scholarly journals The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kym Boycott ◽  
Taila Hartley ◽  
Shelin Adam ◽  
Francois Bernier ◽  
Karen Chong ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. jmedgenet-2021-107897
Author(s):  
Joanna Lazier ◽  
Taila Hartley ◽  
Jo-Ann Brock ◽  
Oana Caluseriu ◽  
David Chitayat ◽  
...  

Purpose and scopeThe aim of this position statement is to provide recommendations for Canadian healthcare professionals regarding the use of genome-wide sequencing (GWS) in the context of diagnostic testing of the fetus during pregnancy. This statement was developed to facilitate clinical translation of GWS as a prenatal diagnostic test and the development of best practices in Canada, but the applicability of this document is broader and aims to help professionals in other healthcare systems.Methods of statement developmentA multidisciplinary group was assembled to review existing literature on fetal GWS for genetic diagnosis in the context of suspected monogenic diseases and to make recommendations relevant to the Canadian context. The statement was circulated for comments to the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) membership-at-large and, following incorporation of feedback, approved by the CCMG Board of Directors on 19 February 2021.Results and conclusionsThe use of prenatal GWS is indicated for the investigation of multiple fetal anomalies. Its use in the context of isolated fetal anomaly should be guided by available resources and current evidence, which is continually changing. During pregnancy, GWS should be ordered by, or in collaboration with, a medical geneticist. It should be used following detailed phenotyping to interrogate known disease genes, preferably using a trio approach, following detailed fetal phenotyping. Testing should be done with an overall aim to help in the management of the pregnancy, delivery and postnatal care. It should be guided by personal utility of the test for the pregnant person and clinical utility for pregnancy and birth management, as outlined herein. Genetic counselling is crucial in making the parental decision an informed decision. Chromosomal microarray analysis should be completed in parallel or prior to GWS and should be preceded by Quantitative Fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) for detection of common aneuploidies. In normal circumstances, only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants with a high likelihood of being associated with the identified fetal anomalies should be reported. Reporting of secondary findings, defined as purposeful analysis of variants in a set of medically actionable genes, should not, by default, be performed in the prenatal context. Laboratories should only report incidental findings that reveal risk of a significant Mendelian condition during infancy and childhood. Should a laboratory have a policy for reporting incidental findings in medically actionable adult-onset conditions, they should only be reported with explicit opt-in consent signed by the tested individuals. Genetic counselling is crucial in disclosing the test results and the implications the results may have for the fetus. It should be emphasised that negative results do not rule out a genetic diagnosis nor guarantee a good prognosis. Postnatal phenotyping and reanalysis of existing data should be considered. Families should be given the opportunity to participate in research studies as appropriate. These recommendations will be routinely re-evaluated as knowledge of the diagnostic and clinical utility of fetal GWS during pregnancy improves.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. e10-e11
Author(s):  
Huiwen Che ◽  
Darine Vileila ◽  
Eftychia Dimitriadou ◽  
Jia Ding ◽  
Thierry Voet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. Ghatan ◽  
A. Costantini ◽  
R. Li ◽  
C. De Bruin ◽  
N. M. Appelman-Dijkstra ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review Fractures are frequently encountered in paediatric practice. Although recurrent fractures in children usually unveil a monogenic syndrome, paediatric fracture risk could be shaped by the individual genetic background influencing the acquisition of bone mineral density, and therefore, the skeletal fragility as shown in adults. Here, we examine paediatric fractures from the perspective of monogenic and complex trait genetics. Recent Findings Large-scale genome-wide studies in children have identified ~44 genetic loci associated with fracture or bone traits whereas ~35 monogenic diseases characterized by paediatric fractures have been described. Summary Genetic variation can predispose to paediatric fractures through monogenic risk variants with a large effect and polygenic risk involving many variants of small effects. Studying genetic factors influencing peak bone attainment might help in identifying individuals at higher risk of developing early-onset osteoporosis and discovering drug targets to be used as bone restorative pharmacotherapies to prevent, or even reverse, bone loss later in life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 718-726
Author(s):  
Jia Ding ◽  
Eftychia Dimitriadou ◽  
Olga Tšuiko ◽  
Aspasia Destouni ◽  
Cindy Melotte ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is it possible to haplotype parents using parental siblings to leverage preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic diseases and aneuploidy (comprehensive PGT) by genome-wide haplotyping? SUMMARY ANSWER We imputed identity-by-state (IBS) sharing of parental siblings to phase parental genotypes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Genome-wide haplotyping of preimplantation embryos is being implemented as a generic approach for genetic diagnosis of inherited single-gene disorders. To enable the phasing of genotypes into haplotypes, genotyping the direct family members of the prospective parent carrying the mutation is required. Current approaches require genotypes of either (i) both or one of the parents of the affected prospective parent or (ii) an affected or an unaffected child of the couple. However, this approach cannot be used when parents or children are not attainable, prompting an investigation into alternative phasing options. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective validation study, which applied IBS-based phasing of parental haplotypes in 56 embryos derived from 12 PGT families. Genome-wide haplotypes and copy number profiles generated for each embryo using the new phasing approach were compared with the reference PGT method to evaluate the diagnostic concordance. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This study included 12 couples with a known hereditary genetic disorder, participating in the comprehensive PGT program and with at least one parental sibling available (e.g. brother and/or sister). Genotyping data from both prospective parents and the parental sibling(s) were used to perform IBS-based phasing and to trace the disease-associated alleles. The outcome of the IBS-based PGT was compared with the results of the clinically implemented reference haplotyping-based PGT method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE IBS-based haplotyping was performed for 12 PGT families. In accordance with the theoretical prediction of allele sharing between sibling pairs, 6 out of 12 (50%) couples or 23 out of 56 embryos could be phased using parental siblings. In families where phasing was possible, haplotype calling in the locus of interest was 100% concordant between the reference PGT method and IBS-based approach using parental siblings. LARGE SCALE DATA N/A LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Phasing of parental haplotypes will only be possible when the disease locus lies in an informative region (categorized as IBS1). Phasing prospective parents using relatives with reduced genetic relatedness as a reference (e.g. siblings) decreases the size and the occurrence of informative IBS1 regions, necessary for haplotype calling. By including more than one extended family member, the chance of obtaining IBS1 coverage in the interrogated locus can be increased. A pre-PGT work-up can define whether the carrier couple could benefit from this approach. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Phasing by relatives extends the potential of comprehensive PGT, since it allows the inclusion of couples who do not have access to the standard phasing references, such as parents or offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was funded by the KU Leuven grant (C14/18/092), Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; GA09311N), Horizon 2020 innovation programme (WIDENLIFE, 692065) and Agilent Technologies. J.R.V., T.V. and M.Z.E. are co-inventors of a patent ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 ‘Methods for haplotyping single-cells’ and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 ‘Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies’ licensed to Agilent Technologies. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Sparks ◽  
Paul J Phelan

