376 A phase I/II study of live biotherapeutic MRx0518 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A401-A401
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Amishi Shah ◽  
Pavlos Msaouel ◽  
Matthew Campbell ◽  
Shi-Ming Tu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Single Strain

BackgroundMRx0518 is a novel, human gut microbiome-derived, single-strain, oral live biotherapeutic. It is a bacterium of the Enterococcus genus that was selected for development in the treatment of solid tumours for its strong in vitro and in vivo immunostimulatory activity. In vivo studies have shown that MRx0518 can inhibit tumour growth in different syngeneic cancer models as monotherapy and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. MRx0518 has been shown to reduce Treg and increase Th1 and Tc1 lymphocyte differentiation in vitro, and increase intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NK cells in vivo.This phase I/II clinical study is evaluating the combination of MRx0518 and pembrolizumab in a cohort of heavily pre-treated patients refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to assess whether it is safe and can provide a clinical benefit.MethodsThe study is being conducted in two parts. Part A is complete and evaluated safety of the combination therapy in a cohort of 12 mRCC and mNSCLC patients. This data was assessed by the Safety Review Committee and it was determined appropriate to proceed to Part B. Part B is now recruiting up to 30 additional patients per indication (RCC, NSCLC or bladder cancer) at several US sites. Patients in both parts must be refractory to checkpoint inhibition. This is defined as having had an initial benefit from PD-1 pathway targeting immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) but developing disease progression confirmed by two radiological scans ≥4 weeks apart in the absence of rapid clinical progression and within 12 weeks of last dose of ICI. Patients are treated with 1 capsule of MRx0518 (1 × 1010 to 1 × 1011 CFU) twice daily and pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression. Tumour response is assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST. Blood, stool and urine samples are collected throughout the study to evaluate immune markers and microbiome. Patients may choose to consent to tissue biopsies. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate safety of the combination by monitoring toxicities in the first cycle of treatment. Secondary objectives are to evaluate efficacy via ORR, DOR, DCR (CR, PR or SD ≥6 months) and PFS. Exploratory objectives are to evaluate biomarkers of treatment effect, impact on microbiota and OS and correlation of clinical outcome with PD-L1 CPS/TPS.ResultsN/AConclusionsN/ATrial RegistrationNCT03637803Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by University of Texas MD Anderson’s Institutional Review Board; approval ref. 2018-0290

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell

Abstract Background: There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumour by flowcytometry. Results: We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumour microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background: There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumor by Flowcytometry. Results: We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumor microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment. keywords: PD-1, Treg, osteosarcoma, anti-PD-1 antibody.

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell

Abstract Background There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumour by flowcytometry. Results We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumour microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment.

scholarly journals GD2 or HER2 targeting T cell engaging bispecific antibodies to treat osteosarcoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong A. Park ◽  
Nai-Kong V. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell

Abstract Background The cure rate for metastatic osteosarcoma has not substantially improved over the past decades. Clinical trials of anti-HER2 trastuzumab or anti-GD2 dinutuximab for metastatic or refractory osteosarcoma were not successful, and neither was immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods We tested various target antigen expressions on osteosarcoma cell lines using flow cytometry and analyzed in vitro T cell engaging BsAb (T-BsAb)-dependent T cell-mediated cytotoxicity using 4-h 51Cr release assay. We tested in vivo anti-tumor activities of T-BsAb targeting GD2 or HER2 in established osteosarcoma cell line or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models carried out in BALB-Rag2−/−IL-2R-γc-KO (BRG) mice. We also generated ex vivo BsAb-armed T cells (EATs) and studied their tumor-suppressive effect against osteosarcoma xenografts. In order to improve the anti-tumor response, ICIs, anti-human PD-1 (pembrolizumab) or anti-human PD-L1 (atezolizumab) antibodies were tested their synergy with GD2- or HER2-BsAb against osteosarcoma. Results GD2 and HER2 were chosen from a panel of surface markers on osteosarcoma cell lines and PDXs. Anti-GD2 BsAb or anti-HER2 BsAb exerted potent anti-tumor effect against osteosarcoma tumors in vitro and in vivo. T cells armed with anti-GD2-BsAb (GD2-EATs) or anti-HER2-BsAb (HER2-EATs) showed significant anti-tumor activities as well. Anti-PD-L1 combination treatment enhanced BsAb-armed T cell function in vivo and improved tumor control and survival of the mice, when given sequentially and continuously. Conclusion Anti-GD2 and anti-HER2 BsAbs were effective in controlling osteosarcoma. These data support the clinical investigation of GD2 and HER2 targeted T-BsAb treatment in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly anti-PD-L1, in patients with osteosarcoma to improve their treatment outcome.

