410 Phase I study of intratumoral NBTXR3 in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A435-A435
Author(s):  
Colette Shen ◽  
Jessica Frakes ◽  
Jiaxin Niu ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Jimmy Caudell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intratumoral Injection ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Subsequent Increase ◽  
Open Label Phase

BackgroundCancer immunotherapies have shown promising clinical outcomes; however, the majority of patients are non-responders or will develop resistance during the course of treatment. One of the current challenges is to increase the response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Combining immunotherapy with radiation therapy (RT) is emerging as a valuable strategy to prime the immune response. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by toxicity related to exposure of healthy tissues. First-in-class radioenhancer NBTXR3, administered by one-time direct intratumoral injection, is designed at the nanoscale to increase RT dose deposit with subsequent increase in tumor cell killing, without increasing toxicity to normal tissue. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest NBTXR3/RT can prime the immune system and act as an in situ vaccine leading to an anti-tumor immune response, producing both local and systemic (abscopal) effects. We hypothesize NBTXR3/RT in combination with anti-PD-1 (NBTXR3/RT/PD-1), will act synergistically to increase the proportion of ICI responders or convert ICI non-responders to responders.MethodsA multicenter, open-label, phase I trial [NCT03589339] evaluating safety and tolerability of NBTXR3/RT/PD-1 in three cohorts: (1; H&N) Locoregional recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to re-irradiation of the HN field, (2; lung) lung or (3; liver) liver metastases from any primary cancer eligible for approved anti-PD-1 treatment. NBTXR3 injected volume is based on a percentage of baseline tumor volume. Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is delivered as per standard practice. The primary objective is to determine NBTXR3/RT/PD-1 recommended phase II dose in each cohort. Secondary objectives are to evaluate anti-tumor response (objective response rate), safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection, and NBTXR3 body kinetic profile.ResultsTo date 6 patients have been treated: 3 in H&N (2 anti-PD-1 naïve) and 3 in lung (all anti-PD-1 non-responders. No DLT or SAE has been observed. Grade 2 nausea related to NBTXR3 or injection procedure was observed in H&N. 2 H&N patients and 3 lung patients have completed RT and initiated anti-PD-1 treatment. RT-related safety profile was as expected. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 1 anti-PD-1 naive and 2 anti-PD-1 non-responders and additional preliminary efficacy and updated safety results will be presented.ConclusionsTo date, NBTXR3 administration activated by SBRT in combination with anti-PD-1 treatment has been safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced cancers. Promising early signs of efficacy in anti-PD-1 naïve, as well as in patients having progressed on previous anti-PD-1 therapy will be presented.Trial RegistrationNCT03589339Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by local institution’s review board

Phase I study of NBTXR3 activated by radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancers treated with an anti-PD-1 therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3173-TPS3173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Shen ◽  
Jessica Frakes ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Jimmy J. Caudell ◽  
Trevor G Hackman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intratumoral Injection ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase

TPS3173 Background: Despite the past decade of transformative advances in immuno-oncology, the response rate to checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains low (~15%). There is significant interest in developing strategies to overcome resistance to these treatments, thus increasing response rate. Emerging evidence suggests that radiation therapy (RT) could potentially augment the antitumor response to ICIs through synergic effect. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by toxicity related to exposure of healthy tissues. NBTXR3 is a first-in-class radioenhancer administered by direct intratumoral injection, designed at the nanoscale to increase RT dose deposition within tumor cells and RT-dependent tumor cell killing, without increasing surrounding normal tissue toxicity. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest NBTXR3 activated by RT can trigger an anti-tumor immune response, producing both local and systemic (abscopal) effects. We hypothesize that NBTXR3 activated by RT, in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy (R3/RT/PD-1), will act synergistically to maximize the local RT effect and produce a systemic response sufficient to increase the proportion of ICI responders or convert ICI non-responders to responders. Methods: This trial [NCT03589339] is a multicenter, open-label, phase I study to evaluate safety and tolerability of R3/RT/PD-1 in three cohorts: (1) Locoregional recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to re-irradiation of the HN field, (2) Lung metastases, or (3) Liver metastases, both from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1 treatment. Approximately two-thirds of patients in each cohort will be anti-PD-1 non-responders. NBTXR3 injected volume is based on a percentage of gross tumor volume (GTV). The primary objective is to determine the R3/RT/PD-1 recommended phase 2 dose in each cohort. Secondary objectives are to evaluate anti-tumor response (objective response rate; ORR), safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection, and NBTXR3 body kinetic profile. Exploratory objectives will assess biomarkers of R3/RT/PD-1 response, including PD-L1 status by IHC, as well as mRNA and cytokine immune marker profiling. To date, three patients have been treated, one in cohort 1, two in cohort 2. Clinical trial information: NCT03589339 .