Despite the high prevalence of hypertension and its resulting morbidity and mortality, our knowledge of its pathogenesis remains limited. Strong evidence for a genetic role in blood pressure (BP) variability was first provided by familial segregation studies and the identification of mendelian disorders causing marked hypertension. These monogenic diseases, largely involving genes in sodium homeostatic pathways, have reinforced the Guytonian principle that BP is largely governed by renal sodium excretion. More recently, large population based genome wide association studies (GWAS) have attempted to fill in the missing heritability of the BP trait, with mixed results. Although many variants have been identified that are robustly associated with BP variability, they are mostly rare and together are responsible for a tiny percentage of total trait variability. Observations from GWAS include shared risk variants for cardiovascular and kidney disease, including polymorphisms in UMOD. Mutations in this gene are known to cause monogenic renal disease. GWAS data may be employed for pathway analysis to discover the etiology of hypertension as well providing the potential to interrogate drug responses to antihypertensive agents depending on genotype. The chapter concludes with describing future directions in BP genetics including evidence of the role of epigenetic mechanisms in BP pathogenesis. As we enter the era of whole genome sequencing, the possibility exists to discover the missing hereditability of BP variation although this technology will present its own challenges. This review contains 6 figures, 2 tables and 94 references Key words: adrenocorticotropic hormone, autosomal dominant,  autosomal recessive, cytosine-phosphate-guanine, epithelial sodium channel


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document