). The phase III MPACT trial in pts with metastatic PC demonstrated longer OS (median, 8.7 vs 6.6 mos; HR, 0.72; P < 0.001) and an ≈ 3-fold greater shrinkage of primary tumors with nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone (−22.15% vs −7.02%), raising the possibility of improved local PC control with nab-P + Gem. LAPACT will assess the efficacy and safety of nab-P + Gem in LAPC. Methods: LAPACT will enroll treatment-naive pts (planned n ≈ 110) in the United States, Canada, and Europe with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, confirmed unresectable LAPC, no distant metastases, and adequate organ function. Pts with mixed-origin tumors, any other malignancy within 5 years, peripheral neuropathy grade > 1, or clinically significant ascites are ineligible. Pts will receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Pts without progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity after 6 cycles will receive investigator’s choice of surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or continued nab-P + Gem. If a major response is observed, surgery may occur prior to completing 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem. The primary endpoint is time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first therapy dose to discontinuation due to PD, start of a new non–protocol-defined anti-cancer therapy, or death). The study design allows for 80% power at a 1-sided α of 0.05 to detect a 30% increase over the 5.1-month median TTF observed for nab-P + Gem in the MPACT study. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR) after 6 cycles, overall response rate, progression-free survival, OS, safety, and quality of life. The exploratory endpoint is correlation of changes in circulating nucleic acids with PD and treatment response. An interim DCR analysis will occur after all pts have completed 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem, discontinued therapy due to PD, died, or started a new non–protocol-defined therapy before completing 6 cycles of therapy. Enrollment is ongoing (first pt enrolled in April 2015). Clinical trial information: NCT02301143.

EAGLE: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6012-6012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa F. Licitra ◽  
Robert I. Haddad ◽  
Caroline Even ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Grade 3

6012 Background: EAGLE is a phase 3 study evaluating efficacy of D (anti-PD-L1 mAb) monotherapy and D+T (anti-CTLA-4 mAb) vs standard of care (SOC) in pts with R/M HNSCC who progressed following platinum-based therapy (NCT02369874). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W), D+T (D 20 mg/kg IV Q4W + T 1 mg/kg IV Q4W for 4 doses, then D 10 mg/kg IV Q2W), or SOC (investigator’s choice: cetuximab, taxane, methotrexate, or fluoropyrimidine-based regimen). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with dual primary objectives of D+T vs SOC and D vs SOC. Additional endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: 240 pts were randomized to D, 247 to D+T and 249 to SOC. An imbalance for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was seen in favor of the SOC arm (D, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; D+T, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; SOC, PS 0 = 32%, PS 1 = 68%). The risk of death was not statistically significantly different for D compared with SOC (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72–1.08; P = 0.20) or D+T vs SOC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.26; P = 0.76). Efficacy data are provided in the table. Treatment-related AEs Grade ≥3 were reported in 10.1% of pts (regardless of causality Grade ≥3 AEs were 41.4%) in the D arm, 16.3% (51.2%) for D+T, and 24.2% (44.2%) for SOC. Following treatment, 2% of pts in D, 5% in D+T and 15% in SOC received immunotherapy. Conclusions: D and D+T did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to standard chemotherapy in pts with R/M HNSCC. Median OS and ORR of D arm were similar to other studies with checkpoint inhibitors. The SOC arm outperformed what has been seen for SOC arms in previous studies; subsequent immunotherapy may have confounded the OS analyses. The safety profile for D and D + T in R/M HNSCC is consistent with previous trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02369874. [Table: see text]

Influence of tumor size and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) at baseline on patient (pt) outcomes in lenvatinib-treated radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6081-6081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Sophie Leboulleux ◽  
Naomi Kiyota ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Size ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Post Hoc