A phase I trial evaluating NBTXR3 activated by radiotherapy in combination with nivolumab or pembrolizumab in patients with advanced cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2590-2590
Author(s):  
Colette Shen ◽  
Jessica M. Frakes ◽  
Jiaxin Niu ◽  
Ari Rosenberg ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intratumoral Injection ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label

2590 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 are an effective treatment for a variety of cancers. However, the majority of patients (pts) exhibit resistance to ICIs. Overcoming this resistance represents a major challenge in immuno-oncology. Emerging evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) produces an immunomodulatory effect that may act synergistically with ICIs. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. NBTXR3, a novel radioenhancer administered by direct intratumoral injection (ITI), is designed at the nanoscale to increase RT dose deposit within tumor cells and subsequent tumor cell killing, without increasing toxicity to surrounding healthy tissue. Preclinical data suggest NBTXR3/RT can trigger a local and systemic anti-tumor immune response and overcome anti-PD-1 resistance. NBTXR3/RT combined with anti-PD-1 may prime the immune system to increase the proportion of ICI responders, or convert ICI non-responders to responders. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I trial [NCT03589339] to evaluate NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 in 3 cohorts: (1) Locoregional recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to HN re-irradiation, and metastases from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) treatment specifically localized in the lung (2) or liver (3), respectively. Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is delivered at tumor-site selective doses per standard practice. The primary objective is NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 recommended phase 2 dose in each cohort. Secondary objectives are anti-tumor response (objective response rate), safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection. Results: Nine pts have been treated: 3 HNSCC, 4 lung, 2 liver. 7/9 pts were anti-PD-1 non-responders. Overall tumor regression was observed in 8/9 pts. NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 resulted in tumor regression in 6/7 pts who had progressed on prior anti-PD-1. A complete response in the injected lymph node lasting over 1 year was observed in 1 anti-PD-1 naïve pt. 2 SAEs related to anti-PD-1 and possibly related to NBTXR3 (G5 pneumonitis, G4 hyperglycemia) were observed in 1 anti-PD-1 naïve HNSCC pt and considered DLTs. This pt also experienced 2 other SAEs related to anti-PD-1 (G4 diabetic ketoacidosis, G4 acute kidney injury). SBRT-related safety profile was as expected. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: Data from this first-in-human phase I trial evaluating NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 in pts with advanced cancers, show NBTXR3 ITI is feasible and well-tolerated. NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 demonstrated promising signs of efficacy. Of particular interest, NBTXR3/RT can overcome ICI resistance in pts having progressed on prior anti-PD-1, supporting further development of NBTXR3 in combination with anti-PD-1 as well as other ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT03589339.

Oral DNA vaccination targeting VEGFR-2 combined with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma, a phase I/II study: NCT03750071.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2076-TPS2076
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Wick ◽  
Antje Wick ◽  
Michael Platten ◽  
Olivier L. Chinot ◽  
Martin J. Van Den Bent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Oral Vaccine ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Open Label Phase