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background: There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumor by Flowcytometry. Results: We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumor microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment. keywords: PD-1, Treg, osteosarcoma, anti-PD-1 antibody.

scholarly journals Targeted Alpha-Particle Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induces Cooperative Inhibition on Tumor Growth of Malignant Melanoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3676
Author(s):  
Mengshi Li ◽  
Dijie Liu ◽  
Dongyoul Lee ◽  
Yinwen Cheng ◽  
Nicholas J. Baumhover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The Body ◽  
Immune Recognition

Radiotherapy can facilitate the immune recognition of immunologically “cold” tumors and enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in melanoma. Systemic administration of receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy has the potential to selectively deliver radionuclides to multiple tumors throughout the body in metastatic settings. By triggering immunologic cell death and increasing the immune susceptibility of surviving tumor cells in these locations, targeted radionuclide therapies may overcome resistance to ICIs and render immunologically “cold” tumors throughout the body responsive to ICIs and immunologically “hot”. Here, we show the anti-tumor cooperation of targeted α-particle radionuclide therapy (α-TRT) and ICIs in preclinical models of melanoma. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R)-targeted radiopeptide [212Pb]VMT01 was employed to deliver α-radiation to melanoma tumors in mice. A single injection of 4.1 MBq [212Pb]VMT01 significantly slowed the tumor growth of B16-F10 melanoma and the combination of [212Pb]VMT01 and ICIs induced a cooperative anti-tumor effect leading to 43% complete tumor response with no sign of malignancy on autopsy. Animals with complete response developed anti-tumor immunity to reject further tumor inoculations. This therapeutic cooperation was completely abolished in RAG1 KO mice, which are deficient in T-cell maturation. In addition, the anti-tumor cooperation was compromised when fractionated [212Pb]VMT01 was used in the combination. We also demonstrated that [212Pb]VMT01 induced immunogenic cell death in tumor vaccination assays and in vitro exposure to [212Pb]VMT01 sensitized immunotolerant melanoma to ICIs treatment in vivo. Enhanced tumor infiltrating CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ lymphocytes were observed following injection of 1.4 MBq [212Pb]VMT01. Overall, we demonstrated anti-tumor cooperation between α-TRT and ICIs in melanoma that is mediated by tumor specific immunity.

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell

Abstract Background: There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumour by flowcytometry. Results: We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumour microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Anti-PD-1 antibody decreases tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushige Yoshida ◽  
Masanori Okamoto ◽  
Jun Sasaki ◽  
Chika Kuroda ◽  
Haruka Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Tumour Microenvironment ◽  
Osteosarcoma Cell

Abstract Background: There are many types of therapies for cancer. In these days, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, are focused on. Though many types of immune checkpoint inhibitors are there, the difference of effect and its mechanism are unclear. Some reports suggest the response rate of anti-PD-1 antibody is superior to that of anti-PD-L1 antibody and could potentially produce different mechanisms of action. On the other hand, Treg also express PD-1; however, their relationship remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we used osteosarcoma cell lines in vitro and osteosarcoma mouse model in vivo. In vitro, we analyzed the effect of IFNγ for expression of PD-L1 on the surface of cell lines by flowcytometry. In vivo, murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8 was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsum of mice. Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody was intraperitoneally administered. we analysed the effect for survival of anti-PD-1 antibody and proportion of T cells in the tumour by flowcytometry. Results: We discovered that IFNγ increased PD-L1 expression on the surface of osteosarcoma cell lines. In assessing the relationship between anti-PD-1 antibody and Treg, we discovered the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody suppresses increases in tumour volume and prolongs overall survival time. In the tumour microenvironment, we found that the administration of anti-PD-1 antibody decreased Treg within the tumour and increased tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: Here we clarify for the first time an additional mechanism of anti-tumour effect—as exerted by anti-PD-1 antibody decreasing Treg— we anticipate that our findings will lead to the development of new methods for cancer treatment.