6081 Background: In SELECT, lenvatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) of pts with RR-DTC versus placebo (18.3 v 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21 [99% CI: 0.14, 0.31]; P<0.001). Here we examine the treatment of RR-DTC with lenvatinib in relation to tumor size (sum of all targeted lesions) and ECOG PS. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of SELECT with pts randomized to receive lenvatinib, Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ECOG PS ≥2 were calculated for subgroups of pts according to baseline ECOG PS or tumor size. Objective response rate (ORR) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and PFS according to ECOG PS (0 or 1) at baseline were calculated. Correlations between ECOG PS at baseline (0 or 1) and maximum tumor shrinkage were calculated using one-way analysis of variance. Results: Pts with ECOG PS 0 or 1 at baseline had similar demographic and disease characteristics. ORR was 78.5% and 51.0% for pts with ECOG PS 0 and 1 at baseline, respectively (odds ratio [95% CI]: 3.508 [2.018, 6.097]). Mean maximum percent decrease in tumor size was significantly greater in pts with baseline ECOG PS 0 (-46.13%) versus pts with ECOG PS 1 (-37.16%; P=0.0017). For pts with ECOG PS 1 at baseline, time to ECOG PS ≥2 was numerically shorter with tumor size >60 mm versus tumor size ≤60 mm (HR [95% CI]: 1.450 [0.708, 2.967]). Additional results are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Among pts with RR-DTC, PFS, OS, ORR, and time to ECOG ≥2 were generally better for patients with lower ECOG PS or smaller tumor size at baseline. These results may indicate that it is beneficial to start lenvatinib in pts with RR-DTC early, before ECOG PS worsens and tumor size increases. Clinical trial information: NCT01321554. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e000698
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Bachet ◽  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
Timothy Price ◽  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Jean-Marc Phelip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundIn RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PRECONNECT was designed to further characterise safety and clinical use of trifluridine/tipiracil.MethodsIn this ongoing, international, multicentre, open-label trial, patients with pretreated mCRC received oral trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included PFS and quality of life (QoL).Results793 patients (median age 62 years) from 13 countries received trifluridine/tipiracil for a median of 2.84 months (IQR 2.64). Adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 96.7%; the most common (≥20% of patients) were neutropaenia, asthenia/fatigue, nausea, anaemia and diarrhoea. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 73.9% of patients, with the most common being neutropaenia (39.1% of patients), anaemia (9.8%) and asthenia/fatigue (5.0%). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7 to 2.9). Median time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status deterioration (≥2) was 8.9 months (range 0.03–14.72). There was no clinically relevant change from baseline in QoL.ConclusionsPRECONNECT showed consistent results with the previously demonstrated safety and efficacy profile of trifluridine/tipiracil, with no new safety concerns identified. QoL was maintained during treatment.Trial registration numberNCT03306394.

Phase II Evaluation of Nanoparticle Albumin–Bound Paclitaxel in Platinum-Sensitive Patients With Recurrent Ovarian, Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1426-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Teneriello ◽  
Paul C. Tseng ◽  
Mark Crozier ◽  
Carlos Encarnacion ◽  
Kenneth Hancock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Measurable Disease

Purpose Patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer have limited therapeutic options. There are no reports of nanoparticle albumin–bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. We report efficacy and toxicity with nab-paclitaxel in this group. Patients and Methods Forty-seven patients enrolled (44 assessable patients). Main inclusion criteria were histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum (any stage, grade 2 to 3 if stage I) and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or elevated CA-125 (> 70 U/mL) in patients without measurable disease. Patients received nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 administered intravenously for 30 minutes on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for six cycles or until disease progression. Results Median age was 65.5 years; 76% of patients had stage IIIC or IV disease, 81% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, and 94% had prior surgery. For assessable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 64% (15 complete responses [CR] and 13 partial responses [PR] among 44 assessable patients). In patients evaluated with RECIST only, the ORR was 45% (one CR and four PR of 11 patients). In patients with only elevated CA-125, ORR was 82% (seven CRs and two PRs of 11 patients). In patients meeting both RECIST and CA-125 criteria, the ORR was 64% (seven CRs and seven PRs of 22 patients). Median time to response was 1.3 months (range, 0.5 to 4.8 months). Estimated median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxicities were neutropenia (24%) and neuropathy (9%). Conclusion Nab-paclitaxel is active in this group of patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The ORR was 64%. Toxicities were manageable. Further studies of nab-paclitaxel in combination with platinum are warranted.

A preliminary study of apatinib in Chinese patients with osteosarcoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22500-e22500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Zhou ◽  
Fan Tang ◽  
Li Min ◽  
Wenli Zhang ◽  
Rui Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
First Line