TPS2076 Background: The vaccine (VXM01) is a VEGFR-2 coding DNA vaccine, using a Salmonella Ty21a carrier for oral application. VEGFR-2 is over-expressed in glioblastoma and serves as a promising target for VEGFR-2 primed T cells with the potential to alter tumor angiogenesis and/or eliminate VEGFR-2 expressing tumor cells. VXM01 was well tolerated in a previous phase I/II study involving 14 patients with progressive glioblastoma multiforme. Immunological correlates of vaccination and anti-tumor immunity in the blood and in the tumor were detected. At least one objective clinical response was attributed to vaccine monotherapy, with one more PR achieved in combination with nivolumab. Prolonged overall survival was associated with peripheral immune responses against VEGFR-2, J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 2017). A combination study with the anti PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody avelumab is currently underway. Methods: A multicentre, open-label phase I/II study ( EudraCT.gov no. 2017-003076-31), will enrol 30 patients with progressive glioblastoma, previously treated with temozolomide/radiotherapy. The primary objective is to evaluate safety and tolerability of the vaccine in combination with avelumab. In a 1+2 safety run in, two cohorts of non-reoperable patients will be vaccinated with one of 2 doses of the oral vaccine (106 or 107 CFU) with concurrent intravenous avelumab. After safety evaluation and recommendation of study continuation by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, 18 non-re-operable and 6 re-operable patients will be treated with 107 CFU of the vaccine + avelumab. Vaccinations for all patients will be on day 1, 3, 5, and 7, followed by 4-weekly boosts until progression. Avelumab 800 mg will be administered every two weeks until progression. The enrolment of cohort 1 started with inclusion of the 1st patient in November 2018. The end of study is week 60. Follow up visits will be on months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical response using iRano criteria, immunological correlates before and after treatment using ELISpot, FACS, TCR-sequencing, IF, and IHC laboratory methods. Clinical trial information: NCT03750071.

scholarly journals 413 Toripalimab in combination with concurrent chemoradiation in patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal carcinoma: protocol for a single-arm, prospective, open-label, phase II clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A444-A444
Author(s):  
Lei Wu ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Gang Wan ◽  
Jiahua Lv ◽  
Qifeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

BackgroundEsophageal carcinoma is a disease with high morbidity and mortality in China and, recently, Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have shown good efficacy and safety for treatment; however, some patients still suffer from tumor progression or metastasis after treatment. Clinical studies have confirmed that immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer, but the efficacy and safety of adding radiotherapy to immunotherapy and chemotherapy have been less reported.MethodsThis is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase ll trial.Patients with unresectable stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) who had not received prior systemic therapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with two cycles of toripalimab (240 mg d1, Q3W) combined with induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m2, d1+carboplatin AUC=4–6, d1, Q3W), sequentially combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (30–50 Gy in 15–25 fractions, paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m2, d1+carboplatin AUC=4–6 d1, Q3W), followed by maintenance treatment with toripalimab (240 mg d1, Q3W) for 1 year. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of this combination therapy;and the secondary objective is related to the assessment of objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the duration of remission (DOR), the 1- and 2-year overall survival(OS) rates, the safety and tolerability of patients to treatment, and the identification of the changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients. Furthermore, we aimed to identify predictive biomarkers (such as the expression of PD-L1 ctDNA and cytokines) and to explore the relationship between these biomarkers and tumor response to the study treatment.AcknowledgementsWe thank all the participants and their advisors involving in this study. We owe thanks to the patients in our study and their family members.Trial RegistrationChiCTR(ChiCTR2100046715). Registered on the 27th of May 2021.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol is approved by Ethics Committee of Sichuan Cancer Hospital (SCCHEC-02-2021-021).Changes to the protocol will be communicated via protocol amendment by the study principal investigators. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

Phase II study of cabozantinib (cabo) combined with pembrolizumab (pembro) in metastatic or recurrent gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEC) to overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS253-TPS253
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Chloe Thomas ◽  
Gwendolyn Ung ◽  
Thomas H Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Number Of Patients

TPS253 Background: GEC is the third leading cause of cancer mortality and the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based combinations are the most commonly used 1L treatment regimens. There are few standard treatment options after 1st line regimens. In the 3L+ GEC Keynote-059 trial, objective response rate (ORR) with Pembro was 15.5% in PD-L1(+) vs. 6.4% in PD-L1(-) tumors. While the responses were durable, the 6-months PFS (6-PFS) was only 14.1% and the median PFS was 2.0 mo. This highlights the remaining unmet need for the majority of patients who either are refractory or develop disease progression following treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in GEC. Cabo plus checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical benefit in various cancers including hepatocellular, renal cell (RCC), urothelial and castration-resistant prostate cancers. In the CheckMate-9ER trial, Cabo+Nivolumab improved both OS and PFS vs sunitinib in 1L RCC. In patients with RCC who had progression on anti-PD1 inhibitor treatment, Cabo showed promising activity with an ORR of 33% and DCR of 79% (ESMO 2018, abstract 3793). Hypothesis: Based on preclinical and clinical observations, Cabo might contribute to overcoming primary or secondary resistance to PD-1 blockade in GEC. Methods: Prospective, open label, non-randomized phase 2 trial. Eligibility: Diagnosis of GEC, 2+ line of treatment including previous fluoropyrimidine/platinum, ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, prior checkpoint inhibitor if tumor PD-L1 CPS≥10%. Treatment: Cabozantinib 40mg PO daily, Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of 21d cycle. Primary objective: Feasibility of the combination and estimate of efficacy. Primary endpoint:PFS-6. Secondary objectives: OS, ORR, adverse events. Total number of patients to be enrolled N = 27. Current enrollment (Sep 2020) N = 10. Statistics: If the PFS-6 is > 25%, the study would be regarded as positive, in which case it is planned to expand patient enrollment into a larger single arm phase 2 trial with additional sites to establish the efficacy of the regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT04164979.