Insurance data of patients receiving sequential immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single center experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18835-e18835
Author(s):  
Muhammad Awidi ◽  
Rojer Ranjit ◽  
Brendan James Connell ◽  
Brigitte Gil ◽  
Natalie Dalbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Tumor Cell Death ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Commercial Insurance

e18835 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) up regulate T cell activity promoting tumor cell death and revolutionized modern oncology. The use and number of indications for ICI is growing at an unprecedented speed. Combination and sequential ICI therapies have been shown to be beneficial in certain types of cancer. There is no significant data to support non-FDA approved sequential use of ICI when patients develop toxicities or progression which could result in a significant financial burden on the patient and the health care system. We conducted a retrospective review of cancer patients receiving ICI at our institution and evaluated the insurance status of these patients who received sequential ICI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Oncology patients’ charts who received ICI between January 1, 2014 to December 18, 2018. We identified patients receiving sequential ICI, to be defined as patients who received a second ICI, following an initial ICI therapy. Insurance status was evaluated for patients receiving sequential therapy. Commercial insurance was defined as either private or non-Medicare/Medicaid. Results: Out of total 437 patients receiving ICI, 15 patients received sequential ICI. 11 patients were transitioned to a secondary ICI following disease progression (73%), three had immune related adverse events and one was switched per standard of care. Nine patients (60%) had commercial insurance and six patients (40%) had medicare/medicaid. Of those, one had urothelial carcinoma and was switched to pembrolizumab from atezolizumab due to disease progression. One patient had melanoma and received nivolumab following ipilimumab when data from the CHECKMATE 238 were published. Three patients with melanoma were transitioned from ipilimumab to nivolumab, two had disease progression and one had autoimmune dermatitis. Two patients had lung adenocarcinoma and were switched from nivolumab to pembrolizumab due to disease progression. One patient had small cell lung cancer and received pembrolizumab following nivolumab due to disease progression. One patient had squamous cell lung cancer and was switched to pembrolizumab from nivolumab following disease progression. Conclusions: With the rapid growth and advancement of ICI indications, there is limited data available on the benefits of sequential ICI to our patients in the clinical setting. We report a small percentage of oncology patients receiving sequential treatment with or without FDA approval and explore their insurance status. Majority of our patients who transitioned to a second ICI due to progression had commercial insurance. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate sequential ICI efficacy and tolerability and cost effectiveness.

scholarly journals Development and validation of blood-based predictive biomarkers for response to PD-(L)-1 checkpoint inhibitors: evidence of a universal systemic core of 3D immunogenetic profiling across multiple oncological indications.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewan Hunter ◽  
Mehrnoush Dizfouli ◽  
Christina Koutsothanasi ◽  
Adam Wilson ◽  
Francisco Coroado Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Brain Lymphoma ◽  
3D Genome ◽  
Clinical Assay ◽  
Genomic Approach ◽  
Development And Validation

Unprecedented advantages in cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remain limited to a subset of patients. Systemic analyses of the regulatory 3D genome architecture linked to individual epigenetics and immunogenetic controls associated with tumour immune evasion mechanisms and immune checkpoint pathways reveals a highly prevalent patient molecular profiles predictive of response to PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. A clinical blood test based on the set of 8 3D genomic biomarkers has been developed and validated on several independent cancer patient cohorts to predict response to PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibition. The predictive 8 biomarker set is derived from prospective observational clinical trials, representing 229 treatments with Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, in diverse indications: melanoma, non-small cell lung, urethral, hepatocellular, bladder, prostate cancer, head and neck, vulvar, colon, breast, bone, brain, lymphoma, larynx cancer, and cervix cancers. The 3D genomic 8 biomarker panel for response to immune checkpoint therapy achieved high accuracy up to 85%, sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 82%. This study demonstrates that a 3D genomic approach could be used to develop a predictive clinical assay for response to PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibition in cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document