e22500 Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant tumor of bone that displays hyperproliferative characteristics and high vascularity, making vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) become promising targets. Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2, shows anti-cancer effects against a broad range of malignancies. This study reported the clinical experience of apatinib in osteosarcoma. Methods: We collected the medical data of osteosarcoma cases who received apatinib for at least one month in our hospital. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated, and the safety profile was observed. The cut-off date of analysis was 01/17/2017. Results: Between May 2015 and Nov 2016, a total of 34 cases received apatinib with informed consent (4 as neoadjuvant, 1 as neoadjuvant and first line, 10 as first line, 15 as second line and 4 as third line). Among them, 18 (52.9%) cases suffered from pulmonary metastases before apatinib administration; 29 (85.3%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1–2. Initial dosages of 250, 425, and 500 mg/d were given to 5 (14.7%), 3 (8.8%), and 26 (76.5%) cases, respectively. Dosage adjustment occurred in only 8 (23.5%) patients. The median duration was 5.9 months (95%CI, 4.5–9.4 months). According to RECIST v1.1, complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were achieved in 1 (2.9%), 6 (17.6%), 25 (73.5%) and 2 (5.9%) patients, respectively. The ORR was 20.5%, and the DCR was 94.1%. Patients with pulmonary metastases showed a relatively better response to apatinib, as the ORR and DCR were 33.3% and 88.9%, respectively. As for safety analysis, the most 3 common adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (29, 85.3%), diarrhea (16, 47.1%), and decreased appetite (9, 26.5%). Nine grade III AEs were occurred including 3 HFS, 2 hypertension, 1 diarrhea, 1 oral mucositis, 1 proteinuria and 1 serious peeling. Conclusions: Apatinib seems to be effective in treating osteosarcoma with acceptable safety profile. Perspective clinical studies with adequate sample size are required to validate our results.

Phase II Multicenter Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Refractory Colorectal Cancer: An NCI Treatment Referral Center Trial TRC-0301

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 3354-3360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen X. Chen ◽  
Margaret Mooney ◽  
Matthew Boron ◽  
Don Vena ◽  
Kimberly Mosby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Referral Center ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To provide bevacizumab (BV) -based therapy to patients with advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) who had exhausted standard chemotherapy options, and to evaluate the response to BV combined with fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in this patient population. Patients and Methods This was a multicenter, single-arm treatment trial conducted under the National Cancer Institute Treatment Referral Center network nationwide. Patients were treated with BV 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks combined with FU/LV; FU was administered by bolus or continuous infusion. Eligibility criteria included advanced CRC that had progressed after irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, and absence of thromboembolism. The primary end point was objective response rate (RR) in the first 100 assessable patients. All patients received follow-up for toxicity and survival. Results Due to rapid accrual, a total of 350 patients were enrolled at 32 participating sites nationwide by October 2003. In the initially planned cohort of 100 assessable patients, the objective RR was 4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 9.9%) by investigators' assessment and 1% (95% CI, 0% to 5.5%) based on independent review; median progression-free survival was 3.5 months and median overall survival was 9.0 months. The safety profile was similar to prior BV trials in CRC. Grade 3 to 4 hemorrhage occurred in 5% of patients, including 3.8% with bleeding in the GI tract. Other adverse events such as hypertension, thrombosis, and bowel perforation were also observed at rates consistent with other studies. Conclusion For patients with advanced CRC that had progressed after both irinotecan-based and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens, the combination of BV and FU/LV was associated with rare objective responses.

A phase 1/2 study of durvalumab (DURVA) in combination with lenalidomide (LEN) with or without dexamethasone (DEX) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8055-TPS8055
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Paula Rodriguez-Otero ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Programmed Death

TPS8055 Background: LEN + DEX (Rd) is approved for pts with newly diagnosed MM, including those who are transplant non-eligible (TNE). DURVA is a monoclonal antibody to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) that blocks PD-L1 binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1). Preclinical studies showed anti-MM immune responses with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade that were enhanced with LEN (Görgün et al, 2015). Here, we present a phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label trial in progress (MEDI4736-MM-002) designed to evaluate DURVA in combination with LEN ± DEX in a target population of pts who are TNE and/or with high-risk NDMM. Methods: Enrollment of up to 138 pts from the US, Canada, and Europe is planned to determine the recommended dose of DURVA (primary endpoint) with LEN ± DEX for the treatment (Tx) of NDMM. Key secondary endpoints include safety, response outcomes, pharmacokinetics, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Pts with previously untreated MM with ≥ 1 of the following will be included: 1 of the CRAB criteria or clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥ 60% and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Pts with a history of primary immunodeficiency will be excluded. Each independent cohort (A, B, C) will enroll 6 pts in parallel in the dose-finding phase (Table). Dose-limiting toxicities will be evaluated during the first cycle of Tx. The optimal regimen will be determined from the dose-finding phase and a parallel dose-expansion phase of up to 40 pts per cohort. Tx will continue until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. To date, 15 pts have enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02685826. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document