Nimbus: A phase II study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic hypermutated HER2-negative breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1115-TPS1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romualdo Barroso-Sousa ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Paulina Lange ◽  
Chelsea Andrews ◽  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
True Response ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden

TPS1115 Background: A previous study from our group showed that approximately 9% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is hypermutated, defined as a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 Mutations/Megabase (Mut/Mb). The aim of this study is to evaluate if patients with hypermutated HER2-negative MBC benefit from the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study assessing the efficacy of nivolumab 3 mg/Kg intravenously (IV) every 14 days plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/Kg IV every 6 weeks in subjects with hypermutated metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients with measurable HER2-negative MBC, TMB ≥10 Mut/Mb assessed by a cancer-gene panel evaluating > 300 genes and performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory, and 0-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting are eligible. The primary objective is overall response rate according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include the safety and tolerability of the combination, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study will follow a two-stage design. In the first stage 14 patients will be enrolled. If there is at least one patient with objective response, accrual will continue to the second stage where an additional 16 patients will be enrolled. If there are at least 4 patients with an objective response among the 30 patients, the regimen will be considered worthy of further study. If the true response rate is 5%, the chance the regimen is declared worthy of further study is less than 5%. If the true response rate is 25%, the chance that the regimen is declared worthy of further study is > 90%. Tumor biopsies, peripheral blood, and stool collection are mandatory and will be obtained at baseline, on treatment (end of cycle 1), and at disease progression and will be assessed for potential biomarkers of treatment response. The trial was activated in February 2019, and accrual should be completed in 18 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03789110.

Phase I evaluation of vandetanib with radiation therapy (RT) ± cisplatin in previously untreated advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6016-6016 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Papadimitrakopoulou ◽  
S. J. Frank ◽  
G. R. Blumenschein ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
M. Kane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
To Receive

6016 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral anticancer agent that selectively targets VEGF, EGF and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. We report preliminary results from an ongoing open-label phase I study of vandetanib with RT ± cisplatin in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresected, locally advanced (stage III-IV) HNSCC. Methods: Eligible pts received once-daily vandetanib for 14 days followed by either 1) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk; total 70 Gy) + cisplatin (30 mg/m2, 2 h iv infusion/wk) for 7 wks, or 2) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2.2 Gy/d accelerated fractionation, 5 d/wk; total 66 Gy) for 6 wks. The primary objective was to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vandetanib in both regimens. The first pt cohort received vandetanib 100 mg/day; escalation to 200 mg and 300 mg in subsequent cohorts was permitted providing <2/6 (33%) pts in the preceding cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Cohort expansion at the MTD of vandetanib was also planned. Results: As of Dec 1 2008, 24 pts (median age 53.5 yrs; 19 male; all M0) had received treatment with vandetanib + RT + cisplatin (n=18) or vandetanib + RT (n=6). In the triplet arm, no DLTs occurred in the initial vandetanib 100 mg cohort (n=6); an additional 6 pts were enrolled to receive vandetanib 200 mg but this dose was considered to exceed the MTD since DLTs were reported in 3/5 evaluable pts (Table). Vandetanib 100 mg was therefore declared the MTD with RT + cisplatin and cohort expansion at this dose continues. In regimen 2), 6 pts have received vandetanib 100 mg + RT and evaluation of this initial cohort is ongoing. Conclusions: This study, which continues to recruit, is the first to evaluate dual targeting of VEGFR/EGFR tyrosine kinases with chemoradiation or radiation alone in HNSCC pts. Among the 24 treated pts, 2 have completed the 2-year follow up, 1 death occurred that was causally related to cisplatin, and 21 remain in follow up or continue to receive treatment. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase Ia/b study of TIM-3/PD-L1 bispecific antibody in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2654-TPS2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew David Hellmann ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
F. Stephen Hodi ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS2654 Background: Programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1) have demonstrated clinical benefit in a subset of patients with manageable safety across a variety of tumor types. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3) can be co-expressed with PD-1 on exhausted T-cells and may be upregulated in tumors refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy (Koyama et al. 2016). Pre-clinical studies demonstrated that blockade of both PD-1 and TIM-3 improved survival of tumor-bearing mice compared to blocking anti-PD-1 only (Koyama et al. 2016). LY3415244 is a TIM-3/PD-L1 bispecific antibody that has the ability to target and inhibit both TIM-3 and PD-L1 and the potential to overcome primary and acquired anti-PD-(L)1 resistance by a novel mechanism to bridge TIM-3- and PD-L1-expressing cells. Methods: Study JZDA is a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, Phase 1a/1b study of LY3415244 in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Phase 1a, subjects with any tumor type who are either PD-(L)1 inhibitor-naïve or exposed are eligible. In Phase 1b, expansion cohorts are planned in subjects with PD-(L)1-experienced NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, and melanoma. Patients with malignant mesothelioma are not required to have received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. The primary objective is to assess safety and tolerability of LY3415244 and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 1a (dose escalation). Safety and tolerability of the RP2D will be assessed in Phase 1b (dose expansion). The secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetics of LY3415244 in Phase 1a/1b and assess early antitumor activity of LY3415244 in Phase 1b cohorts. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies will be obtained to explore potential biomarkers of response. During Phase 1a, dose escalation cohorts will proceed via a modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design with a 1-cycle (28-day) dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. LY3415244 will be dosed intravenously every 2 weeks. Data from Phase 1a will determine the RP2D, which will be used for all cohorts in Phase 1b. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03752177.

ENVASARC: A pivotal trial of envafolimab, and envafolimab in combination with ipilimumab, in patients with advanced or metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or myxofibrosarcoma who have progressed on prior chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11581-TPS11581
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Steven Ian Robinson ◽  
Joelle Lam ◽  
Bonne J. Adams ◽  
James L. Freddo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma

TPS11581 Background: Metastatic undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS) and the genetically related myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with poor prognoses. While responses to front line chemotherapy can approach 20%, efficacy remains limited in the 2nd line setting and beyond. Pazopanib, the only approved treatment in the refractory setting, has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 4%. Envafolimab is a single domain PD-L1 antibody administered rapidly by subcutaneous (SQ) injection that is being studied in two additional pivotal trials: microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer and biliary tract cancer. The activity of envafolimab appears to be similar to other PD-1 antibodies administered i.v. Envafolimab demonstrated a 32% objective response rate (ORR) in MSI-H colorectal cancer patients who failed three approved chemotherapeutics, similar to the ORR of 28% and 33% with nivolumab and pembrolizumab in these patient populations, respectively. The rationale for the ENVASARC trial is based on the previously reported activity of checkpoint inhibition in UPS/MFS. Single agent pembrolizumab demonstrated a 23% ORR, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated a 29% ORR in refractory UPS/MFS. Methods: ENVASARC (NCT 04480502) is a pivotal multicenter (at ̃25 U.S. centers) open-label, randomized, non-comparative, parallel cohort study of treatment with envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection (cohort A; n = 80) or envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks i.v. for four doses (cohort B; n = 80) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic UPS/MFS who have progressed on one or two lines of prior therapy. The primary objective of each of parallel cohort is to demonstrate an ORR with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval that excludes 5.0% in each cohort. If ≥ 9 responders are observed of the 80 patients enrolled in each cohort, then the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval will exclude 5.0%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria: ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy excluded), ECOG ≤ 1. Clinical trial information: NCT 04480502.

scholarly journals Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
pp. 1658-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chesney ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Frances Collichio ◽  
Parminder Singh ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Talimogene Laherparepvec ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
End Point ◽  
Open Label Phase

Purpose We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 108 plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related. Conclusion The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document